Updated AI's diff
forum
AZU feat. SEAMO - Jikan yo Tomare (TV Size)
posted
Total Posts
132
Topic Starter
Hello~
From qq req.
[Notion]
This color means something you can either choose to fix or not to fix cause I prefer to do this.
This color means some suggestions.
And this color means some issue to fix I think.
[General]
Good map and a little suggestions here.
As you requested, I mod in English. If there is somewhere no clear, feel free to contact me in qq or pm.
[Easy]
Hmm.. How to say..
Too many places you set too long slider. If the slider covers 3,4 or even 5 Kanas which is not so consistent, the slider make people don't know what you want to tell.So my suggestion is that to make the diff better to convey the song, remap some sliders covered too many lyrics to make the diff more interesting. So sorry for give that comment but I think that is better for the diff....
[Normal]
Nice diff.
00:35:274 (1) - The slider covered 2 beats which I think is not so good.00:35:929 - here the vocal is also strong and I think you should distribute a note here.
00:43:142 (3) - ^
01:46:086 (1) - ^
[Gero's Hard]
Hard to pick somewhere not reasonable. But I think is not 'that' interesting for the diff is just in smooth flow. and distance is almost the same. Which means almost no jump in the hard diff which I think is not so interesting. The song is pretty suitable to make some jumps, isn't it?
00:04:457 (3,4,5,6) - Music is flow here and I think stacking is not so reasonable.
00:39:044 - Add a note?
[Insane]
Nice map.
00:05:769 (1,2) - Nazimod but are you sure here is in good blanket?
00:16:259 (1,2) - Stacking is also a good choice.
00:42:978 (1,2,3,4) - distance here make people have a feeling of 'on purpose'.. 233
00:44:781 - Not so necessary to set slower SV here imo.
00:48:387 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - So what's the pattern look like? Not so pretty.
00:50:354 (1,2) - Distance between the 2 note is bigger than that in 00:49:043 (3,4,5,6) , which is not so reasonable.
00:56:583 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Distance between stream should be better controlled.
01:02:812 (6,1) - Not in good flow imo.
01:30:678 (4,5,6,7) - Distance here is not equal? Maybe.. But the sudden increase in distance is not so reasonable imo.
01:45:430 (1,2,3,4) - Pattern here is not totally symmetry.
[AI's Insane]
Much to say but still something I didn't know how to say. Just feeling not so good in distributing feeling of hit and distance...
00:01:015 (2) - Bending a little will help the flow here.And symmetry with 3 is a good choice.
00:04:457 (3) - Here nazi mod.. Blanket is not done well. Maybe you just set it on purpose for a better flow, which is also good.
00:05:113 (5,6) - Not reasonable jump imo. Maybe the same distance with 4,5 is fine.
00:06:261 (2,3,4) - Let's see this jump. The distance between 3,4 is about four length of that in 2,3, which is not so reasonable to set that big distance with flow changed here.
00:10:468 (2,3,4,5,6) - This stream is really not good. Because here the music is still 1/4 but not 1/6 imo. And I think here 3 notes on music is ok. 5 notes is kinda unacceptable.
00:11:998 (3,4,5) - Distance is not so good and I can't see any reason for the jump.
00:13:473 (2,3) - Here the distance is also strange imo. The distance is bigger than usual but not so big as a jump.
00:16:915 (2,3,4) - strange flow. The flow 2 is straight to the beginning of 3 and the flow of 3 is not straight and turn to 4. This kind of symmetry is fake and confusing.
00:21:505 (4,5,6) - In my opinion the flow here should be made better.
00:39:208 (7,8,9) - Strange distance here. And 8,9 is not on good flow.
01:04:779 (1,2) - Here 1 no NC and 2 NC. And the flow is not good.
01:06:090 (4,5) - Strange distance. Here is mor fit in usual flow imo.
01:06:910 (6,7,8) - Confusing flow which I think is not reasonable.
01:08:385 (3) - Beats not reasonable. I won't agree that the ending of slider is on the starting of vocal and beat.
01:08:877 (4,5,6) - This part is not reasonable to set this pattern imo. Because the 3 sliders is not so easy to see the strong relationship.
And here you weigh 4,5,6 which is not not on vocal more than 3 which is on more important beat.I don't think this is good pattern.
01:25:432 (1,2,3,4,5) - Here you both followed vocal and rhythm which I think is really not good in distributing the feeling of hitting. But I've got no idea for the beat here.
01:34:612 (3,4,5,6) - ^
01:40:349 (1) - Flow and distance is not good.....
That's my suggestions. Thanks for joining my queue.
.
From qq req.
[Notion]
This color means some suggestions.
And this color means some issue to fix I think.
[General]
Good map and a little suggestions here.
As you requested, I mod in English. If there is somewhere no clear, feel free to contact me in qq or pm.
[Easy]
Hmm.. How to say..
Too many places you set too long slider. If the slider covers 3,4 or even 5 Kanas which is not so consistent, the slider make people don't know what you want to tell.So my suggestion is that to make the diff better to convey the song, remap some sliders covered too many lyrics to make the diff more interesting. So sorry for give that comment but I think that is better for the diff....
[Normal]
Nice diff.
00:35:274 (1) - The slider covered 2 beats which I think is not so good.00:35:929 - here the vocal is also strong and I think you should distribute a note here.
00:43:142 (3) - ^
01:46:086 (1) - ^
[Gero's Hard]
Hard to pick somewhere not reasonable. But I think is not 'that' interesting for the diff is just in smooth flow. and distance is almost the same. Which means almost no jump in the hard diff which I think is not so interesting. The song is pretty suitable to make some jumps, isn't it?
00:04:457 (3,4,5,6) - Music is flow here and I think stacking is not so reasonable.
00:39:044 - Add a note?
[Insane]
Nice map.
00:05:769 (1,2) - Nazimod but are you sure here is in good blanket?
00:16:259 (1,2) - Stacking is also a good choice.
00:42:978 (1,2,3,4) - distance here make people have a feeling of 'on purpose'.. 233
00:44:781 - Not so necessary to set slower SV here imo.
00:48:387 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - So what's the pattern look like? Not so pretty.
00:50:354 (1,2) - Distance between the 2 note is bigger than that in 00:49:043 (3,4,5,6) , which is not so reasonable.
00:56:583 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Distance between stream should be better controlled.
01:02:812 (6,1) - Not in good flow imo.
01:30:678 (4,5,6,7) - Distance here is not equal? Maybe.. But the sudden increase in distance is not so reasonable imo.
01:45:430 (1,2,3,4) - Pattern here is not totally symmetry.
[AI's Insane]
Much to say but still something I didn't know how to say. Just feeling not so good in distributing feeling of hit and distance...
00:01:015 (2) - Bending a little will help the flow here.And symmetry with 3 is a good choice.
00:04:457 (3) - Here nazi mod.. Blanket is not done well. Maybe you just set it on purpose for a better flow, which is also good.
00:05:113 (5,6) - Not reasonable jump imo. Maybe the same distance with 4,5 is fine.
00:06:261 (2,3,4) - Let's see this jump. The distance between 3,4 is about four length of that in 2,3, which is not so reasonable to set that big distance with flow changed here.
00:10:468 (2,3,4,5,6) - This stream is really not good. Because here the music is still 1/4 but not 1/6 imo. And I think here 3 notes on music is ok. 5 notes is kinda unacceptable.
00:11:998 (3,4,5) - Distance is not so good and I can't see any reason for the jump.
00:13:473 (2,3) - Here the distance is also strange imo. The distance is bigger than usual but not so big as a jump.
00:16:915 (2,3,4) - strange flow. The flow 2 is straight to the beginning of 3 and the flow of 3 is not straight and turn to 4. This kind of symmetry is fake and confusing.
00:21:505 (4,5,6) - In my opinion the flow here should be made better.
00:39:208 (7,8,9) - Strange distance here. And 8,9 is not on good flow.
01:04:779 (1,2) - Here 1 no NC and 2 NC. And the flow is not good.
01:06:090 (4,5) - Strange distance. Here is mor fit in usual flow imo.
01:06:910 (6,7,8) - Confusing flow which I think is not reasonable.
01:08:385 (3) - Beats not reasonable. I won't agree that the ending of slider is on the starting of vocal and beat.
01:08:877 (4,5,6) - This part is not reasonable to set this pattern imo. Because the 3 sliders is not so easy to see the strong relationship.
And here you weigh 4,5,6 which is not not on vocal more than 3 which is on more important beat.I don't think this is good pattern.
01:25:432 (1,2,3,4,5) - Here you both followed vocal and rhythm which I think is really not good in distributing the feeling of hitting. But I've got no idea for the beat here.
01:34:612 (3,4,5,6) - ^
01:40:349 (1) - Flow and distance is not good.....
That's my suggestions. Thanks for joining my queue.
.
Topic Starter
Fixed some mods! Thanks!azuretwinight wrote:
Hello~
From qq req.
[Notion]This color means something you can either choose to fix or not to fix cause I prefer to do this.
This color means some suggestions.
And this color means some issue to fix I think.
[General]
Good map and a little suggestions here.
As you requested, I mod in English. If there is somewhere no clear, feel free to contact me in qq or pm.
[Easy]
Hmm.. How to say..
Too many places you set too long slider. If the slider covers 3,4 or even 5 Kanas which is not so consistent, the slider make people don't know what you want to tell.So my suggestion is that to make the diff better to convey the song, remap some sliders covered too many lyrics to make the diff more interesting. So sorry for give that comment but I think that is better for the diff....
[Normal]
Nice diff.
00:35:274 (1) - The slider covered 2 beats which I think is not so good.00:35:929 - here the vocal is also strong and I think you should distribute a note here.
00:43:142 (3) - ^
01:46:086 (1) - ^
[Insane]
Nice map.
00:05:769 (1,2) - Nazimod but are you sure here is in good blanket?
00:16:259 (1,2) - Stacking is also a good choice.
00:42:978 (1,2,3,4) - distance here make people have a feeling of 'on purpose'.. 233
00:44:781 - Not so necessary to set slower SV here imo.
00:48:387 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - So what's the pattern look like? Not so pretty.
00:50:354 (1,2) - Distance between the 2 note is bigger than that in 00:49:043 (3,4,5,6) , which is not so reasonable.
00:56:583 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Distance between stream should be better controlled.
01:02:812 (6,1) - Not in good flow imo.
01:30:678 (4,5,6,7) - Distance here is not equal? Maybe.. But the sudden increase in distance is not so reasonable imo.
01:45:430 (1,2,3,4) - Pattern here is not totally symmetry.
That's my suggestions. Thanks for joining my queue.
Hello , From my queue ~
Easy
Gero's Hard
Easy
- 00:11:014 (1) Put a Finish in the start of this slider , makes more sense since is the start of the map too
- 00:17:571 (2) This 1/2 slider feels a bit weird with the rest of this part . Also , this slider isn't following any kind of sounds from the music . In my opinion , you should change
this slider for a circle only . It will be much better - 00:33:962 (1) This slider doesn't make sense , the slider should finish here 00:34:618 , since the music stand out here . In my opinion , finish the slider in 00:34:618 and add a circle on 00:35:274 . Will work better
- 00:41:830 (2) For a better flow, CTRL+G in this slider
- 00:51:010 (1,2) The flow between these two sliders does not flow very well, especially for beginners . Could you try to make something like this ?
http://puu.sh/5pnI3.jpg - 01:02:812 (2,3) Stacked objects could be very hard to read for beginners , Try to unstack these objects
- 01:13:302 (2,3) Same as above
- 01:16:581 (1) What about to put a Finish in the start of this slider ?
- 00:17:571 (2,3) Honestly , the flow between these two sliders , is very bad . Try moving (3) away, so that the cursor movement is more continuous and fun . Something like this , but it's only an idea
- 00:59:533 (1) In the middle of this slider , sounds a normal hitsound (custom sample) . Try to mute the sound, it sounds awkward and ugly
- 01:30:678 Following your patterns , You should add a circle here :3
Gero's Hard
- 00:01:835 (2) Remueve el Whistle del final de este slider , siguiendo el patron que hiciste con (1) , este slider no necesita un whistle , ademas ese whistle no te da esa sensacion de que la cancion la necesite ahi
- 00:07:080 (2) Lo mismo aqui
- 00:49:698 (4) Para un mejor flow , deberías mover este slider un poco hacia arriba , x:188 y:124 . Y no me digas que no , que testee el slider con esa posicion y está mucho mejor e.e
- 01:07:893 (X) Estoy seguro que olvidaste poner un circle aqui , ademas la cancion lo requiere
- 01:26:416 (4) Honestamente este 1/1 slider no me da mucha sensacion a la música , ya que siguiendo apropiadamente la musica y la voz , deberia ser este un 1/2 slider con reverse o con un circle , Será mejor imo
- 01:48:217 (1) Al igual como hizo Rauken es sus dificultades deberias subir el volumen al final de este spinner , ya que silenciado se siente mal y yo siento que necesita algun hitsound ese spinner
- 00:05:769 (1,2) Try to blanket this much better
offset+15 差不多 539
Topic Starter
Fixed all mods!XinCrin wrote:
Hello , From my queue ~
EasyNormal
- 00:11:014 (1) Put a Finish in the start of this slider , makes more sense since is the start of the map too
- 00:17:571 (2) This 1/2 slider feels a bit weird with the rest of this part . Also , this slider isn't following any kind of sounds from the music . In my opinion , you should change
this slider for a circle only . It will be much better- 00:33:962 (1) This slider doesn't make sense , the slider should finish here 00:34:618 , since the music stand out here . In my opinion , finish the slider in 00:34:618 and add a circle on 00:35:274 . Will work better
- 00:41:830 (2) For a better flow, CTRL+G in this slider
- 00:51:010 (1,2) The flow between these two sliders does not flow very well, especially for beginners . Could you try to make something like this ?
http://puu.sh/5pnI3.jpg- 01:02:812 (2,3) Stacked objects could be very hard to read for beginners , Try to unstack these objects
- 01:13:302 (2,3) Same as above
- 01:16:581 (1) What about to put a Finish in the start of this slider ?
Awesome diff <33
- 00:17:571 (2,3) Honestly , the flow between these two sliders , is very bad . Try moving (3) away, so that the cursor movement is more continuous and fun . Something like this , but it's only an idea
- 00:59:533 (1) In the middle of this slider , sounds a normal hitsound (custom sample) . Try to mute the sound, it sounds awkward and ugly
- 01:30:678 Following your patterns , You should add a circle here :3
InsaneGood Luck with this map
- 00:05:769 (1,2) Try to blanket this much better
Thanks for the mods!
谢谢~Nymph wrote:
offset+15 差不多 539
求有空再摸点>w<'
Changed BPM of all diff, video and background at 22 Nov 2013!
__
Hi, modding as requested.
[General]
Would it be possible to find a higher resolution background image? (1366x768)
Are you sure the BPM 91.51? o.o
AI's Insane is missing video.
[Easy]
00:28:076 - For slidertick hitsounds like this, I suggest lowering the volume slightly since it's not a clickable beat. Try 40% or 50%? (20 or 10 below current volume) This applies to all slidertick hitsounds.
00:27:421 (4) - Remove NC
00:29:388 (1) - Add NC
00:35:944 (2) - This slider doesn't really fit the rhythm of the song. Try something with more 1/1. It doesn't make much sense to have a slider end where there's no significant sound and instead put all the hitsounds on sliderticks ==
00:48:402 (3,1) - Same here >< These don't really fit in.
[Normal]
Same thing about the sliderticks.
00:49:713 (3) - You missed the hitsounds on this slider. (clap, normal, clap)
00:54:958 (3) - Unsnapped slider end.
01:34:954 (4) - Add NC
01:36:266 (1) - Remove NC
[Hard]
You have a lot of inheriting sections that don't do anything >< Remove them?
00:10:373 (2,3,4,5,1) - Seems weird to use 1/4 when the music is 1/6s...
01:11:350 (4) - I get that you're using rotational symmetry, but this just doesn't flow well from (3) to (5) Sorry I don't have any suggestions how to improve this
01:48:232 (1) - I think it would be nice, just for the sake of consistency if you'd follow the other diffs and use SC:2 whistle + finish here. If not, then remove the whistle? O.o It doesn't make sense to have a 5% hitwhistle.
Nothing else to say here. The diff is pretty good.
[Insane]
Same thing about the sliderticks
SV is all over the place D:
and some overmapping ><
00:10:537 (2,3,4) - This is rhythmically incorrect. If you listen to the music, you'll hear that these are 1/6.
00:11:685 (3,4) - This doesn't flow well. I suggest to do something like this: http://puu.sh/5rg9o.jpg
00:16:438 (2) - This doesn't follow anything in the music. You should probably delete it.
00:17:914 (7,8,9) - Do it this way for better flow? http://puu.sh/5rgiW.jpg
00:24:634 (2,3,4,5,6) - Hmm.. maybe don't use so many circles close together. It's a bit awkward to play. and the same in a lot of other spots.
00:39:551 (8,1) - Put more distance between these. It's confusing, and players will tend to hit (1) early.
00:40:370 (1,2) - Stack this normally.
00:41:682 (1,2) - ^ it doesn't make sense to do it this way.
00:44:140 (4) - Ctrl+G?
00:45:124 (1) - I wouldn't change the SV here. It's way too low and doesn't suit the song.
01:00:860 (1) - Now this SV is to high >< I don't think the song calls for such high SV. It feels especially weird because you keep low DS, so the sliders are really fast, but moving between notes is really slow.
01:02:499 (6,8,2) - I wouldn't recommend this kind of stacking. It makes it hard to read, especially since the notes are so close together.
01:04:138 (3,4,5,6,7) - Ctrl+J? I think it'd flow much better.
01:07:089 (3) - Try a different rhythm here. The 1/2 slider doesn't seem appropriate here, as suggested by your hitsounding. Try either (1/4 slider + circle) or (circle + 1/4 slider).
01:27:086 (1) - Same thing with SV here. I don't think it should be this high.
[AI's Insane]
Add video...
For slidertick hitsounds, I suggest lowering the volume slightly since it's not a clickable beat. (20 or 10 below current volume) This applies to all slidertick hitsounds.
A lot of unnecessarily large jumps ><
and a lot of the circle to slider parts with 1/4 beat spacing, the placement is awkward to play, and I would much prefer them to just be stacked.
00:16:274 (1,2,3) - Try this rhythm, I think it's nicer: http://puu.sh/5rhfH.jpg
00:22:175 (6) - Ctrl+G? to be stronger
00:28:568 (2,2) - I know it's not visible, but stack?
00:30:207 (3,4,5) - Try to make the flow here better. For example, you could move (4) like this: http://puu.sh/5rhE9.jpg
00:32:994 (2,3,4) - Improve the flow here. Try http://puu.sh/5rhIs.jpg
00:39:387 (8,1) - Stack?
00:40:370 (1,2) - Why such big jumps? It really doesn't go well with the song. 2.96x spacing is a massive jump for something like this.. i'd try something else. Same goes for the rest of this pattern.
01:04:302 (8,1) - You need some way of making this more smooth. The way the slider velocity is, (1) is way to close to (8). Players will probably click to circle early.
01:10:039 (1) - This slowdown is really sudden and doesn't really make sense to me. I'd just keep going with the same SV
01:38:724 (5) - Spacing... 3.78x... I don't think you should make such huge jumps on a slow song.
Ok, well good luck with this.
[General]
Would it be possible to find a higher resolution background image? (1366x768)
Are you sure the BPM 91.51? o.o
AI's Insane is missing video.
[Easy]
00:28:076 - For slidertick hitsounds like this, I suggest lowering the volume slightly since it's not a clickable beat. Try 40% or 50%? (20 or 10 below current volume) This applies to all slidertick hitsounds.
00:27:421 (4) - Remove NC
00:29:388 (1) - Add NC
00:35:944 (2) - This slider doesn't really fit the rhythm of the song. Try something with more 1/1. It doesn't make much sense to have a slider end where there's no significant sound and instead put all the hitsounds on sliderticks ==
00:48:402 (3,1) - Same here >< These don't really fit in.
[Normal]
Same thing about the sliderticks.
00:49:713 (3) - You missed the hitsounds on this slider. (clap, normal, clap)
00:54:958 (3) - Unsnapped slider end.
01:34:954 (4) - Add NC
01:36:266 (1) - Remove NC
[Hard]
You have a lot of inheriting sections that don't do anything >< Remove them?
00:10:373 (2,3,4,5,1) - Seems weird to use 1/4 when the music is 1/6s...
01:11:350 (4) - I get that you're using rotational symmetry, but this just doesn't flow well from (3) to (5) Sorry I don't have any suggestions how to improve this
01:48:232 (1) - I think it would be nice, just for the sake of consistency if you'd follow the other diffs and use SC:2 whistle + finish here. If not, then remove the whistle? O.o It doesn't make sense to have a 5% hitwhistle.
Nothing else to say here. The diff is pretty good.
[Insane]
Same thing about the sliderticks
SV is all over the place D:
and some overmapping ><
00:10:537 (2,3,4) - This is rhythmically incorrect. If you listen to the music, you'll hear that these are 1/6.
00:11:685 (3,4) - This doesn't flow well. I suggest to do something like this: http://puu.sh/5rg9o.jpg
00:16:438 (2) - This doesn't follow anything in the music. You should probably delete it.
00:17:914 (7,8,9) - Do it this way for better flow? http://puu.sh/5rgiW.jpg
00:24:634 (2,3,4,5,6) - Hmm.. maybe don't use so many circles close together. It's a bit awkward to play. and the same in a lot of other spots.
00:39:551 (8,1) - Put more distance between these. It's confusing, and players will tend to hit (1) early.
00:40:370 (1,2) - Stack this normally.
00:41:682 (1,2) - ^ it doesn't make sense to do it this way.
00:44:140 (4) - Ctrl+G?
00:45:124 (1) - I wouldn't change the SV here. It's way too low and doesn't suit the song.
01:00:860 (1) - Now this SV is to high >< I don't think the song calls for such high SV. It feels especially weird because you keep low DS, so the sliders are really fast, but moving between notes is really slow.
01:02:499 (6,8,2) - I wouldn't recommend this kind of stacking. It makes it hard to read, especially since the notes are so close together.
01:04:138 (3,4,5,6,7) - Ctrl+J? I think it'd flow much better.
01:07:089 (3) - Try a different rhythm here. The 1/2 slider doesn't seem appropriate here, as suggested by your hitsounding. Try either (1/4 slider + circle) or (circle + 1/4 slider).
01:27:086 (1) - Same thing with SV here. I don't think it should be this high.
[AI's Insane]
Add video...
For slidertick hitsounds, I suggest lowering the volume slightly since it's not a clickable beat. (20 or 10 below current volume) This applies to all slidertick hitsounds.
A lot of unnecessarily large jumps ><
and a lot of the circle to slider parts with 1/4 beat spacing, the placement is awkward to play, and I would much prefer them to just be stacked.
00:16:274 (1,2,3) - Try this rhythm, I think it's nicer: http://puu.sh/5rhfH.jpg
00:22:175 (6) - Ctrl+G? to be stronger
00:28:568 (2,2) - I know it's not visible, but stack?
00:30:207 (3,4,5) - Try to make the flow here better. For example, you could move (4) like this: http://puu.sh/5rhE9.jpg
00:32:994 (2,3,4) - Improve the flow here. Try http://puu.sh/5rhIs.jpg
00:39:387 (8,1) - Stack?
00:40:370 (1,2) - Why such big jumps? It really doesn't go well with the song. 2.96x spacing is a massive jump for something like this.. i'd try something else. Same goes for the rest of this pattern.
01:04:302 (8,1) - You need some way of making this more smooth. The way the slider velocity is, (1) is way to close to (8). Players will probably click to circle early.
01:10:039 (1) - This slowdown is really sudden and doesn't really make sense to me. I'd just keep going with the same SV
01:38:724 (5) - Spacing... 3.78x... I don't think you should make such huge jumps on a slow song.
Ok, well good luck with this.
Topic Starter
Fixed all except the SVCloudSplash16 wrote:
Hi, modding as requested.
[General]
Would it be possible to find a higher resolution background image? (1366x768) Can't find any other good BGs, searched for days.
Are you sure the BPM 91.51? o.o BPM tester says 91.51, tell me if there's problem with the timing.
AI's Insane is missing video. Fixed.
[Easy]
00:28:076 - For slidertick hitsounds like this, I suggest lowering the volume slightly since it's not a clickable beat. Try 40% or 50%? (20 or 10 below current volume) This applies to all slidertick hitsounds.
00:27:421 (4) - Remove NC
00:29:388 (1) - Add NC
00:35:944 (2) - This slider doesn't really fit the rhythm of the song. Try something with more 1/1. It doesn't make much sense to have a slider end where there's no significant sound and instead put all the hitsounds on sliderticks ==
00:48:402 (3,1) - Same here >< These don't really fit in.
[Normal]
Same thing about the sliderticks.
00:49:713 (3) - You missed the hitsounds on this slider. (clap, normal, clap)
00:54:958 (3) - Unsnapped slider end.
01:34:954 (4) - Add NC
01:36:266 (1) - Remove NC
[Hard]
You have a lot of inheriting sections that don't do anything >< Remove them?
00:10:373 (2,3,4,5,1) - Seems weird to use 1/4 when the music is 1/6s...
01:11:350 (4) - I get that you're using rotational symmetry, but this just doesn't flow well from (3) to (5) Sorry I don't have any suggestions how to improve this
01:48:232 (1) - I think it would be nice, just for the sake of consistency if you'd follow the other diffs and use SC:2 whistle + finish here. If not, then remove the whistle? O.o It doesn't make sense to have a 5% hitwhistle.
Nothing else to say here. The diff is pretty good.
[Insane]
Same thing about the sliderticks
SV is all over the place D:
and some overmapping ><
00:10:537 (2,3,4) - This is rhythmically incorrect. If you listen to the music, you'll hear that these are 1/6.
00:11:685 (3,4) - This doesn't flow well. I suggest to do something like this: http://puu.sh/5rg9o.jpg
00:16:438 (2) - This doesn't follow anything in the music. You should probably delete it.
00:17:914 (7,8,9) - Do it this way for better flow? http://puu.sh/5rgiW.jpg
00:24:634 (2,3,4,5,6) - Hmm.. maybe don't use so many circles close together. It's a bit awkward to play. and the same in a lot of other spots.
00:39:551 (8,1) - Put more distance between these. It's confusing, and players will tend to hit (1) early.
00:40:370 (1,2) - Stack this normally.
00:41:682 (1,2) - ^ it doesn't make sense to do it this way.
00:44:140 (4) - Ctrl+G?
00:45:124 (1) - I wouldn't change the SV here. It's way too low and doesn't suit the song.
01:00:860 (1) - Now this SV is to high >< I don't think the song calls for such high SV. It feels especially weird because you keep low DS, so the sliders are really fast, but moving between notes is really slow.
01:02:499 (6,8,2) - I wouldn't recommend this kind of stacking. It makes it hard to read, especially since the notes are so close together.
01:04:138 (3,4,5,6,7) - Ctrl+J? I think it'd flow much better.
01:07:089 (3) - Try a different rhythm here. The 1/2 slider doesn't seem appropriate here, as suggested by your hitsounding. Try either (1/4 slider + circle) or (circle + 1/4 slider). Changed the pattern of previous notes tho, will try this
01:27:086 (1) - Same thing with SV here. I don't think it should be this high.
Ok, well good luck with this.
Thanks very much! ❤
No need to kudosu this post
[General]
the AI's Insane has a different video offset with other diffs.
any chance to get a better background?
[Insane]
00:46:107 (3,4,5) - the spacing feel a little inconsistent here (nazi
01:42:495 (1) - I kinda don't understand why the faster sliders stops using from here, imo it should keeping using the 1.5 speeds sliders till the song ends.(btw same opinions with the kiai... if I was mapping this I may keep the tiai till 01:48:232 here).
[AI's Insane]
00:10:483 (2,3,4,5,6) - I personally like neat stream better, the spacing of this stream kinda feel a little ugly at my sight
00:43:157 (2) - well this slidershape is only used once here, and it didn't feel very beautiful, maybe consider use a normal one like 00:42:501 (8) ?
00:50:369 (1) - same shape suggestion
01:42:167 (1) - same as Insane
[General]
the AI's Insane has a different video offset with other diffs.
any chance to get a better background?
[Insane]
00:46:107 (3,4,5) - the spacing feel a little inconsistent here (nazi
01:42:495 (1) - I kinda don't understand why the faster sliders stops using from here, imo it should keeping using the 1.5 speeds sliders till the song ends.(btw same opinions with the kiai... if I was mapping this I may keep the tiai till 01:48:232 here).
[AI's Insane]
00:10:483 (2,3,4,5,6) - I personally like neat stream better, the spacing of this stream kinda feel a little ugly at my sight
00:43:157 (2) - well this slidershape is only used once here, and it didn't feel very beautiful, maybe consider use a normal one like 00:42:501 (8) ?
00:50:369 (1) - same shape suggestion
01:42:167 (1) - same as Insane
Topic Starter
Fixed all~Nymph wrote:
No need to kudosu this post
[General]
the AI's Insane has a different video offset with other diffs.
any chance to get a better background?
[Insane]
00:46:107 (3,4,5) - the spacing feel a little inconsistent here (nazi
01:42:495 (1) - I kinda don't understand why the faster sliders stops using from here, imo it should keeping using the 1.5 speeds sliders till the song ends.(btw same opinions with the kiai... if I was mapping this I may keep the tiai till 01:48:232 here).
[AI's Insane]
00:10:483 (2,3,4,5,6) - I personally like neat stream better, the spacing of this stream kinda feel a little ugly at my sight
00:43:157 (2) - well this slidershape is only used once here, and it didn't feel very beautiful, maybe consider use a normal one like 00:42:501 (8) ?
00:50:369 (1) - same shape suggestion
01:42:167 (1) - same as Insane
Added new BG, see if you like it >w<
Thanks for the mods ❤
你好ヾ(´･ω･｀)ﾉ
之前你给了我kd但是我也没什么给什么帮助，今天来摸摸你的图就不用kd了
[general]
为什么有2个ai's insane Σ( ° △ °|||)︴，新的bg是1280x720是不是要勾上widescreen support
咱一般不太喜欢用screeenshot做bg，我推荐http://puu.sh/5t2Rk.jpg ， 或者 http://puu.sh/5t2TT.jpg
[ai's insane]
* 00:15:455 (7,8) - how about make a blanket there
* 00:21:192 (2,3,4) - DS problem there
* 00:44:468 (5) - since the vocal start from 00:44:796, i suggest you to use a note and slider but not a repeated slider
* 00:46:107 (3) - when you are working on using green line to support hitsound, why not try to use 3 notes there :3
* 00:54:303 (2) - no any sample special clap and finish there is also ok for this slider i think....which means that remove green line there 00:54:631 is also fine
* 00:55:287 (4) - i personally like stream there
btw the two sudden slowdown slider may make people drop their combo...this is also personal comment
* 01:16:924 (1) - remove this slider and add a repeat to the previous slider, this more fit to the rythum
[insane]
* 00:38:567 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 这里的顺序是不是有点不对，还有最后一个note可以换成slider
* 00:53:975 (2) - 移到x 264 y136做个blanket
good luck
之前你给了我kd但是我也没什么给什么帮助，今天来摸摸你的图就不用kd了
[general]
为什么有2个ai's insane Σ( ° △ °|||)︴，新的bg是1280x720是不是要勾上widescreen support
咱一般不太喜欢用screeenshot做bg，我推荐http://puu.sh/5t2Rk.jpg ， 或者 http://puu.sh/5t2TT.jpg
[ai's insane]
* 00:15:455 (7,8) - how about make a blanket there
* 00:21:192 (2,3,4) - DS problem there
* 00:44:468 (5) - since the vocal start from 00:44:796, i suggest you to use a note and slider but not a repeated slider
* 00:46:107 (3) - when you are working on using green line to support hitsound, why not try to use 3 notes there :3
* 00:54:303 (2) - no any sample special clap and finish there is also ok for this slider i think....which means that remove green line there 00:54:631 is also fine
* 00:55:287 (4) - i personally like stream there
btw the two sudden slowdown slider may make people drop their combo...this is also personal comment
* 01:16:924 (1) - remove this slider and add a repeat to the previous slider, this more fit to the rythum
[insane]
* 00:38:567 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 这里的顺序是不是有点不对，还有最后一个note可以换成slider
* 00:53:975 (2) - 移到x 264 y136做个blanket
good luck
Topic Starter
Thanks!Mei wrote:
你好ヾ(´･ω･｀)ﾉ
之前你给了我kd但是我也没什么给什么帮助，今天来摸摸你的图就不用kd了
[general]
为什么有2个ai's insane Σ( ° △ °|||)︴，新的bg是1280x720是不是要勾上widescreen support 放错了 orz
咱一般不太喜欢用screeenshot做bg，我推荐http://puu.sh/5t2Rk.jpg ， 或者 http://puu.sh/5t2TT.jpg 我试试http://puu.sh/5t2TT.jpg
[insane]
* 00:38:567 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 这里的顺序是不是有点不对，还有最后一个note可以换成slider 没换，打了觉得顺序还可以>w< - 不然建议我怎么排吧
* 00:53:975 (2) - 移到x 264 y136做个blanket Fixed~
good luck
Rakuen wrote:
Mei wrote:
[insane]
* 00:38:567 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 这里的顺序是不是有点不对，还有最后一个note可以换成slider 没换，打了觉得顺序还可以>w< - 不然建议我怎么排吧
268,184,38567,1,2,1:2:0:0:
355,99,38731,1,8,0:0:0:0:
360,228,38895,1,2,0:0:0:0:
312,96,39059,1,0,0:0:0:0:
304,216,39223,1,2,1:2:0:0:
397,131,39387,1,0,0:0:0:0:
396,132,39551,1,2,0:0:0:0:
我建议是这样，两个3角形，你的那个排列在ar8下我感觉很乱啊看不出规律来@_@所以才提一下
Topic Starter
Ok~照这个排了Mei wrote:
268,184,38567,1,2,1:2:0:0:
355,99,38731,1,8,0:0:0:0:
360,228,38895,1,2,0:0:0:0:
312,96,39059,1,0,0:0:0:0:
304,216,39223,1,2,1:2:0:0:
397,131,39387,1,0,0:0:0:0:
396,132,39551,1,2,0:0:0:0:
我建议是这样，两个3角形，你的那个排列在ar8下我感觉很乱啊看不出规律来@_@所以才提一下
谢谢!
Topic Starter
Updated._AI wrote:
Fixed all the mod above >.o/ (almost all)
Rakuen : http://puu.sh/5tIeV.osu
recheck:
2 objects are unsnapped on ai insane.
bubbled.
Finally ;___;
after discussing with jonathanlfj, timing I believe is BPM: 91.50 Offset: 543
good luck!
good luck!
omg <3 pro pro Rakuen
After discussing with mapper, captin1's timing is applied with some minor tweaks (including adding some red lines to fix stanza count). Since nothing in the actual map was touched I will restore Nymph's bubble here
Rebubbled~
Rebubbled~
Just checking: did you make sure to recalculate slider lengths and resnap all objects?
Topic Starter
Checked the AI mods and see there's nothing unusual...
But if there's anything not right please do tell me >w<
I'm newbie mapper ;w;
But if there's anything not right please do tell me >w<
I'm newbie mapper ;w;
mapper self pop to change something
rebubbled.
rebubbled.
I see no problem with this map, if you are ready for a rank, let me know
omg finally
gogo rank!
OMG YES PLEASE!
RANKED
Congratulations
Congratulations
Congratz on your first ranked map <3
oh a first rank :3
Congrats, really nice Easy and Normal!
Congrats, really nice Easy and Normal!
Gratz Rakuen and Hent_AI ww
Both of you too et mapping :3
Both of you too et mapping :3
congratz~
Gratzz!! AI_, Gero, and Rakuen!!^^ for first Ranked Maps!!^^
Rakuen pro desuyo! :3
Topic Starter
Thanks very much! >.< /
gratz！
grats！
gratz owo
congratz
Congratz Man! ^^
wow you ranked this
congratz :3
congratz :3
Congratulations :3 Great Job!
Cool Insane :3
i enjoy osu yay
Rakuen wrote:
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Friday, November 29, 2013 at 8:39:24 PM
Artist: AZU feat. SEAMO
Title: Jikan yo Tomare (TV Size)
Source: Itazura na Kiss
Tags: Ending 2 _AI romantic anime Gero
BPM: 91.5
Filesize: 7033kb
Play Time: 01:51
Difficulties Available:Download: AZU feat. SEAMO - Jikan yo Tomare (TV Size)
- AI's Insane (4.95 stars, 297 notes)
- Easy (0.78 stars, 62 notes)
- Gero's Hard (4.58 stars, 218 notes)
- Insane (4.9 stars, 290 notes)
- Normal (2.83 stars, 115 notes)
Download: AZU feat. SEAMO - Jikan yo Tomare (TV Size) (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Itazura na Kiss（イタズラなキス） ED2
AZU feat. SEAMO - Jikan yo Tomare
AZU - 時間よ止まれ feat. SEAMO- Rakuen
- Rakuen
- Gero
- Rakuen
Nymph
Breeze
Thanks to the testers!YGOkid8
Accel WorldThanks to the modders!HeatKai
mintong89
orioncomet
- Miomio Chii -
-Umi-
Xinely
sheela901
Alarido
AnreFM
[Navy]
N E K O
-Srui-
10crystalmask01
[ Sana ]
LKs
RandomEffect
kajiyatta
Accel World
CET 6
CrystilonZ
captin1
moonlightleaf
Sonico Makaron
LexiaLovesU
Gero
Mei
Sephibro
azuretwinight
XinCrin
CloudSplash16