1. Del's Easy (1.7 stars, 130 notes)
2. Euny's Normal (2.04 stars, 170 notes)
3. G.G's Light Insane (3.66 stars, 260 notes)
4. Hard (3.05 stars, 243 notes)
5. -Neipezi's Insane (4.56 stars, 311 notes)

Shmiklak wrote:

R. I. P. Sky Future :'(

_ Hatsune Miku wrote:

Shmiklak wrote:

R. I. P. Sky Future :'(

Sky Future ban Reason is multiple accounts

RVMathew wrote:

My part of the m4m with you.

Note that whatever I say is my own opinion so you do not have to follow everything I say.

General
1) Metadata:
- Artist: Rhodanthe* is the correct one. Currently you spelt the artist's name wrong.
- Title: Yumeiro Parade is correct, but in the ranked version by Crystal, he/she uses 夢色パレード as the title and puts 'Yumeiro Parade' in the Romanized title. I don't know if makes any difference or not but I think you can add that as well.
- Tags: Add season 2 as this song is used as the opening for season 2 of the show.^all fixed

2) Combo Colours: Right now only Euny has custom combo colours. One suggestion I have is that you could use a golden yellow colour as one of the combo colours.Add it soon



Hard
1) 00:30:083 (5,1) - There is nothing to me that suggests that these notes should be stacked, unless you were doing them for looks.
Applies to:
- 00:32:750 (5,1) - stack error? fixed

I also notice you tend to have some sliders that start on the red tick. I assume at times you use it to follow the vocals.

2) 00:38:250 I like the idea of the slow down section, but when I was playing it, the slowdown from 1.0x to 0.8x was not really noticeable. I would try 0.7x because I think the results are more visible. 0.7 in hard can be difficult. 0.8 is good for me

3) 01:26:833 (1) - Pretty short spinner but I think you should be fine.I want now spinner XD

Really smooth difficulty.

Euny's Normal
1) 00:58:083 (1) - The slider fits in terms of the music, but it does not feel right. Try shortening the slider by 1/2 so it ends at 00:58:417 and then add a note at 00:58:583 (2). I think this will play a lot better.

2) 00:30:249 (1,2) - Symmetry would be nice, but the current one looks good as well.

Everything else checks out.

Final thoughts
Right now the beatmap looks nice, but fix the metadata as soon as possible.

Good luck,

RVMathew

Enon wrote:

IRC

2016-05-26 20:48 Enon: 00:19:417 - 00:22:083 - 00:24:750 - 00:27:083 - 00:32:750 - 00:35:417 - 00:40:750 - 00:46:083 - 여기처럼 박자를 비우신 곳도 있는데 00:29:917 (4) - 처럼 박자를 채우신 곳도 있네요. 리딩 하기에 좀 까다로웠던 것 같고, 이 어려움의 원인에는 박자 뿐만이 아니라 배치에서도 있었던 것 같은데, 우선 00:19:083 (5,1) - 00:21:750 (5,1) - 여기서는 안티점프 배치를 하신 반면에, 00:24:417 (4,1) - 여기선 완전히 띄워 놓으셨어요. 00:26:917 (4,5) - 여기선 또 갑자기 안티점프가 나오구요. 이런 일관성이 안 맞는 패턴이 리딩을 힘들게 했던 것 같습니다.
2016-05-26 20:48 Neoskylove: 오매
2016-05-26 20:48 Enon: 00:40:583 (6,1) - 여기서도 갑자기 띄워 놓으셨고
2016-05-26 20:49 Enon: 00:45:917 (7,1) - 다시 안티점프
2016-05-26 20:49 Enon: 00:52:250 (3,4,5) - 이건 저만 이상한 건지는 모르겠는데 1/4 박자로 되어 있네요
2016-05-26 20:49 Neoskylove: 거기 일부러 1/4 넣었어요
2016-05-26 20:50 Neoskylove: 저 근데 안티점프는 없을건데...
2016-05-26 20:50 Neoskylove: 그냥 스택 에러 아니에여?
2016-05-26 20:50 Neoskylove: 잠만 그나저나 저 irc인데ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2016-05-26 20:52 Enon: 제가 안티 점프의 뜻을 잘못 이해하고 있는건지는 모르겠지만 예를 들면 00:19:083 (5,1) - 이 둘 사이에 1/1 만큼이나 빈박자가 있었는데, 1/1 전에 배치한 00:19:083 (5) - 에서 디스턴스가 변하지 않은 걸 말하고 싶었던거에요.
2016-05-26 20:52 Neoskylove: 그거 꼬리에 스택한거 말이죠...?
2016-05-26 20:52 Enon: 안티 점프를 지적하고 싶은게 아니라, 어디에는 안티 점프가 쓰이고 어디에는 안 쓰이고 일관성 안 맞는 패턴이 리딩하는데에 있어서 어려움을 주니까 일관성을 맞춰주시면 좋을 것 같다는 것을 말씀드리고 싶었어요.
2016-05-26 20:52 Enon: 네
2016-05-26 20:53 Enon: IRC라 체크하기 힘드시면 스레드에 적어드릴게요.
2016-05-26 20:53 Enon: 나중에 인게임에서 체크 함 해보시면 될 듯
2016-05-26 20:53 Neoskylove: 26.917초 부분에 있는 패턴을 그냥
2016-05-26 20:53 Neoskylove: 붙이는게 좋으려나요
2016-05-26 20:54 Enon: 00:26:917 (4,5) - 이거 두 개는 이미 안티 점프 상태인데요?
2016-05-26 20:55 Neoskylove: 그냥 스택이요ㅋㅋ
2016-05-26 20:55 Enon: 네 그럼 스택이라고 정정할게요
2016-05-26 20:56 Enon: 혹시 이해하기 힘드신 거 있으시면 말씀해주시면 최대한 설명해보겠습니다만
2016-05-26 20:57 Neoskylove: 이해하기 어려운 글은 없네여ㅋ
2016-05-26 20:57 Enon: 다행이네요
2016-05-26 20:58 Enon: 도움이 되었길 바라는.. ㅋㅋ
2016-05-26 20:58 Neoskylove: 다른 부분에서 어려운건 없었나여?
2016-05-26 20:58 Enon: 네
2016-05-26 20:59 Neoskylove: 휴 다행이네요
2016-05-26 20:59 Enon: 굿럭
2016-05-26 20:59 Neoskylove: 아 에논님 이거 올려주실수 있나여
2016-05-26 20:59 Neoskylove: 나중에 고치게
2016-05-26 21:00 Enon: 알겠습니다
2016-05-26 21:00 Neoskylove: 감사합니다~

irc앱 이상;;;;;

Left wrote:

[Euny]
00:01:583 (2) - 여기도 일관성있게 보컬을 살려주는게 어떨까요..
00:08:750 (1,2) - 블랭킷
00:44:417 (2,1) - 디스턴스 조정이 필요!
00:46:917 (3,4) - 스택되면서 DS깨진듯!
01:24:251 (2,3,1) - ^
01:06:083 (1,2) - DS
01:26:250 (1,2) - DS

[Hard]
00:13:250 (2,3,4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5254222 처럼 하는게 어떨까요? 뒤에 00:13:583 (3) - 얘 꼬리서 나오는 트럼펫 소리? 에 클릭커블 노트가 있었으면 좋겠고, 00:13:250 (2,3) - 여기 3슬라머리에 큰 소리도 없는데 디스턴스 벌린것도 좀 그렇고..
00:23:417 (1,2) - 블랭킷이미 되어있습니다

아 까먹고 컴껏다

1. silent slidder?

1. 00:01:583 (2) - replace it with a reverse like 00:04:250 (2) - ?
2. 00:05:917 add a circle ?
3. 00:23:917 ^
4. 00:38:250 (1,2) - What about this:
   
   00:43:583 (1,2) - ^
5. 00:41:917 add a note?
6. 00:56:917 (1) - replace it with a slidder ?
7. 00:58:750 (2) - replace it like this?
   
8. 01:05:250 (2) - replace it with a circle?
9. 01:06:084 (1) - replace it with a slidder and a circle like this ?
   

1. 00:00:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - remove "clap" of this part ? bgm is soft and add clap in this part sounds a little strange.
2. 00:15:250 (4,1,2) - what about this rhythm ?
   
3. 00:40:750 add a note ?
4. 01:24:584 (4,1) - replace it like this ?
   
5. 01:26:250 (1,2) - replace it with a slidder or make 01:26:250 (1,2,3,4) - a good shape? Quadrilateral dose not looking good.

1. 00:00:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - remove "clap"?
2. 00:02:917 (3,4,5,6) - 2 slidders is better than 4 circles, in my opinion.
3. 00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6) - I may make them a pentagram
4. 00:19:417 add a note to make flow ?
5. 00:27:083 add a note ?
6. 00:38:917 (3,4,1,2) - I may use this rhythm:
   
   00:41:583 (3,4) - ^
7. 00:40:750 add a note ?
8. 00:49:750 (4,5) - I may make (4) stack with end of (2) and stack (5) with (3)
9. 01:01:750 (4,5) - Ctrl + G to change position ?
10. 01:21:583 (4,5) - Ctrl + G to change rhythm ?

1. 00:02:917 (1,3) - Ctrl + G?
2. 00:14:750 add a note ?
3. 00:22:583 (1,2,3,4,5) - feel confused when test play, try another shape may be better.
4. 00:38:250 (1,2) - rhythm here may not fit the song, what about this:
   
5. 00:47:750 (1,2,3,4) - you can use larger DS (better larger than 00:46:250 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - )
6. 00:48:583 (1) - extend to 00:48:833
7. 00:51:083 (2,3) - Ctrl + G ?
8. 00:52:583 (5) - move to X:114 Y:227 ?
9. 00:56:583 (4) - replace it with a slidder ?
10. 00:56:917 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - use larger DS for jump.
11. 00:59:917 (1) - no NC
12. 01:09:750 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - do not put them in the same position, stack will look bad when playing, you can put stream in a straight line like this: (or something others)
    

-Neipezi wrote:

Left

Left wrote:

[-Neipezi]
00:04:333 (1) - 여기있는 보컬, 피아노음 등을 스피너로 굳이 죽일 필요가 있나 싶네요.
00:13:417 (4) - 바로 앞저럼 3/4 써보는것도 나쁘지 않을 거같아요.
00:33:417 (2,3,4) - 오버매핑인거같아요. 제가 잘 못듣는 거일수도 있겠는데, 명백한 음이 없으니!
00:48:583 (1) - 피아노음에 대한 묘사인거 같은데, 피아노음은 계속 이어져서 00:48:750 - 여기까진 끌어줘야 할 거같아요. Done
01:07:916 (3,4) - 보컬음과 안맞게 디스턴스가 너무 좁아요. 이부분은 보컬음 고려하면 그냥 디스턴스 비슷비슷하게 맞춰주는게 맞는 거같아요.
01:14:583 (3) - 슬라가 너무 직선이라 모양이 안나는거 같지만 이건 본인 스타일이면 상관없겠네요.
01:26:750 (1,2,3) - 끝쪽에 강한 드럼사운드가 3개있는데 제일 앞 하나만 슬라꼬리로 처리하니 타이밍잡기도 힘들고, 느낌도 안좋은 거같아요. 그것도 클리커블 노트로 바꿔주면 좋겠네요. 1/3박자 슬라이드로 바꿨습니다.

굳럭!

Vanillas

Vanillas wrote:

Hi~ M4M here
[-Neipezi's Insane]

1. 00:02:917 (1,3) - Ctrl + G?
2. 00:14:750 add a note ?
3. 00:22:583 (1,2,3,4,5) - feel confused when test play, try another shape may be better.
4. 00:38:250 (1,2) - rhythm here may not fit the song, what about this:
   
5. 00:47:750 (1,2,3,4) - you can use larger DS (better larger than 00:46:250 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - )
6. 00:48:583 (1) - extend to 00:48:833
   It has the same information about modding.
7. 00:51:083 (2,3) - Ctrl + G ? Done
8. 00:52:583 (5) - move to X:114 Y:227 ?
9. 00:56:583 (4) - replace it with a slidder ?
10. 00:56:917 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - use larger DS for jump.
11. 00:59:917 (1) - no NC Done
12. 01:09:750 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - do not put them in the same position, stack will look bad when playing, you can put stream in a straight line like this: (or something others)
    

Good luck for rank~

No command = No change
thank you for modding

Vanillas wrote:

Hi~ M4M here

[General]

1. silent slidder?

[Euny's Normal]

1. 00:01:583 (2) - replace it with a reverse like 00:04:250 (2) - ?
2. 00:05:917 add a circle ?
3. 00:23:917 ^
4. 00:38:250 (1,2) - What about this:
   
   00:43:583 (1,2) - ^
5. 00:41:917 add a note?
6. 00:56:917 (1) - replace it with a slidder ?
7. 00:58:750 (2) - replace it like this?
   
8. 01:05:250 (2) - replace it with a circle?
9. 01:06:084 (1) - replace it with a slidder and a circle like this ?
   

[Hard]

1. 00:00:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - remove "clap" of this part ? bgm is soft and add clap in this part sounds a little strange.Hitsound doesn't matter.
2. 00:15:250 (4,1,2) - what about this rhythm ?No. Now is better for me.
   
3. 00:40:750 add a note ?I couldn't hear rhythm.
4. 01:24:584 (4,1) - replace it like this ?No. Now is better for me.
   
5. 01:26:250 (1,2) - replace it with a slidder or make 01:26:250 (1,2,3,4) - a good shape? Quadrilateral dose not looking good.why? this is pretty enough.

[Insane]

1. 00:00:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - remove "clap"?^Hard
2. 00:02:917 (3,4,5,6) - 2 slidders is better than 4 circles, in my opinion.No. I wanted to express all vocal sound.
3. 00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6) - I may make them a pentagramIt's okay.
4. 00:19:417 add a note to make flow ?For consistency.
5. 00:27:083 add a note ?No. I can't hear strong sound.
6. 00:38:917 (3,4,1,2) - I may use this rhythm:I want to make 00:38:250 (1,2,3,4) - this pattern.
   
   00:41:583 (3,4) - ^^
7. 00:40:750 add a note ?^Hard
8. 00:49:750 (4,5) - I may make (4) stack with end of (2) and stack (5) with (3)00:49:583 (3,4,5) - I want to make triangle
9. 01:01:750 (4,5) - Ctrl + G to change position ?No. I think now is better.
10. 01:21:583 (4,5) - Ctrl + G to change rhythm ?No. It is same sound with00:11:917 (2,3,4,5) -

[-Neipezi's Insane]

1. 00:02:917 (1,3) - Ctrl + G?
2. 00:14:750 add a note ?
3. 00:22:583 (1,2,3,4,5) - feel confused when test play, try another shape may be better.
4. 00:38:250 (1,2) - rhythm here may not fit the song, what about this:
   
5. 00:47:750 (1,2,3,4) - you can use larger DS (better larger than 00:46:250 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - )
6. 00:48:583 (1) - extend to 00:48:833
7. 00:51:083 (2,3) - Ctrl + G ?
8. 00:52:583 (5) - move to X:114 Y:227 ?
9. 00:56:583 (4) - replace it with a slidder ?
10. 00:56:917 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - use larger DS for jump.
11. 00:59:917 (1) - no NC
12. 01:09:750 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - do not put them in the same position, stack will look bad when playing, you can put stream in a straight line like this: (or something others)
    

Good luck for rank~

-Neipezi wrote:

Janpai wrote:

-Neipezi's Insane

1. 00:04:333 (1) - I think it's better if you map this instead of spinner like the other diffs To remove slide, it increased the length of the spinner.
2. 00:22:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Jump is too compressed imo i wish you could use more space on this It expanded the distance a little snap.

Goodluck :3!

-Tochi wrote:

m4m!

• 
  

  General

1. Combo colors are not set in Hard, Insane 1st and Insane 2nd. Be sure to set some, maybe from the easier diff's.

• 
  

  -Neipezi's Insane

1. 00:07:417 (1) - Maybe rotate it like this: http://puu.sh/pgecR/cfedb30e54.png
2. 00:08:583 (4) - Moving it to X:448 y:236 will make the flow better imo.
3. 00:16:083 (5,1) - The spacing here for this 3/4 is too big considering the difficulty-consistency of the map, so making it touch each other, or less spaced will make it more consistent with the other objects.
4. 00:59:250 (4,5,6,1) - These are too close to each other i think, try moving the triplet 00:59:250 (4,5,6) - to x:312 y:180. It makes a nice flow on the jump
5. 01:25:417 (1,2) - Fix blanket.
6. Cool diff, seems fine overall.

• 
  

  Insane

1. 00:07:750 (2) - Try to delete the reverse and add a circle under the slider here 00:08:083 - This will emphasis the beat better because 00:08:083 - should be clickable.
2. 00:27:250 (5,6,1) - This flow could be improved if you moved this 00:27:417 (6) - to somewhere like x:192 y:256.
3. This diff looks fine overall too, i don't have much to say because it's clean.

• 
  

  Hard

1. 00:39:583 - Why did you skip this strong beat? I think it would be better to map it lol.Because I followed vocal
2. 00:42:250 - Same as above.^
3. 00:44:750 (1) - You didn't make a long slider here and mapped to the strong beat on the big white tick, so i think it would be best to do the same for the previous too xDI changed a little bit.
4. Nice diff, but i think the flow is too much anticlockwise.

• 
  

  Euny's Normal

1. 00:43:167 - Slider repeat is unsnapped.
2. Looks good overall.

• 
  

  Feedback

  
  Nice map, good luck!

Janpai wrote:

M4M!

General

1. Maybe you'll need to put an easy here due to too much 1/2 slider usage in normal
2. Disable widescreen support since no SB

Euny's Normal

1. Reduce HP to 4 and CS to 3.3
2. 00:07:917 - I think you should add a note here cuz I see on the following rhythms these drum where filled out
3. 00:24:083 (2,3) - Switching to vocals here is kinda out of place, saw on your rhythms that you follow the melody of piano or drums but not really the vocals
4. 01:16:250 (2) - Add clap?

Hard

1. 00:02:583 (2) - Ctrl+J? and put it below the tail of 00:02:083 (1) - like this http://puu.sh/pdpOq/94eba75213.jpgNo.
2. 00:07:417 (1) - Remove clap and put clap at 00:07:917 (2) -
3. 00:08:750 (1) - Remove clap and put clap at 00:09:250 (2) - and remove the clap at the tailIDK about the hitsound.
4. 00:13:750 (3) - I think this should be clickable because the trumpet is audible and also this is a clapumm..I'll think about that
5. 00:43:250 (5) - Ctrl+>? cuz overlap doesn't look goodIt's okay.
6. 01:14:917 (3) - Remove clap
7. Is it just me but the playfield of objects is really at the center most of the time ._.

-Neipezi's Insane

1. 00:04:333 (1) - I think it's better if you map this instead of spinner like the other diffs
2. 00:22:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Jump is too compressed imo i wish you could use more space on this

Goodluck :3!

Sotarks wrote:

-Neipezi's Insane

• 
  Why no combo colors, feels so empty aaaa I like the standard colors =3=

1. 00:03:583 (1) - increase spacing a bit for emphasis on the downbeat np..
2. 00:03:667 (1) - how 2 kill a downbeat? put a spinner and end it on a high section in an insane. Done. (pls this makes me so sad that you end your spinner on a downbeat, I wouldn't even put one tbh, and map that part. It does not seem a good idea.
3. 00:06:583 (2) - why is this a 3/4 slider even tho 00:09:250 (2) - this one is not ? 1/2 slider is better at this section tbh.
4. 00:09:750 (4,4) - why are you murdering your clap here by ending a slider on it, please make this a circle !
5. 00:16:083 (5,1) - holyshit the spacing dude, nerf this. change to 1/2 slide
6. 00:16:917 (1) - why such low spacing for this downbeat, space it more !!
7. 00:17:750 (4) - wtf is this slider that kills rythmn? this is a slider you will probably use in Easy/normal, not in insane !!
8. 00:29:917 (1) - Okay so first of all, wtf is this poor quality flow, and why this slider has a NC? Maybe do something like this so it makes a nice circle flow, and don't forget to remove that useless NC.
9. 00:32:417 (4) - yeyeye kill the clap again ... >< #
10. 00:34:583 (3,1) - why the spacing here is so low ?! those 2 notes are high voice section and 2 claps, and you reduce the spacing? Please change that for better emphasis.
11. 00:31:083 (3) - clap murder again #
12. 00:42:417 (3) - this overlap is bad, just remove it. It plays bad. I would highly suggest you to reconsider this patern.
13. 00:43:417 (9) - those 2 notes has no reasons to be stacked at all, emphasis this clap by putting it somewhere x99 y293, it could be nice with a cool flow.
14. 00:44:083 (2) - clap murder again, but even worse, you put it on a reverse aaaaaaaaaa
15. 00:46:583 (3,4) - Why those 2 notes has such low spacing, it's a highsection voice here please. Make a consistent jump, not a totally random one.
16. 00:48:583 (1) - this can have a longer duration until the other slider, it stops randomly
17. 00:53:750 (4) - rip clap #
18. 00:55:250 (5) - rip clap emphasis v2 (low spacing :CCC) #
19. 00:56:917 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - aaa i'm done with your random jumps xd please think about what note needs to be emphasized here, and reconsider.
20. 01:07:916 (3) - stoooop killing claps aaaaaaaa #
21. 01:07:916 (3,4) - nice overlap 11/10 :c
22. 01:26:750 (1) - stacking a downbeat for 0 emphasis that's a good idea sir xdd
    
    # - only rip clap clap has already been processed by standard hit sound. I'm not using a custom hit sound.
    
    
    Holyshit, I think you really need to think about 1 thing in priority while you are mapping, first of all, you need to tell to yourself before adding the actual note, "is this note needs emphasis?" , "is it a downbeat", "is it a high or a low section in the song?", so you can adjust your paterning with correct spacing, so it won't feel random as fck. This is a really good advice, because at this stage this whole diff, feels akward by this random jumps and spacing. And an other thing is, that you should know that a slider end has literraly 0 emphasis, so putting a clap here a 90% chance it's ridiculous tbh.
    I hope this was helpful, so you can learn more about how to really make correct paterns in your maps.

-Neipezi wrote:

-Tochi wrote:

m4m!

• 
  

  -Neipezi's Insane

1. 00:07:417 (1) - Maybe rotate it like this: http://puu.sh/pgecR/cfedb30e54.png no problem
2. 00:08:583 (4) - Moving it to X:448 y:236 will make the flow better imo. Done
3. 00:16:083 (5,1) - The spacing here for this 3/4 is too big considering the difficulty-consistency of the map, so making it touch each other, or less spaced will make it more consistent with the other objects. It has been changed.
4. 00:59:250 (4,5,6,1) - These are too close to each other i think, try moving the triplet 00:59:250 (4,5,6) - to x:312 y:180. It makes a nice flow on the jump Done
5. 01:25:417 (1,2) - Fix blanket. Done
6. Cool diff, seems fine overall.

[/list]

thank you for modding

1. 00:03:667 (1) - isn't this spinner a little forced? the whole previous was clearly following voice so would be better to focus on that imo, at least until 00:04:917 - where the vocal is continous so a spinner would fit nice starting from there
2. 00:11:917 (2,3,4) - stuff like this is kinda awkward to play, because of the spacing usage. i mean, you were previously using free spacing to place the patterns (00:10:750 (1,2) - this one, for example)... so, the transition here from high to super low spacing is pointless because the music hasn't really changed.
3. 00:20:083 (3) - well... pretty much the same as previous, i think there's a lot of possibilities available here, you could space stuff like 00:20:083 (3) - more in order to emphasize the voice... maybe stacking 00:20:083 (3) - with 00:19:417 (3) - might be a good option?
4. 00:26:083 (1,2,3,4,5) - the whole combo feels cramped compared with the previous patterns, you could use more spacing for this 00:26:750 (4) - for example, which is a really strong beat because of the voice and drums
5. 00:34:583 (3,1) - the spacing is super low considering the 2 claps here, maybe something like this might work?
   suggestion

   
6. 00:43:250 (8,9) - stacking here feels odd because these 2 are two completely different beats, i would recomment to move 00:43:417 (9) - somewhere to the left instead, it will also emphasize the voice change on 00:43:583 (1) -
   suggestion

   
7. 00:48:583 (1) - this should be 1/6 instead of 1/8, also, i would the repeat to 00:48:861 - because there's still a piano sound on there
8. 00:53:417 (3,4) - super low spacing considering the instruments on 00:53:750 (4) - :'(
9. 00:58:750 (3,1,2,3) - linear spacing increments doesn't play that good, i would prefer to have a sharp angle here instead, maybe moving the triplet 00:58:917 (1,2,3) - to the upside would be a nice idea
   suggestion

   

1. 00:27:250 (5,6,1) - i understand the spacing change here because of the claps, but shouldn't be 00:27:583 (1) - also emphasized because of the voice? maybe moving 00:27:417 (6) - a bit down, would fit nice. it also creates a smooth movement
   suggestion

   
2. 00:53:917 (4,5) - i don't understand the jump here :'( 00:54:083 (5) - isn't even a strong beat so the jump feels out of place
3. 01:04:750 (5) - kinda weird that you decided to map this beat as clickable, it kinda rest importance on 01:04:917 (1) - so i would recomment to delete 01:04:750 (5) - .... convert 01:04:583 (4,5) - into a slider might work too xd

Kagetsu wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:27:250 (5,6,1) - i understand the spacing change here because of the claps, but shouldn't be 00:27:583 (1) - also emphasized because of the voice? maybe moving 00:27:417 (6) - a bit down, would fit nice. it also creates a smooth movement
   suggestion

   
2. 00:53:917 (4,5) - i don't understand the jump here :'( 00:54:083 (5) - isn't even a strong beat so the jump feels out of placeI Think this is okay now. It is insane.//
3. 01:04:750 (5) - kinda weird that you decided to map this beat as clickable, it kinda rest importance on 01:04:917 (1) - so i would recomment to delete 01:04:750 (5) - .... convert 01:04:583 (4,5) - into a slider might work too xd^

good luck xd

SinJiRu wrote:

[Hard]

전체적인 사운드를 다시 한번 확인하셔야 될 것 같은데, 너무 볼륨들이 낮아요. 20~30%인것들이 좀 있는데 곡분위기에 맞추는것은 좋지만 사운드가 거의 들리지 않을 정도로 내리는것은 오히려 타격감이나 노트를 치는 느낌도 없고 플레이 쪽에서 굉장히 좋지 않을 것 같아요. 그리고 키아이 부분에 슬라이더 속도 올리시는건 별로 추천드리지 않아요. 지금 하드 노트 분포를 보면 AR만 살짝올리면 라이트 인세인인데. 이것도 븡이나 QAT에게 여쭤보시고 난이도 분포 확인을 제대로 받으시는게 좋을 것 같아요.

■ 00:16:917 (1) - 슬라이더 머리에 피니시 빠져있어요
■ 00:27:583 (1) - ^
■ 00:37:917 (3,4,5,1) - 패턴 스페이싱을 잘못잡으신 것 같아요, (4,5,1) 거리가 너무 가깝고 살짝 오버랩 된 느낌이있어서 패턴이 엉성하게 된 것 같은데, 1번 슬라이더를 조금 띄워주시는게 좋을 것 같아요.00:38:583 (2) - 여기 스택에 원래 부분에서 컨트롤 지로 점프 잡은 거라 괜찮다고 봅니당
■ 00:38:083 (5) - 여기 노트 굳이 필요한가 싶기도 하네요, 볼륨 5%로 해서 들어보면 소리나 보컬쪽에서 아무것도 없는데 괜히 억지로 끼워넣은듯한 느낌이 들어요.저는 들려서 넣었는뎀....일단 생각해볼게요
■ 00:58:667 (1,4) - 언랭커블이네요, 1번 슬라이더 끝쪽 잔상이 아예 사라지지도 않고 눈에띄게 남아있는데 4번 슬라이더 리핏이 아예 보이질 않고 잘못하면 플레이어가 리핏이 없는 1/4 짧은슬라로 인식해서 리딩을 못할 가능성이 굉장히 크네요.
■ 01:14:917 (3) - 피니쉬 넣어주세요.
■ 01:19:417 (1) - 슬라이더 머리에 피니쉬 넣어주세요
■ 01:20:750 (1) - ^
■ 01:22:583 (2) - 슬라이더 머리에 클랩 빠져있으니 넣어주세요
■ 01:23:250 (4) - 노트에 클랩 넣어주세요
■ 01:23:417 (1) - 슬라이더 머리에 피니쉬 넣어주세요
■ 01:25:250 (1,2,3,4) - 이렇게 노트만 넣기엔 소리와 리듬의 느낌으로 봐선 1/2슬라이더 한개와 노트 두개로 바꾸시는게 타격감이 더 좋을 것 같아요.

SPOILER

no comment=fix.
Thanks


[Insane]

■ 00:18:583 (3,4) - 의미없는 스페이싱 붕괴와 점프는 넣지 말아주세요. 플레이어가 인식할 때 정말로 까다롭고 헷갈립니다.강조를 위해 일부러 스페이싱 붕괴를 넣었습니다./ 글고 인세인이라서 어느정도의 점프는 필요할 것 같아서요
■ 00:20:583 (3) - ^
■ 00:50:083 (1) - 슬라이더 방향을 반대로 하시는게 더 동선쪽에서 좋아보여요. 이후에 오는 00:50:583 (2) 슬라이더 동선이랑 자연스럽게 이어지는 것 같구요.일부러 꼬리스택 시킨겁니당,
■ 00:54:250 (1) - 슬라이더 머리에 피니쉬 넣어주세요
■ 00:56:917 (1) - ^
■ 01:03:417 (1) - ^
■ 01:04:917 (1) - 노트에 피니쉬 넣어주세요.
■ 01:17:917 (5) - 스페이싱을 맞춰주시는게 베스트 일 것 같습니다.
■ 01:18:917 (2,3,4,5) - 히트사운드 빼먹으신게 있나없나 확인해주세요.

-Neipezi wrote:

Dailycare wrote:

m4m
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/910913 는 븡 모딩을 받으셔서 이거 해드릴게요

[-Neipezi's Insane]
*00:03:667 (1) - 스피너가 굉장히 작위적으로 배치된 느낌을 받았는데, 노래 해석의 차이일진 몰라도 노트 놓는게 더 나아보여요 수정안합니다.
*00:10:750 (1) - 여기선 뉴콤을 쓰셨고 01:20:083 (4) - 에선 안쓰셨는데, 쓰거나 안 쓰거나 하나로 통일시키는게 좋아보여요 수정완료
*00:16:417 (1) - 약간 과하다고 생각합니다 전에 모딩 내용에 있던거라 수정했습니다.
*01:19:417 (1) - 꼬리에 휘슬 없어도 될 것 같은데.. 앞에서 1/1로 놓기도 하셨구 수정완료
*01:20:083 (4) - 몸통에 휘슬 없어도 될듯? 반면 00:11:083 (2) - 여기 몸통엔 추가하셔도 좋을 것 같아요. 그리고 01:20:083 (4,5) - 머리에 드럼샘플셋 수정완료
*01:20:417 (5,1) - 너무 00:11:083 (2,1) - 에 비해 짧은 느낌이네요 간격 넓혔습니다.

Kagetsu wrote:

[-Neipezi's Insane]

1. 00:03:667 (1) - isn't this spinner a little forced? the whole previous was clearly following voice so would be better to focus on that imo, at least until 00:04:917 - where the vocal is continous so a spinner would fit nice starting from there done and 00:04:833 - to spinner add
2. 00:11:917 (2,3,4) - stuff like this is kinda awkward to play, because of the spacing usage. i mean, you were previously using free spacing to place the patterns (00:10:750 (1,2) - this one, for example)... so, the transition here from high to super low spacing is pointless because the music hasn't really changed. "00:10:750 (1,2) - from a completely different feeling, it does not change.
   
3. 00:20:083 (3) - well... pretty much the same as previous, i think there's a lot of possibilities available here, you could space stuff like 00:20:083 (3) - more in order to emphasize the voice... maybe stacking 00:20:083 (3) - with 00:19:417 (3) - might be a good option?
4. 00:26:083 (1,2,3,4,5) - the whole combo feels cramped compared with the previous patterns, you could use more spacing for this 00:26:750 (4) - for example, which is a really strong beat because of the voice and drums
5. 00:34:583 (3,1) - the spacing is super low considering the 2 claps here, maybe something like this might work? done
   suggestion

   
6. 00:43:250 (8,9) - stacking here feels odd because these 2 are two completely different beats, i would recomment to move 00:43:417 (9) - somewhere to the left instead, it will also emphasize the voice change on 00:43:583 (1) - It is a little strange.. no change
   suggestion

   
7. 00:48:583 (1) - this should be 1/6 instead of 1/8, also, i would the repeat to 00:48:861 - because there's still a piano sound on there okay, 1/6 slide change
8. 00:53:417 (3,4) - super low spacing considering the instruments on 00:53:750 (4) - :'( It has broadened the snap.
9. 00:58:750 (3,1,2,3) - linear spacing increments doesn't play that good, i would prefer to have a sharp angle here instead, maybe moving the triplet 00:58:917 (1,2,3) - to the upside would be a nice idea No, I think different.
   suggestion

   

[]

the diff itself looks really clean, even though i pointed a lot of stuff, it is mostly easily fixable. the patterns looks nice and flows good xd

sahuang wrote:

M4M
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/455069
To keep drain time the same u can choose 5 diffs to mod lol
Consider reducing gap between h and i. 2.98 is too low so you should make it harder imo

[Easy]

1. ar3
2. 00:04:250 (2) - use a circle. but i recommend 00:04:250 (2,3) - same as 00:01:583 (2) -
3. 00:24:583 (4) - dont put loud beat at slider end.. http://puu.sh/pzdna/64991cf687.jpg
4. make sure u delete some useless green lines lol

[Normal]

1. 00:21:250 (2,3) - stack well
2. 00:24:917 (1,2) - quite strange. u are following drum for (1) but vocal for (2)
   i suggest this http://puu.sh/pzdwX/e7675e839e.jpg
3. 00:47:417 (1,1) - not properly stacked?
   Nice diff

[Hard]

• 
  So many sliders in this diff lol
  There is not big issue but i think the sliders are definitely to boring and there is no variation. i think you should try more patterns.
  also should be some triplets here,and dont follow ds so often. it should be harder than this.Umm...I'll think about it.

[Insane]

1. 00:08:083 - much louder than 00:08:250 - so maybe dont make it slidertailI wanted to make triangle.
2. 00:20:750 (1,2,3,4) - bad flow. the angle and distance is hard to play
3. 00:31:917 (3,4) - imo the distance here should > 00:31:417 (1,2,3) - cuz loud vocalI used ctrlG in 00:32:083 (4) - here.
   u can ctrl+G 00:31:417 (1) - and 00:32:083 (4) - etc
4. 01:01:917 (5,6) - stack here is not good...try a jumpNo.
5. 01:07:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - u are using too many patterns like this...why cant u try some jumps? that will be funnier and better.
   random example
   http://puu.sh/pzdRU/635932d2ca.jpg
   http://puu.sh/pzdSD/ca1ac52845.jpg
   This also applies to your other parts lolI want now my pattern

[/notice]

The hardest diff has too many problems tbh so i think need more work

gl

Xinely wrote:

m4m

Easy :
- AR 3 HP2 for better balance spread ;_;
- banyak greenline yang ga kepake btw, di remove in aja biar ga ngespam
- 00:02:083 - volumenya 50% aja. ga kedengeran
- 00:04:750 (3) - missing whistle
- 00:14:083 (1) - tambah finish di kepala ada cymbal music nya
- 00:17:250 (2) - sampleset normal buat tail? drumnya sama kek yg di head
- 00:18:750 - ini coba di map? suara drumnya lebih important gitu daripada yang di 00:18:583 - , kalo setuju coba ganti 00:18:250 (3,4) - pake http://puu.sh/pBIFD/5b66bea51e.jpg
- 00:21:417 - 00:24:083 - ^
- 00:29:750 (4) - ekornya drum sampleset addition normal? kerasa keras banget aneh gitu normal-hitnormal nya
- 00:50:583 - 00:51:250 - hitsoundnya kok beda pdhl suara drum sama melodinya sama
- 00:56:917 (1) - middle curve nya 184,368 biar bentuk curve nya sama kek slider yang sebelumnya
- 01:03:916 (1) - remove nc
- 01:10:250 (1) - cocok kalo dikasih drum finish
- 01:23:417 (1) - consider bikin tailnya lebih keliatan jalur nya, itu keliatan agak bingungin

Normal :
- HP 4 pls ;_;
- 00:05:417 (3) - should be whistle on head for the piano?
- there are some unused greenlines too
- 00:22:583 (2) - moving the tail to 240,240 would give smoother transtition for the slider
- 00:27:583 (1) - need addition soft in head due cymbal music on background
- 00:54:250 (1) - same as above
- 00:59:583 - definitely feels empty w/o hitsound. try soft whistle?
- 01:03:417 - soft finish
- 01:10:250 (1) - finish for the music
- 01:11:250 (3) - nc for consistency as you nc every stanza

Hard :
- OD 6 HP 5
- 00:01:917 - until 00:05:917 - remove all claps, they dont hitsound any similar sound in music
- 00:02:917 (3) - 8,164 for symmetrical pattern with 00:02:583 (2,3,4) - I fixed some.
- 00:08:583 (4,1) - can be stacked perfectly
- 00:09:250 (2) - remove clap in tail, no music for it
- 00:11:417 (1) - finish due cymbal background music
- 00:14:083 (1) - ^
- 00:12:250 (3) - 268,64 for symmetrical with previous slider
- 00:21:750 (4) - rotate 30 degree for symmetrical with previous sliderI don't wany to use symmetry.
- 00:24:083 - clap due music
- 00:34:750 - ^
- 00:46:250 - finish
- pattern is fine, just hitsound really can improved
I fixed all hitsounds modding.

Insane :
- AR 8,5 i guess, your pattern doesnt include many jumpsar 9 is better for me. I don't want to use jumps.

good luck ~

-Chata- wrote:

한거 날아갔다..

Del05 wrote:

Hi
My update
Thanks

Nevo wrote:

Hard
01:26:833 (1) - Maybe I don't play enough hard's anymore but I feel this spinner is to fast for a 3* mapIt's okay.

Insane
00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6) - I say make the jumps bigger - http://puu.sh/pWkjB/83bd232119.jpg
00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I think bigger jumps, I like jumps Jumps are life
00:47:750 (3,4,5,6) - ^
00:50:917 (3,4,5,6) - ^
01:07:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^
01:23:916 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^I didin't fix all. I wanted to make this overlap patterns.

1. 00:32:083 (3) - I expected it to go up, it feels more logical due to the pattern you built before it, so reverse it (Ctrl-G)
2. 00:32:750 / 00:35:417 - I'd recommend to add notes here and there to avoid awkward pauses
3. 00:48:583 (1) - try normal clap instead and see if you like it

1. 00:16:583 (6,1) - would make a jump here
2. 01:04:583 (4) - missing hitnormal

1. 00:29:917 (7) - it's the only slider that ends on a blue tick before kiai, which may feel odd
2. 00:35:083 (7,1) - I recommend to unstack these two to make (1) more noticeable
3. 00:38:250 ~ 00:46:250 - please increase spacing for the whole slow part to get rid of tiny overlaps
4. 01:04:583 (7) - missing hitnormal
5. 01:23:083 (4,5,1) - isn't spacing here too large?

1. 00:09:917 - feels empty without a note
2. 00:22:583 (2) - if you make it twice as short and add a note at 00:23:250, it's more interesting and rhythmic: https://tc.s-ul.eu/OfaladyE.png
3. 00:35:583 (1) - again, there's too many things going in the music behind the slider. https://tc.s-ul.eu/aWEAaOkW.png or https://tc.s-ul.eu/FLXy68Kv.png is more fitting
4. 00:37:417 - it's a strong beat, which you buried under a slider's body. Better put a note or start a slider from it instead
5. 00:58:583 (2) - missing clap
6. 00:59:583 (1) - feels empty without a finish or something of that sort
7. 01:16:251 (2) - missing clap on the tail

1. 01:04:583 (5) - missing hitnormal

TicClick wrote:

[Del's Easy, Euny's Normal, Hard]
I recommend to end these difficulties at 01:27:750 with the last drum hit, because ending the last slider or spinner on the white tick gives a feeling of incompleteness.

[Hard, Insane, -Neipezi's Insane]
Combo colours are not set, are you sure it is intended? Pick these from Euny/Del's difficulties or create your own palette.

[Insane]

1. 00:16:583 (6,1) - would make a jump hereNo. I want to make just DS pattern and stack with 00:15:750 (2,3) -
2. 01:04:583 (4) - missing hitnormal I copied Neipezi's hitsound...

What saddens me is amount of back and forth jumps, such as 00:06:583 (2,3,4,5), that you used: you could make something more creative than that instead of putting the same pattern whenever there's a chance.

[Hard]

1. 00:29:917 (7) - it's the only slider that ends on a blue tick before kiai, which may feel oddI wanted express trunpet? sounds
2. 00:35:083 (7,1) - I recommend to unstack these two to make (1) more noticeableI tink It doesn't matter.
3. 00:38:250 ~ 00:46:250 - please increase spacing for the whole slow part to get rid of tiny overlaps
4. 01:04:583 (7) - missing hitnormalSame as Insane
5. 01:23:083 (4,5,1) - isn't spacing here too large?Just ctrl G jump, I think It doesn't matter.

Thanks For mod~
[Euny's Normal]

1. 00:09:917 - feels empty without a note
2. 00:22:583 (2) - if you make it twice as short and add a note at 00:23:250, it's more interesting and rhythmic: https://tc.s-ul.eu/OfaladyE.png
3. 00:35:583 (1) - again, there's too many things going in the music behind the slider. https://tc.s-ul.eu/aWEAaOkW.png or https://tc.s-ul.eu/FLXy68Kv.png is more fitting
4. 00:37:417 - it's a strong beat, which you buried under a slider's body. Better put a note or start a slider from it instead
5. 00:58:583 (2) - missing clap
6. 00:59:583 (1) - feels empty without a finish or something of that sort
7. 01:16:251 (2) - missing clap on the tail

[Del's Easy]

1. 01:04:583 (5) - missing hitnormal

1. 00:08:083 - Add whistle?
2. 00:14:917 (2,4) - Use the same shape for symmetry? Also stacking 00:14:917 (2,2) would be nice.

1. 00:20:750 (1,2) - 00:36:749 (1,2) - Inconsistent spacings due to stack.

1. 00:02:583 (4) - This is based on piano right? And you're following vocal with 00:02:917 (5,6) so I suggest changing 00:02:583 (4) to circles to distinguish the difference between piano and vocals, they are different elements so they should be mapped differently.
2. 00:27:417 (8) - Sounds weaker than 00:27:583 so it should have a smaller spacing.
3. 00:29:917 (7) - Shouldn't use a 3/4 slider when there's a sound on 00:30:083 . And to me the trumpet or whatever faded out on 00:30:083 .
4. 00:37:917 (7,8,1) - Should have the same/similar spacing to what you did on 00:27:250 (7,8,1) for consistency.
5. 00:40:917 (1,2,3) - Just my preference but the flow can be better, 00:41:250 (2) can be placed a bit more to the left for a better cursor movement from 00:40:917 (1) . Same goes for 00:41:583 (3) .
6. 01:11:250 (3,4) - Imo this beat 01:11:417 is kinda weak and it's not that necessary to be mapped, try this rhythm instead? This will make 01:11:750 clickable so it'll become more stand out.
7. 01:13:917 (3) - A circle on 01:14:083 instead if you applied the suggestion above, I think a 1/1 pause fits nicely here.
8. 01:23:083 (4,5) - Swap these? Imo it flows nicer and you got a bigger will have a bigger spacing to emphasize 01:23:417 (1) that way.

1. In my opinion the whole diff plays a lot better with AR8.5
2. 00:05:417 (1) - Just my personal preference but the SV change should be on 00:06:083 (1) instead since the rhythm is changing, at least I don't think 00:05:417 (1) deserves 1.00 SV because it's not prominent as 00:06:083 (1), maybe use either use 0.75 or something between 0.75-1.00?
3. 00:07:750 (2) - The repeat slider doesn't flow well because you have to hold for it in actual gameplay. This rhythm can follow the trumpet or whatever sound nicely, you can also change (1) and (2) to back and forth circles this way too.
4. 00:26:917 (4) - Move this to 00:27:083 ? I think that beat is kinda stronger.
5. 00:27:250 (5,6) - Nerf the spacing a bit pls for a better emphasis on 00:27:583 (1) .
6. 00:32:417 (5) - Ctrl+G and restack 00:32:917 (1) ? Flows better and if you're worrying about making a big spacing, you already did a similar scale on 00:21:417 (4,5) .
7. 00:45:250 (2,5,6,7) - Can you avoid the overlap? It's really hard to read atm.
8. 00:46:583 (1) - 00:46:917 (1) - Just curious, is there any reason for NC'ing on these places? Cuz you didn't did the same thing on 00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6) earlier, and NC on 00:47:250 (1,2) can be swapped here with the downbeat reasoning.
9. 01:01:917 (5,6) - This stack plays alright but it can be better if there's movement involved, how about swapping 01:01:750 (4,5) ?

1. 00:02:083 (1) - did u set a drum hitsound intentional here? it doesn't seem suitable for the calm intro part
2. 00:37:750 (1,2,3,1) - i'd just do this instead cuz of the downbeat http://puu.sh/pYQ56/ada490fe7e.jpg
3. 01:26:750 (1) - add finish here

1. 00:02:083 (1) - same reason from -neipezi's
2. 01:26:833 (1) - finish

1. 00:02:083 (3) - again, same reason
2. 00:17:917 (3) - missing normal sampleset
3. 01:04:583 (7) - missing normal sampleset
4. 01:26:750 (3) - finish

Lami wrote:

H

01:23:083 (4,5,1) - 전체적 난이도에 비해서, 점프가 좀 과한거같습니다확실히 강조하고 싶었습니다. 2.1이 조금 크다고 느껴지긴 하지만 일단은 좀 더 지켜보겠습니다.

I

00:16:583 (6) - 노트 2개? 하드의 리듬은 2개네요
00:23:417 (1,2,3,4) - 다른파트에 비해 유독 여기만 점프가 커보이네요
(여기와 00:34:083 (1,2,3,4) - 비교했을때..)
00:34:083 (1) - NC넣는게 좋지않을까요. 앞의 알록달록한 00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - 를
고려했을때 말이죠..????뉴콤 있는데요
00:56:583 (4,5,1) - 점프크기에 비해 음의 크기가 반대로 느껴지는데,
점프가 뒤바뀐거같아서 어색했어요.

[@lit120's mod]
I'll copy Neipezi's.

Electoz wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:02:583 (4) - This is based on piano right? And you're following vocal with 00:02:917 (5,6) so I suggest changing 00:02:583 (4) to circles to distinguish the difference between piano and vocals, they are different elements so they should be mapped differently.But I wanted to make00:02:583 (4,5,6) - pattern.
2. 00:27:417 (8) - Sounds weaker than 00:27:583 so it should have a smaller spacing.Changed to triangle pattern.
3. 00:29:917 (7) - Shouldn't use a 3/4 slider when there's a sound on 00:30:083 . And to me the trumpet or whatever faded out on 00:30:083 .
4. 00:37:917 (7,8,1) - Should have the same/similar spacing to what you did on 00:27:250 (7,8,1) for consistency.You say 1.20x? but it has changed SV. I want to make same distance with 00:37:917 (7,8) -
5. 00:40:917 (1,2,3) - Just my preference but the flow can be better, 00:41:250 (2) can be placed a bit more to the left for a better cursor movement from 00:40:917 (1) . Same goes for 00:41:583 (3) .But I love this flobreak moving lol
6. 01:11:250 (3,4) - Imo this beat 01:11:417 is kinda weak and it's not that necessary to be mapped, try this rhythm instead? This will make 01:11:750 clickable so it'll become more stand out.
7. 01:13:917 (3) - A circle on 01:14:083 instead if you applied the suggestion above, I think a 1/1 pause fits nicely here.
8. 01:23:083 (4,5) - Swap these? Imo it flows nicer and you got a bigger will have a bigger spacing to emphasize 01:23:417 (1) that way.Flow could be better, But I wanted to express 01:23:083 (4) - this is high sound.

[Insane]

1. In my opinion the whole diff plays a lot better with AR8.5
2. 00:05:417 (1) - Just my personal preference but the SV change should be on 00:06:083 (1) instead since the rhythm is changing, at least I don't think 00:05:417 (1) deserves 1.00 SV because it's not prominent as 00:06:083 (1), maybe use either use 0.75 or something between 0.75-1.00?I can't understand what you saying sorry.
3. 00:07:750 (2) - The repeat slider doesn't flow well because you have to hold for it in actual gameplay.This rhythm can follow the trumpet or whatever sound nicely, you can also change (1) and (2) to back and forth circles this way too.Umm...I want to make 00:08:083 - was clickable, But i don't know how can I fix it, If other modders give me good idea, I'll fix it
4. 00:26:917 (4) - Move this to 00:27:083 ? I think that beat is kinda stronger.No. I think 00:26:917 - is stronger.
5. 00:27:250 (5,6) - Nerf the spacing a bit pls for a better emphasis on 00:27:583 (1) .00:27:417 (6) - is for stack with 00:28:750 (1) -
6. 00:32:417 (5) - Ctrl+G and restack 00:32:917 (1) ? Flows better and if you're worrying about making a big spacing, you already did a similar scale on 00:21:417 (4,5) .I'll think about it How can I fix..//
7. 00:45:250 (2,5,6,7) - Can you avoid the overlap? It's really hard to read atm.It is not overlap, anyway fixed
8. 00:46:583 (1) - 00:46:917 (1) - Just curious, is there any reason for NC'ing on these places? Cuz you didn't did the same thing on 00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6) earlier, and NC on 00:47:250 (1,2) can be swapped here with the downbeat reasoning.Because of DS changing.
9. 01:01:917 (5,6) - This stack plays alright but it can be better if there's movement involved, how about swapping 01:01:750 (4,5) ?

Good luck!

Neoskylove wrote:

Lami wrote:

00:34:083 (1) - NC넣는게 좋지않을까요. 앞의 알록달록한 00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - 를
고려했을때 말이죠..????뉴콤 있는데요

-Neipezi wrote:

TicClick wrote:

[-Neipezi's Insane]

1. 00:32:083 (3) - I expected it to go up, it feels more logical due to the pattern you built before it, so reverse it (Ctrl-G)
2. 00:32:750 / 00:35:417 - I'd recommend to add notes here and there to avoid awkward pauses
3. 00:48:583 (1) - try normal clap instead and see if you like it

lit120 wrote:

[-neipezi]

1. 00:02:083 (1) - did u set a drum hitsound intentional here? it doesn't seem suitable for the calm intro part
2. 00:37:750 (1,2,3,1) - i'd just do this instead cuz of the downbeat http://puu.sh/pYQ56/ada490fe7e.jpg
3. 01:26:750 (1) - add finish here

all done

Lami wrote:

00:47:750 (3) - 저기가 아니라 요기에요

• 00:38:083 (8) - 완전 스텍 시키시면 조금 읽기 힘들 것 같은데, 살짝 비껴 놓는게 어떨가요
  
  00:48:917 (1,2) - 00:51:917 (2) - 스텍 된 듯 안 된 듯한 모양이 어색해요 > <; (여기는 스텍 해 놓으셨네요 ㅇㅅㅇ)
  
  01:04:083 (6,1,2) - 스텍?

• 00:08:583 (6,1) - 여기 DS 를 00:05:917 (2,1) - DS 와 비슷하게 늘려서 강조 하는게 좋지 않을까요? 뒤 두 부분 00:09:750 (5,1) - 00:11:083 (4,1) - 보다 더 강조되야할 소리 같아요 (00:09:250 (2,3) - 여기두요)
  
  00:06:583 (2,3) - 3번은 거의 소리가 없는데 DS 가 2번보다 크네요.
  
  00:12:417 (5,1) - 여기 다운비트 flow break은 좋은데, DS 도 좀 늘려 주시면 좋을듯
  
  00:27:083 - 여기 비워두신게 조금 아쉽네요
  
  00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 비슷한 플로우가 있는 다른 부분은 그렇지 않은데(e.g. 00:57:250 (2,3,4,5,6) - 01:07:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ), 여기만 NC 되 있는 의도를 잘 모르겠어요 ㅇㅅㅇ
  
  01:14:917 (4) - 스텍에대가 거리도 같아서 1/2 비트랑 햇갈릴수도 있을것 같아요. DS 를 늘려 주시거나, 이곳 01:14:583 (3) - 에 스텍 하시거나, NC 해주는게어떨까요?
  
  01:15:917 (2,3) - 위 00:06:583 (2,3) - 와 비슷한데, 여기 DS 큰 의도를 모르겠어요. 01:15:917 (2) - 가 오히려 더 강조되어야 하지 않나요?

• 00:03:667 (1,1) - I dislike this decision to cover all vocal and piano with spinners. Especially the spinner end at 00:06:083 -
  스피너가 보컬 피아노 다 커버하고 있는게 좋아보이지 않습니다
  
  00:07:917 - 00:11:250 - 00:12:583 - I think these drum beats should be clickable since the notes are following other strong drum beats faithfully around this part
  강한 드럼인데, 슬라이더 테일에 가려진게 아쉽습니다
  
  00:24:417 (2,2) - Perhaps this overlap can be avoided by making 00:24:917 (1,2) - blanket 00:24:417 (2) -
  오버렙이 좋아 보이지 않습니다. 00:24:917 (1,2) - 를 담요로 해서 00:24:417 (2) - 를 감싸주면 좀 더 깔끔할수도 있을것 같아요
  
  00:29:750 (4,5) - This flow seems bit awkward to me.
  플로우가 좋아 보이지 않네요
  
  00:37:750 (1,1) - Maybe a blanket here?
  여기 담요 어떨가요
  
  00:38:250 (1,1,3) - I think these overlaps can be more consistent
  오버랩 된 노트들을 좀 더 깔끔하게 정리해 주실수 있을것 같아요
  
  00:43:417 (9) - Consider not stacking this note. I think all the 1/4 beats that precedes 00:43:417 (9) - might confuse player into thinking this is also 1/4
  스텍 안 하는게 좋지 않을까요? 읽기 힘들 것 같습니다
  
  00:43:583 (1,2) - Doesn’t seem consistent with 00:40:917 (1) - and 00:38:250 (1) - … Am I missing something here =w=?
  위 세 부분 일관성이 없어 보이는데, 확인해 주시면 좋을것 같습니다
  
  00:57:750 (2) - Strong sound, consider not stacking?
  강한 보컬이라 스텍 안 하는게 좋을수도 있겠네요
  
  01:10:750 (2,3) - 01:11:250 (4,1) - Shouldn’t these have more consistent spacing?
  비슷한 DS 를 쓰는게 맞는것 같아요
  
  01:11:583 (1,2) - I think this should have larger DS than 01:11:250 (4,1) -
  01:11:583 (1,2) - DS 가 01:11:250 (4,1) - DS 보다 큰게 맞을것 같에요
  
  01:23:250 (6,2) - I heard this is not good: ( http://puu.sh/q42Lu/e861db9f23.jpg )
  살짝 겹쳐 있는게 좋아 보이지 않습니다

CaffeAmericano wrote:

Hard

• 00:38:083 (8) - 완전 스텍 시키시면 조금 읽기 힘들 것 같은데, 살짝 비껴 놓는게 어떨가요삼각형으로 바꿨습니다
  
  00:48:917 (1,2) - 00:51:917 (2) - 스텍 된 듯 안 된 듯한 모양이 어색해요 > <; (여기는 스텍 해 놓으셨네요 ㅇㅅㅇ)스택 다 되어있는데염
  
  01:04:083 (6,1,2) - 스텍?이미 되어있습니다.

Insane
[list]00:08:583 (6,1) - 여기 DS 를 00:05:917 (2,1) - DS 와 비슷하게 늘려서 강조 하는게 좋지 않을까요? 뒤 두 부분 00:09:750 (5,1) - 00:11:083 (4,1) - 보다 더 강조되야할 소리 같아요 (00:09:250 (2,3) - 여기두요)00:08:250 (4,5,6) - 삼각형 만들려구요

00:06:583 (2,3) - 3번은 거의 소리가 없는데 DS 가 2번보다 크네요.일부러 스택시킬려고 이렇게했습니다.

00:12:417 (5,1) - 여기 다운비트 flow break은 좋은데, DS 도 좀 늘려 주시면 좋을듯별로 DS 늘리고 싶지 않네요

00:27:083 - 여기 비워두신게 조금 아쉽네요제가 듣기엔 음이 약해서요[color]

00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 비슷한 플로우가 있는 다른 부분은 그렇지 않은데(e.g. 00:57:250 (2,3,4,5,6) - 01:07:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ), 여기만 NC 되 있는 의도를 잘 모르겠어요 ㅇㅅㅇ

01:14:917 (4) - 스텍에대가 거리도 같아서 1/2 비트랑 햇갈릴수도 있을것 같아요. DS 를 늘려 주시거나, 이곳 01:14:583 (3) - 에 스텍 하시거나, NC 해주는게어떨까요?중분히 리딩 가능할 것 같습니다.

01:15:917 (2,3) - 위 00:06:583 (2,3) - 와 비슷한데, 여기 DS 큰 의도를 모르겠어요. 01:15:917 (2) - 가 오히려 더 강조되어야 하지 않나요? 오버랩 피하려고 억지로 집어넣은 패턴이긴 한데...생각해 보겠습니다.

Ovoui wrote:

hi !


Not Euny's Insane, It's Normal


[Hard]

00:02:583 (4) - i suggest you to change this slider to two circle because the mapping is mapped on the piano, but just after you used slider to map the vocal aswell 00:02:917 (5,6) - and it could be confus when you're playing it. It could be nice to use circle here 00:02:583 (4) - to show a difference.00:02:583 (4,5,6) - for this pattern.
00:14:583 (2,3) - a jump between those slider should fit well imo^



[Insane]

00:06:583 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4,5) - this is good place for jump but these ones are too big imo
00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - and these are too small imo
about Insane, I don't make too many jumps,Sorry, I didn't fixed all./

Kaifin wrote:

Hard

1. 00:08:083 (6) - was surprised no whistle here because you whistle on 00:10:750 (6) -
2. 00:34:583 (5,6,7,1) - this is super cool, but i think it would be nicer if you made it a perfect line with 00:34:083 (4)
   SPOILER

   
   No. 00:35:083 (7,1) - Just stacked.
   
   wow really nice diff i love your patternsThanks

Insane

1. 00:27:083 - i think skipping this beat is a little weird, you could make 00:26:917 (4) - a 1/2 slider if you dont want to emphasize it, then it'll feel less empty? i understand the emphasis you're going for its just the beat is still there at 00:27:083, its just not as strongI don't think so.
2. 00:39:250 (4,3) - 4 is not stacked on 3, wasnt sure if you intended for it to be or not but i think stacking it looks nicer than the auto stack thats there now
3. 01:14:917 (4) - do you think NCing this would make it easier to read? since changes from 1/2 to 1/1
4. 01:25:083 (2,6) - same thing as with the other stack
   
   looks really nice! the back and forths are cool

CaffeAmericano wrote:

00:49:250 (2) - 여기 살짝 어긋나 있었던것 같은데, 잘못 봤나봐요.

하지만 00:51:917 (2) - 하고 01:04:917 (1,2) - 는 살짝 어긋나 있는데... 다시한번 확인해 보심이...?

Ovoui wrote:

hi !


[Del's Easy]

00:00:917 (1) - it is a bit weird to begin the diff at the bottom because the whole approach circle is not visible, a suggestion to fix it (slider end of 1 is stacked with 3) ?? It is fine actually
00:04:250 (2,3) - lack of consistency here, the song is like here 00:01:583 (2) - but the rhythm of the map is different. Nope, if you hear again this one lead to new rhythm so i keep this
00:05:417 (4,1) - these slider aren't perfectly parallel Fixed
00:17:250 (2,3) - the flow is broken between those sliders because of the shape of 2. After 2, it should more intuitive to play above It is fine like now

Kaifin wrote:

free mod for cute map

Del Easy

1. 00:05:417 (4,1) - make parallel?? :9 Fixed
2. 00:06:917 (2,1) - blanket Fixed
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:32:417 (4) - whistle on slider end? Fixed
4. 00:48:917 to 01:10:250 - the whistles in the kiai section of the map are super inconsistent, if you want to follow the horns with the whistle then commit to it and pick a rhythm to use throughout the chorus, some of it has a lot of whistles and some of it has none, if there's a pattern i'm not hearing let me know, but it just sounds random to a casual observer and really throws me off Fixed
   
   other than hitsound inconsistency in kiai really solid easy! Thank you

Line- wrote:

m4m4m4m4m4m

1. 으니님 난이도 빼고 클랩 힛사가 없어서 좀 아쉽네요. 딱히 이유가 있는 것이 아니라면 추가해주시는게 좋을 것 같아요.샘플 노말이 클랩 역할을 해주기 때문에 괜찮습니다
   
   Insane
   
2. 패턴이 와리가리 점프가 주를 이루네요. 렢트님은 좋게 보신 것 같지만 전 같은 패턴만 반복해서 쓴 것이 조금 다양성이 없어서 아쉬웠습니다.이건 어쩔 수가 없네욤...
   
   Hard
   
3. 00:48:583 (1) -슬라 끝소리 줄여주시는건 어떨까요? 딱히....
   
4. 00:49:250 (2,3,4,5) - 제 실력문제일 수도 있지만 이 패턴에서 리딩이 꼬였어요. 00:59:917 (2,3,4) - 이런 식으로 진행방향이 한 방향으로 구성되면 좋겠지만 패턴도 괜찮게 나온 것 같으니 딱히 방치해도 상관은 없을거같네용..그렇게 크게 혼란이 올 패턴은 아니라고 봅니다.

Len wrote:

Hard:

1. 00:06:083 (1) - anti-flow slider http://puu.sh/qfxUw/055d6700d5.jpg일부러 꺾은겁니다
2. 00:11:417 (1) - it should be emphasized instead of 00:11:917 (2,3) - ....... http://puu.sh/qfznu/264b7d479f.jpg다른 방향으로 고침.
3. 00:15:250 (4,5) - and 00:15:917 (6,7) - lazy stack miss. also 00:20:583 (3,4) - , 00:23:917 (5,6) - and 00:31:250 (3,4) - lazy too!스택에러는 언랭요소가 아니니 뭐....일단은 냅두겠습니다
4. 00:19:417 (8) - avoid overlap is better i think!(보통 스택이라고 안하나...?)이것도 일부러 스택한겁니다. 리딩에는 별 문제 없을 겁니다.
5. 00:21:750 (7,1) - , 00:24:417 (7,1) - no need to stack or anti here!스택이어도 괜찮을겁니다
6. 00:27:250 (7) - just nah, anti flow... also too hard to play.... and 00:27:250 (7,8,1) - this jump is shit to play for me but i dont know if you want to keep this pattern!강조를 위해 놔뒀습니다.
7. 00:32:417 (7,1) - if you want to use stack or anti on here just use note on 00:32:583 - like this: 00:45:917 (7,1) - . if no, feels really awkward.. 앞에도 계속 스택을 시켰는데 여기를 떨어뜨리면 이상할것 같습니다.
8. 00:35:083 (6,1) - just wtf; you should change the pattern imo. it isnt for "Hard" users cant do......... http://puu.sh/qfBov/2ecc12f98d.jpg이거는 보류. 얘기는 많이 들어오는데 뭔가 고치고 싶지는 않아서...
9. 00:40:917 (1,2,3) - straight slider is enough http://puu.sh/qfCfg/cd349df79d.jpg이정도 꺾인 흐름은 괜찮을 겁니다.
10. 00:48:917 (1,2,3,4,5) - this pattern is a bit hard to read. change like 00:59:583 (1,2,3,4,5) - is better for playing thooooooooooo!!!!!!!!! and 00:49:250 - it should be ephasized also 00:59:917 - too!딱히 꼬아놓은 패턴을 노린건 아닌데 꼬인 패턴이 되어버렸네요...그래도 일단 제가 볼땐 괜찮은 것 같으니 놔두겠습니다. 앞에도 이런 꼬인 패턴 많이 있어서 괜찮을겁니다.
11. 00:50:917 (7,8) - this hidden notes are too hard to play i think그냥 단순 스택인데....
12. 00:55:250 (3) - move to x79 y194 for flow and read? i think you're not hollow wings, right?00:54:250 (1,3) - 스택을 위해 여기 놔둔 겁니다.
13. 00:56:583 (7,1) - make a jump! 00:56:917 (1) - it should be emphasized!!!이곳도 일부러 스택을 시킨거긴 한데... 생각 해보겠습니다
14. 01:04:917 (1,2) - same as 00:50:917 (7,8) - D'X^같은 이유로 안고칩니다.
15. 01:06:083 (5,7) - too curved괜찮을겁니다.
16. 01:13:917 (3,4,5,6,7) - what a confusing pattern
17. 01:22:583 (2,4) - same. confusing pattern01:22:583 (2,4) - 스택.

Insane:

1. 00:06:583 (2,3,4,5) - even though many people say its fine, i think those are too bad. lot of back and forth spam jumps in insane.. , 00:09:250 (2,3,4,5) - , 00:14:583 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - ..... and etc그렇게 큰 점프는 아닐것 같네요
2. 00:08:083 (3,4,5,6) - try to change like this? http://puu.sh/qgcyZ/bd524c649c.jpg그건 무슨 패턴이죠
3. 00:19:083 (5,1) - same as hard^저도 하드랑 같은 의견.
4. 00:27:417 (2) - make triangle with 00:27:250 (1,1) - ?00:27:417 (2,1) - 스택이리서 놔두겠습니다.
5. 00:21:417 (4,5) - anti flow sliders are making uglybut fun for me
6. 00:28:083 (2) - just make a bit curve on here like this: http://puu.sh/qfDv6/5d42eefdbd.jpg이거는 그냥 직선으로 놔두고 싶습니다.
7. 00:39:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - distance is too short, it will make a shit to play음악 분위기상.
8. 00:46:250 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - the jumps right before the kiai are smaller than the ones at 00:16:417 (5,6,7,1) - which is not a part thats very much emphasized in the song, and this makes it awkward to play. just make a jump without stack and overlap will make a good map!음 하나하나를 강조하고 싶습니다
9. 00:47:417 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as above! especially 00:48:250 - ^
10. 00:50:917 (3,4,5,6,1) - i think u can do make a funny jump지금 이 형태의 패턴이 제 인세인 맵의 컨셉이기 때문에 놔두겠습니다.
11. 00:52:417 (4,5) - ctrl+g is better for flow!그렇게 하면 00:51:917 (2,3,4) - 얘네가 이상해지므로 일단 패스.
12. 01:07:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - ㅇㅅㅇ? 패턴 지적하신것 같은데 두줄 위 답변 참조
13. 01:11:583 (1,2,3) - distance is too short like 00:39:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 음악 분위기.
14. 01:17:750 (4,5) - ctrl+g?얘는 생각해보겠습니다
15. 01:23:916 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - .
16. 01:26:583 (2) - x158 y59 for flow?01:25:916 (6,2) - 스택

1. drum sliderslide is pretty loud on Easy at 01:10:250 -.. maybe consider using a mute drum sliderslide.wav?

1. 00:04:250 (2,3) – 1/2 slider here feels kind of really abrupt and doesn’t really follow the instruments or vocals that well. maybe try a pattern like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:40:583 – maybe consider adding in a circle here since you did one at 00:43:250 (4) – and 00:45:917 (4) – and it kind of completes this rhythm pattern you were going with

1. 00:24:917 (1,2) – this rhythm feels really weird to me since it doesn’t really match with the vocals or instrumentals all that well.. maybe try something like this? this suggestion could also be used at 00:35:583 (1,2) -
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:41:917 – 00:45:417 – if you’re going to be following vocals during the bridge I don’t think you should ignore the vocal notes here; it feels kind of weird how there’s this sudden gap in the rhythm since there’s no gap in the vocals and it feels a bit weird
3. 00:52:750 (1) – 00:55:417 (1) – 01:03:417 (1) – 01:06:083 (1) – i think that if you divided these longer sliders up into a 1/1 slider followed by a circle on the white tick it would give some more emphasis to the clap. it’d also help emphasize vocals since the vocals aren’t held for this long. maybe give it a try?

1. 00:08:250 (4,5) – if you’re going to put hitsounds on the (5) I kind of expected a larger distance between these notes to highlight the emphasis
2. 00:18:417 (2,3) – ^refer to the above because that applies here. you highlighted the emphasis between 00:18:583 (3,4) – which is fine, but I think there should be a spacing difference between the (2,3) as well. this suggestion also applies to 00:21:083 (2,3) -
3. 00:26:917 (4,1) – this gap feels really weird to play. the music is still going here, so why the sudden stop? I recommend placing a note at 00:27:083 –
4. 00:59:083 (6) – to be honest I think using just a circle here is more appropriate than a 1/4 slider. there’s not really a sound on 00:59:167 – so I don’t see any reason as to why this should be held down
5. 00:59:083 (6) - 01:08:583 (7,2,3) – you should try turning on stacking under View > Stacking every once in a while to see how your stacks look. these look really weird aesthetically since the stacks mess up all the spacing

1. 00:03:667 (1,1) – why the spinners? Why have the spinner follow the instrumentals and then the second spinner follow the vocals? I think mapping this part out like what the other mappers did would be more ideal than using a spinner but it’s up to you
2. 00:18:583 (5,1) – the (1) is kind of in a really bad position.. players will be moving from left to right, and then this slider is moving up to down with a slight right to left movement. imo it creates this very sudden pull that feels uncomfortable to play. maybe try to Ctrl + H the slider for smoother play? this way, since the slider is also moving left to right like the player is, it makes it less uncomfortable
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:21:250 (2,3) – kind of expected some more distance between these two notes since there’s an emphasis on the (3) as well
4. 00:38:250 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) – feels out of place with the rest of bridge since this is the only part that follows the drums really closely and then 00:40:917 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) – follows vocals more closely than it does the drums.
5. 01:23:417 (1) – i’d rotate this clockwise by some degrees so the movement from (6) to (1) is less sharp since the current angle feels very stiff; it kind of feels like I’m moving up and left, and the suddenly very left, which feels slightly uncomfortable imo

Len wrote:

음 하나하나를 강조하고싶은건 잘 알겠으나 다른 쓸모없는 부분보다 점프가 강조되어야 하는곳보다 약한것은 오히려 강조라기보단 수정하기 귀찮아서 라고밖에 안보이네요 제대로 음악을 표현하시는게 맞나요? 강조해야하는 부분이 어디인지, 아니어야하는 부분이 어딘지 쯤은 아실거라 생각하니 길게 적지는 않았는데 답변 보고나서 조금 실망했네요.
또한 스택을 이용한 흐름 끊기는 오히려 해가 될수 있다는건 알아두셨으면하네요 ar이 느리기때문에 플레이하기에 불편한점이 "반드시" 있는데 그 부분도 말입니다.

모딩온걸 수정하기 귀찮아서 또는 그냥 고치기 싫어서 회피하는 경향이 다른 맵에도 많이 보이는데, 제가 진하게 언급한 저 부분하고 general 부분은 언랭커블이 될수있으니 참고해주세요. 그리고 가끔씩은 컨셉을 내려놓는것도 맵 퀄리티의 증가로 이어질수 있을것같습니다... ㅋㅋ

Doormat wrote:

hi hi sorry for late m4m
[Insane]

1. 00:08:250 (4,5) – if you’re going to put hitsounds on the (5) I kind of expected a larger distance between these notes to highlight the emphasis
2. 00:18:417 (2,3) – ^refer to the above because that applies here. you highlighted the emphasis between 00:18:583 (3,4) – which is fine, but I think there should be a spacing difference between the (2,3) as well. this suggestion also applies to 00:21:083 (2,3) -
3. 00:26:917 (4,1) – this gap feels really weird to play. the music is still going here, so why the sudden stop? I recommend placing a note at 00:27:083 –
4. 00:59:083 (6) – to be honest I think using just a circle here is more appropriate than a 1/4 slider. there’s not really a sound on 00:59:167 – so I don’t see any reason as to why this should be held down[color=#FF0000]I want 00:59:167 - Here should be add a rhythm..I'll think about that.[/color]
5. 00:59:083 (6) - 01:08:583 (7,2,3) – you should try turning on stacking under View > Stacking every once in a while to see how your stacks look. these look really weird aesthetically since the stacks mess up all the spacing

1. 01:04:583 (5) - Add normal sampleset, I think you forget
2. 01:26:750 (2) - Try to use drum sampleset with finish, if use normal sampleset the hitsound still sound too loud

1. 00:36:749 (1,2,3,4) - Missing some hitsound, can add clap on following beat 00:37:250 - 00:37:417 - and 00:37:917 -
2. 00:58:750 (3) - Somehow that rhythm sounds weird, the beat on 00:59:417 - not necesarry to emphsize imo, yet you ignore the trumpet sound on 00:59:250 - . I think you can slightly have a better rhythm like http://puu.sh/qmTpK/cdacae511c.jpg , and the placement can be like this http://puu.sh/qmTry/6fe42831a5.jpg or something else better
3. 01:27:750 - Try volume 10-20%? there still drum sound at the end and I think a sudden 5% volume not good on that one

1. 00:35:083 (7,1) - The slider path on (1) is not clear to see during testplay, please avoid a complete stacking like that. You can slightly move this 00:35:583 (1) - to x:440 y:120 to improve the readability on (1) http://puu.sh/qmU3t/ab9aefb949.jpg
2. 00:27:250 (7,8,1) - The jumps on them feels too big compared to 00:16:583 (8,9,1) - which literally have same music. Maybe you can move 00:27:417 (8) - to x:192 y:176 to keep the consistency on them
3. 01:14:250 (4) - Add nc? slightly improve the anti jump and the music transition

1. 01:27:639 (2) - Add nc? for easier to distinguish the 1/3 beat

1. Why no custom combo color like the rest?
2. 00:16:750 (3,1) - I think you can add a bit more spacing like you did on 00:16:417 (1,2) - for better emphsized on (1)
3. 01:27:639 (2) - 01:27:639 (2) - Add nc? for easier to distinguish the 1/3 beat