M4M sorry it's a lot of rambling about some stuff that might not matter but i hope it helps
!

SPOILER
Easy
ok disclaimer i kind of suck at easy diffs. but i think itd be better if you maybe had higher SV and undermapped a bit more? idk
00:00:320 (1) - should be two seperate 1/1 sliders
00:03:177 (1) - ^
00:06:034 (1) - ^
00:10:141 (1,2,3) -i dont like the clicking rhythm here, for one you are going over the down beat with a slider end at 00:10:319 - and also missing the vocal at 00:10:498 - which you map to either of them. i think what you got currently is kind of akward for new players.
actually i dont know a good solution easy diffs are kind of tricky but i think you should definitely change the placement of 00:08:891 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - since its an easy diff you cant really use spacing to show emphasis but have 00:10:141 (1,2,3) - go to the right instead because your kind of just moving your cursor in one curve.
00:18:177 (5,1) - ^ like above 00:18:891 (1) - the only thing you got emphasising this is the different type of slider + NC but otherwise it feels like your playing same
00:16:748 (2,3) - why are these circles instead of a slider? also 00:16:034 (1,2) - this kind of flows weirdly because you dont really have to follow the entire slider, and blanket could be a bit better
00:22:462 (2,3) - ^
00:19:605 (2) - id just do a 1/1 slider imo
00:26:034 (3) - this is kinda weird first of all i dont like how the slider looks but i guess thats all opinions but i think itd play better with just two 1/1s
00:38:891 (1) - how come your using 3/2? either of those white ticks would be better to end the slider on not much happening at 00:39:427 -
00:48:891 (3) - dont like the look of this
01:26:034 (1,2,3,4,1) - dont think this should be 5 circles, id use sliders instead to map that part.
Normal
this diff looks better than the easy but im pretty sure you should use some spacing changes to emphasis some things because itd play to the song better imo and your spread would look better if the normal was closer to the middle of the hard and easy
00:00:320 (1,2,3) - these sliders look a lot nicer imo than what youve got in the easy, you should use this style over there aswell
00:21:034 (3) - i think itd be good to change this to a 1/1 instead because its a good place to emphasis the vocals instead
00:33:177 (1,2) - ^
00:25:319 (3) - itd look better just being a straight or curved slider imo
00:37:462 (5) - circles instead
00:38:891 (1) - why is this slider ending on 00:39:427 - ?
00:40:319 - start a note here
00:44:605 (1,1) - these dont look good together imo, maybe join the curves or make 00:46:034 (1) - a straight slider instead?
00:59:605 - 01:00:319 - start notes here
01:11:034 - 01:11:748 - ^
01:04:605 (1) - i think sliders like this look better if you put the red point in the middle
01:17:462 (2) - not a fan
Hard
00:02:462 - how come your not starting note here?
00:04:605 (1) - ^ and then you dont use that repeated 1/1 slider again? seems wrong to me
00:05:319 (3,4) - less spacing
00:14:784 - start note here
00:15:141 - ^
00:15:677 (6) - 1/2 slider instead ?
00:34:962 - start note here?
00:48:177 (2,3,4,5) - this doesnt really fit like
00:41:748 (1) - ok now i here that little ding on the end of the slider but i still think you should undermap it
00:48:355 (3,4) - seems like a pretty big spacing change over nothing
00:51:034 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - 00:53:891 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - how come these are completely opposite?
00:58:534 - start note here
01:09:605 (3,1) - stack
01:21:748 (1) - first 3/4 in the whole map but i dont see a very good reason for even if especially since your missing a vocal on 01:21:927 -
01:22:462 - should have something here
01:25:319 - start note here
01:26:034 - ^ its pretty strong sound? shouldnt miss it
Insane
00:01:212 (4,5,6) - isnt this overmapping and if not wouldnt there be one over at 00:04:069 (4,5) - 00:06:927 (4,5) - ?
00:01:748 (1,2) - should this be 1x spacing between those?
00:04:248 (5) - shouldnt the 5 be given spacing here not the 6?
00:05:677 (6) - how come your introducing extended slider here? couldnt you have done it b4
00:06:748 (3,4,5,6) - 00:03:891 (3,4,5,6) - completely different spacing ideas but shouldnt they be roughly the same?
00:08:177 (3) - your missing a lot of stuff with this. 00:08:534 - this kink in the slider isnt enough as you dont actually click it. just map the stuff properly
00:11:391 (5) - circle instead
00:14:427 (5) - start note here
00:15:498 - ^
00:17:105 - ^
00:20:677 - ^
00:22:105 - ^
00:23:534 - ^
00:24:962 - ^
00:33:534 - ^
00:34:962 - ^
00:36:391 - ^ tell me why im wrong about these please because you seem to do it a lot
00:45:498 (4,5) - this shouldnt be an extended slider as you miss a sound on 00:45:677 -
00:47:105 - ^
00:52:819 - start note here
00:54:962 - ^
00:59:248 - ^
01:17:552 (1) - id do a slider instead because 01:18:534 - you dont really feel the end of a spinner so itd be better to have a slider end there imo
01:21:034 (1,2,1,2) - i dont think you should NC these
01:27:462 (1) - this slider doesnt show the change in sound at 01:27:819 -
ok disclaimer i kind of suck at easy diffs. but i think itd be better if you maybe had higher SV and undermapped a bit more? idk
00:00:320 (1) - should be two seperate 1/1 sliders
00:03:177 (1) - ^
00:06:034 (1) - ^
00:10:141 (1,2,3) -
actually i dont know a good solution easy diffs are kind of tricky but i think you should definitely change the placement of 00:08:891 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - since its an easy diff you cant really use spacing to show emphasis but have 00:10:141 (1,2,3) - go to the right instead because your kind of just moving your cursor in one curve.
00:18:177 (5,1) - ^ like above 00:18:891 (1) - the only thing you got emphasising this is the different type of slider + NC but otherwise it feels like your playing same
00:16:748 (2,3) - why are these circles instead of a slider? also 00:16:034 (1,2) - this kind of flows weirdly because you dont really have to follow the entire slider, and blanket could be a bit better
00:22:462 (2,3) - ^
00:19:605 (2) - id just do a 1/1 slider imo
00:26:034 (3) - this is kinda weird first of all i dont like how the slider looks but i guess thats all opinions but i think itd play better with just two 1/1s
00:38:891 (1) - how come your using 3/2? either of those white ticks would be better to end the slider on not much happening at 00:39:427 -
00:48:891 (3) - dont like the look of this
01:26:034 (1,2,3,4,1) - dont think this should be 5 circles, id use sliders instead to map that part.
Normal
this diff looks better than the easy but im pretty sure you should use some spacing changes to emphasis some things because itd play to the song better imo and your spread would look better if the normal was closer to the middle of the hard and easy
00:00:320 (1,2,3) - these sliders look a lot nicer imo than what youve got in the easy, you should use this style over there aswell
00:21:034 (3) - i think itd be good to change this to a 1/1 instead because its a good place to emphasis the vocals instead
00:33:177 (1,2) - ^
00:25:319 (3) - itd look better just being a straight or curved slider imo
00:37:462 (5) - circles instead
00:38:891 (1) - why is this slider ending on 00:39:427 - ?
00:40:319 - start a note here
00:44:605 (1,1) - these dont look good together imo, maybe join the curves or make 00:46:034 (1) - a straight slider instead?
00:59:605 - 01:00:319 - start notes here
01:11:034 - 01:11:748 - ^
01:04:605 (1) - i think sliders like this look better if you put the red point in the middle
01:17:462 (2) - not a fan
Hard
00:02:462 - how come your not starting note here?
00:04:605 (1) - ^ and then you dont use that repeated 1/1 slider again? seems wrong to me
00:05:319 (3,4) - less spacing
00:14:784 - start note here
00:15:141 - ^
00:15:677 (6) - 1/2 slider instead ?
00:34:962 - start note here?
00:48:177 (2,3,4,5) - this doesnt really fit like
00:41:748 (1) - ok now i here that little ding on the end of the slider but i still think you should undermap it
00:48:355 (3,4) - seems like a pretty big spacing change over nothing
00:51:034 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - 00:53:891 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - how come these are completely opposite?
00:58:534 - start note here
01:09:605 (3,1) - stack
01:21:748 (1) - first 3/4 in the whole map but i dont see a very good reason for even if especially since your missing a vocal on 01:21:927 -
01:22:462 - should have something here
01:25:319 - start note here
01:26:034 - ^ its pretty strong sound? shouldnt miss it
Insane
00:01:212 (4,5,6) - isnt this overmapping and if not wouldnt there be one over at 00:04:069 (4,5) - 00:06:927 (4,5) - ?
00:01:748 (1,2) - should this be 1x spacing between those?
00:04:248 (5) - shouldnt the 5 be given spacing here not the 6?
00:05:677 (6) - how come your introducing extended slider here? couldnt you have done it b4
00:06:748 (3,4,5,6) - 00:03:891 (3,4,5,6) - completely different spacing ideas but shouldnt they be roughly the same?
00:08:177 (3) - your missing a lot of stuff with this. 00:08:534 - this kink in the slider isnt enough as you dont actually click it. just map the stuff properly
00:11:391 (5) - circle instead
00:14:427 (5) - start note here
00:15:498 - ^
00:17:105 - ^
00:20:677 - ^
00:22:105 - ^
00:23:534 - ^
00:24:962 - ^
00:33:534 - ^
00:34:962 - ^
00:36:391 - ^ tell me why im wrong about these please because you seem to do it a lot
00:45:498 (4,5) - this shouldnt be an extended slider as you miss a sound on 00:45:677 -
00:47:105 - ^
00:52:819 - start note here
00:54:962 - ^
00:59:248 - ^
01:17:552 (1) - id do a slider instead because 01:18:534 - you dont really feel the end of a spinner so itd be better to have a slider end there imo
01:21:034 (1,2,1,2) - i dont think you should NC these
01:27:462 (1) - this slider doesnt show the change in sound at 01:27:819 -