This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2010年10月16日 at 20:07:32

Artist: EastNewSound
Title: Hana wa Gensou no Hate ni
Source: Touhou
Tags: kiddly dr_dy tsubaki
BPM: 130
Filesize: 6148kb
Play Time: 02:44
Difficulties Available:

1. Easy (2.26 stars, 135 notes)
2. Hard (4.8 stars, 425 notes)
3. Hard+ (4.82 stars, 493 notes)
4. Normal+ (4.03 stars, 255 notes)

Download: EastNewSound - Hana wa Gensou no Hate ni
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Easy - kiddly
Hard - Done
Normal - Dr_dy
Hard+ - me feat. kiddly

CHANGED AUDIO FILE RE-DL IT PLS

顶楼主

卧槽我当初传给你的还留着没？那天我忘了在这上传了< <

Download: Tsubaki - Hana ha Gensou no Hateni (tsuka) [Easy].osu

s

star

哇~你看都2的出血列。。。

star

2

star 0.0

:*.;".*・;・^;・:＼(*^▽^*)/:・;^・;・*.";.*:

　
nice map★
syarara~♪

Star~ (・ω・ノ)ノ☆

Easy: HP-1~2?
Hard:01:01:854 (3) - +finish?

Edit:bubbled!

Technicalities, mostly.

Overall:
ALL OFFSETS MUST BE THE SAME. .
Any reason Hard has smaller hitcircles than Hard+?
End Kiai time on Hard+

Normal:
Probably have the slowdowns less significant. 0.5 might mess up a normal mode player~.

Easy:
00:48:931 (3) - (1) kinda obstructs the slider start enough for an easy player to get confused. Also, get (2) off the slider. It looks silly ~.
01:51:700 (6) - Fix the sliderpoints so that both repeats are facing the correct way~.
02:12:007 (1,1) - Combine these two for easiness ;D.
02:32:316 (3) - Same as I said earlier

Overall, cool map, and cool song ~.

The first red line of each difficulty must have the same BPM/Offset values, fix that please!
Also mp3 is 320 kbps, re-encode to 192 kbps please
Different preview times across all difficulties.

Oh yeah one more thing, change the thread title to reflect the real artist of the song according to your beatmap?

Hey do I get to be here now too?
This map needs some detailed modding imo...and not just from me

I don't think the current offset is quite right...but it doesn't matter because you are changing mp3
Start kiai time at 02:15:700 on every difficulty, end it at 02:45:238 on every difficulty
Hard having smaller circles than Hard+ makes very little sense to me
(speaking of which I pretty much never see a "Hard+", change a few things and call it Insane or something? It is just odd

Easy:
For the easiest difficulty AR/HP -1?
00:39:700 (1) - might want to go through and make stuff like 00:34:161 (3) , 00:39:700 (1) symmetrical to make it look nicer (not going to list them all but up to you)
00:47:084 (1,2,3) - I agree with previous mod...looks bad
01:49:854 (5) - new combo (looks better imo)
01:57:238 (5) - ^
02:04:623 (5) - ^
02:12:007 (1,1) - I agree make this 1
02:26:777 (5,1) - switch new combo to stay with pattern
02:30:469 (1,2,3) - same as before
What happened to the hitsounds after the break?? Add some

Normal+:
Map feels very empty hitsound wise (same for the rest of the difficulties)
01:26:777 (7,8,1) - spaicng
01:52:623 (5,6,1) - spacing (distance snap isn't right 100%)

Hard:
Combos could use some work...for example why does 02:20:777 (1) have a new combo but the sections around it don't. Try and make all your combos follow a pattern
00:34:623 (3,4) - don't really like overlap
00:39:469 (8,1) - spacing
00:42:469 (9,1) - don't have anti jumps if possible
01:46:161 (1,2,3,4) - no reason to have spacing so small?
01:53:546 (1,2,3,4) - ^

Hard+:
Turn up volume on all timing sections (especially beginning) it doesn't need to be so quiet
00:52:633 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - spacing
01:56:556 (7,8,1) - ^

Ok that is enough for now...but I think this map needs more work before a rebubble

The first red line of each difficulty must have the same BPM/Offset values, fix that please! fixed
Also mp3 is 320 kbps, re-encode to 192 kbps please its not unrankable

Different preview times across all difficulties. fixed


Oh yeah one more thing, change the thread title to reflect the real artist of the song according to your beatmap? fixed



thanks for your modding

James2250 wrote:

Hey do I get to be here now too?
This map needs some detailed modding imo...and not just from me

I don't think the current offset is quite right...but it doesn't matter because you are changing mp3
Start kiai time at 02:15:700 on every difficulty, end it at 02:45:238 on every difficulty fixed
Hard having smaller circles than Hard+ makes very little sense to me i don't wanna change it
(speaking of which I pretty much never see a "Hard+", change a few things and call it Insane or something? It is just odd
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/10856 here the source
Easy:
For the easiest difficulty AR/HP -1?
00:39:700 (1) - might want to go through and make stuff like 00:34:161 (3) , 00:39:700 (1) symmetrical to make it look nicer (not going to list them all but up to you)
00:47:084 (1,2,3) - I agree with previous mod...looks bad
01:49:854 (5) - new combo (looks better imo)
01:57:238 (5) - ^
02:04:623 (5) - ^
02:12:007 (1,1) - I agree make this 1
02:26:777 (5,1) - switch new combo to stay with pattern
02:30:469 (1,2,3) - same as before
What happened to the hitsounds after the break?? Add some

Normal+:
Map feels very empty hitsound wise (same for the rest of the difficulties) simple is good01:26:777 (7,8,1) - spaicng
01:52:623 (5,6,1) - spacing (distance snap isn't right 100%)

Hard:
Combos could use some work...for example why does 02:20:777 (1) have a new combo but the sections around it don't. Try and make all your combos follow a pattern
00:34:623 (3,4) - don't really like overlap
00:39:469 (8,1) - spacing
00:42:469 (9,1) - don't have anti jumps if possible
01:46:161 (1,2,3,4) - no reason to have spacing so small?
01:53:546 (1,2,3,4) - ^

Hard+:
Turn up volume on all timing sections (especially beginning) it doesn't need to be so quiet
00:52:633 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - spacing
01:56:556 (7,8,1) - ^

Ok that is enough for now...but I think this map needs more work before a rebubble

yeah any others i don't wanna change it and its not unrankable

with the lack of batch moving inherited sections function, asking the mapper to recompress the mp3 is unreasonable (since it involves changing those inherited sections, also please don't come up with ideas like using excel), other than that i found no major problems.

if that function is back in the future, feel free to pop my bubble.

tsuka wrote:

Also mp3 is 320 kbps, re-encode to 192 kbps please its not unrankable
[/color]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

The song audio file should also be of reasonable quality. Try and source mp3 files yourself - ripping them from a streaming video site often results in low quality audio with high file sizes. The bitrate of a beatmap's audio file should be no lower than 128kbps and no higher than 256kbps. If you are having trouble acquiring an appropriate audio file, contact one of the more audio-savvy BAT - they will be more than happy to find one for you.

If only for that i would pop it, but i was told to wait a bit

ignorethis wrote:

with the lack of batch moving inherited sections function, asking the mapper to recompress the mp3 is unreasonable (since it involves changing those inherited sections, also please don't come up with ideas like using excel), other than that i found no major problems.

if that function is back in the future, feel free to pop my bubble.

You can always -X ms to each section individually once you find the offset variation, even on the .osu file

so just hold on for now
the rule is the rule ~_~
wait for next patch

Sakura Hana wrote:

ignorethis wrote:

with the lack of batch moving inherited sections function, asking the mapper to recompress the mp3 is unreasonable (since it involves changing those inherited sections, also please don't come up with ideas like using excel), other than that i found no major problems.

if that function is back in the future, feel free to pop my bubble.

You can always -X ms to each section individually once you find the offset variation, even on the .osu file

just as i expected, but that needs way too much work, i just don't want to cause trouble for the mapper

and ranking criteria can be violated in certain occasions imo

ignorethis wrote:

and ranking criteria can be violated in certain occasions imo

Ranking Criteria can be violated if it makes the map better. Not when someone is too lazy to re-compress or find a new mp3 file.

makes map better? are you joking?

CDFA wrote:

Ranking Criteria can be violated if it makes the map better. Not when someone is too lazy to re-compress or find a new mp3 file.

320kbps makes the map better than 256kbps. I really don't understand this rule.
Anyways, cool map °.°

320kbps takes up too much space and the difference in quality for it compared to a 256kbps isn't worth it

Anyway even if you disagree with rule still needs to be changed~

i can generally re-encode something without altering the offset using a fraunhofer encoder

there is a reason why i handle audio related stuff you know.

http://www.mediafire.com/?6ws9888lf22gl3j

that should be pretty much identical to the current offset bar 1-2ms difference

that'll do it i guess

also those who are talking about "being too lazy to change mp3" obviously didn't get my point. it's an offset related issue, not lazy

Rules are great, because when we have rules, we don`t need to use brains
ask me to check everything when you finish to change mp3 and offset and blablabla stuffs

the mapset is pretty well made, i don`t get why it SHOULD HAVE many modding posts here
the best modder is always mapper him/herself

changed audio file to the 256kbps
changed offset by Alace

fixed kiai timing section
fixed hitsound volume