• 00:26:520 (4,1,1) - Playability issue here - the white tick is a strong beat which should be clicked, but the sliderend covers the beat. That alone is bad, but the antijumps right after make this pattern very hard to sightread. I recommend making (4) a 1/2 slider and adding a note at the white tick.

1. 00:29:724 (3,4) - these aren't correctly symmetric in relation to (1) D:
2. 00:34:093 (2,1) - the antijump here doesn't flow too well imo.. there's not too much you can do about it though (and I feel the NC is unnecessary)
3. 00:41:229 (2) - This slider starting in a blue tick plays pretty badly and breaks the flow. I don't think there should be a slider here, actually.. it plays pretty nicely like this.
4. 00:45:744 (1,2,3) - I know the intention behind these, but IMO they just play really weirdly for a player who's never heard the song before. At least they're 1/4 now, so it's much better.
5. 00:48:656 (4) - nazi, but moving 1 grid right will make this symmetric
6. 00:55:210 (2,3) - why do these start in blue ticks? it plays weirdly D:
7. 01:00:598 (1,2) - not sure if offgrid points are rankable
8. 01:20:113 (4) - This plays better ctrl+G'd. the flow when you make them symmetric (as it is) feels really broken and it creates a bad antijump for (4,1).
9. 01:22:006 (3,4) - blue tick sliders ):
10. 01:29:433 (4) - the slidertrack isn't properly stacked with (1)
11. 01:49:530 (1) - well, pretty sure offgrid sliderends are unrankable
12. 02:09:773 (2,3) - still not a fan of blue tick sliders
13. 02:15:161 (1) - same as 01:49
14. 02:22:749 (3) - weird sliderstacking here
15. 02:23:914 (3) - ^
16. 02:33:453 (5) - Pretty sure this note doesn't exist in the song. This overmapping is pretty bad x:
17. 02:36:074 (5) - ^

Blue Dragon wrote:

Remember that most of these are my opinions as a player and are what I noticed when this map was qualified and that didn't make the experience too enjoyable. Alright.

[IT'S ME]

• 00:26:520 (4,1,1) - Playability issue here - the white tick is a strong beat which should be clicked, but the sliderend covers the beat. That alone is bad, but the antijumps right after make this pattern very hard to sightread. I recommend making (4) a 1/2 slider and adding a note at the white tick. Fixed.

1. 00:29:724 (3,4) - these aren't correctly symmetric in relation to (1) D: Fixed.
2. 00:34:093 (2,1) - the antijump here doesn't flow too well imo.. there's not too much you can do about it though (and I feel the NC is unnecessary) I have no clue how to fix that so I took your idea about delete those NC.
3. 00:41:229 (2) - This slider starting in a blue tick plays pretty badly and breaks the flow. I don't think there should be a slider here, actually.. it plays pretty nicely like this. I know that this is starting on blue tick but it's because we are following the vocal so I don't think it's bad imo.
4. 00:45:744 (1,2,3) - I know the intention behind these, but IMO they just play really weirdly for a player who's never heard the song before. At least they're 1/4 now, so it's much better. Seems like nobody is complained about it so I'll prefer to keep it as is.
5. 00:48:656 (4) - nazi, but moving 1 grid right will make this symmetric Fixed.
6. 00:55:210 (2,3) - why do these start in blue ticks? it plays weirdly D: As I said before we're following the vocal.
7. 01:00:598 (1,2) - not sure if offgrid points are rankable You don't have to worry about it they are perfectly safe for ranking also here is the proof that isn't offscreen/offgrid at all.
8. 01:20:113 (4) - This plays better ctrl+G'd. the flow when you make them symmetric (as it is) feels really broken and it creates a bad antijump for (4,1). Sorry but this is intentional so we want to keep it as is.
9. 01:22:006 (3,4) - blue tick sliders ): I don't even know why it's so bad since it follow the other strong sound of the blue tick.
10. 01:29:433 (4) - the slidertrack isn't properly stacked with (1) Fixed.
11. 01:49:530 (1) - well, pretty sure offgrid sliderends are unrankable ^ (Proof)
12. 02:09:773 (2,3) - still not a fan of blue tick sliders You know that this is following the vocal :<
13. 02:15:161 (1) - same as 01:49 ^
14. 02:22:749 (3) - weird sliderstacking here Fixed.
15. 02:23:914 (3) - ^ ^
16. 02:33:453 (5) - Pretty sure this note doesn't exist in the song. This overmapping is pretty bad x: Fixed.
17. 02:36:074 (5) - ^ ^

Some of these are just nazi stuff, but most of them are legit issues that I have found while playing the map when it first got qualified, so please look a bit into these. The map is good, but the blue-tick sliders feel weird to play and there are a few issues here and there.

Niko-nyan wrote:

regratz and thanks to let me #1 gero :> *hides*

[ Space ] wrote:

The audio amplification is really high, for me it crackles at the loud parts and sound displeasing...