xd
forum
Is it bad for me to have 89.6% acc at my rank? (241k)
posted
Total Posts
46
89.6% acc is bad at any rank.
I think it doesn't matter at that rank. I had probably 92% acc at that rank tho, try really listening to beat instead of approach circles. It will improve naturally if you have any rhythm sense and don't play too hard maps for you to fc all the time.
It doesnt matter
Khelly wrote:
It doesnt matter
again with this...!stalkyh wrote:
try really listening to beat instead of approach circles.
noo! why?
just focus on them they help a ton, youre listening to the song anyway.
idk about hidden but nomod ive noticed they help me.
but of course i could be wrong
To answer Op:-
If you're not paying attention to approach circles, you're not reading, you're just anticipating/guessing/memorizing/shitmissing/etc.
OP's problem could be that he needs to learn to listen to beat of the music in order to time taps properly. It could also be that he needs to learn to read approach circles in order to get the right distance between beats, e.g. he plays a 1/2 note 1/4 of a beat early. It could be both of these things. It could be a lot of things. OP will have to play more to figure it out.
Since he's a 6 digit rank, it's probably both + more.
Kibbleru wrote:
Khelly wrote:
It doesnt matter
You read the duration of the notes, e.g. 1/4, 1/2, etc. of each beat by using the approach circles in nomod or the difference between points in time hitcircles fade out with HD. You then match that timing correctly by listening to the music.Yolshka wrote:
again with this...!stalkyh wrote:
try really listening to beat instead of approach circles.
noo! why?
just focus on them they help a ton, youre listening to the song anyway.
idk about hidden but nomod ive noticed they help me.
but of course i could be wrong
If you're not paying attention to approach circles, you're not reading, you're just anticipating/guessing/memorizing/shitmissing/etc.
OP's problem could be that he needs to learn to listen to beat of the music in order to time taps properly. It could also be that he needs to learn to read approach circles in order to get the right distance between beats, e.g. he plays a 1/2 note 1/4 of a beat early. It could be both of these things. It could be a lot of things. OP will have to play more to figure it out.
Since he's a 6 digit rank, it's probably both + more.
That's bad acc for any rank; 97 is bad at any rank; 99+ is good at any rank.
how about 98?Outline wrote:
That's bad acc for any rank; 97 is bad at any rank; 99+ is good at any rank.
98 is gr8StephOsu wrote:
how about 98?
but 99.98 shines so might brighter than 98 it makes 98 insignificant and bad :c
Says someone with 96% smhOutline wrote:
That's bad acc for any rank; 97 is bad at any rank; 99+ is good at any rank.
You dont need to worry too much about acc but dont just straight out ignore it like Khelly does.
I dont worry about acc and have 98%, just git good.
100% or gtfo
you should be practicing maps you get 60-70% on with nf
HK_ wrote:
Outline wrote:
That's bad acc for any rank; 97 is bad at any rank; 99+ is good at any rank.
Says someone with 96% smh
You dont need to worry too much about acc but dont just straight out ignore it like Khelly does.
I dont worry about acc and have 98%, just git good.
I used to have 98.7 fml white cis male scum judging me because of my acc
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
I used to have 99.5% and the I went deviant.Outline wrote:
I used to have 98.7 fml white cis male scum judging me because of my acc
gay lolBarusamikosu wrote:
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
Yes
Barusamikosu wrote:
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
Keep telling yourself thatBarusamikosu wrote:
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
but baru has 99.98% acc :cEndie- wrote:
Keep telling yourself thatBarusamikosu wrote:
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
Hes the same rank since I started playing. Not even 110% acc will make up for thatStephOsu wrote:
but baru has 99.98% acc :c
He goes full tryhard, still doesn't get 100%Barusamikosu wrote:
All accuracies are beautiful in their own way
And you still didn't catch up. Please.HK_ wrote:
Hes the same rank since I started playing. Not even 110% acc will make up for thatStephOsu wrote:
but baru has 99.98% acc :c
HK_ wrote:
Hes the same rank since I started playing. Not even 110% acc will make up for thatStephOsu wrote:
but baru has 99.98% acc :c
Same as shady
I could just spam meme aim maps and catch up today. Thats not fun at all.Endaris wrote:
And you still didn't catch up. Please.
HK_ wrote:
I could just spam meme aim maps and catch up today. Thats not fun at all.Endaris wrote:
And you still didn't catch up. Please.
Khelly would say something like "if it's so easy prove it"HK_ wrote:
But I dont want to put effort into any map.
Didnt say its easy, just very possible.
You caught up to guy who didnt play online for like 6 months. Grats.
I can't catch up to baru too
but at least I caught up to Endaris and got surpassed again few days ago :c
but at least I caught up to Endaris and got surpassed again few days ago :c
triggeredSkullFull wrote:
IMO 96% is the least you should get; a ''good acc'' is above 98.50%
Topic Starter
Well at the rate I'm playing at it's the best I can getSkullFull wrote:
IMO 96% is the least you should get; a ''good acc'' is above 98.50%
plus I tend to play 3.6-3.8 star maps getting C (rarely B) ranks on them, which tanks my accuracy
Topic Starter
Well at the rate I'm playing at it's the best I can get
plus I tend to play 3.6-3.8 star maps getting C (rarely B) ranks on them, which tanks my accuracy[/quote]
And sometimes when even IMPROVING accuracy on a map, I lose acc.
plus I tend to play 3.6-3.8 star maps getting C (rarely B) ranks on them, which tanks my accuracy[/quote]
And sometimes when even IMPROVING accuracy on a map, I lose acc.