Really like this song. Gonna mod it soon, then maybe a bubble Just maybe tho
lol thanksnewyams99 wrote:
Really like this song. Gonna mod it soon, then maybe a bubble Just maybe tho
So that's about it lol, I hope I didn't miss any mod.newyams99 wrote:
Reduced some word so I can reply lol
diffname fine
metadata okMany suggestions00:19:432 (7) - You may want to change this to k since the vocal pitch is higher than the hits surrounding it. I'd prefer to let the first stanza (or first beat) to be d, just like original Taiko no Tatsujin style do it.
00:24:494 (28) - ^ The pitch is the same as the next hit, and you did a similar thing at 00:34:085 (67). ok
00:27:957 (42,43) - Just a personal opinion, but this should have Ctrl + G done on it, then change 00:28:490 (44) to k. The way you've matched the ks here seems to be matched to the music box (let's call it that); if so, you could possibly Ctrl + G 00:27:158 (39,40) instead. But the vocal does fit these pattern if you hear properly
00:29:423 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - I'd personally delete this portion, since adding hits in a quiet section doesn't sound good imo. Also, it creates a transitional effect into the second half of the quiet section. You can do whatever you want tho. But I wanna keep the similarity of the part, you can see that all part a these soft section are contain 4-note.
00:36:616 (78) - I realize you matched the instrumentals here because it's on a different place within the measure compared to places such as 00:31:821 where you didn't match to the instrumentals. However, I still think you should add the hits at these places where you omitted, such as the one mentioned above, and other similar places such as 00:35:018 in the quiet section. Idk, it just felt kinda inconsistent when I played through it. Because generally the vocal is louder than instrumental and it barely hearable when I put note on it, but when the vocal is gone then I'll put the instrumental instead.
01:06:190 - Add a d here. You can clearly hear an instrumental sound here, and it kinda interrupts the flow. To compensate for the break loss, you could add a break by deleting 01:07:789 (314,315) which doesn't have a sound. But I does the same thing on other part?? It would be more interrupts the flow when I used your suggestion because the break part isn't similarity anymore.
01:07:922 (316) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals and instrumentals. Even further, you could change 01:08:055 (317) to k as well, and Ctrl + G 01:08:188 (318,319,320) for a better match with the instrumentals, like so https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431956 I've changed the first suggestion but not second one because that is quite hard to press for kkdd player
01:08:721 (322) - Change to d? The background instrumentals aren't present here (the snare drum-like sound I think), and vocals aren't present either. same as above reason, it's kinda hard to press when comes to kkdd player's flow
01:09:121 (327,328,329,330,331) - This rhythm should be reworked as there are instrumentals that are missed. Something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431966 may work I've used your suggestion but I think the rhythm is weird. Generally I want to emphasize the guitar bass at here.
01:11:119 (343) - You could change this to k for the snare drum sound. You're right but I wanna keep this to d because the it was too much k on it imo
01:13:384 (363,364) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. sure
01:15:115 (378) - You could change to d as there's a clear bass drum sound here. Same as above reason, I don't want to make it same pattern in like ~2 sec. It's kinda boring imo
01:15:781 (384) - Change to k? Then Ctrl + G 01:16:048 (387,388) would make a better match the instrumentals, with the ks matching the snare drums once again. ddkdk is really hard for kkdd player imo when comes to really fast bpm lol sorry for this
01:16:448 - This rhythm is absolutely beautiful. wow I didn't notice these, thanks
01:18:579 (406) - I'm guessing this is a d for contrast with the next hit which is vocals. However, I personally like this as a k better. yeah
01:18:845 (408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - This could be reworked too imo. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4432058 yeah I like this, also applied above suggestion cuz I've change pattern lol
01:21:510 (432) - Change to d to match the bass drum and because there's no snare drum, and because the vocals are lower. I want to make it same as 01:21:776 (434) - this note as their vocal tone are same
01:22:842 (444) - You can change this to k if you want to match the snare drum. hmm I'd prefer to keep this so I can make a variety of
01:26:172 (472,473) - You may want to delete this for a nice emphasis on the vocals. If you hear properly this is already emphasis to it because at 01:24:707 - here you get d k d k d k-ish pattern and 01:25:773 - at here you will get k d k d k d-ish pattern.
01:26:705 (477) - Change to k for the snare drum. As above reason
01:27:504 (483,484,485,486) - You could switch the colours of these four hits for the same reasons as before. The colour change on 01:27:904 (486) is most optional. I thought this is fit the vocal perfectly?
01:28:304 (490,491) - Ctrl + G matches the snare drum and the vocal pitch better. ok
01:29:369 (500,501,502) - Switch the colours for the same reason as above? same
01:30:435 (509) - You can change this to k. Alternatively, 01:30:568 (510) may be changed to match the vocals. yeah
01:33:499 (534,535,536,537) - k d d k is possible to match the snare drums, and the first k d to match the vocals. ok
01:34:698 (544,545,546,547) - k d k k is possible to match the snare drums and the k k to match the vocals. yeah
01:35:763 (550) - You may change this to d to match the pitch of the vocals, as you did at 01:38:960 (568). ^
01:47:086 (622,623) - Ctrl + G would have the k matched to the vocals and have a d to contrast with the instrumentals at 01:47:352 (624). ^
01:52:415 (668,669,670,671) - Switch the colours of this pattern? A k on 01:52:415 (668) works to match the vocals, and a k on 01:52:681 (671) works to match the instrumentals. Changed to other pattern to make the flow better.
01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736,737,738) - This can also be reworked like this perhaps: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4435774
The current rhythm is too monotonous at 01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736) imo. Changed to other pattern too to make a variety or difference to previous part
02:02:805 (772) - You can change this to k to match the instrumentals. Alternatively, you could change 02:03:072 (774) to k to match the instrumentals. I'd prefer to keep this to make the flow better and more fun
02:04:804 (792,793) - Ctrl + G would match the instrumentals and vocals better imo. Changed to other pattern to avoid too much kdkdkd
02:07:867 (814) - You could change this to D to contrast with the surrounding hits and to emphasize the highest point of the vocals at 02:08:666 (818). Same at 03:25:130 (1402) and 05:04:774 (174). nah, if you see properly that I am playing with the big note pattern with D and then D and K and K. I did this for the vocal tone is slightly fading up too.
02:08:666 (818) - Best part of every kiai and the whole song right at this hit <3 Ikr haha!
02:12:663 - I think the kiai should end here. I'm pretty particular on stylistic elements such as the kiai time.But the score will be less
02:16:260 (875,876,877,878) - Switching the colours of these hits would work better to match the pitch of the instrumental melody. yep, these sounds great!
02:18:525 (895,896,897) - ^ yea
02:20:256 (910,911,912,913) - ^ but not here, kdd is a anti-flow lol
02:22:921 (931) - You could change this to d to contrast the vocal pitch and the instrumental sound difference. But I wanna emphasize the instrumental. If I change to d the pattern will too low-pitch-ish (that's mean the k generally for soft part or high pitch, so if I put too much d it will too noisy).
02:26:118 (949) - Change to k? The instrumental sound is more similar to the next hit than the previous. yep
02:26:384 - It wouldn't hurt to add a hit here. Generally I don't want to put something between big note so I can emphasis it.
02:27:050 (955,956,957,958) - Ctrl + G would work to match the ks to both the vocals and instrumentals. yep
02:28:782 (970,971,972) - ^ ^
02:29:448 (976,977) - ^ If you want to match to the vocals. ^
02:30:381 (984,985,986) - If you switch the colours of these hits, it could work better for the k on 02:30:381 (984) to match a similar sound that was heard at 02:30:248 (983) and d k for a nice contrast on the vocal pitch. Same as first reason, I'd want to keep this because of first stanza
02:34:377 (1006,1007) - You could change these to d to show a difference in instrumental sound with the next two hits, and you could also add a k at 02:34:910 if you want to. ok
02:44:767 (1076,1077,1078,1079,1080) - You could switch the colours of these hits to match the instrumentals better at 02:44:901 (1077,1078). well ok
02:49:297 (1101) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals which I think you're doing here; it also matches the instrumentals. ok
02:49:896 - You can add a hit here. I'd prefer to keep here just 1/2 beat snap divisor because here is very soft
02:54:891 (1141,1142) - Ctrl + G may be better to have the k be matched to the high pitched drum sound at 02:55:024 (1142). same reason
02:55:424 (1144) - You can change this to d to put a bit more emphasis on the vocals. ok
03:04:216 (1211) - You can change this to k to match the similar sound at 03:04:083 (1210).
03:07:146 (1240) - You can change this to d for a slight more variety. I wanna keep this not just because I wanna make it harder than first part but I wanna emphaize the drum tick at white line
03:07:946 (1247,1248) - Ctrl + G works to bring out the vocals with the k at 03:08:079 (1248). ok
03:10:610 (1272,1273,1274,1275) - Ctrl + G for consistency with 01:53:347 (678,679,680), it also sounds better. You may also want to change 03:11:076 (1276) to k if you want, or just have the whole triplet as ddd as it was originally. yea
03:16:072 (1324,1325) - ^ for a better match with the vocals.
03:19:136 (1355,1356) - ^
03:19:669 (1359,1360) - You could also change this to dd if you want to bring out the vocals at the end of the triplet.
03:35:254 (1459) - Change to d. The k matching is inconsistent with 03:34:722 (1457). If you accept this suggestion, you should also Ctrl + G 03:35:521 (1460,1461,1462) for contrast and consistency of matching. I want to keep the d d k d k k pattern
03:43:780 -It's also possible to create a kiai here. It's a pretty high-paced part.ok maybe not cuz the kiai would be insanely long lel lol
03:47:777 (1536,1537) - Ctrl + G for a nice match with the vocals 03:47:777 (1536,1537). ok
03:49:908 (1554,1555,1556) - Switch the colours of these hits? It'll help match the vocals and match the instrumental sound at 03:49:908 (1554). I'll change to k k D because of first reason
03:53:105 (1579) - The drums are slightly higher pitched here and it'll also create a good contrast with the next finisher, so change to k? I'll keep here to emphasis the vocal a~a~a (vocal tone is fading down)
03:54:970 (1587) - Change to k to keep the consistency of matching the instrumentals at 03:54:171 (1583). Same at 03:55:769 (1591). You may also want to change some surrounding hits. same as first reason
03:58:833 (1607,1608) - Ctrl + G will have a k better match with the high vocals and the instrumental sounds. ok
04:08:291 (1681,1682) - ^
04:11:489 (1707,1708) - ^ To match the instrumental sound at 04:11:755 (1708).
04:14:686 (1730,1731) - ^
04:22:146 (1785) - You should change to D since the vocal pitch is lower. Similarly, 04:25:343 (1799) should be changed for the lower instrumental sound. Same, I was playing the flow of the pattern (D and K and D and K)
04:22:546 (1786,1787) - Maybe change to d d to contrast the instrumental sound at 04:22:945 (1788)? Since the second big note is K, so I'll make it all k for similarity.
04:27:740 (1801) - You can change this to k to match a similar sounding xylophone sound at 04:28:274 (1803). I'll reconsider this, well I don't make it same as second part for variety
04:36:266 (1827,1828) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. same, for variety.
04:34:401 (1822,1823,1824) - Switching the colours would match the pitch of the xylophone and the vocals.
04:41:595 (1844,1845) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. I'd prefer the k for final note because d is too noisy
04:47:722 (16,17) - ^ to have the k matched to the vocals, probably one of the more optional changes tho. ok
04:51:452 (48) - You could change this to k to match the high vocals. yep, and thus flow is better too
04:58:646 (126,127,128,129,130) - Having this pattern start and end with a k would sound better imo. yea
05:02:109 (165) - Idk, but this slider seemed unnecessary to me, and could be made just like 03:22:466. For emphasize the very strong word from the song
05:08:504 (202) - You could change this to K for a greater contrast with the surrounding hits. hmm I did prefer D d d d for similarity.
05:09:036 (204) - This could be changed to k for the instrumental difference and vocals.
05:10:635 (1) - This spinner should end at 05:12:500 for the vocals imo. But for the gameplay it's too short imo
05:14:498 (5,6) - Ctrl + G may work to have the k match the instrumental sound at 05:14:631. Same at 05:30:617 (104). ok
05:17:828 (25) - Could be changed to k for the same reason as above. Adding a hit could also be possible at 05:17:695.
05:19:693 (35,36) - d d works better to contrast the instrumentals at 05:19:960 (37).
05:20:892 (42) - This can also be changed to d for the same reason as above.
05:22:491 (55,56) - Ctrl + G works better to match the instrumentals imo.
05:23:956 (67,68) - ^ all are applied
05:34:613 (126) - You may change to k here for the same reasons as before. I wanna make a difference or variety for second part
05:35:412 - May I ask why this inherited point is at 47% lel xD Change to 45% if you want to be precise:P ahh you're right lol, miscalculated
Nah don't worry, because you've change something on your suggestion and I think that is reasonable enough, so I'll fix it :3.newyams99 wrote:
Ok, the things look good. I didn't want to force you so please make sure the suggestions you applied actually make sense to you, and you like them. You have no reason to change them if you don't like my suggestions. Also, just one more thing, you should add hits after the spinner so there isn't a weird gap (perhaps that's what you were arguing against). Something like this would easily fill the gap: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4449897
Call me back after you filled that gap, then we can bubble this
Thank you and Thank you lolnewyams99 wrote:
Hi, hopefully this should be my last post before the bubble. Sorry x.x
02:12:663 - As said before, I personally think the kiai should end here. I couldn't tell if you completely denied it or not so just gonna restate that. I'm sorry but I just gonna keep this. Mainly because the kiai time is almost same with chorus, but the vocal isn't sing finish yet when you put here
02:38:240 (1037) - You can change this to k to match the higher vocals. Perhaps there's a bit too much d here as well. yes
03:03:949 (1207,1208,1209) - You may Ctrl + G this for a better match to the instrumental clap sound. I will keep the ddk to ddd because in my option the ddk is too much at here.
03:17:404 (1335,1336,1337,1338) - kkd k would work better with the pitch of the vocals and matching the instrumentals imo. yes, this sound great
04:49:987 (36,37,38) - Change to d k k for a match to the instrumental clap sound and contrast with the finisher at the end of the pattern. If not, you should at least change 04:50:253 (38) to k for contrast imo. But at here I'm following the tone of the piano. If you hear properly that the piano tone is getting down.
I have many other points to point out, but the way you mapped it sounds fine too imo. Other BNs may touch on things like that. Call me back one last time for the bubble
Thanks for mod!tasuke912 wrote:
Hi.
fixed
[ Inner Oni]You may call me back when you are done.
- 00:27:425 (40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - ddkdkk for consistency with 00:21:030 (14,15,16,17,18,19) - and 00:40:213 (93,94,95,96,97,98) - ? yeah
- 00:41:679 - could have a note to follow the sound. I'd like to keep for 1/2 pattern here
- 00:53:668 (196) - delete. (and 00:53:401 (194) - k, or 00:53:801 (197) - d? ) this part looks busy, needs 1/1s imo. Actually the part isn't really too dense because there's break at before and after. And this is Inner so it doesn't matter, right? lol
- 01:00:329 (249) - delete, ^ hmm I'll keep this for the fit to the drum
- 01:11:785 (348) - ^ And some more notes could be deleted. It's your decision. I'll change to other pattern instead for fit better
- 00:55:932 (214,215,216,217) - ddkk would more fit to the drums. you're right
- 01:08:055 (316,317,318,319) - could follow the drums. eg.) kdkk yes
- 01:20:178 (419,420) - ctrl+g to follow the drums? yep
- 01:13:384 (362,363) - ^. yeah
- 01:24:840 (461,462,463,464,465,466) - could follow the drums. eg.) -kkddk ok
- 01:46:886 (617,618,619) - consider deleting, This pattern seems too long relatively than other patterns in this part I'd like to keep it because I want to represent the dense of the song and it's almost want to go for chorus part.
- 01:48:152 (629,630,631,632,633,634,635) - umm... this pattern doesn't fit to sound well imo. How about following sound pitches? also it seems bit overdone. I don't know, I feel this is really fun at least for the gameplay, also there's no modder that mention this before lol. I'll consider this anyway
- 02:11:730 (843,845,847) - bit overdone too.
- 02:39:040 (1044) - d? lower pitch than prev. ok
- 02:51:561 (1116,1117,1118,1119,1120) - I'm not sure what sound does it follow. k-k-k- works good enough imo yeah
- 03:04:349 (1210,1211,1212,1213,1214,1215,1216,1217,1218,1219) - I don't think it fits to the drums well. Downbeats should be kats in the same way as next stream. 03:05:415 (1220,1224,1228,1232) - ? ok you're right
- 03:13:274 (1294,1295,1296,1297,1298) - kdkdk makes more natural flow imo. ok
- 03:22:599 (1382) - del? looks too long. Well I'll keep this because generally delete this will break the flow of fun of pattern, also there's already have break at before stream and almost get to break too.
- 03:32:057 (1445) - why not d.. ddk x3 works fine. Because there another tone (which is not drum) that are higher than other two. So I put d k k for the fit both side.
- 03:35:254 (1457,1458,1459,1460) - ^ (d-kkd) The piano tone is higher than first one, so I put d k k to represent it
- 05:22:424 (54) - delete? this part is so quiet, this pattern looks bit overdone. yes
- 05:36:212 (138) - k? since high pitch sound, and it makes nicely ending imo. yes
good luck (¦3[▓▓]
Thanks a lotJUDYDANNY wrote:
Lite mod, I may mod again…(when I recheck) ?Symbol meaning
- >> Normal suggestion.
Big text >> Strong suggestion.
>> Questionable imo.
>>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
[Timing]
Disunified the BPM. Comparing with them. ( 00:05:044 - , 04:27:474 - , 05:36:212 -).
You should change 00:05:044 – to 225.2 and SV x 0.5. It does feel really weird if I change this. Because generally the white line is too much at gameplay. I could change it tho if this is unrankable or you're really bother with this
02:51:295 – move to 02:50:496 - and change to 4/4 . on beat there 02:51:561 – . You're right
- 02:52:627 – how about accel the 0.85~0.90 ? from 02:59:021 – x1.00 looks far gap before x0.75. I've thought this before at the end I don't really want it because it kinda fucked up at gameplay for "mod" player imo.
[Oni]Good Luck (¦3[___]
- 00:41:279 (97) – change to d and 00:41:679 – add k? Appeared the little over 00:36:616 -, so I suggest this matches better and 00:41:679 – it follows the chime and 00:41:013 - ~ 00:41:812 – expression the vocal being low sounds better . I'd like to keep it for the 1/2 pattern here on purpose.
00:45:675 – change to d? , not same snare time as 00:44:876 (111,112) -. sure- 00:49:938 - ^ , same as above. I'd like keep as kkk for the better flow at here
- 01:07:122 (308,309,310) – about 1/2 coloring, how adjust the kd? (maybe kkd? )
dk sounds , enhanced the low-tone bass sounds , like from next part (01:09:254 -~~). I guess it still earlier to follow. I don't know it sound more weird when I put this LOL, any other suggestion?
Either? (or both?) *-1 both are fine for me, fixed
From 01:59:475 –to 02:01:740 -, 1/2 -1 plot > 1/4 plot > 1/2-1 > 1/4 > 1/2-1 sounds busy to me. I guess variation sounds better. Like these.
- A. 02:00:874 – move to 02:00:607 -? 02:00:407 – Enhance the vocal slar at 02:00:674 -.
B. 02:01:407 – move to 02:01:673 -? Similer , 02:01:473 – enhance the slar at 02:01:740 -.- 02:09:599 - remove and 02:09:332 – change to d? Making a break consistent on kiai with… like them 01:49:217 (1,2) - , 02:06:269 (1,2) -. I make those break because of big note...since here isn't have any big note so I'll keep it
- 02:35:176 – remove? same as 02:26:650 -? yes
- 02:53:559 – remove? backsounds seem to stop and making a little rest. umm no? I've listen that there's drum tick at here
- 02:56:756 -^
- 03:03:483 - ^ for adjust the sounds pressure if you apply the ^ and ^^. it's weird tho if just dk notes
- 03:08:012 – add d? comparing with 1st kiai, I guess there’re lack of 1/4 sounds with plays. sure! this is good for me
- 03:09:744 - ^? sound weird lol but I'll put at other places
- 03:21:201 – add k? for following the vocal. wow good!
- 03:36:587 – finisher? same as 03:33:389 -. yeah
- 03:37:119 – change to k? sounds up with cymbals. yep
- 04:51:385 – add d? same reason *-1 ok
Thanks a lot!DakeDekaane wrote:
Hi mint, just a few comments for your map:Nice map.
- Use 225.2BPM for the first timing point as it's the correct BPM, and use a 6/4 signature. fixed, thanks a lot finally solved
- Consider adjusting the volume a bit:
80-85% for the sections where you use 70%.
85-90% for the kiai, since hitsounds are barely hearable there. I'm not sure about both of these because I've using osu default skin to play so I feel these are fine.- 00:29:423 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - These notes feel a bit weird as there's no vocal present here like in other patterns, you should remove them. ahh, I put these because you can see that all of part contain these type of pattern, so it will be weird if this part didn't have this pattern, right?
- 05:36:212 (134) - Probably change for a big note so it creates a nice ending feeling? yep
Thankstasuke912 wrote:
Bubbled! #2