maybe my global offset is screwed? i'll continue getting playtests like i have been i guess
I did!Sing wrote:
woah man, shouldnt you (RLC) warn people about that x0.1 sv slider?
just following the ranking criteria like a good boy.Ranking Criteria wrote:
Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards, slider velocity multipliers and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride. If non-standard slider velocity multipliers are used, they must be announced in the beatmap description during the modding process.
opt out of what? you'd rather see him post a wall of fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed?viptwo wrote:
this map is plagued with inconsistencies, i'll see if i can get around to modding it
without it getting ranked tomorrow or something
Following up, wtf is that mod reply, neither did you repsond to sugeestions you did not apply nor to the ones you did and leaving it with "things not mentioned were addressed in some way or another" is just an easy opt out.
Every mapper is supposed to respond to a mod appropriately, that includes stating why you have/havent applied something from a mod.deetz wrote:
opt out of what? you'd rather see him post a wall of fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed fixed?viptwo wrote:
this map is plagued with inconsistencies, i'll see if i can get around to modding it
without it getting ranked tomorrow or something
Following up, wtf is that mod reply, neither did you repsond to sugeestions you did not apply nor to the ones you did and leaving it with "things not mentioned were addressed in some way or another" is just an easy opt out.
the point of replying like this is to only give a reply to things that need reasoning. if he ignored parts of fiery's mod, fiery is free to come here and call him out on it.
Since when is every mapper supposed to respond proper to a mod? The modding system is informal at best and shouldn't be treated as otherwise——nor should it ever be. If you don't understand a map, then don't bother making suggestions to the map; if you do, then expect the worst.viptwo wrote:
viptwo wrote:
this map is plagued with inconsistencies, i'll see if i can get around to modding it
without it getting ranked tomorrow or something
Following up, wtf is that mod reply, neither did you repsond to sugeestions you did not apply nor to the ones you did and leaving it with "things not mentioned were addressed in some way or another" is just an easy opt out.
Every mapper is supposed to respond to a mod appropriately, that includes stating why you have/havent applied something from a mod.
Code of Conduct: Modding and Mappingbyfar wrote:
Since when is every mapper supposed to respond proper to a mod? The modding system is informal at best and shouldn't be treated as otherwise——nor should it ever be. If you don't understand a map, then don't bother making suggestions to the map; if you do, then expect the worst.
http://puu.sh/sgXoX/6546cc1a02.pngBonsai wrote:
Code of Conduct: Modding and Mappingbyfar wrote:
Since when is every mapper supposed to respond proper to a mod? The modding system is informal at best and shouldn't be treated as otherwise——nor should it ever be. If you don't understand a map, then don't bother making suggestions to the map; if you do, then expect the worst.
byfar wrote:
http://puu.sh/sgXoX/6546cc1a02.png
Ok?byfar wrote:
http://puu.sh/sgXoX/6546cc1a02.png
thank mr. viptwoSing wrote:
In my personal opinion your (RLC) new diff "consistent" far outranks the old diff and in my (Sing) opinion, should be put up for "approval" instead.
2016-11-15 17:48 Ascendance: kill yourselfthis is y ur not a bn
will ascendance ever stop flaming peopleRLC wrote:
2016-11-15 17:48 Ascendance: kill yourselfthis is y ur not a bn
thanks!Rizia wrote:
01:27:509 (2,3) - floowww, it not pretty good between 2 and 3, ctrl+g on 2? changed this a little
01:40:075 (4,5) - same as above, how about 3/4 here i made it weak like this because the backing in the music cuts out at 01:40:232 - and 01:40:546 - . the reason i did 01:35:048 (4,5,6) - differently is because the kiai just started so i wanted it to be stronger
02:32:378 (1) - imo it will make some affect for reading fixed