that's even a different case, acorrding to the img, it should be:[ A v a l o n ] wrote:
iTunes
and then published by composer (using words "feat." too )
Feat or feat. it doesn't really matter since we have 2 metadata source by the composer itself
or it should be asked to S3RL directly ?
hmm, correct me if i wrong then
Oke doneDellvangel wrote:
Just passing by, re-snap all your SB to 00:00:040 - , even if the current SB still rankable its better to re-snap it >w<b
ngpaen di cari lagi :v kan cmn unsnapped...so udah di re-snap ma arvie, so..its should be fineLina Sintyadewi wrote:
Cari modder SB gih~
Okok kkKuo Kyoka wrote:
Anyway, i want to ask if sber fill out the blank i mentioned you before, it would be good if you do
nvr kadasajeemaniz wrote:
kud me thx
IamKwaN wrote:
did you copy what I wrote in the metadata check...
i am really tired of people not paying much attention to my checks
Come here baim :v just reserved room for us :p[Baim] wrote:
Rape me please
Please be my Rave girl
Maho ihh x.xDraftnell wrote:
Come here baim :v just reserved room for us :p[Baim] wrote:
Rape me please
Please be my Rave girl
AHAHAHA
Elementaires wrote:
lol
anjir dat LN lolElementaires wrote:
lol
Hha nc elementaires xDElementaires wrote:
nice checks xddxdxd
To many, so what we should do ?peppy wrote:
If it's just one note, we can probably just fix it and pretend nothing happened.