Hi.
[ Inner Oni]
good luck (¦3[▓▓]
[ Inner Oni]
- 00:27:425 (40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - ddkdkk for consistency with 00:21:030 (14,15,16,17,18,19) - and 00:40:213 (93,94,95,96,97,98) - ?
- 00:41:679 - could have a note to follow the sound.
- 00:53:668 (196) - delete. (and 00:53:401 (194) - k, or 00:53:801 (197) - d? ) this part looks busy, needs 1/1s imo.
- 01:00:329 (249) - delete, ^
- 01:11:785 (348) - ^ And some more notes could be deleted. It's your decision.
- 00:55:932 (214,215,216,217) - ddkk would more fit to the drums.
- 01:08:055 (316,317,318,319) - could follow the drums. eg.) kdkk
- 01:20:178 (419,420) - ctrl+g to follow the drums?
- 01:13:384 (362,363) - ^.
- 01:24:840 (461,462,463,464,465,466) - could follow the drums. eg.) -kkddk
- 01:46:886 (617,618,619) - consider deleting, This pattern seems too long relatively than other patterns in this part
- 01:48:152 (629,630,631,632,633,634,635) - umm... this pattern doesn't fit to sound well imo. How about following sound pitches? also it seems bit overdone.
- 02:11:730 (843,845,847) - bit overdone too.
- 02:39:040 (1044) - d? lower pitch than prev.
- 02:51:561 (1116,1117,1118,1119,1120) - I'm not sure what sound does it follow. k-k-k- works good enough imo
- 03:04:349 (1210,1211,1212,1213,1214,1215,1216,1217,1218,1219) - I don't think it fits to the drums well. Downbeats should be kats in the same way as next stream. 03:05:415 (1220,1224,1228,1232) - ?
- 03:13:274 (1294,1295,1296,1297,1298) - kdkdk makes more natural flow imo.
- 03:22:599 (1382) - del? looks too long.
- 03:32:057 (1445) - why not d.. ddk x3 works fine.
- 03:35:254 (1457,1458,1459,1460) - ^ (d-kkd)
- 05:22:424 (54) - delete? this part is so quiet, this pattern looks bit overdone.
- 05:36:212 (138) - k? since high pitch sound, and it makes nicely ending imo.
good luck (¦3[▓▓]