Bubbled~
#1
#1
Final IRC check
22:26 gaston_2199: Hey! I applied the changes you sent me on the forum. When you can check it
22:28 snowball112: i'll check now I think
22:34 snowball112: alright, 02:44:577 - this could be a k
22:34 snowball112: mono is fine for the piano I think
22:35 gaston_2199: 02:45:949 (2) - d?
22:35 snowball112: no, just leave as k
22:35 snowball112: it's better if you just mono k for piano
22:36 snowball112: and then start using d and k for long instruments later
22:36 gaston_2199: Ok
22:36 snowball112: just make 02:44:577 - k, rest is fine here
22:36 gaston_2199: Well, fixed
22:40 snowball112: ok, 04:42:520 - the part starting here
22:41 snowball112: I think 04:48:006 - this one should be the same as 04:45:263 (232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239) -
22:42 snowball112: 04:48:006 - http://puu.sh/sFsdR/5bd99b3154.jpg
22:42 snowball112: just looks neater that way
22:46 snowball112: i'm still a bit unhappy about 04:20:920 (74,75) - 04:22:292 (82,83) - 04:23:663 (90,91) - that these are not dk :< because the pitch is different to 04:25:035 (98,99) - for example
22:48 snowball112: 04:26:406 (107,108) - dk and 04:27:777 (115,116) - dk too, so you transition better
22:48 snowball112: it would make dk_dk_dk_kd and dk_dk_kd_kd, could be nice for transition in this part
22:50 gaston_2199: Mmm, sounds good
22:51 snowball112: 04:37:377 (175,176) - and 04:38:749 (184,185) - would be dk too, indicator to transition
22:51 snowball112: so there you would have dk_dk_kk_kk
22:54 gaston_2199: I try to follow on the drums throughout the song and i think that d is not sound good
22:55 gaston_2199: Since here 04:32:235 (141) - for example, is k
22:55 gaston_2199: And I want to constantly follow that
22:55 snowball112: then you can leave these
22:55 snowball112: the ones I mentioned first are the more important ones
22:58 snowball112: can you update? that should be everything
22:59 gaston_2199: Ok
23:00 gaston_2199: done
23:00 snowball112: alright, last recheck
23:02 gaston_2199: I thins change this 04:37:892 (176,185) - for k
23:02 gaston_2199: think*
23:04 snowball112: you also forgot a finish on 01:05:835 -
23:04 snowball112: 01:16:806 - maybe too, but that one is optional
23:05 snowball112: and 03:50:577 - should be a d
23:05 gaston_2199: I forgot lol
23:05 gaston_2199: Ok
23:06 snowball112: maybe 03:57:435 - d as well, for better structure
23:06 gaston_2199: 03:57:263 (193) - Remove finish?
23:07 snowball112: probably, other sounds like this don't have finish either
23:08 gaston_2199: Ok, it's better to remove it
23:10 snowball112: I'm thinking that you could maybe change 04:40:292 - to d
23:10 snowball112: maybe 04:41:663 - as well
23:10 snowball112: to buildup more closely to the ddk_d_kdk from previous parts
23:12 gaston_2199: r Ok
23:12 gaston_2199: Ok*
23:13 snowball112: how about 04:44:149 - and 04:45:092 - d as well? very optional, but so much k is a bit loud
23:14 gaston_2199: You're right, it sounds better as you said it
23:15 snowball112: ok, last thing
23:15 snowball112: maybe 05:30:520 - and 05:36:006 - k
23:17 snowball112: because you used ddkkd before at 05:29:663 - for example, and 05:30:349 (156,157,158) - is stronger, so maybe dkk here
23:17 gaston_2199: I had thought about it
23:18 snowball112: i think it would work well :P
23:18 gaston_2199: The same in 05:41:492 - and 05:46:977 (54) - ¿
23:18 gaston_2199: ?*
23:19 snowball112: yes
23:19 gaston_2199: Beatmap updated
, been busy with so many exams and stuffs.