Mod 4 modd
[What does that diff name have to do with the song]
- 00:02:373 (1,2,3,4) - I don't think continuing the flow in the same curved upwards direction carries the tone changes in the music that well. A pattern like this feels nicer (ctrl c+v last pattern then rotate 135 anticlockwise, stack the 2 on the 3 and fix the 4)
- 00:04:491 (1,2) - All of the slider ends on these. It's probably a better idea to use a silenced sample instead of lowering the volume because you can still hear the hitsound :3
- 00:08:550 (4) - I see you rotated this slightly to emphasize the change in tone but something about it just feels a little uncomfortable, rotating clockwise would be better to me.
- 00:29:197 (1,2) - I'd advise against that stack, I don't think killing the momentum in this part of the music feels right.
- 01:07:314 (1) - 0.75x SV instead? 0.5x is too low imo and 0.75 would mean a longer slider which could be used to create a more interesting shape. Do it with the other ones if you're going to do it here.
- 01:13:314 (2,3,4,5) - Ok look at this flow The angle between the (2,3,4) is horrible. As well as that the sliders are all going anti clockwise but mouse movement is clockwise. This technique works in some cases and is good for emphasizing music but usually that's when it's a medium to low bpm song and you're dealing with halves and not kick sliders.
- 01:20:020 (1,2) - This stack doesn't feel right. I get you're trying to emphasize the music, it worked at 01:15:785 (1,2) - but that was because there was a lot of spacing from the previous note so yeah, more spacing plsss.
- 03:34:491 (3) - Yeah I thought that was a part of the stream. I can't see any of the numbers the way you have them stacked.
- 03:43:226 (4,5) - The direction of that doesn't feel right.
- 04:06:609 (1,2,1,2) - Why kill all momentum by using DS? There you go. Much more fun. Same for 00:20:726 (1,2,1,2) - I guess.