1. Futsuu (2.23 stars, 769 notes)
2. Kantan (1.49 stars, 397 notes)
3. Muzukashii (3.09 stars, 1161 notes)
4. Oni (4.46 stars, 1529 notes)

S a n d wrote:

Taiko mod request from: Nardoxyribonucleic
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: -
Modding Content: Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*


- 00:08:432 - Change to k? Because 00:11:094 is also k k I would prefer focusing the pitch increase of vocal across 00:08:432 (43,44) - , just as I focused the drop of vocal pitch across 00:11:272 (56,57) -
--If you apply that one--> Change 00:08:787 to d to be consistent with 00:11:627 refer to ^
- 00:19:083(98,99) - Ctrl + G to follow the drum sound better? similar to 00:08:432 - , I think k d would follow the vocal in a way better.
-- 00:20:503(106,107) - ^ same as ^
-- Same suggestion could be applied in 01:27:248 section refer to ^
- 00:22:100 - Change to k? Again to follow the drum sound. I see your point, but keeping k d k d k d in 1/2 continuously would be a bit monotonous.
- 00:35:414(192,193) - Ctrl + G? There is kick in the background, also better emphasize the k at 00:35:946, also to be consistent with 00:38:077 similar to 00:08:432 - , d k could reflect the pitch of vocal nicely. However, I used k d in 00:38:254 - as a result of variation, i.e. 00:29:733 vs 00:32:574 -
- 00:45:177(428,429) - Ctrl + G? Follows the saxophone better, also there's a higher pitch at 00:45:355 Hmm, the pitch of saxophone is actually lower at 00:45:355 - ...
- 00:49:615 - Change to k? It is the same sound and to be consistent with 00:46:775 They are mapped differently because of the discrepancy in vocal pitch at these spots.
-- Same suggestion could be applied in 01:57:781 refer to ^
- 00:59:556 - Change to k? To follow the k k sound in the background like you did in 00:57:958 same as 00:49:615 -
-- 01:06:656 - ^ same as ^
- 02:07:722 - I think you realized this, but the kick is here; hence, I would probably put it as kdkdd or kdk d to follow the kick, since you've been following the kick most of the time before. Retained for pattern consistency as 00:59:556 -
- 03:05:769 - k d -> d k? To be consistent with 03:08:609 and 03:10:029 Hmm, I would like to keep the pattern to show the pitch increase across 03:05:414 (1052,1054,1056,1058) -
- 03:47:130 - Change to k? The k k sound in the background again. The variation is intentionally done to cater to the vocal there like in other kiais.
- 04:02:751(1409,1410) - Ctrl + G? To be consistent with 04:05:414 refer to 00:08:432 -
- 04:07:722 - Change to d? There's no k k sound here. Hmm, same as 00:19:083(98,99) -

GL finishing the set :3! I must say that the map is pretty much well done, I'm being very picky and subjective here when I'm modding this.

sing216 wrote:

Hi :3/
mod request from ingame.

d = don
k = kat
D = Big d
K = Big k

Muzukashii

00:22:100 (88) - Change to k? The pattern here will be flooded with k if I change this.
Because follow the drum sound. (Same part with 01:30:266 (387) - )

00:22:988 (92,93,94,95,96) - Change to ddd d k? ^Same as Retained to follow the snares there.
(Same part with 01:31:154 (391,392,393,394,395) - )

00:27:781 (113) - Change to d(?) I think k would fit the high-pitched music well.
(Same part with 01:35:946 (412) - )

01:07:899 (285,286,287,288,289) - Change to kkddk Fixed both.
Because feel more smooth (Same part with 02:16:064 (583,584,585,586,587) - )

02:54:585 - Add d or Add k and 02:54:763 (763) - Change to d? fixed
There is a sound, i don't know whether it will be better to add.

02:55:917 (771) - Delete ^
Just my feeling. Alleviate the difficulty here, because it is difficult afterwards. 點解del左呢粒之後仲高星左ww

04:17:130 (1131) - Change to d? Remain unchanged to keep it consistent with 00:22:810 (91) and 01:30:976 (390) -

Oni

00:16:775 (85) - Change to d? No change here to follow the snare.
Beucase feel better.

01:22:988 (472) - Change to d same as ^
Because follow the drum sound. (Same part with 02:31:153 (866) - , 03:57:781 (1392) - )

01:42:337 (568) - Move to 01:42:514 - I would prefer following the rhythm at 01:42:337 -
Beucase feel better.

01:52:988 (628) - Change to d Nope, the vocal pitch here is the same as 01:51:568 (617) -
Because follow the sound.

02:47:485 (953) - Change to d and 02:47:396 - Add k? Hmm, I used k k at 02:47:307 (951,952) - owing to the pitch differences.
I saw the front and rear notes are kd, but it is kk here. Maybe you feel here too many kd, so i propose change to kkd.

02:50:325 (970) - Change to D? This would be a bit overemphasized imo.

02:52:633 (983) - Change to d Retained to accompany the progressive pitch increase of the trumpet.
Sound feel better(?)

It is good song and i really enjoy this. Hope my advice can help you

1. 01:09:674 - change to k or 01:08:964 (103,104,105,106,107,108) - change to d-k-ddk-d? d-ddk-d
   Current pattern “d-ddk” seems not good flow(2/1 rhythm) with acconpaniment sound imo.
2. 02:17:840 - , 03:21:745 - , 03:44:467 - ^
   01:15:000 - , 01:16:420 - change to d, k? Its not bad way to use the variatied flow, cuz of also acconpaniment sounds variated there. And plays very nice to simple pattern imo. www
   02:23:165 (215,218) - , 03:27:070 (303,306) - , 03:49:793 (341,344) - ^
3. 03:31:686 - , 03:54:408 - change to k? vocal up, snare sounds, it sounds good to change the flow.
   01:37:367 (147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154) -,01:43:047 (155,156,157,158,159,160) - little overdone? comparing with kiai 1st pattern, 01:03:284 (95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102) - . Either?
   • A. Make a similar patterns like 1st ? 00:29:201 (44,45,46,47) - .
     B. remove somewhere…to keep to focus the drums? e.g. 01:39:497 - .
   
   |03:03:639 - remove sounds good imo to focus the more… . the calmest part.

• 
  How about ?
  [list:1337]A. 01:12:692 - move to 01:12:337 - and B. 01:14:112 - add d ?
  >> smoother with vocal, it plays good imo.
  >> the gap with Muzukashii and follow the drum roll, lack of sounds a bit imo.

1. 00:22:810 (91,92,93,94) - change to ddd-k instead? its lack of bass (don)sounds imo.
2. 01:30:976 (389,390,391,392) - ,
3. 00:52:455 - add d or 00:53:165 - move to 00:52:455 - (+change d) ? to follow the vocal more, its not bad way imo.
4. 02:00:621 - ,04:17:219 - same
   
   
5. 00:55:118 (230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237) - kkk-k >>>ddd-d flows a bit questionable (ddd sounds weird to me ..? cuz of not following the vocal or drum pitc enough…?)
   how about ddd-k-kkk-d or kkk-d-kkk-d instead?
6. 02:03:284 (528,529,530,531,532,533,534) - same.
7. 01:00:266 - remove?
8. 02:08:432 - same.
   01:11:006 - uum….. seems not well imo. try to use ¼ on 01:12:426 - instead? So,I suggest them↓↓
   
   1. 01:10:562 - move to 01:10:207 - ? vocal stopped but Instrumental seems not variated , not bad way.
   2. 01:11:006 - move to 01:12:426 - ? feels not good power on there,
9. arround 02:19:171 - ,03:23:077 - ,03:45:710 - same.
   before I suggested (testplay) you @Oni, 01:15:266 - ~~ ¼ change the strategy?
   so I suggest them.
   
   1. 01:15:266 - move to 01:15:443 -
   2. 01:16:864 - , 01:16:952 - add k to make a ¼ kkk ,
   3. 01:17:130 - change to d ?
10. arround 02:23:432 - , 03:27:337 - ,03:50:059 - same.
    
    • |02:25:295 - lol. move to +1ms right ,
    01:21:568 (352,353) - remove and 01:21:213 - add d intead? 1/4sounds not well drums and acconpaniment with plays
11. arround 02:29:733 - ,03:33:639 - same. 03:56:006 - add d?
    
    
12. 02:37:722 - remove ? to focus the more trumpet. I think its overdone.
    
    • and 02:38:609 (687,688) - change to kd? to avoid the 3times dkk ...ww
13. 02:44:645 - change to d and 02:44:822 - move to 02:45:355 - (+change k) , 02:45:088 - move to 02:45:266 - ? I think its better rhythm for spread F-M.
    02:49:260 (736,737) - make a triplet ¼ kkk and 02:49:615 - add k? plays nice with trumpet imo ww.
14. 03:09:142 - remove…?
15. 03:15:000 - add k?
16. 04:21:923 - move to 04:21:568 - or 04:21:568 - add? to make a consistent with 1st , 2nd. (00:27:248 - , 01:35:414 - )

• 
  |03:33:017 - no add k? like last-2nd kiai.

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello, via M4M

Introduction

1. Muzukashii : Some questionable ¼ patterns .

Symbol meaning

　

• 
  | >> Little question and small suggestion.
  >> idea lol

1. >> Normal suggestion.
   Big text >> Strong suggestion.
   >> Questionable imo.
   >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
   No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.

　or JUST MY OPINION.

[Kantan]

1. 01:09:674 - change to k or 01:08:964 (103,104,105,106,107,108) - change to d-k-ddk-d? d-ddk-d
   Current pattern “d-ddk” seems not good flow(2/1 rhythm) with acconpaniment sound imo. changed 01:10:029 (105) - to k instead. Hope it sounds better.
2. 02:17:840 - , 03:21:745 - , 03:44:467 - ^ same as ^
   01:15:000 - , 01:16:420 - change to d, k? Its not bad way to use the variatied flow, cuz of also acconpaniment sounds variated there. And plays very nice to simple pattern imo. www Nice idea www
   02:23:165 (215,218) - , 03:27:070 (303,306) - , 03:49:793 (341,344) - ^ fixed
3. 03:31:686 - , 03:54:408 - change to k? vocal up, snare sounds, it sounds good to change the flow. ^
   01:37:367 (147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154) -,01:43:047 (155,156,157,158,159,160) - little overdone? comparing with kiai 1st pattern, 01:03:284 (95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102) - . Either?
   • A. Make a similar patterns like 1st ? 00:29:201 (44,45,46,47) - .
     B. remove somewhere…to keep to focus the drums? e.g. 01:39:497 - . adopted plan B.
   |03:03:639 - remove sounds good imo to focus the more… . the calmest part. I think it would be better to keep the note in contrast to 03:09:319 (278,279) -

[Futsuu]

• 
  How about ?
  [list:1337]A. 01:12:692 - move to 01:12:337 - and B. 01:14:112 - add d ?
  >> smoother with vocal, it plays good imo.
  >> the gap with Muzukashii and follow the drum roll, lack of sounds a bit imo. I have considered this before, but the current pattern is a better compromise between the spread with Kantan and Muzukashii.

02:20:680 - , same, same as ^03:24:408 - same , and 03:25:651 - , remove? making a gap next fiinal kiai.(03:48:372 - ) removed the note at 03:25:651 - 03:47:130 - same. and 3:48:372 remov same as 01:12:692 -
|03:10:029 - remove? fixed[Muzukashii]

1. 00:22:810 (91,92,93,94) - change to ddd-k instead? its lack of bass (don)sounds imo. fixed
2. 01:30:976 (389,390,391,392) - , ^
3. 00:52:455 - add d or 00:53:165 - move to 00:52:455 - (+change d) ? to follow the vocal more, its not bad way imo. fixed the latter.
4. 02:00:621 - ,04:17:219 - same ^,^
   
   
5. 00:55:118 (230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237) - kkk-k >>>ddd-d flows a bit questionable (ddd sounds weird to me ..? cuz of not following the vocal or drum pitc enough…?)
   how about ddd-k-kkk-d or kkk-d-kkk-d instead? fixed the former.
6. 02:03:284 (528,529,530,531,532,533,534) - same. ^
7. 01:00:266 - remove? Okay.
8. 02:08:432 - same. ^
   01:11:006 - uum….. seems not well imo. try to use ¼ on 01:12:426 - instead? So,I suggest them↓↓ Hmm... Retained for a better spread from Futsuu to Oni.
   
   1. 01:10:562 - move to 01:10:207 - ? vocal stopped but Instrumental seems not variated , not bad way.
   2. 01:11:006 - move to 01:12:426 - ? feels not good power on there,
9. arround 02:19:171 - ,03:23:077 - ,03:45:710 - same. same as ^
   before I suggested (testplay) you @Oni, 01:15:266 - ~~ ¼ change the strategy? fixed all with some alterations.
   so I suggest them.
   
   1. 01:15:266 - move to 01:15:443 -
   2. 01:16:864 - , 01:16:952 - add k to make a ¼ kkk ,
   3. 01:17:130 - change to d ?
10. arround 02:23:432 - , 03:27:337 - ,03:50:059 - same.
    
    • |02:25:295 - lol. move to +1ms right , fixed
    01:21:568 (352,353) - remove and 01:21:213 - add d intead? 1/4sounds not well drums and acconpaniment with plays fixed the ones in the 1st and 2nd kiai to make the 3rd and 4th denser.
11. arround 02:29:733 - ,03:33:639 - same. 03:56:006 - add d?
    
    
12. 02:37:722 - remove ? to focus the more trumpet. I think its overdone. fixed
    
    • and 02:38:609 (687,688) - change to kd? to avoid the 3times dkk ...ww changed 02:38:254 (683) - to d instead.
13. 02:44:645 - change to d and 02:44:822 - move to 02:45:355 - (+change k) , 02:45:088 - move to 02:45:266 - ? I think its better rhythm for spread F-M. fixed in an alternative way.
    02:49:260 (736,737) - make a triplet ¼ kkk and 02:49:615 - add k? plays nice with trumpet imo ww. fixed
14. 03:09:142 - remove…? Okay.
15. 03:15:000 - add k? Remain unchanged to allow longer rest after the pentaplet.
16. 04:21:923 - move to 04:21:568 - or 04:21:568 - add? to make a consistent with 1st , 2nd. (00:27:248 - , 01:35:414 - ) moved the note.

[Oni]

• 
  |03:33:017 - no add k? like last-2nd kiai. I would like to keep this part simpler to give a bigger impact for the variations starting from 03:38:432 -

That's all for now as 1st mod :3 Overall great d( ・∀・)b

-Sh1n1- wrote:

Also some more things.

Taiko mod

About

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is finish don note
4. K is finish kat note

Oni

1. 00:22:810 (118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125) - Isn't better quintuplet first then triplet to follow drums nicely? I would prefer increasing the note density progressively for the consecutive drum sounds.
2. 00:28:846 (154,155,156) - it would be better if you change such triplet into kdk, the reason is the transition between 00:29:023 (156,157) -, is more confortable to press k before D. Hmm, I think kkd would follow the drum pattern more accurately.
3. 00:33:284 (181) - move to 00:33:461 - cause there is an important sound that you are skipping, also feels more natural. Remain unchanged as I followed the vocal mainly throughout the song.
4. 00:35:414 (192,193) - press Ctrl+G, 00:35:236 (191,192) - have the same pitch, also consistency with 00:38:077 (207,208) -. If you notice carefully, I used dkdk and dkkd alternately in this session, which could also be regarded as a kind of consistency.
5. if you are agree with my previous suggestion, you can consider change 00:34:881 (189) - into k too, you did two consecutives ddd, ( 00:34:704 (187,188,189) - and 00:36:124 (195,196,197) - ), a little bit of variation could be nice. Similar to ^ , I used the same variation strategy there.
6. 00:45:799 - did you miss note here? I can hear drums from 00:45:532 - to 00:45:887 -, so you can move 00:45:976 (254) - to 00:45:799 -. The break is intentional as this is not an Inner Oni. You do not need to follow all of the 1/4 beats whenever appropriate.
7. 01:30:976 (507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514) - 04:17:130 (1487,1488,1489,1490,1491,1492,1493,1494) - same as 00:22:810 - same as 00:22:810 (118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125) -
8. 01:37:101 (544,545) - same as 00:28:846 (154,155,156) -. same as 00:28:846 (154,155,156) -
9. 01:42:870 - 01:43:225 - you should add notes here to fix the gap between Muzukashii and Oni, this part is the same at both diffs. Made this part in Muzukashii simpler instead.
10. 01:43:935 - break here for consistency with 00:35:769 -, vocal at 01:43:757 (573) - and 00:35:591 (193) - are very similar, so remove 01:43:935 (574) -. fixed
11. from 00:29:201 - to 00:40:562 - and from 01:37:367 - to 01:48:727 - are very similar but the second is a bit light comparing with the first one, but if you compare the last section from both parts, 00:38:787 - and 01:45:355 -, the second one is more difficult, I'm agree about variation but I'm not sure, why from 00:29:201 - only the half of the section is more hard than from 01:37:367 - and the end is the opposite? shouldn't be the structure constant throught the whole section? Normally I would make the second similar part harder overall as the song progresses, but this song is a bit special that the pace of music from 01:37:367 to 01:45:887 - is a bit slower, thus the density variation is formed.
12. 03:13:757 (1094) - why D only at this diff? lower diffs have K and sounds much better imo, I feel that you change into D only for 03:13:935 (1095,1096) - right? Yes, in this way the pattern would be relatively harder than Muzukashii.

Muzukashii

1. 01:21:568 (352) - move to 01:21:213 -, then 01:21:656 (353) - move to 01:22:544 - and 01:22:455 (358) - change into d for a better spread with Oni. fixed in JuDa's mod.
2. 02:29:733 (651,652) - 03:33:639 (930,931) - 03:56:361 (1042,1043) - same as above same as ^ with some density changes.

Futsuu

1. 00:39:142 (120) - move to 00:38:964 - to follow vocal as you were doing previously, then add k at 00:39:319 - The flow change here is intentional as it is close to the start of the next stanza at 00:40:562 - . Also the current arrangement would result in a better spread with Kantan and Muzukashii.
2. 01:22:278 (246,247) - switch such notes with ctrl+g, drums starts since 01:21:745 - and vocal pitch feels better with d. I would prefer focusing the pitch changes instead of the drums here. 01:22:100 (245,247) - have the same vocal pitch.
3. 02:30:443 (445,446) - 03:34:349 (620,621) - 03:57:071 (691,692) - same as above same as ^
   omg this is perfect I'm glad to hear that~

Kantan

1. I'm a bit curious about 00:28:313 - and 01:36:479 -, at such place you did D at Futsuu, Muzukashii and Oni, why only at Kantan you decided to put K? is necessary to put big note at 00:27:781 - and 01:35:946 -? I think that general pattern is more important and k could works fine as you did on higer diffs. D K would be more intuitive to play for Kantan as both big notes in the big white line are D, i.e. 01:35:947 (145,147) - . As difficulty increases, more sounds are followed from 01:35:946 to 01:36:301 - , so keeping those notes small in higher difficulties would help building a focus at the end of the pattern strand.
2. from 01:37:367 - to 01:48:727 - vs 00:29:201 - to 00:40:562 -, is the opposite of what you did in Oni, the first one have less notes while at Oni the first one is more intense than the second one. The problem is addressed upon JuDa's mod.
3. 04:10:739 - one more time, I'm not sure about D here, k works fine as higer diffs. same as 00:28:313 -
4. 04:22:101 (394,395) - k D works better as higuer diffs. ^

GL Nardo :3

Xinely wrote:

Waa nice yuri song ♥
Good luck nardo :3

1. 00:01:686 (1,2) - , 00:04:526 (1) - remove? to make a short break and to focus the only snare (try?) ?

1. 01:17:574 - , 02:25:739 - remove to make a nerf on purpose? to make a gap with last kiai? :3 and the new gap betweento M-O lol

JUDYDANNY wrote:

[Futsuu]

1. 00:01:686 (1,2) - , 00:04:526 (1) - remove? to make a short break and to focus the only snare (try?) ? Deleted the note at 00:01:686 and 00:04:526 -

[Oni]

1. 01:17:574 - , 02:25:739 - remove to make a nerf on purpose? to make a gap with last kiai? :3 and the new gap betweento M-O lol fixed

alacat wrote:

Hello

南條愛乃 : Her name is written "Yoshino Nanjo" in official website.

https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5576728

Then, The artist should be "絢瀬絵里・東條 希" ? I couldn't find "南條愛乃 & 楠田亜衣奈" from official. "南條愛乃 & 楠田亜衣奈" is based on the CV of the two characters.



Could you give me the source of artist name ? I could also find only one direct source as the one you suggested. Changed.

Additional suggestion :
How about using "ラブライブ！ School idol project" instead English version on source ? This is Japanese anime and we used Japanese version on osu! Hmm, added "ラブライブ！" to tags instead.
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmaplist?q=%E3%83%A9%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%96%EF%BC%81%20School%20idol%20project