Yoratama wrote:

Hi, M4M here https://osu.ppy.sh/s/465536
Sorry My English is Bad Yo, no it ain't man :^) <3

General

- Decrease Audio 10 - 20%? sound effect to noise imo I'll reduce it by 20 in verse, and 10 in chorus how about that?
- HP Setting for other ranked maps that have same lenght
Kantan = 7/8
Futsuu = 6/7
Muzu = 6/7
Oni = 6
Want a stale decrease, so HP is now:
8, 7, 6, 5, but yeah, the HP was off before, now it's hopefully better!

[Difficulty]
HPDrainRate:6
CircleSize:5
OverallDifficulty:5
ApproachRate:7
SliderMultiplier:1.3999999666214
SliderTickRate:1

- Slider Multiplier Should be 1.4, change that to all diff. Done, heard a lot of complaints about that (Also did for _DUSK_'s diff)

Futsuu

If you feel SR too high, here i give you a suggest.
00:32:491 - move to 00:31:098 - and make that kk or keep that for variation. Like this idea, changed
00:42:809 - move to 00:43:741 - to make it same with 00:29:384 - Nah needs a bit of variety to be interesting
00:44:491 - move to 00:45:456 - Can't remember if I did this or not, don't think I did
00:46:206 - remove? Naah
00:46:206 - don? to make it same with 00:32:813 - B-but it's already a don :^(

Muzukashii

00:19:313 - kat? high vocal pitch. I actually thought about changing that too, 'cause that pattern would also suck for alternating players, done :^)
00:34:956 - delete? to give break, and there's no sound there. Deleted, and added a don on 00:35:384 (127) - and 00:35:813 (129) -
00:41:063 - move 00:40:848 - ? because stream is started there. Nah I'm leading into the vocals
Oni

00:10:420 (53,54,55) - make it dkdk? there's good for that stream. i want to suggest dkkd but that pattern is here 00:12:134 - Did the opposite and make it kdkd
00:24:348 - same ^ ^^^^

_DUSK_ Inner Oni

HP = 5/6 ? 7 is too hard imo.
Uncheck Widescreen SUpport Did this for him
Tags Conflict Changed for him, by adding to all others

00:25:956 - make it longer? tilll 00:25:956 - ? i think that's too easy for inner.
00:44:706 - kat too early i thin, change 00:44:706 (150,151,152,153) - to dkkd for variation, or keep dkkk like 00:30:991 -
00:46:100 (160) - object is not snapped
00:55:313 - make it same with other diff? i think that's not fit with the sound.

My mod just a little, because we have do IRC before xD
Hope it help
Good Luck

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is Finish don note
4. K is Finish kat note
   
   
5. Purple is UnRankable , Please change
6. Green is I would strongly recommend
7. black is Pointed out that

1. Okay.

1. 00:00:456 - add finisher? - same as Muzukashii.
   
   
2. 00:05:598 - change k? -I think that sounds good.and Oni to be the same way.
   
   
3. 00:55:313 - change D? - i think better sound.Other diff is also the same.

1. 00:00:456 - same as kantan
   
   
2. 00:02:170 - change k?
   
   
3. 00:05:598 - same as kantan.

1. 00:01:956 - ctrl+G? - 00:03:670 (10,11) - reverse.
   
   
2. 00:05:384 - ctrl+G? - same as kantan.
   
   
3. 00:07:741 (18) - change d? - same as other diff.
   
   
4. 00:08:170 (19,20) - ctrl+G?
   
   
5. 00:09:456 - change d? - ^
   
   
6. 00:09:884 (24) - change k? - I think that often hear.
   
   
7. 00:11:170 (29,30) - ctrl+G? - ^
   
   
8. 00:12:134 - delete? - a little diffcult.
   
   
9. 00:12:456 (34,35,36) - change d? - same as other diff.
   
   
10. 00:15:027 - change d? - ^
    
    
11. 00:27:884 - remove finisher.

1. change diff name Oni? - I can not understand is that it is the diff name.
   
   
2. 00:00:456 - same as kantan
   
   
3. 00:03:777 - delete? - I think that it is unnecessary.
   
   
4. 00:04:206 (23) - move to 00:04:206 (23) - ? - 00:00:456 - ~ 00:01:956 - ,00:02:170 - ~ 00:03:670 same.
   
   
5. 00:14:170 - remove finisher.dkdkD,It is better to quit.
   
   
6. 00:20:063,00:20:706 - delete - It is not need to be difficult until there.
   
   
7. 00:21:027 - same as 00:14:170
   
   
8. This map is Inner Oni < Oni notes So, please slightly reduce the notes.For example,00:28:848 - ,00:29:491 - ,00:30:563 - , 00:31:206....
   
   
9. 00:34:741 - same as 00:14:170
   
   
10. 00:48:456 - ^
    
    
11. 00:54:991 - delete.

1. _DUSK_'s Inner Oni? - same as Oni.and HP=6?
   
   
2. 00:14:170 - remove finisher.dkdkD,It is better to quit.
   
   
3. 00:27:884 - ^
   
   
4. 00:41:170 - ^
   
   
5. 00:55:313 - remove spinner,add D is better.

1. _DUSK_'s Inner Oni? - same as Oni.and HP=6?
   
   
2. 00:14:170 - remove finisher.dkdkD,It is better to quit. Done
   
   
3. 00:27:884 - ^ I think adding a finisher here gives this part much more effect
   
   
4. 00:41:170 - ^ Same as above
   
   
5. 00:55:313 - remove spinner,add D is better.

chaica wrote:

Hi, from my quoue, for m4m

[ about]

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is Finish don note
4. K is Finish kat note
   
   
5. Purple is UnRankable , Please change
6. Green is I would strongly recommend
7. black is Pointed out that

[ General]

1. Okay.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Kantan]

1. 00:00:456 - add finisher? - same as Muzukashii. Removed muzukashii finisher instead.
   
   
2. 00:05:598 - change k? -I think that sounds good.and Oni to be the same way. Nah it's fine here.
   
   
3. 00:55:313 - change D? - i think better sound.Other diff is also the same. I prefer the K :^)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Futsuu]

1. 00:00:456 - same as kantan Muzu finish removed, so doesn't apply
   
   
2. 00:02:170 - change k? Done for variety.
   
   
3. 00:05:598 - same as kantan. Nah :3

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:01:956 - ctrl+G? - 00:03:670 (10,11) - reverse. Changed 00:02:598 (7) - to k instead for variety like Futsuu
   
   
2. 00:05:384 - ctrl+G? - same as kantan. nop :^)
   
   
3. 00:07:741 (18) - change d? - same as other diff. It's a d on futsuu, so I don't see the problem
   
   
4. 00:08:170 (19,20) - ctrl+G? The song is the same, so most of the time, I'm going to stay repetitive, that flows better for me. I make entire sections different instead :^)
   
   
5. 00:09:456 - change d? - ^ Don't see much of a problem here, I feel that it flows just fine.
   
   
6. 00:09:884 (24) - change k? - I think that often hear.
   
   
7. 00:11:170 (29,30) - ctrl+G? - ^
   
   
8. 00:12:134 - delete? - a little diffcult. There's a similar pattern later, so I'll keep this.
   
   
9. 00:12:456 (34,35,36) - change d? - same as other diff. Changed
   
   
10. 00:15:027 - change d? - ^ Would be inconsistent with 00:18:027 (52) - and 00:16:313 (46) - if I did that, so nop
    
    
11. 00:27:884 - remove finisher. There's two reasons why I'm not changing this: 1: I don't think it's unrankable, since I have a D after a k, and not a d, and 2: it's the start of the kiai, so it fits insanely well.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Oni]

1. change diff name Oni? - I can not understand is that it is the diff name. It's the lyrics that are "thrown" into the Oni :^)
   
   
2. 00:00:456 - same as kantan Removed muzu finisher.
   
   
3. 00:03:777 - delete? - I think that it is unnecessary. If it comes up again, I'll change it, but I like that it's dense there, I don't wanna make the diff overflow with doubles.
   
   
4. 00:04:206 (23) - move to 00:04:206 (23) - ? - 00:00:456 - ~ 00:01:956 - ,00:02:170 - ~ 00:03:670 same. Think it's ok.
   
   
5. 00:14:170 - remove finisher.dkdkD,It is better to quit. Again, if it gets mentioned I'll consider it, it's not unrankable tho, since there's a k before a D (+ it's an Oni)
   
   
6. 00:20:063,00:20:706 - delete - It is not need to be difficult until there. Removed the first one, but the second one, I like the long stream.
   
   
7. 00:21:027 - same as 00:14:170 Again, don't think it's a problem, but if it becomes a problem later, I'll change it.
   
   
8. This map is Inner Oni < Oni notes So, please slightly reduce the notes.For example,00:28:848 - ,00:29:491 - ,00:30:563 - , 00:31:206.... Dusk reworked his map so that it feels a lot harder (It's almost equally dense now in terms of total objects)
   
   
9. 00:34:741 - same as 00:14:170 THAT I'll change right away, big mistake lol, thanks :^)
   
   
10. 00:48:456 - ^ Sure :^)
    
    
11. 00:54:991 - delete. nononoonono, vocals D:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Inner Oni]

1. _DUSK_'s Inner Oni? - same as Oni.and HP=6?
   
   
2. 00:14:170 - remove finisher.dkdkD,It is better to quit.
   
   
3. 00:27:884 - ^
   
   
4. 00:41:170 - ^
   
   
5. 00:55:313 - remove spinner,add D is better.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Oni is a little difficult. Please consider to reduce the number of Notes than inner Oni. good luck:D
Thanks for the mod <3 <3 <3

Vulkin wrote:

Friendly mod!

-General-
Only one diff can have custom name so the "O-U-ni" at the Oni diff has to go, _DUSK_'s Diff can have the O-U-ni because its the hardest ^^ I'll wait with changing this untill Stefan is here, I generally think it's fine, due to the ranking criteria saying "Highest level" of difficulty, with Oni being part of both.
Also im not sure, increase hitsound volume? This was discussed in a different mod, where someone suggested we reduce the 100% to 80-90, so I'll keep this :3

-Kantan-
00:21:884 (19) - remove to have a break Nah, the Kantan is already so far away from the Futsuu SR-wise, I get your point tho
00:54:456 (59) - change to k to make it easier for people to hit it I'll take it into consideration, I feel that it fits fine

-Futsuu-
00:24:456 (49) - make d so it can make difference between the previous kdk Done

-Muzukashii-
00:20:598 (64) - move to 00:20:491 - Done, and changed (65) to d
00:54:777 (210) - move to 00:54:563 - Nah, it would be inconsistent with the Oni

-O-U-ni-
00:14:170 (77) - remove finisher
00:21:027 (124) - ^
00:27:884 (169) - ^ To me, the finishers aren't a problem, and they fit okay for me, I'll remove them though, if it becomes a problem for ranking.

-_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni-
00:03:777 (24) - make k to follow that sound idk hdiajfodsiofjadsiofjidsfojasdo how is it called fml
00:05:598 (37) - make d
00:27:884 (17) - remove finisher
00:41:170 (123,124) - ^

Good luck on map! ^^

Mihaugoku wrote:

Sorry, if the mod is bad, i'm just a beginner!
Mod from the Queue

[Kantan]
Looks okay to me!

[Futsuu]
Oh wow 2.60* nice xD
00:39:884 (85) - in here the sound is higher i guess, so maybe k? d is fine though Yeah might as well change that, I get ya :^)

[Muzukashii]
00:27:456 (91,92,93,94,95) - i kind of don't like this, because i rarely see quintuples in a Muzukashii, especially a dkdkD Because of the D being followed by a k, there's nothing awkward about it. If it was dD you'd need to single tap one of the beats, but alternating this shouldn't be too hard.

[O-U-ni]
00:13:741 (73,74,75,76,77) - i think a kdkdk or kdkdd sounds better here It follows vocals :^)
00:40:741 (259,260,261,262,263) - also i think kkkkd fits the song better Did dkddd so it isn't insanely easy lol
00:54:455 (357,358,359,360,361) - the same thing as above, although this one can stay i think Lemme keep that yeah :3

[_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni]
00:15:563 (79,80,81,82) - imo dkdk would fit better because of k you put earlier
00:20:491 (99,100,101,102) - this is okay, but what about kkdk?


I hope this mod helps!
Have a good day! Thank you kind sir, and thanks for the mod <3

Mihaugoku wrote:

Sorry, if the mod is bad, i'm just a beginner!
Mod from the Queue


[_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni]
00:15:563 (79,80,81,82) - imo dkdk would fit better because of k you put earlier Done
00:20:491 (99,100,101,102) - this is okay, but what about kkdk? Done

Vulkin wrote:

Friendly mod!



-_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni-
00:03:777 (24) - make k to follow that sound idk hdiajfodsiofjadsiofjidsfojasdo how is it called fml Done
00:05:598 (37) - make d Done
00:27:884 (17) - remove finisher I think I'll leave this since the finisher gives it more effect. May change it if one more person also recommends this
00:41:170 (123,124) - ^ Same as above

Good luck on map! ^^

Ayyri wrote:

Hello~

_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni

[strike]I can actually hear what I'm playing now. Thank you for using Normal instead of Soft.)
00:26:920 - Change to k, the slight change in the tapping(?) sound here changes here, rather than at 00:27:027 -

Done. It sounds much better now. Thanks~

Ayyri wrote:

Hello~ o/

M4M. Getting to yours today :3

Keep in mind, these are my suggestions, don't change something I mentioned unless it seems good to you!

If I didn't make a box for something, that doesn't mean I didn't look at it. It just means I didn't find anything wrong with it.

General

I honestly dislike not being able to hear what I am hitting. I think 100% volume might be best here if you don't want to use Normal hitsounds, because the song is rather loud itself. It will also add more emphasis to the finishers that you used. Changed to normal hitsample untill I find a suitable custom hitsound.

Kantan

00:00:456 - Change to D. Why start so subtly? There's a big sound at the beginning here. It should be emphasized. I get your point, but at the same time, I don't really feel like I want to, don't really like starting with a finisher I suppose, I'll do it for now though, but might change it back later.
00:27:884 - This could be changed to D. Since the note before was k. It's generally nice to have the finisher after it be the opposite color. (Honestly either color sounds fine.) Or you could change 00:27:456 - to d since it would match with 00:26:170 - in pitch. The vocals disallow the first k to be changed, so I'll just change the K to D.
00:34:313 - Remove. This removal would allow the player a bit of a break. You generally want to keep patterns about 3 notes long in a Kantan. It's a pretty easy pattern though to be honest (Easy players prefer same-color patterns), and the song is a fairly low bpm, so I think it's fine here
00:48:027 - Remove for the same reason as above. Won't change this either, since the spread is already bad enough as it is lol :p
If you do the above removal, you could ctrl+g at the notes at 00:47:170 - and 00:47:598 - so the pattern is even again. (If not, it's fine.)

Futsuu

00:00:456 - Change to D. Same reason as in Kantan. Did it, but with regret xD
00:12:241 - and 00:12:456 - ctrl+g so the k gives more emphasis to the change in sound at 00:12:456 - made kk instead
00:19:313 - Change to k. The background sounds change here. made into kk (I mostly follow vocals on emphasized spots)
00:20:598 - Remove this note for a short break here. Would be inconsistent. imo :3

Muzukashii

00:00:456 - Change to D. Same reasoning as in the last two difficulties. With regret, but sure xD
00:03:777 - A k could be added here. You're allowed to use some triplets in Muzukashii. Also this would add some variation to your doubles. Nah
00:10:634 - Same thing as above. Same
00:21:027 - Why have a finisher here, but not in any other difficulties? Either have it in all of your difficulties, or none of them. (I would suggest adding them to all.) Adding to other diffs.
00:22:634 - A k could be be added here. Same reasoning as before. Don't want to use triples before the kiai.
00:41:384 - This note isn't really needed here. If this note were to be removed, it would add more emphasis to 00:41:598 - (The start of the new kiai.) Vocals.
00:47:491 - Remove this note, having kkd repeated isn't very good in a Muzukashii. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5425581 did this instead.
00:54:991 - Remove this note. dddk also isn't a good pattern to use in Muzukashii, how you're doing it here, that is. (Having the last note on the next blue tick.) And it honestly just sounds weird being placed here. And you're following the kind of echoed part of her voice, so it's not the strongest thing to map to. It's best to leave it not mapped here. I don't agree, I follow the vocals a lot, and in the Oni, you'll see a 6-note version of that same pattern. It's totally fine
With the above removal, you could change 00:54:884 - to a k to follow the change in vocal tone.

Lol star diff went down by 0.06*

O-U-ni

00:00:456 - Why start with k when you've always started with d? I'd also suggest not just having a d, have it be a D. Changed to K instead, 'cause my overall rhythmical intension is different in this first section from the other 3 diffs.
00:08:920 - Add a k, the rhythm repeats back to what it started with. (Also you followed it at 00:10:634 - ) Sure, and made it kdkd
00:17:491 - Add a k, and change 00:17:598 - to d. Same reasoning as above. Done :3
00:22:634 - Add a k. Same as above. Kaaaay :3
00:41:170 - Change to k. The vocal comes in at the end of the kiai here, and has the same pitch as 00:41:384 - The higher pitched vocal is supposed to be emphasized with the k, and the d is the lower pitch.
00:54:884 - and 00:54:991 - ctrl+g. So 00:54:884 - is k, and you can remove the d at 00:54:991 - (Same reason as in Muzukashii.) No thanks :3

_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni

[strike]I can actually hear what I'm playing now. Thank you for using Normal instead of Soft.)
00:26:920 - Change to k, the slight change in the tapping(?) sound here changes here, rather than at 00:27:027 -

Aldwych wrote:

Hi Spork Lover

M4M from your queue.

[General]

Futsuu seems way high in the set, gonna look further why.

[Kantan]

00:13:741 : Not a big fan of this note since it creates a 3/1 space, it isn't also an important sound/effect of the music. If I changed this to like a 2/1 instead, it would just become plain And as you'll see later, I like to follow vocals a lot.
00:20:170 : I would delete this note aswell, here you create a 2x 2/1 spacing which is ok, but this place is less complete in terms of music than before, but you map "more", also the new music section starts at 00:21:027 which is visible with your finish too. imo, I think the two k's before the finish emphasize vocals well enough to be acceptable. And after that I'm back to the typical dkdkdkdk thing :^) I'm open to changes, but don't see a big problem :3
00:27:546 : Same as 00:13:741. Fine to me
00:40:741 : Add d in order to keep a consistent spacing with the whole map (moreover if you applied what i've said above). Changed to d
00:46:741 : Why ddkkd here when you kkkkd before? Was generally to amp up the difficulty a liiiittle bit, so the spread isn't COMPLETELY off xD I don't think it should be a problem, it's not unheard off to do it like this :3

Well basic kantan but dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdk is zzzzzz.

[Futsuu]

00:13:741 : Some break is still good to have, so i recommend you to delete these kind of note (same aswell for 00:20:598). Would be inconsistent with the Kantan, since I didn't change it before.
00:22:527+ : Why here you decided not to have doublets like before? Kind of unconsistent. Bad mistake, reworked that section a bit
00:27:456 : Delete (and next d too) for some break in your map. But then I'm not following the vocals anymore ;o
00:35:598++ : Ok this is why futsuu is so high rated, well... even if the rythm is correct, i don't think it is accurate to keep so many pattern like this one on a futsuu, it is really technical because you combine 3/4 spacing and 1/2 doublets, it is really hard to follow for new players and the gap is really huge compare to the kantan patterns/set. Did a small rework here in the first part.
00:42:027 : If you decide to changed all the patterns that causes trouble, you can delete this kind of note in order to have a clean Finisher play. Removed this note.
00:49:098 : Right now this is an example of what you can perfectly have in a muzukashii but not in a futsuu x) Changed in the same way as I reworked 35:598
Less 3/4's = 0.3* less difficulty, nice suggestions :^)

If you fix these problems it will correct big issues in your futsuu (and also the over rating too). Did MOST of them, and I think it's really good now, thanks <3

[Muzukashii]

00:07:013++ : I don't get the idea of a progressive struture pattern, i mean the first one has no double 1/4, the second one : one double 1/4 the third one has twice. Dunno, the music is repetitive in itself so you have nearly no choice imo. Is fine to me
00:19:527 & 00:19:956 : I would delete this notes in order to have a consistent pattern. Plus it's kinda full of vocals fozejfiefjfzeojepfozeofz so no real important thing to map on a muzukashii. It's a lead-up to a new section + the "squeaky" sound is pretty audible imo
00:25:313 : Same thing as mentioned above, you decided to have a constant pattern just before, and here you're using double 1/4, kinda odd. deleted first double, was a mistake, thanks for spotting :^)
00:26:384 & 00:26:813 : It's up to you but as a personnal feel i would delete these aswell. Just because no sound else vocals and preparation for kiai. To me, kiai preparation should be stronger than the consistency patterns. It's a peak.
00:27:027 : Since a stream starts here but you only do vocals, i would replace this note and the next quint by a slider.
00:27:884 : Unrankable! You cannot use finisher on a 1/4 unless it is really necessary, i mean you can avoid this kind of problem by using a slider (what i said above). Pretty sure it isn't unrankable with a k before a D, but I nerfed the 1/4 section a bit by removing the 2nd note.
00:29:813 & 00:30:241 : I felt this kind of note are out of place in this diff. Nearly i kinda decrease the "importancy" (wow is it english) of some of the main notes. By deleteting these you give some importance to the melody to focus and play which is noice, but you also create a clear structure pattern to follow and play which is really good. Removed 29:8 but not 30:2

00:33:348 : Imo the triple fits more when starting at 00:33:027 it sounds better. But also filling with full triple here would be Oni diff like and Imo, using full dkdkdk is too boring. so what i advise you is to use something like this below. My mapping style disallows me from using kkk or ddd triples unless it's REALLY obvious that it's the same rhythm for those 3 notes, and that's not the case here. For the placement, I think it's fine for now :3



00:36:884++ : Well i'm ok for triple, but be consistent in your patterns, because you do different things which are not realted in this section, so you're not on the same page and the player won't be too. For some diversity argues i would advise you to go on the triples but do what you prefer. Added a note to 00:37:527 & 00:39:241 - for consistency :^)
00:40:741 : Since it's a quint beats but you don't map as it is, i don't know why you're using a triple after, maybe using a slider instead? Nope, don't like sliders in general, but that's just preference.
00:41:598 ++ : The argues and issues are the same as above, again i'm ok for some diversity but consistency on the sections x) Did somewhat the same as in the previous section.
00:54:670 : What quadruple with 3/4 space after? Wooot? xD Don't see the problem, sure it might be a little hard, but it's perfectly fine for a muzu.

Ok, imo i like the pattern and the rythm you're using in this muzukashii but just be consistent in the section and use some increasing pattern difficulty between the normal part and the kiai and it'll make your muzukashii better. Also as an advise, if you're using triples in your muzukashii, you shouldn't use different colors, you're introducing triples and alternative keyboard playstyle and bicolor 1/4 patterns are more technical. Also TnT muzkashii maps rarely use bicolor triples.

[O-U-ni]

00:03:563 : Why quadruple here when it was only double 1/4 at this position? Diversity, and the vocals are somewhat different.
00:11:384 : Why no tripple here? Sound logic regarding to your section? The vocals are delayed a bit.
00:12:670 + : Regarding to your muzukashii and your oni, the patterns to play are kinda a bit way harder, i would delete these notes in order to have a usefull break and also it sound nice and logic to have it. Don't want a very audible vocal sound to be left in the dark.
00:14:170 : Same as muzukashii, find a solution which fits you. It's perfectly fine here.
00:14:812 : No triple? Good catch, added.
00:19:956 : Few problems here for me, the stream is kinda techical since you do quadruple d then k + ddkkd, it is harder than common oni pattern (which are quints pattern basical), i would advise you to change into ddkkddk which sounds nice and allows you to D the last of your initial stream. Also the k at 00:19:956 sounds odd for me, i'd rather have a break here or change to d (both are good but i prefer the break imo ). Did a very simple thing, I just ctrl+g'd 00:19:956 (118,119) - , and problem solved lol
00:24:134 : No quadruple? I'm sleeping, added.
00:26:384 & 00:26:813 : I really really dislike these k xD, i feels bettern without due to the lack of general sounds/music. But vocals
00:27:027 : Actually i should be ddddkdk right? The high pitchs are missplaced. New pattern is dddddkdkD
00:27:777 : Delete due to finisher. Noh
00:28:848 : The current stream contains triple d in the middle, it's technical to play imo. I would delete it. Ctrl+g'd 00:28:634 (179,180) -
00:30:456 : dkkd is more accurate tbh. Then I do the exact same as the previous quad.
00:31:206 : I would delete this one in order to make the next d more impact to hear and play. Done
00:37:420 : Same as a bit above, delete. Nah, but I changed the pattern around a bit!
00:38:384 : For now, the current stream is a bit hard, and inaccurate since it should start from 00:38:170 instead. And if you keep as a long pattern, prefer using ddkkddkkddkk?
00:40:741 : In order to follow the beats + vocal, how about using ddddk? The last vocal pitch is deeper than the one after it, that's why I'm doing d on the last note, and the vocals are more emphasized on the last note.
00:42:563 : Delete (same argues as above). Same change :^)
00:43:527 : Why a long stream here? You should split it imo, how about delete 00:43:848 and 00:44:277? Deleted some other notes instead :^)
00:51:134 : Blabla. Is fine here, is end of song
00:52:098 : Blablabla i'm lazy. same.

Hey you're close in terms of consistency at the begining, you got it. I didn't checked closely the kiai part but it seems quite good so far.

[_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni]

Dunno if this diff's name sounds ok but why not.

00:03:777 : Why different end when it is barely the same thing as before?
00:04:741 : Why reverse? (Less shocking but ok).
00:14:170++ : Really odd, its sounds the same as the begging but you mapped it way less, why?
00:24:456 : I don't know why you're using a spinner since it doesn't sounds for, plus a spinner is not finishable at the same time at each play so it's not that accurate.
00:26:920 : Change into d? Sounds weird and illogic to have k here since the vocals is next 1/4.
00:28:634 : Why k? The next k are logic since it follows the melody, this one doesn't.
00:31:206 & 00:32:063 : A bit the same.
00:38:170 : Same as Oni, a long stream is possible and starts here.
00:40:527 : Why double k here?
00:41:170 : Unrankable, finishers on 1/4 should be decent and on pattern like kkkkD, yours isn't that decent imo.
00:41:384 : The punctual speed-up could be ok, but it overlaps with the next elements so much that it's barely unrankable.
00:43:099+ : Not sure if it's legit, but i don't find any reason for 1/8 imo. Just because the vocals are a but screwed up?
00:48:670++ : It's still the kiai yet and you decide to reduce the note density, why? It's a bit odd.
00:54:456 : Better ddddkd imo.
00:55:313 : Well i'm ok for a larger speed-up, imo it's not enough for a finisher like that. 2.0 or higher is still good. (Even 3.0 but on HR it would be so meh xD).

Some questionable point imo, generally it's not that bad but you're using k where it doesn't need to, and the 1/8 sticked with 1/4 are so meh.

GL HF for rank! THANKS and thanks for the mod my man <3 I'll get to your map soon :3

1. 00:15:241 - try adding a d here because 2 and 4 patterns just play so much more naturally than timing all those blue ticks lol
2. 00:16:956 - ^
3. 00:18:670 - ^
4. 00:26:813 (7,8) - ctrl+g sounds better imo
5. 00:33:670 (62,63,64) - i think it would be nice if you started this stream with kdd also to be same as 00:33:241 (59,60,61) - since this part of the music is repeated. my suggestion http://puu.sh/pyYIq/3dd1f13061.jpg
6. 00:41:063 (122,123) - dat sv change reminds me of convers lol. probably unrankable to have it following right after a 1/4, so maybe you can try moving 00:41:063 (122) - to 00:40:420 - and make one long stream before a 1/2 for the sv change. also my suggestion to change up a few notes if you do that http://puu.sh/pyZ39/470e35a250.jpg . alternatively, you can just not SV this i guess
7. 00:43:170 (138) - change to d? i mean this is already overmapping, which is fine but lets not make it sound too weird xd
8. 00:48:456 - everything after here is just way too easy considering the music doesnt let up that much in this transition lol. we should at least have some triples or 5-plets.

1. 00:07:313 - i really recommend lowering the density of this part to make more of a contrast between here and the kiai time. no need for everything to be a 1/4 rite (not to mention thats actually less fun than having some more 1/2 for variety imo). so my suggestion aka the easy way out would be just deleting 00:08:063 (38) - and other similar parts so that each repeat looks like this http://puu.sh/pz05E/8fd91e14ed.jpg plays gud sounds fine yaaas
2. 00:11:491 - oh hey you already did my suggestion here lol (youre missing a note here if you dont wanna do that)
3. 00:14:920 (83) - same thing as 00:07:313 - just delete the note in the middle of the second triple every time lol
4. 00:19:527 (115,116,117,118) - try something other than ddk since obviously it sounds different than 00:17:598 (102,103,104,105,106) - and the other repeated stuff before. maybe kkd k
5. 00:21:027 - same thing as 00:07:313 -
6. 00:24:777 - same thing as 00:11:491 -
7. 00:27:455 (170,171,172,173,174) - strange uses of k's here, is it for the vocal or for the squeaky thingy or just for fun? vocal = change 00:27:241 (168) - to k as well and possibly 169 too if you want. squeaker = reverse the color of these last 5 notes. for fun well uh.. having 5 d's in a row is pretty awkward to play since 00:27:456 - the white tick is usually a better place to indicate change to the rhythm so k is ideal imo. like usually its ddddk... or dddddd... with six or more d's
8. 00:27:884 (174) - using a finish here is really meh, with just 1 k before it?
9. 00:29:277 (184,185,186,187) - this doesnt sound right imo, try using the same pattern as 00:30:991 (196,197,198) - instead or at least change it so that the quad ends with a k
10. 00:30:991 (196,197,198) - and now that i listen more carefully theres actually sounds on the tick being skipped here and there was nothing on the other ones lol, technically this one should be the quad and the others should be 2 and 1
11. 00:32:706 (207,208,209,210) - same as 00:29:277 -
12. 00:38:063 - try adding k here same reason as 00:30:991 -
13. 00:40:741 (263,264) - why though this music actually sounds different than the two doubles before it. for this 5-plet lets try something normal like kkkkd lol
14. 00:41:598 - same repeated stuffff as 00:29:277 - and 00:30:991 - in this section
15. 00:54:455 (359,360,361,362,363,364) - arkdafjasdn yo i talked about dddddk earlier please maybe you can try kkkkdk since there is a drum roll before the white tick anyway

1. 00:10:098 (25,26,31,32,33,34) - well if you are gonna do this you should do it here too 00:03:027 (8,9) - 00:04:741 (13,14,15,16) -
2. 00:18:456 (53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - delete some stuff yo doubles are already considered very hard for muzu and they should not be surrounded by so much dense patterns. maybe try deleting the two d's 00:19:527 (59,61) -
3. 00:26:170 (85,86,87,88,89,90) - wat to do aaa this just doesnt sound good d k d k spam and random empty space im sorry http://puu.sh/pz39E/7177a3b923.jpg
4. 00:27:670 (91,92,93) - i wanna say unrankable usage of finish
5. 00:37:098 (131,132,133,134,135,136) - this is pretty hard man. you can just not use a triple tbh
6. 00:43:956 (161,162,163,164,165,166) - ^
7. 00:54:670 (209,210,211,212,213) - rip im a broken record at this point but this is hard man 3/4 timing and really awkward quad in the first place

1. 00:14:170 (13,14,15,16,17) - why is it so empty here? i think we should aim for a similar density to 00:07:313 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - as you have in all the other diffs

eeezzzeee wrote:

M4M from your queueueueueue

[Inner]
i love complex streams man

1. 00:15:241 - try adding a d here because 2 and 4 patterns just play so much more naturally than timing all those blue ticks lol
2. 00:16:956 - ^
3. 00:18:670 - ^
4. 00:26:813 (7,8) - ctrl+g sounds better imo
5. 00:33:670 (62,63,64) - i think it would be nice if you started this stream with kdd also to be same as 00:33:241 (59,60,61) - since this part of the music is repeated. my suggestion http://puu.sh/pyYIq/3dd1f13061.jpg
6. 00:41:063 (122,123) - dat sv change reminds me of convers lol. probably unrankable to have it following right after a 1/4, so maybe you can try moving 00:41:063 (122) - to 00:40:420 - and make one long stream before a 1/2 for the sv change. also my suggestion to change up a few notes if you do that http://puu.sh/pyZ39/470e35a250.jpg . alternatively, you can just not SV this i guess
7. 00:43:170 (138) - change to d? i mean this is already overmapping, which is fine but lets not make it sound too weird xd
8. 00:48:456 - everything after here is just way too easy considering the music doesnt let up that much in this transition lol. we should at least have some triples or 5-plets.

[Oni]

1. 00:07:313 - i really recommend lowering the density of this part to make more of a contrast between here and the kiai time. no need for everything to be a 1/4 rite (not to mention thats actually less fun than having some more 1/2 for variety imo). so my suggestion aka the easy way out would be just deleting 00:08:063 (38) - and other similar parts so that each repeat looks like this http://puu.sh/pz05E/8fd91e14ed.jpg plays gud sounds fine yaaas Tried doing a rework to very similar triples/doubles, is fine nao yaaaas
2. 00:11:491 - oh hey you already did my suggestion here lol (youre missing a note here if you dont wanna do that) Well I removed them, so is all good homie :^)
3. 00:14:920 (83) - same thing as 00:07:313 - just delete the note in the middle of the second triple every time lol Yaaaaaaas
4. 00:19:527 (115,116,117,118) - try something other than ddk since obviously it sounds different than 00:17:598 (102,103,104,105,106) - and the other repeated stuff before. maybe kkd k I don't agree, I really like the off-beat drums that follow the k's :^)
5. 00:21:027 - same thing as 00:07:313 - Here I did something different for variety, and did a tiny pattern change.
6. 00:24:777 - same thing as 00:11:491 -
7. 00:27:455 (170,171,172,173,174) - strange uses of k's here, is it for the vocal or for the squeaky thingy or just for fun? vocal = change 00:27:241 (168) - to k as well and possibly 169 too if you want. squeaker = reverse the color of these last 5 notes. for fun well uh.. having 5 d's in a row is pretty awkward to play since 00:27:456 - the white tick is usually a better place to indicate change to the rhythm so k is ideal imo. like usually its ddddk... or dddddd... with six or more d's Yes, it's 100% for the vocals :^), but added a k so the drums are in on the fun too :^)
8. 00:27:884 (174) - using a finish here is really meh, with just 1 k before it? I hope you mean clap, and I changed it :3
9. 00:29:277 (184,185,186,187) - this doesnt sound right imo, try using the same pattern as 00:30:991 (196,197,198) - instead or at least change it so that the quad ends with a k Think of it as an extended double instead, 'cause that's the intension here. 'Cause basically, if you remove the second note of the quad, it would in theory make sense, but I want a bit more density, so I did it like this here :3
10. 00:30:991 (196,197,198) - and now that i listen more carefully theres actually sounds on the tick being skipped here and there was nothing on the other ones lol, technically this one should be the quad and the others should be 2 and 1 I don't agree here , that's not the way I'm following the music :^)
11. 00:32:706 (207,208,209,210) - same as 00:29:277 - I donno, I don't really see a problem here :3
12. 00:38:063 - try adding k here same reason as 00:30:991 - Sure :^)
13. 00:40:741 (263,264) - why though this music actually sounds different than the two doubles before it. for this 5-plet lets try something normal like kkkkd lol Naaah, I like it the way it is now :^)
14. 00:41:598 - same repeated stuffff as 00:29:277 - and 00:30:991 - in this section I generally wanted this to be more dense than the other part, 'cause there's more instruments in the song.
15. 00:54:455 (359,360,361,362,363,364) - arkdafjasdn yo i talked about dddddk earlier please maybe you can try kkkkdk since there is a drum roll before the white tick anyway

Nein, 100% vocals
a quote from OnosakiHito that i think applies to this diff. especially the emphasize certain patterns part xd I don't have much of a problem with the emphasis as such, but might change the first few notes around later, if I find something I like :^)


[Muzu]

1. 00:10:098 (25,26,31,32,33,34) - well if you are gonna do this you should do it here too 00:03:027 (8,9) - 00:04:741 (13,14,15,16) - I just realised that I did it for 47-53 lol, so I removed the doubles here, and added a triple in the last pattern instead.
2. 00:18:456 (53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - delete some stuff yo doubles are already considered very hard for muzu and they should not be surrounded by so much dense patterns. maybe try deleting the two d's 00:19:527 (59,61) -
3. 00:26:170 (85,86,87,88,89,90) - wat to do aaa this just doesnt sound good d k d k spam and random empty space im sorry Don't, worry I feel like I changed it with the removed triple before.http://puu.sh/pz39E/7177a3b923.jpg
4. 00:27:670 (91,92,93) - i wanna say unrankable usage of finish Removed triple lol
5. 00:37:098 (131,132,133,134,135,136) - this is pretty hard man. you can just not use a triple tbh Did the opposite, and removed the double lol
6. 00:43:956 (161,162,163,164,165,166) - ^
7. 00:54:670 (209,210,211,212,213) - rip im a broken record at this point but this is hard man 3/4 timing and really awkward quad in the first place

please ddd/kkk or dd/kk they are your friends for muzu xd Made the 3/4 pattern kkk, but didn't do anything else, the quad is there to stay x)

[Futsuu]
Nice diff! I already spent a long time talking about the other diffs so lets not nitpick this one which is basically fine imo That's really nice, thanks <3

[Kantan]
Its okay i guess but a bit too much dkdkdk spam though, especially the fact that sections that sound completely different got the exact same patterns like 00:21:027 (18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - vs 00:27:884 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32) - etc.

1. 00:14:170 (13,14,15,16,17) - why is it so empty here? i think we should aim for a similar density to 00:07:313 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - as you have in all the other diffs
   Did tiny reworks to a few of the sections you mentioned, and added a few notes/breaks to certain sections that were too dense.

that's all from me, good luck! c: Thaaaaanks, I'm gonna mod yours soon, was very helpful <3

Spork Lover wrote:

Aldwych wrote:

[_DUSK_'s Inner O-U-ni]

Dunno if this diff's name sounds ok but why not.

00:03:777 : Why different end when it is barely the same thing as before? Changed
00:04:741 : Why reverse? (Less shocking but ok). idk
00:14:170++ : Really odd, its sounds the same as the begging but you mapped it way less, why? I don't really see a reason for having the exact same stream that was at the beggining at this part
00:24:456 : I don't know why you're using a spinner since it doesn't sounds for, plus a spinner is not finishable at the same time at each play so it's not that accurate. Without a spinner, this part is just plain awkward. Also, it's only a short spinner, anyone can do it quickly.
00:26:920 : Change into d? Sounds weird and illogic to have k here since the vocals is next 1/4. Changed
00:28:634 : Why k? The next k are logic since it follows the melody, this one doesn't. Changed
00:31:206 & 00:32:063 : A bit the same.
00:38:170 : Same as Oni, a long stream is possible and starts here. Changed.
00:40:527 : Why double k here? Changed
00:41:170 : Unrankable, finishers on 1/4 should be decent and on pattern like kkkkD, yours isn't that decent imo. Changed
00:41:384 : The punctual speed-up could be ok, but it overlaps with the next elements so much that it's barely unrankable. SV changed since a lot of people have mentioned more or less the same thing
00:43:099+ : Not sure if it's legit, but i don't find any reason for 1/8 imo. Just because the vocals are a but screwed up? I guess it kind of fits in the song. Also more difficult.
00:48:670++ : It's still the kiai yet and you decide to reduce the note density, why? It's a bit odd. I think that because the song is coming to an end, less and less notes sound more fitting.
00:54:456 : Better ddddkd imo. Changed
00:55:313 : Well i'm ok for a larger speed-up, imo it's not enough for a finisher like that. 2.0 or higher is still good. (Even 3.0 but on HR it would be so meh xD). SV changed to 3.00

Some questionable point imo, generally it's not that bad but you're using k where it doesn't need to, and the 1/8 sticked with 1/4 are so meh.

GL HF for rank! THANKS and thanks for the mod my man <3 I'll get to your map soon :3

Spork Lover wrote:

eeezzzeee wrote:

[Inner]
i love complex streams man

1. 00:15:241 - try adding a d here because 2 and 4 patterns just play so much more naturally than timing all those blue ticks lol Changed
2. 00:16:956 - ^ [
3. 00:18:670 - ^
4. 00:26:813 (7,8) - ctrl+g sounds better imo
5. 00:33:670 (62,63,64) - i think it would be nice if you started this stream with kdd also to be same as 00:33:241 (59,60,61) - since this part of the music is repeated. my suggestion http://puu.sh/pyYIq/3dd1f13061.jpg [
6. 00:41:063 (122,123) - dat sv change reminds me of convers lol. probably unrankable to have it following right after a 1/4, so maybe you can try moving 00:41:063 (122) - to 00:40:420 - and make one long stream before a 1/2 for the sv change. also my suggestion to change up a few notes if you do that http://puu.sh/pyZ39/470e35a250.jpg . alternatively, you can just not SV this i guess
7. 00:43:170 (138) - change to d? i mean this is already overmapping, which is fine but lets not make it sound too weird xd
8. 00:48:456 - everything after here is just way too easy considering the music doesnt let up that much in this transition lol. we should at least have some triples or 5-plets.

Didn't write 'changed' on any of them because I changed every single thing. Thx for the mod


that's all from me, good luck! c: Thaaaaanks, I'm gonna mod yours soon, was very helpful <3