forum

Your opinion on American Politics?

posted
Total Posts
770
show more
mx04ma
we have to tax the rich less so that they won't bother going to the lengths they do to completely avoid paying them. Better to get 20% of a lot instead of 60% of nothing.
Horaizon-

roshan117 wrote:

Mahogany wrote:

Overall I pretty much hate America and Americans
I hate my country too, I want to move out

I would if i was 18 or older



:|
I hate my country too.

If trump became president, i don't know what will happen to the US after that
mx04ma
nothing? his inexperience and not knowing what to do will lead to, essentially, the cabinet & his advisors running the country for him. Same shit happened when arnold swarzchenegger became a governor. People thought an actor would be a good idea to put into a position of power but he had no idea what to do and so he just did everything his advisors said.

uhh i mean im 9 and what is this?
Mahogany
In my history class we have fun drawing parallels between Trump and Hitler
B1rd
Because leftists typically can't think of any better criticism than comparing someone they don't like to Hitler.
-Makishima S-

Jordan wrote:

[Taiga] wrote:

Never come to poland, at least 80% of this country are cunts and idiots.
And why? Because 80% of your country is against islamification and africanisation? Aren't Sweden and Germany a good enough example of what cultural marxism does to countries?

I've been to Poland and poles are great people.
If you want me to be 100% serious, i am anti-german because of their geneticaly shared extreme jew and polish rasism and greed. Typical german when he see polish/jew person he will act like complete last idiot and scream "KILL KILL KILL" (best scenario, there was already action that random german group of people attacked our turists becuase of nationalizm) while whole nation when they see option to greed last cent from you they will shout "KILL KILL KILL" just to get it. Germans doesn't care about people, families, etc, they only care about themselves and their money bags.Looking for actually not rasist and greddy german is like looking with a candle for a needle in a haystack. This is just a mentality what i honestly try to fix with mental doctor but while it gets better and i try to get into touch with some germans, i see next new news how to german guy "called a polish guy to go die in gas chamber because he is polish" (one of my work contractor lead a work company who sends people outside country for job so i get some shitty news from time to time).
Also there is a reason why every single german online game hubs are WORST in the world and from long times keeps number 1 in every ranking as a worst game publishing company due shitty greed (eg. Failforge, Inno games).
To cut one thing - i sound like a rasist against germans but it only triggers when a specific person act like that. There are also cool and nice people there what i respect.
Polish people from other side and in great majority fuckin idiots. They think how to steal your money bag, where to start a fist fight, being drunk 24/7 and acting cool in groups while solo they are just a shitters who will run whenever you rise your voice tone.
Swidish people from all of them are at least normal.
Mahogany

B1rd wrote:

Because leftists typically can't think of any better criticism than comparing someone they don't like to Hitler.
What the fuck even is a leftist? I don't care much for politics outside of memes.
fat pear
build a wall
Yuudachi-kun

Mahogany wrote:

In my history class we have fun drawing parallels between Trump and Hitler
Is this even serious
Lacrimae_old

Mahogany wrote:

In my history class we have fun drawing parallels between Trump and Hitler
i bet your history teacher is a SJW
Mahogany

Khelly wrote:

Is this even serious
Serious as in am I telling the truth or not? Serious.

Serious as in do we take it seriously? Not at all, it's a big meme, just like the big wall and the small loan of 1m dollars.

Lacrimae wrote:

i bet your history teacher is a SJW
Teacher doesn't participate sadly but she still finds it funny
Rurree

Mahogany wrote:

B1rd wrote:

Because leftists typically can't think of any better criticism than comparing someone they don't like to Hitler.
What the fuck even is a leftist? I don't care much for politics outside of memes.
A communist
dNextGen
Jordan

Mahogany wrote:

In my history class we have fun drawing parallels between Trump and Hitler
Razzy

Jordan wrote:

snip
nice meme
mx04ma

[Taiga] wrote:

geneticaly shared extreme jew and polish rasism and greed
genetic racism and greed? :roll:
IppE
Jordan

mx04ma wrote:

[Taiga] wrote:

geneticaly shared extreme jew and polish rasism and greed
genetic racism and greed? :roll:
I didn't get a single thing about his post, it was more the disconnected random stuff he said rather than the grammar. Also, germans being racist, WTF. They're literally the most apologetic country in the world (you can thank the 6 gazillion for that). So much that they're completely okay with their place being taken over by arabs and nig nogs :^)
autoteleology
hahahahahaha children discussing politics on the internet

nothing good was ever going to come out of this
Flaus
yolo kanye 2020
-Makishima S-
Also, germans being racist, WTF. They're literally the most apologetic country in the world (you can thank the 6 gazillion for that).
Too many bad memories with this nation to call them apologetic.
It's long story why i hate germans but when someone will tell you "we don't want pure polish worker here" in interview for work, you will understand what i mean.
repr1se
American politics suck. Big corporations are buying the government and politicians are giving themselves raises while everyone else suffers. Factor in how dumb the American population is (THE MOON LANDING IS FAKE!!!!!!! OBAMA IS A KENYAN MUSLIM!!!!!!!!!!! CHEMTRAILS ARE THE GOVERNMENT'S PLAN TO CONTROL US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ARE FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!), and you have a shitshow in politics.

People hate politics, but they don't do anything to change it. The richest have been in power for so long that the electorate forgot that they're the ones in charge, and can vote people OUT of office. Yes, you can vote the bad ones out. Just show up to the ballot and throw a piece of paper into a box and you save the nation.

Personal opinion time:

On this election so far, I believe that Senator Sanders and Governor Kasich are the only honest candidates in the election. My voting preference is:
Sanders>Kasich>Clinton>Trump>Cruz

1) Sanders
The most honest candidate in the election. He faces the facts and isn't afraid to confront the celebrity on stage Clinton. He has the highest percentage of True claims on Politifact.com (as background, Politifact is an independent political news source that won the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting). I agree with every one of his claims, EXCEPT for social justice claims such as "women make 78 cents for every dollar a man makes," simply because it's false.

2) Kasich
The only honest Republican candidate. He has the experience as governor to get things done. He has no experience at the federal level, but he has been on committees and gotten shit done, tl;dr.

3) Clinton
I believe Clinton is a fraud. But, I would rather have a fraud that's in it to benefit herself than someone who would knowingly run the country into the dirt -- id est Trump and Cruz.

4) Trump
This kid is crazy. There's a reason why people vote for him: he's a baby. You know how a 3 year old shows up to a talent show and wins the sympathetic vote of the entire audience? Yeah, that's Trump.

5) Cruz
The only reason why I put Trump over Cruz is that Cruz is a baby, but he's also a fundamentalist evangelical Christian. The evangelical Christian part I can deal with, the fundamentalist part is a no go.
Get your "If you don't love Jesus I'll put cops at your front door" shit out of here.

Rurree wrote:

OP, why are you asking for our opinions when all you said was that you're voting for Bernie? I find that strange, also, this should be in General Discussion not Off-Topic.

I can't really give an accurate opinion concerning American politics without living there, but I think so far they've been unlucky with their presidents, starting from the younger Bush. Obama, while being highly intellectual and sympathetic with the ordinary American, has not been so good with most of the problems that the USA is experiencing today. He didn't heal the country's racial divisions, ObamaCare wasn't really as effective as he meant to be, he ignored Iraq due to him being overly cautious (which is another flaw of his, he doesn't want to be another Bush, though understandably so.), he failed to reform immigration, he didn't keep the NSA from spying, he didn't shut down Guantanamo.. I could go on but I wouldn't want this post to be lengthy. :p

But then again, we can't expect that a president could be perfect. This year's list of candidates aren't too impressive for me either.
This happens because of an obstructionist Congress. They've blocked Obama at every step he's tried to take.

B1rd wrote:

Because leftists typically can't think of any better criticism than comparing someone they don't like to Hitler.
There are two types of supporters: Smart supporters and shitty supporters.

Shitty supporters on Trump's side:
LEFTISTS ARE LIBTARD CUCKS
HIGH ENERGY
CUCKS

Shitty supporter's on Sander's side:
IF YOU NEED MORE EVIDENCE THAN HER TRUTH, THAT'S RAPE CULTURE
BLACK LIVES MATTER BUT LET'S DEFACE PUBLIC PROPERTY WITH THAT SHIT
FREE COLLEGE FREE COLLEGE FREE COLLEGE

I'm a Sanders supporter, but I don't compare Trump to Hitler. Ideologically they're similar but with the way mass media works now, Trump can't do anything close to what Hitler did. If you read what I wrote above, yes, I believe Trump is a big baby, yes, I disagree with him, but no, he isn't Hitler.

While we're at it, let's compare Trump's claims to Sanders'.

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

Trump's claims are, for the most part, false. Sanders' claims are, for the most part, true.

I think this factors into why shitty Sanders supporters compare Trump to Hitler -- Jews aren't bad people, for example, but shitty Sanders supporters make the connection anyways.

P.S.: If you want to see shitty Trump supporters, visit reddit.com/r/the_donald
you're in for some fun
Lacrimae_old

repr1se wrote:

I'm a Sanders supporter, but I don't compare Trump to Hitler. Ideologically they're similar but with the way mass media works now, Trump can't do anything close to what Hitler did. If you read what I wrote above, yes, I believe Trump is a big baby, yes, I disagree with him, but no, he isn't Hitler.
at last i found a sane bernie supporter
repr1se

Lacrimae wrote:

at last i found a sane bernie supporter
Sanity is a rare gem.

And gems are truly outrageous.
Topic Starter
roshan117

repr1se wrote:

Lacrimae wrote:

at last i found a sane bernie supporter
Sanity is a rare gem.

And gems are truly outrageous.
agreed
DeletedUser_2024727

[Taiga] wrote:

If you want me to be 100% serious, i am anti-german because of their geneticaly shared extreme jew and polish rasism and greed. Typical german when he see polish/jew person he will act like complete last idiot and scream "KILL KILL KILL" (best scenario, there was already action that random german group of people attacked our turists becuase of nationalizm) while whole nation when they see option to greed last cent from you they will shout "KILL KILL KILL" just to get it. Germans doesn't care about people, families, etc, they only care about themselves and their money bags.Looking for actually not rasist and greddy german is like looking with a candle for a needle in a haystack. This is just a mentality what i honestly try to fix with mental doctor but while it gets better and i try to get into touch with some germans, i see next new news how to german guy "called a polish guy to go die in gas chamber because he is polish" (one of my work contractor lead a work company who sends people outside country for job so i get some shitty news from time to time).
Also there is a reason why every single german online game hubs are WORST in the world and from long times keeps number 1 in every ranking as a worst game publishing company due shitty greed (eg. Failforge, Inno games).
To cut one thing - i sound like a rasist against germans but it only triggers when a specific person act like that. There are also cool and nice people there what i respect.
Polish people from other side and in great majority fuckin idiots. They think how to steal your money bag, where to start a fist fight, being drunk 24/7 and acting cool in groups while solo they are just a shitters who will run whenever you rise your voice tone.
Swidish people from all of them are at least normal.
*tips fedora*
fat pear
bernie/hilary supporters: omg clappign is FUCKING SEXIst icant even fkn believ it!!!!! fuckn hate men and cis and white FUCK them. wage gap is real
Razzy

microism wrote:

bernie/hilary supporters: omg clappign is FUCKING SEXIst icant even fkn believ it!!!!! fuckn hate men and cis and white FUCK them. wage gap is real
lmao

we're not all sjws, you know
repr1se

Teffammie Maye wrote:

microism wrote:

bernie/hilary supporters: omg clappign is FUCKING SEXIst icant even fkn believ it!!!!! fuckn hate men and cis and white FUCK them. wage gap is real
lmao

we're not all sjws, you know
To add to this: There are social issues, then there's social justice.

Personally, I believe in the former and don't recognize the latter. And that's coming from someone that identifies as extremely liberal.
Rurree

Teffammie Maye wrote:

microism wrote:

bernie/hilary supporters: omg clappign is FUCKING SEXIst icant even fkn believ it!!!!! fuckn hate men and cis and white FUCK them. wage gap is real
lmao

we're not all sjws, you know
and not all use tumblr kek
Witch Mercy
FuZ
Navizel
muh free college xdddd
I'll vote for Hillary just because she's a woman and nothing else xdddd

good thing there's age restriction in voting or else ignorant libshits (redundancy!) will ruin everything more than they already have
Yuudachi-kun

FuZ wrote:

Only if the food is illegal
FuZ
ill feed you illegal food
repr1se

Navizel wrote:

muh free college xdddd
I'll vote for Hillary just because she's a woman and nothing else xdddd

good thing there's age restriction in voting or else ignorant libshits (redundancy!) will ruin everything more than they already have
I hate to admit but there are shitty Bernie supporters, shitty Hillary supporters and most of all shitty Trump supporters. They're a plague and block issue oriented dialogue.

BTW, when have liberals ruined things? As far as I know, W. Bush launched US national debt. Currently Obama's been slowing it, but the fuse was lit by W. Bush.
W. Bush spent tax money needlessly on wars in the Middle East to protect US oil interests. Obama fixed that by withdrawing troops.
Things like that. I want to know your opinion.
Navizel

repr1se wrote:

Navizel wrote:

muh free college xdddd
I'll vote for Hillary just because she's a woman and nothing else xdddd

good thing there's age restriction in voting or else ignorant libshits (redundancy!) will ruin everything more than they already have
I hate to admit but there are shitty Bernie supporters, shitty Hillary supporters and most of all shitty Trump supporters. They're a plague and block issue oriented dialogue.

BTW, when have liberals ruined things? As far as I know, W. Bush launched US national debt. Currently Obama's been slowing it, but the fuse was lit by W. Bush.
W. Bush spent tax money needlessly on wars in the Middle East to protect US oil interests. Obama fixed that by withdrawing troops.
Things like that. I want to know your opinion.
And Obama wants to bring rapi- Syrian refugees. What's happening in Europe should be enough reason to not do that. Unfortunately, that's what mapleland's PM did. Also, the far left and its sjw bullshit. I mean, far right is bad too but the counterpart is worse.
IppE
FuZ
pinoys shouldnt be able to speak about politics for living in such uneducated country
fat pear

Navizel wrote:

muh free college xdddd
I'll vote for Hillary just because she's a woman and nothing else xdddd

good thing there's age restriction in voting or else ignorant libshits (redundancy!) will ruin everything more than they already have
>voting for hilary just because she's a woman

are you dumb?
DeletedUser_2024727

microism wrote:

Navizel wrote:

muh free college xdddd
I'll vote for Hillary just because she's a woman and nothing else xdddd

good thing there's age restriction in voting or else ignorant libshits (redundancy!) will ruin everything more than they already have
>voting for hilary just because she's a woman

are you dumb?
you're dumb for being baited like this
fat pear

Choofers wrote:

microism wrote:

>voting for hilary just because she's a woman

are you dumb?
you're dumb for being baited like this
hilary is the worst candidate
Navizel

FuZ wrote:

pinoys shouldnt be able to speak about politics for living in such uneducated country
Doesn't matter. As long as we can keep our mudslimes in one place and not let them go rampant like what you shits did I'm good enough. Plus peenoise are finally learning since they're not voting for the cancers anymore.
repr1se

Navizel wrote:

And Obama wants to bring rapi- Syrian refugees. What's happening in Europe should be enough reason to not do that. Unfortunately, that's what mapleland's PM did. Also, the far left and its sjw bullshit. I mean, far right is bad too but the counterpart is worse.
Statistically speaking, I should be more afraid of a Christian hate crime than of any Syrian/Muslim. It may be different in Europe, but that's how it is in the US. Christian terrorism dominates this country.

The big question is: Should we allow people in and risk our own safety, or keep them out and risk their safety? While absolutes are (obviously) impossible I do believe it's okay to bring in refugees, though the screening process should be much heavier.

There's another issue as well: How will their culture adapt to ours? Islam, as the dominant religion (and its associated culture) is in its most violent phase in a while. They're trying to enforce rules of their culture onto us, in some geographic areas. In Europe there have been rape cases by refugees. There's a massive difference in culture and I believe that, in general, culture of Western civilizations is more humane and should be the ones refugees adapt to, not vice versa.

I identify as a far leftist. I'm not a SJW. I'm in full support of social ISSUES (e.g. Black Lives Matter, equal opportunity, etc), but I fully oppose social JUSTICE (misandric feminism, minority superiority, etc). Because social justice is nonsense and is not based on the facts.
The same is true for far rightists. They may be in support of far right policies but oppose racism and misogyny (i.e. the right wing counterpart of social justice). Again, these issues are not policies and are not based on the facts.
Yuudachi-kun
Hey repr1se wanna fuck
Lacrimae_old

FuZ wrote:

pinoys shouldnt be able to speak about politics for living in such uneducated country
considering they have celebrities in office
repr1se

Khelly wrote:

Hey repr1se wanna fuck
How dare you catcall me! You worthless pig! Misogyny!

but seriously who are you
B1rd

repr1se wrote:

Statistically speaking, I should be more afraid of a Christian hate crime than of any Syrian/Muslim. It may be different in Europe, but that's how it is in the US. Christian terrorism dominates this country. .
Navizel

repr1se wrote:

Navizel wrote:

And Obama wants to bring rapi- Syrian refugees. What's happening in Europe should be enough reason to not do that. Unfortunately, that's what mapleland's PM did. Also, the far left and its sjw bullshit. I mean, far right is bad too but the counterpart is worse.
Statistically speaking, I should be more afraid of a Christian hate crime than of any Syrian/Muslim. It may be different in Europe, but that's how it is in the US. Christian terrorism dominates this country.

The big question is: Should we allow people in and risk our own safety, or keep them out and risk their safety? While absolutes are (obviously) impossible I do believe it's okay to bring in refugees, though the screening process should be much heavier.

There's another issue as well: How will their culture adapt to ours? Islam, as the dominant religion (and its associated culture) is in its most violent phase in a while. They're trying to enforce rules of their culture onto us, in some geographic areas. In Europe there have been rape cases by refugees. There's a massive difference in culture and I believe that, in general, culture of Western civilizations is more humane and should be the ones refugees adapt to, not vice versa.

I identify as a far leftist. I'm not a SJW. I'm in full support of social ISSUES (e.g. Black Lives Matter, equal opportunity, etc), but I fully oppose social JUSTICE (misandric feminism, minority superiority, etc). Because social justice is nonsense and is not based on the facts.
The same is true for far rightists. They may be in support of far right policies but oppose racism and misogyny (i.e. the right wing counterpart of social justice). Again, these issues are not policies and are not based on the facts.
I have never heard of terrorism done by Christians in the name of Christianity in the past few years. Can you give me an example?

Nah. They don't deserve the free things they'd get. I look like a hypocrite here since I'm an immigrant but I work so I'm not the only one that benefits here.

BLM is a hate group though. And I don't think black lives matter to black people considering how black on black cases are higher than white to black. Equal opportunity does exist. If you think people are not getting hired because of their skin color then you're stupid. Equal number of male and female in the workplace is also asinine.
Lacrimae_old

Navizel wrote:

I have never heard of terrorism done by Christians in the name of Christianity in the past few years. Can you give me an example?
most of them are anti-abortion related. i'll give three

September 4, 2015: A Planned Parenthood clinic in Pullman, Washington was intentionally set on fire. No injuries were reported due to the time of day, but the FBI was involved because of a history of domestic terrorism against the clinic.
October 22, 2015: A Planned Parenthood clinic in Claremont, New Hampshire was vandalized by a juvenile intruder. Damaged in the attack were computers, furniture, plumbing fixtures, office equipment, medical equipment, phone lines, windows, and walls. The flooding that resulted from the vandalism also damaged an adjacent business.
November 29, 2015: A shooting at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado, left three dead and several injured, and a suspect was apprehended. The suspect had previously acted against other clinics, and referred to himself as a "warrior for the babies" at his hearing. Neighbors and former neighbors described the suspect as "reclusive", and police from several states where the suspect resided described a history of run-ins dating from at least 1997. As of December 2015, the trial of the suspect is on going.
B1rd
None of your examples prove that it was done because of Christianity, and even if it was it's still just anecdotal evidence.


Yes, Christian are much of a bigger problem than Muslims aren't they.
mx04ma
wow anarchism sucks
B1rd
Anarchism is great. It's the edgy leftists anarcho-kiddies who give anarchism a bad name. All we need is private companies to replace the services the government provides and our society will greatly benefit.
repr1se

B1rd wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-wei ... 85138.html
The important part is here, key words are "non-Muslim extremists":


B1rd wrote:

None of your examples prove that it was done because of Christianity, and even if it was it's still just anecdotal evidence.


Yes, Christian are much of a bigger problem than Muslims aren't they.
On the topic of problematic (not related to terrorism)...

I'm a former Christian. I went on missions trips to Cameroon (Africa) and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I was a pianist on a worship team and attended a weekly Bible study, as well as three church services every week. Now I'm an atheist.

Speaking from the inferior American race, yes, Christians are a bigger problem than Muslims. Christian politicians are trying to block civil rights for minorities because it violates their own religion. Christian politicians want businesses to be able to discriminate against minorities because they don't want anyone outside of their group to interact with them. Christian politicians want Creationism (which none have observed, and none have proven) taught in schools instead of natural selection. Just to name a few civil issues.

Christians are majority assholes. I can write more about that but it's irrelevant to the thread.

Navizel wrote:

I have never heard of terrorism done by Christians in the name of Christianity in the past few years. Can you give me an example?

Nah. They don't deserve the free things they'd get. I look like a hypocrite here since I'm an immigrant but I work so I'm not the only one that benefits here.

BLM is a hate group though. And I don't think black lives matter to black people considering how black on black cases are higher than white to black. Equal opportunity does exist. If you think people are not getting hired because of their skin color then you're stupid. Equal number of male and female in the workplace is also asinine.
The overall data are shown in the excerpt I posted above, there are specific examples as well. The most common one I cite is this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/02/us/ro ... oting.html
And here's the important bit:


That's true. Refugees do get free things, but how they contribute back to society (if they do at all) is up to them.

Like how there are shitty Sanders supporters, shitty Clinton supporters and shitty Trump supporters, there are also shitty BLM supporters. I know a few people that are fanatical about that and would even deface public property and other people for the sake of BLM.
I think you're misunderstanding me, as skin color and # of men and women in the workplace are social justice issues. I'm writing mostly about crime and the prison population. Blacks do commit more crime per capita than whites (you have to do the math, but the data are here) https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/c ... verviewpdf
But the prison population is incredibly disproportionate to the crime per capita and the justice system isn't fair.
http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues ... ed-states/
The important bits are here:



So clearly there's some disparity in the justice system and that's what I'm concerned about.

FAST EDIT:

B1rd wrote:

Anarchism is great. It's the edgy leftists anarcho-kiddies who give anarchism a bad name. All we need is private companies to replace the services the government provides and our society will greatly benefit.
I disagree. The government is the reason society hasn't crumbled, in my opinion. Government regulates a lot of things that businesses wouldn't.
You go the the supermarket and pick up some meat and vegetables. How do you know it's safe? The government regulates it.
You get some water. How do you know it's safe? The government regulates it.
Your friend's house catches fire. Why does the fire department come? The government created it.
Crime? Government created the police force.
Roads? Government funded.
etc.
FuZ
can someone move this shit thread to GD
Rurree

FuZ wrote:

pinoys shouldnt be able to speak about politics for living in such uneducated country
idk man it's probably more uneducated if a person is ignorant enough to think all filipinos are idiots

granted a lot of filipinos are indeed clueless about politics in general but you get my point.
DeathHydra
A serious discussion in Off-Topic? That's unheard of
Navizel
I ain't clicking that huffpo link niqqa

The overall data are shown in the excerpt I posted above, there are specific examples as well. The most common one I cite is this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/02/us/ro ... oting.html
And here's the important bit:
Ok, got me there. Islam terrorism is still more large scale though. I don't agree with how the guy did it but abortion is abhorrent.

That's true. Refugees do get free things, but how they contribute back to society (if they do at all) is up to them.
lol what

Blacks do commit more crime per capita than whites (you have to do the math, but the data are here)
So you admit that Blacks commit more crimes but you complain that there are more blacks in jail? Although I agree that justice should be fair not only between whites and non whites but also between men and women.
B1rd
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-wei ... 85138.html
The important part is here, key words are "non-Muslim extremists":
I'm not clicking on your stupid leftist news sites. If you want to share something link to studies directly.

So lets have a look at the information in the text .jpg...

'Since Sep11'

So you're discounting the largest terrorist attack on American soil for what reason? If you include the deaths from that, the number would dwarf any of the deaths from non Muslims. And it's non-Muslim terrorist, not Christian terrorists. So, let's include 9/11, Muslim kills vs Christian kills, and the Muslim number is multiple times higher. And you're also ignoring the fact that in America, there are hundreds or thousands of times more Christians than Muslim. So if we look at the statistics per capita, the killing are skewed in the Muslim side to an extreme degree.

And that's not even counting all of the terror attacks in Europe, where the terrorists are focusing their efforts. It is a first hand example of the decline of Western societies when they let in large numbers of 'refugees' and Muslims. For example, rape and crime statistics skyrocket after immigrants. And then there's the financial burden of giving welfare to so many people who are unwilling or unable to integrate into the economy (and the society itself, for that matter). And a thousand more reasons why refugees are nothing but detrimental to a country. I think I'm quite lucky to be able to live where I am now in a largely homogenous white society that doesn't have these problems. But the way things are going, that might not last long either.

repr1se wrote:

On the topic of problematic (not related to terrorism)...

I'm a former Christian. I went on missions trips to Cameroon (Africa) and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I was a pianist on a worship team and attended a weekly Bible study, as well as three church services every week. Now I'm an atheist.

Speaking from the inferior American race, yes, Christians are a bigger problem than Muslims. Christian politicians are trying to block civil rights for minorities because it violates their own religion. Christian politicians want businesses to be able to discriminate against minorities because they don't want anyone outside of their group to interact with them. Christian politicians want Creationism (which none have observed, and none have proven) taught in schools instead of natural selection. Just to name a few civil issues.

Christians are majority assholes. I can write more about that but it's irrelevant to the thread.
Christians have differing political opinions don't make them a problem. I think immigrants are 'problematic', because they tend to vote left, for more wellfare, a more authoritarian government, et cetera. The real problem isn't the demographics, it's the democracy itself. Tyranny of the majority, and all that.

Minorities don't get any extra civil rights because they already have equal rights to everyone else. Businesses should be allowed to discriminate against whomever they please, it's their business.

I disagree. The government is the reason society hasn't crumbled, in my opinion. Government regulates a lot of things that businesses wouldn't.
You go the the supermarket and pick up some meat and vegetables. How do you know it's safe? The government regulates it.
You get some water. How do you know it's safe? The government regulates it.
Your friend's house catches fire. Why does the fire department come? The government created it.
Crime? Government created the police force.
Roads? Government funded.
etc.
Goes to show a leftist's understanding of the econemy. Government don't pay for roads, taxpayers do. Taxpayers are people. Now what if, people could pay for the roads they use directly, rather than being forced to give their money to the government and having the government use the money however it wishes?

What if people pay for private police forces and firefighter?

The government is inherently inefficient compared to the free market. It is also prone to corruption. And mass murder. If you lift up a stone in a river, water takes its place. Private companies can provide all the services of a government, and do it better. There is no reason why businesses wouldn't provide the services that a government does.


FuZ wrote:

can someone move this shit thread to GD
No.
semaphore
basically it's shit and so are the people
Topic Starter
roshan117
jfc
DeletedUser_6709840
This thread has gone to hell and back, but it's fun to read. So far, rep1se seems to be the one with most sanity and rational sense.
Zain Sugieres
#CanadaAnnexUSA2016
Kappa FrankerZ

Zain Sugieres wrote:

#CanadaAnnexUSA2016
No.
Navizel

Zain Sugieres wrote:

#CanadaAnnexUSA2016
who would want reddit as their leader
DeletedUser_6709840

Zain Sugieres wrote:

#CanadaAnnexUSA2016
Please do, Canada. This country is a mess.
Topic Starter
roshan117

Zain Sugieres wrote:

#CanadaAnnexUSA2016
pls
end the suffering
repr1se

Navizel wrote:

I ain't clicking that huffpo link niqqa
Not forcing you to, I image the most important paragraphs. If I missed that one, my bad.

lol what
Only makes sense, refugees are technically immigrants. They take from us, they give back.


So you admit that Blacks commit more crimes but you complain that there are more blacks in jail? Although I agree that justice should be fair not only between whites and non whites but also between men and women.
I'm not complaining that there are more blacks in jail: I'm complaining that blacks have a much higher chance of detainment/imprisonment than whites for the same crime.

B1rd wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-wei ... 85138.html
The important part is here, key words are "non-Muslim extremists":
I'm not clicking on your stupid leftist news sites. If you want to share something link to studies directly.
From this I can probably dismiss whatever else you write.
So lets have a look at the information in the text .jpg...

'Since Sep11'

So you're discounting the largest terrorist attack on American soil for what reason? If you include the deaths from that, the number would dwarf any of the deaths from non Muslims. And it's non-Muslim terrorist, not Christian terrorists. So, let's include 9/11, Muslim kills vs Christian kills, and the Muslim number is multiple times higher. And you're also ignoring the fact that in America, there are hundreds or thousands of times more Christians than Muslim. So if we look at the statistics per capita, the killing are skewed in the Muslim side to an extreme degree.

And that's not even counting all of the terror attacks in Europe, where the terrorists are focusing their efforts. It is a first hand example of the decline of Western societies when they let in large numbers of 'refugees' and Muslims. For example, rape and crime statistics skyrocket after immigrants. And then there's the financial burden of giving welfare to so many people who are unwilling or unable to integrate into the economy (and the society itself, for that matter). And a thousand more reasons why refugees are nothing but detrimental to a country. I think I'm quite lucky to be able to live where I am now in a largely homogenous white society that doesn't have these problems. But the way things are going, that might not last long either.
Going to leave this here.
>If you want to share something link to studies directly.
A liberal news site is better than nothing at all.

Christians have differing political opinions don't make them a problem. I think immigrants are 'problematic', because they tend to vote left, for more wellfare, a more authoritarian government, et cetera. The real problem isn't the demographics, it's the democracy itself. Tyranny of the majority, and all that.

Minorities don't get any extra civil rights because they already have equal rights to everyone else. Businesses should be allowed to discriminate against whomever they please, it's their business.
Immigrants are problematic because they vote left, and you vote right.
Just going to leave it at that.

Goes to show a leftist's understanding of the econemy. Government don't pay for roads, taxpayers do. Taxpayers are people. Now what if, people could pay for the roads they use directly, rather than being forced to give their money to the government and having the government use the money however it wishes?

What if people pay for private police forces and firefighter?

The government is inherently inefficient compared to the free market. It is also prone to corruption. And mass murder. If you lift up a stone in a river, water takes its place. Private companies can provide all the services of a government, and do it better. There is no reason why businesses wouldn't provide the services that a government does.
They wouldn't. They wouldn't pay for roads, they wouldn't pay for a private police force, fire department, etc.
The thing with conservatism is that it assumes the people with money are going to use it for the good of the community. That doesn't happen. Kansas had a governor that believed this theory, so much so that he cut taxes immensely. He said it would create jobs among other things. Not giving the government money doesn't work, as the data show. The Kansas City Star, a newspaper in that very state, agrees. Link: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-c ... 54187.html
Image for the important bit:


Not having a government means there's no one to protect the rights of anyone. If there were to be a private police force, the one that owns it can say "Hey, I don't like my neighbors, so when they dial the emergency number ignore them." If they paid for private firefighters, the person/group that owns it can say "I don't like you, so the FD won't come when you need help." That's why, even though a public service is ineffective, is still more effective than a private service.

Yes, the government is prone to corruption, but simultaneously big money is prone to corruption. The only difference between the two is that the government, once found, is held accountable while big money isn't.

FuZ wrote:

can someone move this shit thread to GD
Current American politics is a joke, therefore, keep it in Off Topic.

RoseusJaeger wrote:

This thread has gone to hell and back, but it's fun to read. So far, rep1se seems to be the one with most sanity and rational sense.
I'm not flattered
Topic Starter
roshan117
AYYY TODAY ARE THE PRIMARIES IN MY STATE

LETS HOPE TRUMP DOESNT WIN MY STATE YEAAAA?
Yuudachi-kun

roshan117 wrote:

AYYY TODAY ARE THE PRIMARIES IN MY STATE

LETS HOPE TRUMP DOESNT WIN MY STATE YEAAAA?
I hope Trump wins
DeletedUser_6709840

repr1se wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

This thread has gone to hell and back, but it's fun to read. So far, rep1se seems to be the one with most sanity and rational sense.
I'm not flattered
I wasn't trying to.
repr1se

RoseusJaeger wrote:

I wasn't trying to.
bb come back :cry:

But I meant it as "I expected this to be a rational discussion so it isn't a surprise." Sorry for the misunderstanding.
DeletedUser_6709840

repr1se wrote:

RoseusJaeger wrote:

I wasn't trying to.
bb come back :cry:

But I meant it as "I expected this to be a rational discussion so it isn't a surprise." Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Alright, that sounds better
laport
Couldn't care less.
Yuudachi-kun
Connecticut · 28 delegates
40% reporting · Trump won and has 16 delegates
Delaware · 16 delegates
Trump won and has 16 delegates
Maryland · 38 delegates
3% reporting · Trump won and has 26 delegates
Pennsylvania · 17 delegates
Trump won and has 17 delegates
Rhode Island · 19 delegates
56% reporting · Trump won and has 7 delegates
Topic Starter
roshan117

Khelly wrote:

Connecticut · 28 delegates
40% reporting · Trump won and has 16 delegates
Delaware · 16 delegates
Trump won and has 16 delegates
Maryland · 38 delegates
3% reporting · Trump won and has 26 delegates
Pennsylvania · 17 delegates
Trump won and has 17 delegates
Rhode Island · 19 delegates
56% reporting · Trump won and has 7 delegates
IKR IM SO MAD TRUMP WON AHGGGHGGHGHGHGHGHGHHHGGHHGGHHGH
Yuudachi-kun
So what do you mean ikr? I'm glad trump won.
Yuudachi-kun
Rhode Island · 19 delegates
91% reporting · Trump won and has 9 delegates, Kasich has 2

Ted Cruz is so shit even kasich is getting delegates over him
xxdeathx
Clinton vs Trump 2016
Foxtrot

Mahogany wrote:

In my history class we have fun drawing parallels between Trump and Hitler
They are both great men. :^)

I actually like Bernie's idea of taxing purchased shares because it would create enough revenue for the policies he has promised for such as free education and government provided health care (which I don't think even matter now, since his chances of winning are dim). However, his federal 15$ minimum wage idea was completely bonkers and I'm happy he stopped bringing it up because minimum wage should be calculated per city's population and revenue.

Trump is definitely my plan B because he actually happens to have a sensible tax plan whereas Cruz wants it to be a fixed rate even though he loves talking for the true Can-- American blue collar people, the kind of people who need a tax reform the most (Cruz is not even American so I don't even know why the fuck he's still running). At the same time though, Trump's tax plan kind of goes out of the window if you consider the cost of the infamous wall (Mexico is not going to pay for it, it's just another stupid bait like the $15 dollar minimum wage), let alone the cost of checking literally every illegal immigrant's background and then letting them back in once they're "clear" or whatever. I want the immigration system to be tightened as much as the next guy, but I would also like a plan that won't cost the taxpayers another stack of billions. It would be amazing if that money, instead, could be used to create a universal care system like any other civilized country. For fuck's sake if Moldova can do it with the amount of money they have, then so can we.

And for all the fear mongering, I believe that if you're a legal, law-abiding immigrant, you shouldn't be afraid of Trump. Simple as that, really.


Also if you have a vagina for the love of god please don't vote for Clinton just because she also happens to have one.

Khelly wrote:

Rhode Island · 19 delegates
91% reporting · Trump won and has 9 delegates, Kasich has 2

Ted Cruz is so shit even kasich is getting delegates over him
he is so shit people are still voting for rubio, man

xxdeathx wrote:

Clinton vs Trump 2016
TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

People need to realize that Bill Clinton won't come back or be involved at all if Hillary is elected. Most of her voters have voted for Clinton during his campaign and they're expecting her to be like her husband (though he clearly stated he doesn't wish to be married to her and who the fuck can blame him). People are so fucking dumb. Bill is gone. Bill is fucking gone (cries).
repr1se

Dulcet wrote:

I actually like Bernie's idea of taxing purchased shares because it would create enough revenue for the policies he has promised for such as free education and government provided health care (which I don't think even matter now, since his chances of winning are dim). However, his federal 15$ minimum wage idea was completely bonkers and I'm happy he stopped bringing it up because minimum wage should be calculated per city's population and revenue.
That's sensible, but we can agree that the minimum wage should be a livable wage, no? Of course, minimum wage shouldn't be able to afford luxuries but I believe it should be enough to sustain food, rent and bills.

Trump is definitely my plan B because he actually happens to have a sensible tax plan whereas Cruz wants it to be a fixed rate even though he loves talking for the true Can-- American blue collar people, the kind of people who need a tax reform the most (Cruz is not even American so I don't even know why the fuck he's still running). At the same time though, Trump's tax plan kind of goes out of the window if you consider the cost of the infamous wall (Mexico is not going to pay for it, it's just another stupid bait like the $15 dollar minimum wage), let alone the cost of checking literally every illegal immigrant's background and then letting them back in once they're "clear" or whatever. I want the immigration system to be tightened as much as the next guy, but I would also like a plan that won't cost the taxpayers another stack of billions. It would be amazing if that money, instead, could be used to create a universal care system like any other civilized country. For fuck's sake if Moldova can do it with the amount of money they have, then so can we.
Cruz is the epitome of modern fundamentalist evangelical, and no one takes him seriously because everything out of his mouth came from a 1700 year old book.
And yes... the wall is stupid.
And for all the fear mongering, I believe that if you're a legal, law-abiding immigrant, you shouldn't be afraid of Trump. Simple as that, really.
I don't think the issue is with immigration, but rather that Trump is alienating people related to immigrants. My parents are Asian immigrants and they feel the same.
Also if you have a vagina for the love of god please don't vote for Clinton just because she also happens to have one.
Hillary don't care about no women.

People need to realize that Bill Clinton won't come back or be involved at all if Hillary is elected. Most of her voters have voted for Clinton during his campaign and they're expecting her to be like her husband (though he clearly stated he doesn't wish to be married to her and who the fuck can blame him). People are so fucking dumb. Bill is gone. Bill is fucking gone (cries).
+1. Bill, as the First Man, would be pacing the White House waiting for the end of the 4 year term just to get out.
Foxtrot
:lol:

repr1se wrote:

Dulcet wrote:

I actually like Bernie's idea of taxing purchased shares because it would create enough revenue for the policies he has promised for such as free education and government provided health care (which I don't think even matter now, since his chances of winning are dim). However, his federal 15$ minimum wage idea was completely bonkers and I'm happy he stopped bringing it up because minimum wage should be calculated per city's population and revenue.
That's sensible, but we can agree that the minimum wage should be a livable wage, no? Of course, minimum wage shouldn't be able to afford luxuries but I believe it should be enough to sustain food, rent and bills.
"Live-able" paychecks differ from each state. For example, if you like in Missisisppi where the state minimum wage is $7.25 it's because things and rent are REALLY cheap. If all the sudden it gets raised to $15, not only will it dramatically raise cost of living, but there just won't be enough money to FEDERALLY pay $15 dollars an hour per each individual. It's just too much money, and that's why I believe minimum wage should really depend on how affordable it is to live in your location. I believe people should have enough money for shelter and food, but I don't believe that our citizens should just rely the minimum wage alone.

repr1se wrote:

Bill, as the First Man, would be pacing the White House waiting for the end of the 4 year term just to get out.
Hillary is clearly holding him hostage for political fame. Every time he looks at the camera I try to count the amount of eye blinks just to see if there's a pattern and a code behind it
B1rd

repr1se wrote:

Going to leave this here.
>If you want to share something link to studies directly.
A liberal news site is better than nothing at all.
No, biased information is worse than no information. You don't see me linking stuff from Stormfront, do you? Link to objective facts, not sites that will try to manipulate information to suit their agenda. Like the information that I already debunked.

Immigrants are problematic because they vote left, and you vote right.
Just going to leave it at that.
You missed the point. If your favoured political system one where one side can just import voters, then that probably isn't a very good system.

You also ignored all of the points I presented about why Muslim immigrants are detrimental.

The thing with liberalism is that it assumes the government will use people's money solely for the good of the community. That doesn't happen.
ftfy

People don't pay for roads and fire services out of a desire to help the community. They do because they want those services. Do people value having these things? Do you? Then you would pay for them if you weren't forced to. Simple as that. And if you didn't, that's your choice, it's going to affect no one but you.

Edit: What you probably have in mind is people paying one large fund that provides these services for everyone. It wouldn't work like that. It would be private contracts, a bit like insurance works. For roads you would just pay road tolls.

Kansas had a governor that believed this theory, so much so that he cut taxes immensely. He said it would create jobs among other things. Not giving the government money doesn't work, as the data show. The Kansas City Star, a newspaper in that very state, agrees. Link: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-c ... 54187.html
Image for the important bit:
Cutting taxes is not the same as creating an anarcho-capitilistic society. You don't leave the traditional medium of funding all of the public services in place and then just not use it, things don't work like that.

Not having a government means there's no one to protect the rights of anyone. If there were to be a private police force, the one that owns it can say "Hey, I don't like my neighbors, so when they dial the emergency number ignore them." If they paid for private firefighters, the person/group that owns it can say "I don't like you, so the FD won't come when you need help." That's why, even though a public service is ineffective, is still more effective than a private service.
No they wouldn't. If a security provider refused to issue services, their reputation would suffer greatly and people would switch to their rivals. Private companies have every incentive to offer the best services possible. Public government services don't, because they have no competition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIsFkTJNBlw

Yes, the government is prone to corruption, but simultaneously big money is prone to corruption. The only difference between the two is that the government, once found, is held accountable while big money isn't.
How is the government accountable to corruption while businesses aren't? The American political system is blatantly corrupt. What can you do about it?

Governments are an inherently flawed system. Because power corrupts. Leftists act like it's the fault of the businesses rather than the government. Well tell me, how many people have private businesses killed in the last century? Businesses do not have an armies or police. But when you have a system set up how it is, you create the opportunity for corruption because businesses can bribe politicians, which in turn give favours to the businesses. Yo will never eliminate this form of corruption unless you eliminate the entity that has a monopoly on force.

I'ld like to elaborate on the subject of anarchist societies a bit more, but I'll admit that I don't know much of the technical details myself yet. I have some books on the subject that I ordered, which I just need to collect.
Yuudachi-kun
I think people who pander to illegal immigrants are alienating legal immigrants by devaluing the process those people went through to legitimately come intonthe country.
Yuudachi-kun
Also Ted Cruz looks like he's perpetually going to cry or he is going to take a big shit. Is that just me who sees this?
B1rd
TRIGGER WARNING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

Another reason why democracy is shit female suffrage
Foxtrot

Khelly wrote:

Also Ted Cruz looks like he's perpetually going to cry or he is going to take a big shit. Is that just me who sees this?


Khelly wrote:

I think people who pander to illegal immigrants are alienating legal immigrants by devaluing the process those people went through to legitimately come intonthe country.
as an legal immigrant with a green card, I can tell you that it's 100% true
Navizel
quality huffpost article
very nice

Khelly wrote:

I think people who pander to illegal immigrants are alienating legal immigrants by devaluing the process those people went through to legitimately come intonthe country.
also this
Darkwing_420
1.You opened the wrong can of worms and 2.I also wish to move outta the us for a while to see what the rest of the world is like
DeletedUser_6709840
I'd move if I had money to
Yuudachi-kun
Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
DeletedUser_6709840

Khelly wrote:

Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
That's not very easy to answer.
B1rd
Because Mexico is a shithole, perhaps?
Endie-

Khelly wrote:

Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
Canada is more like the US i guess
DeletedUser_2024727

Khelly wrote:

Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
because mexico has tons of crime, a weak infrastructure, and no job market
Navizel

Khelly wrote:

Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
maybe because they have to learn a new language?

I don't know what's so hard about this question.
Topic Starter
roshan117

Khelly wrote:

Why does everyone want to move to Canada and not Mexico?
because canada is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NICE



and because its so close, it doesnt take that long to get there

like, from where I am, it is just a 4 hour drive and boom im in ontario
DeletedUser_6767276
delete this post
Zain Sugieres
Topic Starter
roshan117
~~~
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply