Heya, follow up mod on irc suggestions.
Edit: some more things you may want to consider:
- Move down bg further, looks better. Change to 0,0,"2d97d91603.jpg",0,120 or so.
- It's a bit annoying that you don't keep 00:45:263 (25,26) - these sounds consistent as k later in this section when the sound is similar, at least until 00:51:949. For 00:52:120 (58,59) - you can use kd, because the sound is lower, but before that I think it's better if you keep it as k. Try something like this, cursor on 00:49:377. I don't think it fits well if you switch the note colour for that sound.
- 01:08:320 - move to 01:08:149 for better fit. Similar at 01:18:863 - etc.
- 01:14:063 - this part could use a few more notes, density is too low otherwise I think. Try something like this, cursor on 01:15:435.
- 01:10:635 - this should not be kkddk. The sound is similar to 01:07:892 - , not to 01:13:377. Maybe try 01:10:720 - d and 01:13:635 - k, just make these two different.
- 01:15:435 - add a note here for consistency
- Similar to what we discussed in IRC for the previous section: I am not convinced that it is good to start a triple from sounds like 01:29:492 - when sounds like 01:30:520 - are better for that. Also, you have clearer sounds that can be used for 1/4 between 01:29:149 - and 01:29:492 - (low background sound). And 01:29:063 - should be removed. And 01:31:120 - does not fit well I think. Try something like this,cursor on 01:30:177. Also applies to later sections until 01:46:806.
- 01:49:206 - section from here until 02:08:920 - could use a few more notes. Example, cursor on 01:51:949.
- 03:50:577 - this should be k according to the other patterns you have used here.
- 04:53:835 - kdkd? and 05:12:692 (48,49,50,51) - ddkd for more consistent structure in this part.
- The section from 04:09:606 - is a bit questionable, I don't think the song is not so intense. Maybe try patterns like this, cursor on 04:10:463. Or something like this, cursor on 04:11:835 - . Or add some breaks to what you currently have, because I think these patterns are questionable, especially the 5-note 1/4 in this part. The song does not really do a build up here.
Edit: some more things you may want to consider:
- 01:15:435 - try this, so that the spacing follows the high instrument sounds in the background, feels more natural to play.
- 01:24:435 - missing note for consistency.
- 01:53:149 - add d, better for following background sounds here.
- 01:54:777 - add d for consistency
- 01:55:035 - kkd? The instrument is strong here.
- 01:57:263 - ddkkk? Similar reason to ^
- Try 02:00:692 - D and remove 02:00:863 (66,67) - for similar structure to 01:49:720 (3,4,5). You can also signal the beginning of the increasing song intensity like this.
- 02:01:806 and 02:04:549 - should be k I think.
- 02:06:863 - maybe add d here for the background instruments.
- 02:08:235 - ^