ZLOdeuka- wrote:

hello~ from #modreqs

[General]

• Background format is PNG - it only affects the weight of the map. Change the format and make jpg. - OMG I didn't notice that jpeg is more useful. Fixed!
• You have set the standard colors for new combos. I still advise you to choose other colors, that they looked more harmoniously with the background. - I'll consider it. Actually, I want to approve this map without color like freddy map, but I'll think of it.
• size MP3 scares. Maybe make the size a little less? eg reduce kb - NO!!!

[Realize]

00:10:282 (1,1) - These sliders seem scary to me... It can make something more pleasant? - I love this slider.....more opinion
01:05:666 (1,4) - possible so that they do not touch each other? - Fixed
01:10:282 (6) - new combo. Because the accelerated rhythm - Okay
01:13:051 (1,2) - to do something like this http://puu.sh/jZyEi/6613951338.jpg . to the slider (1) does not touch the ends of the slider (2) - Fixed
01:15:243 (2,4) - ^ http://puu.sh/jZyHJ/6a2c745b3b.jpg and 01:15:589 (3) - You will need to tweak... - Since I make blanket with01:15:243 (2,3,4) - , I don't have to fix
01:20:436 (1) - Please correct him. it seems curves http://puu.sh/jZyLh/8afa6f1d63.jpg - Fixed
01:27:820 (5) - new combo. Because the accelerated rhythm - Okay
01:36:820 (4,5) - this jump is too small. it is difficult to read at such a rate. or do ctrl + g or Take it away - took it away.
01:50:205 (5,6) - possible so that they do not touch each other? - Fixed
01:53:666 (5,6) - spacing. this is not readable. put (6) at the end of the slider - Fixed
01:54:589 (1) - make it symmetrically - Hope now is better. cuz I don't know what is changed.
02:29:436 (4) - new combo. cuz change spacings - NC looks weird me, so I fixed some DS
03:09:589 (5) - new combo. because otherwise it is impossible to play more jumping. (03:09:243 (4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/jZz97/71609b0302.jpg between them the same distance on the grid, but not metronome) - Fixed
03:35:436 (6,7) - blanket - Fixed
04:00:128 (5) - new combo
04:10:743 (4,1) - spacing. difficult to play! Try to move the slider (1) or put at the end of the slider (4)
04:44:658 (2,3) - blanket http://puu.sh/jZzpY/a0c289b2af.jpg
04:54:581 (5) - new combo
05:09:350 (5) - ^ - Both fixed
05:35:197 (5,7) - Make them symmetrically? - To blanket 05:34:735 (3,5) - and 05:35:543 (6,1) - , I do not make them symmetrically

Important mistakes I no longer found.

Good luck!

clp012345 wrote:

All suggestions

[Realize]

00:10:282 (1,1) - maybe place 3 notes in between would be better? - Well....not attract me.....
00:28:513 (3,1) - somehow separating this two notes looks better to me - Stacking also looks good to me
00:32:436 (1) - i think this needs reshape - Yep. reshaped. but still looks ugly
01:28:512 (6) - maybe changing this to stream? - Since I want to make star diff under 5.2, I don't make these to stream.
04:55:273 (6) - ^-^
01:45:589 (2) - I prefer something like this - Since I mapped according to violin sonund, I changed circle to slider.
02:17:666 (1,1,1) - this looks strange, maybe a reverse slider? - I also feel this should change, but reverse slider looks weird to me. This will changed laster
02:58:743 (7) - maybe make this two reverse sliders? - I mapped violin sound, so I don't make this two slider
04:48:697 (6) - instead, maybe 216, 160 would be better - I feel flow looks weird if I change like this.

testplay

Beomsan wrote:

첫 퀄파 기념 스타쏘고 감니다

Taeyang wrote:

• General

1. 안쓰는 이미지 파일
   • Files unused:
   {image material.png} - 이건 업뎃하면서 이미 지워졌을 거에요
2. 전체적으로 블랭킷 담요 간격을 지키거나
   스택이나 반스택을 규칙적으로 사용하거나
   오버랩을 때론 과감하게 사용했으면 좋겠습니다.
3. 뉴콤도 다운비트에 맞춰서 스팸 할떄는 규칙적으로

• General

1. 00:21:359 (1,2,3,4) - DS 안맞아서 약간 삐뚤어진 느낌이 들어요 - 수정
2. 01:03:012 (5,6) - 약간 먼느낌 - 수정
3. 01:17:666 (4) - 뉴콤해제 - 수정
4. 01:27:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 곡선 무빙으로? - 곡선으로 한번 해보니까 뭔가 이상하달까...? 수정은 안하겠습니다
5. 01:27:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - 리듬 - 글쎄요....이 박자는 영 아니라는 느낌?
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:33:359 (5) - 뉴콤 시작 부분01:33:589 (1) - 뉴콤 해제 - 여기는 삼각형들만 뉴콤으로 하고 싶네요
7. 01:36:820 (4,5) - 안티점프 들어갈 부분은 아닌것 같습니다. 01:37:397 - 서클 추가 - 이게 안티점프인지는 잘 모르겠지만....일단 서클 넣는건 좀 아닌거 같아서 간격 넓혔습니다.
8. 01:41:666 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 이부분 드럼 박자 따라가고 연타가 어려워질것 같으면 리버스 슬라 이용하세요 - 수정
9. 01:46:743 (2,3) - 오버랩 피하시고 간격 지켰으면...
10. 01:48:359 (4,5,6,1) - 이렇게 간격 지키면 리딩도 훨씬 쉽고 무빙하기도 좋고 보기좋아집니다.
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 02:13:743 - 02:13:859 - 노트추가 02:13:512 (3,1) - 안티점프 들어갈부분 아닌것 같습니다. - 여기부분은 바이올린(맞나?)소리에 따라 만들고싶으므로 수정 안하겠습니다.
12. 02:17:666 (1,1,1) - 이런 박자 텀이 바뀌는 곳은 특히 특별하게 강조되는곳이 아니라면 리버스슬라로 잡는게 좋습니다. - 흠.....많은 지적도 들어왔고 그러니 수정하겠습니다.
    
    SPOILER

    

나머지 더 의견 필요하시다면 찾아보세엽~

Fast wrote:

Realize:

01:27:820 (1) - 여기 다른부분처럼 두개로 나누는건 어떻게 생각하시나요: - 여기 슬라이더는 기타소리에 맞춰서 그냥 하나로 두고싶네요.

01:39:820 (1,2,3,4) - 여기에 갑자기 흐름이 끊긴거같은느낌이 드네요. 감속이 필요한것같지도않고... 다른곳처럼 꽉꽉 리듬 채우시는건..? - 나쁘지 않은 거 같군요. 수정
06:46:440 - 점점 느려지는부분에서 여기가 bpm이 잠깐 조금 높아졌는데 06:45:364 - 이부분과 같은 속도인 0.75를 쓸 필요가 없어보입니다. 차라리 06:46:440 - 여기엔 0.5배를 06:47:363 - 여기에 0.6배를 해서 06:45:364 - 여기서부터 점점 느려지는.. 그런 의도는 어떤가요..? - 수정




스탠 난이도는 그냥 캐치볼겸 같이 모딩했어요. 굿럭

1. Everything looks fine.

1. 00:59:782 (2) - The SV change here seems unnecessary. But if you were trying to emphasize the electric guitar's hold, the SV change here should be bit more drastic, or this should be instead a wiggle slider. This note should also have NC rather than 00:59:666 (1) - this note to indicate that this note has a SV change.
2. 01:33:589 (1,2,3) - The triangle here would look more neat if their distance were just like the default DS :
   
   
3. 01:40:743 (4,6) - (6) should be completely overlapping (4)'s tail for the aesthetics.
4. 02:13:974 (1,2,3,4,5) - The stream's flow was originally a curve, yet the slider didn't really have a curve at the start of it. It could be better like this :
   
   
5. 03:32:205 (4) - Following the drum beat previously, this instead should be 1 circle at 03:32:205 - and 1 triplet at 03:32:320 - .
6. 04:40:158 (2,3) - These would look nicer if they were overlapped bit more.
7. 05:32:197 (8,9,10,11) - The stream actually starts on 05:31:966 - , so these should be kick sliders. Or you could follow the drum beat from previous rhythms and delete (9).
8. 06:04:966 (6) - The slider's shape looks kinda weird, as it has a sudden increase in curve towards the end of the slider. You would rather want to make this slider even on curves for both sides.
9. 06:18:466 - The beat here should be emphasized like you did on 06:14:773 (7) - , or remove 06:14:773 (7) - this as a whole for consistency in rhythm.
10. Overall, a good map, with just a few aesthetic issue, but I am pretty sure that doesn't matter much.

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Hello there~ NM as requested in my queue~
And this map is hardcore o.o

1. Unrankable issues
2. My opinion which I highly recommend changing it
3. Just small suggestions/nazi

[General]

1. Everything looks fine.

[Realize]

1. 00:59:782 (2) - The SV change here seems unnecessary. But if you were trying to emphasize the electric guitar's hold, the SV change here should be bit more drastic, or this should be instead a wiggle slider. This note should also have NC rather than 00:59:666 (1) - this note to indicate that this note has a SV change. - Changed SV change more drastic
2. 01:33:589 (1,2,3) - The triangle here would look more neat if their distance were just like the default DS : - Fixed
   
   
3. 01:40:743 (4,6) - (6) should be completely overlapping (4)'s tail for the aesthetics. - Hmm...this unstack also looks good. also, I change like that, unstack with 01:40:282 (3) - looks weird
4. 02:13:974 (1,2,3,4,5) - The stream's flow was originally a curve, yet the slider didn't really have a curve at the start of it. It could be better like this : - It looks unnatural to me. Just this slider is fine imo.
   
   
5. 03:32:205 (4) - Following the drum beat previously, this instead should be 1 circle at 03:32:205 - and 1 triplet at 03:32:320 - . - It looks not problem to me.
6. 04:40:158 (2,3) - These would look nicer if they were overlapped bit more. - Fixed
7. 05:32:197 (8,9,10,11) - The stream actually starts on 05:31:966 - , so these should be kick sliders. Or you could follow the drum beat from previous rhythms and delete (9). - I think it doesn't. stream should start 05:32:197 (8) - and it fits drumsound.
8. 06:04:966 (6) - The slider's shape looks kinda weird, as it has a sudden increase in curve towards the end of the slider. You would rather want to make this slider even on curves for both sides. - Fixed
9. 06:18:466 - The beat here should be emphasized like you did on 06:14:773 (7) - , or remove 06:14:773 (7) - this as a whole for consistency in rhythm.
10. Overall, a good map, with just a few aesthetic issue, but I am pretty sure that doesn't matter much. - The reason why I add 06:14:773 (7) - is that there is another violin sound. but on 06:18:466, there is no violin sound like previous. so I mapped like this.

That is all from me. GL!

1. Missing BG picture.
2. 02:06:589 (1,2,1) - I'm okay with the 1/4 jump, but it's easy to catch players off-guard with such distance. I suggest placing (1,2) closer to each other to make it more confortable to play: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3703447
3. 04:33:235 (4,1) - This is quite a pain, coming from lots of horizontal slider-jumps and suddenly arriving into a vertical stream. I tried rotating the 1st 4 notes of the stream 45º and placing them a bit closer to the others: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3703507
4. 04:33:811 (1,2,3,4) - If you modify the previous pattern, you might want to keep the symmetry.
5. 04:54:927 (4,1) - A similar case, quite hard to achieve without knowing the jump well. What about applying Ctrl-G to (4) to balance the distance and improve slightly the flow? If it's not your taste, you can increase the curve of the stream 04:55:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - to make the beginning at least more horizontal.
6. 05:09:812 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Move the stream slightly to the left? With the strenght of the ~4x HDash, the player hits easily the wall.
7. 05:23:427 (2) - Just 1 grid to the right reduces the difficulty of the back and forth jump (x:320).
8. 05:24:350 (2) - Mirrored pattern, use x:192 for this one.
9. 05:32:312 (4) - Moving this slider a bit to the left would let the player catch the next one easier. How about x:192?
10. 05:46:273 (1,1) - I'd do something similar to this sliders, as suggested on 02:06:589 (1,2,1) - .
11. 06:20:427 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - Some hitsounds could've been added, since the next section is quite a noisy one. Place a N-sampleset at the beginning of each slider to remark them (not necessary to add an extra hitsound).

CLSW wrote:

캐치는 랭크 준비 완료된것같습니다. 이제 스탠만..
그리고 앞서 언급되었듯 BG체크 다시한번 해주세요

http://puu.sh/kiNlj/d235f9a75f.zip

스타의 상태가?

Doyak wrote:

1:1 req

[Realize]
* 00:13:974 (1,2) - 각 슬라가 좌우균형이 안 맞는데 똑바로 맞춰주시는 게? - 수정
* 00:28:513 (3) - 그다지 중요한 소리는 없는데 그냥 뺴도 괜찮을 거 같습니다. - 여기는 없으면 뭔가 허전해보여서 그냥 넣겠습니다
* 00:35:205 (1) - 뉴콤 해제? - 수정
* 00:41:666 (1) - 이 변속은 글쎄요 개인적으론 좀 어울리지 않는다는 느낌인데... - 흠.....글쎄요 저는 잘 어울린다고 생각합니다.
* 00:59:897 - 강한 소리(드럼 + 일렉기타)가 무시됐는데 메워주셨으면 좋겠습니다. - 수정
* 01:36:589 (3,4) - 블랭킷 많이 비뚤그놈의 망할 블랭캣 수정
* 01:41:897 - 드럼 소리가 무시되고 오히려 더 약하게 느껴지는 01:42:012 - 가 표현됐네요. - 수정
* 02:52:743 (1) - 뉴콤 해제 - 수정....은 했는데 왠지 선이 거슬리는군요
* 02:55:974 - 전반적으로 현악기 소리를 따라가고 계셨는데 여기가 빠진 건 아쉽네요. - 여기는 그냥 현악기따라 냅두고 싶네요.
* 02:59:436 - 02:59:205 (1,2) - 이렇게 2개는 쓰셨는데 드럼 소리는 일정하게 3번이 나는데도 3번째 건 빼셔서 아쉽습니다.
* 03:46:512 (1) - 뉴콤 해제 - 여기는 힛사도 그렇고 DS도 1.3으로 늘어났으니 그냥 냅두는게 좋을 거 같네요
* 03:47:205 - 여기서부터 뉴콤 주기 반으로 잘라주셨으면 좋겠어요. 하드락 같은 걸 걸었을 때 가장 힘든 구간이 빡센 부분 이후 노트 밀도가 낮은 곳에서 피가 차질 않고 도리어 줄어든다는 점인데 뉴콤을 더 잘게 넣으시면 조금 도움이 될 수 있습니다. 앞이랑 비교해도 여기가 지금 2배 길기도 하고요. - 완벽하게 반으로(?) 자를 수는 없지만 재량껏 뉴콤 추가했습니다.
* 04:49:043 (1,3) - 점을 더 사용해서 담요를 다듬을 수 있을 것 같습니다. - 여긴 딱히 담요의도한게 아니지만 담요 넣어봤습니다.
* 05:08:658 - 여기도 드럼 3개인데 마지막 것만 뺴셨네요. - 수정
* 05:09:004 - 여기도 빠진 게 아쉽습니다. - 수정
* 05:27:581 (3) - (300, 89)로 이동, 에디터의 버그 때문에 슬라끼리의 스택 시 좌표가 1씩 밀려나는 현상이 나타나는데 수동으로 조절해주시면 좋습니다. - 별 버그가 다있네요? 수정했습니다.
* 05:39:350 (7,8) - 이쪽에 소리가 많은데 1/4을 많이 써주셨으면 좋겠네요. 05:37:043 (1,2,3,4) - 여기보다 분위기도 더 뜨는 느낌이고요. - 괜찮아 보이는군요. 수정
* 06:01:966 (1,2) - 1번의 커브가 너무 급해서 담요가 비뚤어졌습니다. - 수정
* 06:12:927 - 06:13:850 - 아쉬운 드럼, 06:14:773 (7) - 여기만 표현해주셔서 일관성도 약간... - 여기는 현악기 따라가서 매핑한건데, 저기만 현악기가 따로 한번더 있더라고요? 그래서 저부분만 저렇게 매힝했습니다.

흐름은 좋은 것 같아요. 곧 어프 되길!

CLSW wrote:

http://puu.sh/kmDbf/f357d203bc.zip 마지막 수정본입니다. 이걸로 진짜 마감. 부족했던 오브젝트 안전한 선 안에서 추가했고 그 외 자잘한 흐름 어색한 부분 수정했습니다.

이제 전 팝콘을 들뿐
전모드 최초 9성 랭크를 위하여...

아 그리고 태그에 reflect beat가 아니라 REFLEC BEAT입니다. 또한 최초 수록된 버전이 라임라이트 버전이니 limelight 역시 추가해주시는게 좋을거같아요.

EDIT : 장르 업데이트했습니다.

1. there are many blanket issues going on on this diff. better recheck again whether it is blanket or not
2. 00:06:590 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - that symmetry play though
3. 00:24:128 (2,1) - better improve this blanket a bit
4. 00:30:128 (1) - idk if it's me, but i kinda feel bad about this. 00:30:128 - for note and the other one should do the slider or a note imo
5. 00:31:974 (4,1) - blanket stuff...
6. 00:37:974 (3,1) - blanket~~~
7. 01:04:397 (3,4) - improve this blanket just a little bit
8. 01:11:205 (1,2,3) - fix this blanket stuff you made here
9. 01:13:051 (1,2) - ^
10. 01:17:897 (6,7) - is this an intentional for blanket?
11. 01:22:051 (7) - try to stack this tail on (2)'s head. that will do for fixing the blanket of 01:22:051 (7,1) -
12. 01:31:397 (4,1) - yep. blanket again
13. 01:52:743 (1,2) - you should do something on this in order to blanket it
14. 01:54:589 (1,1,1) - well this is kinda creative LOL
15. 02:04:166 (2,3) - again. blanket
16. 02:08:205 (3,4) - do a small fix on this blanket
17. 02:24:589 (3,4) - small fix on blanket again
18. 02:24:589 (3,4) - ^
19. 02:27:762 (10) - i don't think that i can hear a note right here. remove it
20. 02:47:436 (7,1) - blanket again
21. 03:12:128 (1,1,1,1) - pretty creative blanket here, but 03:13:051 (1,1,1) - this needs to fix a bit
22. 03:22:743 (6,7) - blanket stuff~~~
23. 03:28:282 (7,1) - blanket again and again
24. 03:36:589 (3,4) - blanket stuff~~~
25. 03:43:974 (3,5) - ^
26. 03:48:589 (3,4) - ^
27. 03:57:128 (1,2) - ^
28. 04:01:974 (1,2) - ^
29. 04:24:812 (9,1) - yep. blanket
30. 04:39:812 (1,2) - again. same stuff
31. 04:56:197 (4,5) - ^
32. 05:28:273 (6,1) - ^
33. 05:34:735 (3,5) - ^
34. 05:35:658 (7,1) - ^
35. 06:01:966 (1,2,3) - ^
36. 06:03:812 (1,3) - ^
37. 06:11:139 - someone needs to use that slider reverse on this one
38. 06:43:518 (2) - i think this one feels so wrong right here. i'd prefer to use a note on 06:43:518 - and a note/slider on 06:43:979 -
39. 06:48:201 (1) - instead of finish, how about whistle?

message for CLSW

-Hakurei- wrote:

right...

[Better ver. from that 7 star map]

1. there are many blanket issues going on on this diff. better recheck again whether it is blanket or not
2. 00:06:590 (1,2,1,1,2,1) - that symmetry play though
3. 00:24:128 (2,1) - better improve this blanket a bit
4. 00:30:128 (1) - idk if it's me, but i kinda feel bad about this. 00:30:128 - for note and the other one should do the slider or a note imo
5. 00:31:974 (4,1) - blanket stuff...
6. 00:37:974 (3,1) - blanket~~~
7. 01:04:397 (3,4) - improve this blanket just a little bit
8. 01:11:205 (1,2,3) - fix this blanket stuff you made here
9. 01:13:051 (1,2) - ^
10. 01:17:897 (6,7) - is this an intentional for blanket?
11. 01:22:051 (7) - try to stack this tail on (2)'s head. that will do for fixing the blanket of 01:22:051 (7,1) -
12. 01:31:397 (4,1) - yep. blanket again
13. 01:52:743 (1,2) - you should do something on this in order to blanket it
14. 01:54:589 (1,1,1) - well this is kinda creative LOL
15. 02:04:166 (2,3) - again. blanket
16. 02:08:205 (3,4) - do a small fix on this blanket
17. 02:24:589 (3,4) - small fix on blanket again
18. 02:24:589 (3,4) - ^
19. 02:27:762 (10) - i don't think that i can hear a note right here. remove it - Hmm... These one looks no problem....
20. 02:47:436 (7,1) - blanket again
21. 03:12:128 (1,1,1,1) - pretty creative blanket here, but 03:13:051 (1,1,1) - this needs to fix a bit
22. 03:22:743 (6,7) - blanket stuff~~~
23. 03:28:282 (7,1) - blanket again and again
24. 03:36:589 (3,4) - blanket stuff~~~
25. 03:43:974 (3,5) - ^
26. 03:48:589 (3,4) - ^
27. 03:57:128 (1,2) - ^
28. 04:01:974 (1,2) - ^
29. 04:24:812 (9,1) - yep. blanket
30. 04:39:812 (1,2) - again. same stuff
31. 04:56:197 (4,5) - ^
32. 05:28:273 (6,1) - ^
33. 05:34:735 (3,5) - ^
34. 05:35:658 (7,1) - ^
35. 06:01:966 (1,2,3) - ^
36. 06:03:812 (1,3) - ^
37. 06:11:139 - someone needs to use that slider reverse on this one
38. 06:43:518 (2) - i think this one feels so wrong right here. i'd prefer to use a note on 06:43:518 - and a note/slider on 06:43:979 -
39. 06:48:201 (1) - instead of finish, how about whistle? - I tried it, but finish looks better imo.

message for CLSW

GL!

Tenseki wrote:

아
비피엠과
SV가
이렇게
높을줄은
몰랐네
ㅋㅋ - SV는 이미 돌이킬수 없다죠

[Realize]
-아 블랭캣 고치면서 잘못스냅된듯 하네요 ㄳ
근데 마지막 스피너는 1/16에 넣은거 맞으니 수정은 안하겠습니다.
03:08:320 - 서클 추가
03:08:089 - ^ - 이 둘은 보컬따라 단일서클 하고싶네요
03:13:051 (1,1) - 오버랩 별로 이쁘진 않네요 - 둘다 블랭킷이 우선이긴 한테 의견 좀더 모아보겠습니다
03:22:974 (7,1) - 흐름이 끊키네요 - 수정
03:28:282 (7,1) - 오버랩 - 수정
04:35:197 (5,7) - ^ 그다지 보기 좋진 않네요 - 점프가 좀 심해진거 같지만 뭐 수정
04:59:023 (8,9) - 8번과 9번슬라의 꼬리쪽에 소리 없습니다 - 여긴 바이올린 소리 들리는거 같은데...
05:01:504 (3,4) - 흐름이 아쉽네요 - 수정
05:02:715 (9,11) - 소리 없습니다 - 수정
05:09:350 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 25% 맞춰서 들어보세요, 오버매핑인곳이 어디인지 아실거에요. - 흠....여기는 드럼소리가 작아서 구별이 힘든데다, 원래 난이도도 여기는 스트림이라서 일단 보류해두겠습니다.
05:24:812 (7) - 3/4(05:24:985 ) 까지 연타 넣을수 있으세요 - 이거 넣으면 난이도도 올라가는데다, 강조되는 드럼음이 스트림밖에 없어서 그냥 냅두겠습니다.
05:25:735 (4,6) - 오버랩 - 수정
05:41:197 (7) - 13도 돌려보세용 - 수정
05:43:330 (9) - 소리없네요 - 하나만 없는거니까 괜찮지 않을까요?
05:50:484 (8,10) - 드럼비트 없네요 - 아 한번 수정해봤는데 이거 없으면 또 이상해지네요....일단은 냅두고 한번 BN한테 물어볼게요
06:02:427 (3) - 서클 3개로 바꿔보세요 - 06:02:427 (3,4) - 이거 점프때문에 그냥 냅두겠습니다.
06:23:254 (2) - 드럼 비트 없네요
06:23:312 (3) - 3번째 리버스쪽에 ^ 06:23:485
06:23:716 - ^
06:23:947 - ^ - 음.....애매하네요. 원래난이도도 이렇게 했으니 괜찮을거라 생각되네요. 아마도요
06:46:440 (1) - 서클 두개로 바꿔보시는건 어떤가요 - 약간 수정해서 서클+슬라로 바꿈
06:48:201 (1) - 06:50:969 - 여기로 옮기고 07:00:892 - 여기까지 늘려주시는것도 괜찮을듯 하네요 - 여긴 그냥 냅두는게 좋다고 생각드네요.

gl

koliron wrote:

huhhh, ar 9.6+ should not be allowed in CtB, is too insane, reduce it to 9.6 or less please!

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

[General]
no

[Realize]
힛사가 너무 쓸데없이 큰 곳이 부분부분 있음.
음악을 잡아먹네요. 01:08:897 (7,8) - 특히 이런것들.

초반 부분도 그렇지만 음악에 맞춘게 뒤죽박죽이라 느낌이 이상함. 맵 전체가 붕 떠있는 느낌.
01:03:820 (1) - 이런건 기타에 맞췄으면서 01:04:051 (2) - 이런 부분은 왜 드럼에 했는지도 의문. 그러고 다시 01:05:205 (7) - 여기는 기타.
그리고 리버스 슬라가 너무 멀리 떨어져있어서 그런것도 있지만 모양 자체가 이쁘지가 않음.
1.0 디스턴스가 아니라 0.6 정도로 붙여놓는게 차라리 나았을듯.

01:06:589 (1) - 이 슬라는 감속이 이해가 되는데 01:06:936 (2) - 이 슬라이더까지 감속을 했어야했나라는 의문이 듬.
01:07:512 (1,2) - 또한 위의 슬라를 감속 할 생각이었으면 이 두개의 슬라는 가속을 넣어주는 편이 좋지 않았는가라는 생각이 듭니다.

01:25:512 - 이부분도 가속이 참 뜬금없다는 생각이 드네요. 굳이 필요한 부분이라곤 생각 되지 않습니다.

01:28:282 (2) - 노말 휘슬 안어울림. 차라리 여기도 소프트 휘슬이었으면 괜찮았겠네요.

01:30:589 (1,2) - 가끔 보이는건데 별로 좋은 흐름이 아니라고 봅니다. 굳이 1.0 디스턴스 지키지 말고 다른 방향으로 전개했다면 더 이뻤을 것 같네요.

04:18:892 (1,1) - 굳이 노트를 박아야했는지. 그냥 스핀으로 시작해도 충분하다고봄. 아니면 걍 슬라를 놓은쪽. 04:19:025 (1) - 그리고 끝부분 04:22:622 - 여기 소리 없애주세요.

06:24:120 - 그냥 여기서 끝내는 편이 더 깔끔했을 것 같은데. 굳이 뒤에 이어가니 뭔가 늘어지는 느낌이네요.

맵을 전체적으로 다 둘러봤는데 갑갑합니다. 과하다 싶을 정도로 디스턴스를 지키셨네요.
그냥 브픔 빠르고 노트 많이 박힌 하드? 인센? 느낌. 전 재미있다고 느낄만한 부분이 딱 한부분 밖에 없었네요. (05:23:658 (3,4,5,1,2) - )
그 한 부분 외에는 맵이 전체적으로 지루하다. 라는 느낌이었습니다. 들어차있어도 될만한 부분들을 1/1로 처리한 부분들이라던가, 갑갑할정도로 똘똘 뭉쳐진 슬라들이라든가. 옛날맵중에서도 틀에박힌 옛날맵을 보는 느낌이었습니다.
솔직히 어디는 왜 이렇게 했고, 그런 것들을 좀 많이 토론 해보고 싶은 맵이네요.

시간이 없어서 짧게 적고 갑니다.

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

as your req

[ HalLoWeeN ] wrote:

[General]
no

[Realize]
힛사가 너무 쓸데없이 큰 곳이 부분부분 있음.
음악을 잡아먹네요. 01:08:897 (7,8) - 특히 이런것들. - 일단 전체적으로 둘러보면서 수정하겠습니다

초반 부분도 그렇지만 음악에 맞춘게 뒤죽박죽이라 느낌이 이상함. 맵 전체가 붕 떠있는 느낌.
01:03:820 (1) - 이런건 기타에 맞췄으면서 01:04:051 (2) - 이런 부분은 왜 드럼에 했는지도 의문. 그러고 다시 01:05:205 (7) - 여기는 기타. - 좀 뒤죽박죽이긴 한데 여기타이밍은 마음에 드네요.
그리고 리버스 슬라가 너무 멀리 떨어져있어서 그런것도 있지만 모양 자체가 이쁘지가 않음.
1.0 디스턴스가 아니라 0.6 정도로 붙여놓는게 차라리 나았을듯. - 수정

01:06:589 (1) - 이 슬라는 감속이 이해가 되는데 01:06:936 (2) - 이 슬라이더까지 감속을 했어야했나라는 의문이 듬. - 여기는 뉴콤 하나로해서 같은 속도로 내고싶군요. 그닥 나빠보이지도 않으니...
01:07:512 (1,2) - 또한 위의 슬라를 감속 할 생각이었으면 이 두개의 슬라는 가속을 넣어주는 편이 좋지 않았는가라는 생각이 듭니다. - 지금 차이로도 충분히 가속되있다고 생각이 드네요.

01:25:512 - 이부분도 가속이 참 뜬금없다는 생각이 드네요. 굳이 필요한 부분이라곤 생각 되지 않습니다. - 이건 개인적으로 어울린다고 생각이 듭니다만, 이전 지적도 있었으니 앞의 0.5x부분만 없애겠습니다.

01:28:282 (2) - 노말 휘슬 안어울림. 차라리 여기도 소프트 휘슬이었으면 괜찮았겠네요. - 아 잘못넣었네요 수정

01:30:589 (1,2) - 가끔 보이는건데 별로 좋은 흐름이 아니라고 봅니다. 굳이 1.0 디스턴스 지키지 말고 다른 방향으로 전개했다면 더 이뻤을 것 같네요. - 수정

04:18:892 (1,1) - 굳이 노트를 박아야했는지. 그냥 스핀으로 시작해도 충분하다고봄. 아니면 걍 슬라를 놓은쪽. 04:19:025 (1) - 그리고 끝부분 04:22:622 - 여기 소리 없애주세요. - 수정

06:24:120 - 그냥 여기서 끝내는 편이 더 깔끔했을 것 같은데. 굳이 뒤에 이어가니 뭔가 늘어지는 느낌이네요. - 그냥 여기는 더 넣고 싶으므로 냅두겠습니다.

맵을 전체적으로 다 둘러봤는데 갑갑합니다. 과하다 싶을 정도로 디스턴스를 지키셨네요.
그냥 브픔 빠르고 노트 많이 박힌 하드? 인센? 느낌. 전 재미있다고 느낄만한 부분이 딱 한부분 밖에 없었네요. (05:23:658 (3,4,5,1,2) - )
그 한 부분 외에는 맵이 전체적으로 지루하다. 라는 느낌이었습니다. 들어차있어도 될만한 부분들을 1/1로 처리한 부분들이라던가, 갑갑할정도로 똘똘 뭉쳐진 슬라들이라든가. 옛날맵중에서도 틀에박힌 옛날맵을 보는 느낌이었습니다.
솔직히 어디는 왜 이렇게 했고, 그런 것들을 좀 많이 토론 해보고 싶은 맵이네요.

시간이 없어서 짧게 적고 갑니다.

Milan- wrote:

osu:
-01:15:243 (2) - i dont like how wub this is slider is compared to the sliders or the whole section. Prefer to use a more subtle curve - Fixed
-01:33:128 (4,1) - this little overlap is kinda meh - Fixed
-01:35:666 (5) - this 1/1 breaks the momentum created by 01:35:205 (3,4) - , i think it sounds better as 1/2 as well - Fixed
-01:41:205 (6,1) - distance that looks like 1/2 but is 1/1 doesnt seem to be fitting for this high bpm imo - Fixed
-01:45:243 (1,3) - not sure what you're actually mapping here. You tend to go with the main melody, so mapping the downbeats would make more sense in that aspect - I mapped here follow the violin sound, and there's nothing to emphasize on downbeat imo.
-06:32:902 (1,1,1) - i dont think this many NC are actually needed - Fixed
-would be cool if you go over the whole map and fix some minor, but noticiable, spacing errors like 01:19:282 (3,4,5) - 04:35:658 (7,8,9) - and the ones with triples as the autostack makes them look no so neat 04:48:581 (5,6,7) - etc.
-also i would try to avoid sharp angles that several of your patterns have cuz op bpm like 03:09:589 (1,2,3,1) - 04:32:889 (3,4,1) - 01:33:589 (1,2,3,1) -

there's no much of technical errors i suppose but i'm not really a fan of your aesthetics either. The map is kinda unbalanced in certain way, having the section of 01:28:743 - with the most variable distance usage while keeping the rest in a more friendly level, in addition the way you use 1/4 influences too cuz it's quite inconsistent though the whole map, some are constantly spaced and others are just there.
hope it helps a bit, gl

1. 콤보 컬러 1과 2가 많이 어두워서 리딩에 다소 무리가 있습니다. 01:16:512 (7) 이거는 슬라이더가 잘 안보이기도 합니다. 밝은 색들로 조절해보세요.
2. 01:36:589 (3,4) - 블랭킷 목적이라고해도 갑자기 너무 가까워져서 플레이에 지장이 갑니다. (3)을 ctrl+G해서 차라리 점프처리해주세요.
3. 01:37:512 (5) - 뉴콤해주실래요? 개인적으로 이전 박자와의 텀이 살짝 리딩과 안어울리는것 같기도 했습니다.
4. 01:38:320 (2,3) - 역시 둘 사이의 간격 1.00x으로 일치시킬수 있을듯요.
5. 01:39:128 (6,7,8) - 간격
6. 01:40:743 (4,6) - 둘의 끝이 겹쳐야 더 깔금한 모양이 될것 같기도 해보입니다. (5,6) 회전시켜서 그리드 내에서 처리 가능하게 설정해보세요.
7. 01:43:282 (9,10,11) - 1/4 리버스 슬라 이후에 연타 처리하셨는데 개인적으로는 변조라기 보다는 패턴 불일치로 느껴졌습니다.
8. 01:50:205 (1,2,3) - 마찬가지로 간격 문제입니다. 간격 지키면서도 충분히 이런 패턴 만드실 수 있는데 간격 안지키면 정말 이상해보여요.
9. 02:25:974 (1,2,3) - 간격 설정이 상당히 어색해서 패턴의 유기성이 떨어져보입니다. (1)의 끝이 (4) 머리에 오도록 배치해주세요.
10. 02:27:474 (7,8,9,10,1) - 대칭 점프 이후 3연타는 상당히 인공적인 패턴으로 느껴집니다. 더 자연스럽게 만드시려면 대칭을 파괴해서 배치해보시는게 좋을것 같아요.
11. 03:01:859 (4,5) - 박자상 노트-슬라 순서가 03:01:974의 다운비트를 클릭 가능하게 만들기 때문에 더 자연스럽습니다.
12. 03:06:359 (3,4,5) - (4) 위치 조절하셔서 간격 1.00x 유지.
13. 03:47:205 (1) - 브픔 변화가 있어서 그렇긴 했습니다만 변속이 너무 갑작스럽게 나타났습니다. 03:46:743 - 에 0.9배속, 03:46:974 - 에 0.75배속 같은 설정을 하시면 그래도 조금은 더 지금보다 읽기 편해지지 않을까 싶네요.
14. 04:11:550 (1,1,2,1) - 마지막 04:13:506 (2,1)의 간격을 더 가깝게 가져가는게 통일성 있을듯요.
15. 04:25:735 (4,5) - 간격.
16. 04:48:235 (4,5,6,7) - 롱놋 처리하실 거면 끝까지 일관성있게 하시지 (6,7)에서 갑자기 간격 줄어서 이상하네요.
17. 05:41:658 (1,3) - 둘다 같은 모양으로 처리하는게 더 통일성있지 않을까요?
18. 06:20:427 (3) - 간격상 문제 및 다운비트이니 뉴콤해주세요.
    초반 슬라이더와 06:13:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6) 이런 사각 패턴 좋았어요.
    슬라이더들이 전반적으로 살아있네요. 좋은 맵입니다. 장래가 기대돼요.

Sonnyc wrote:

Korean Air
[Realize]

1. 콤보 컬러 1과 2가 많이 어두워서 리딩에 다소 무리가 있습니다. 01:16:512 (7) 이거는 슬라이더가 잘 안보이기도 합니다. 밝은 색들로 조절해보세요. - 수정
2. 01:36:589 (3,4) - 블랭킷 목적이라고해도 갑자기 너무 가까워져서 플레이에 지장이 갑니다. (3)을 ctrl+G해서 차라리 점프처리해주세요. - 헉 좋은 흐름....수정
3. 01:37:512 (5) - 뉴콤해주실래요? 개인적으로 이전 박자와의 텀이 살짝 리딩과 안어울리는것 같기도 했습니다. - 수정
4. 01:38:320 (2,3) - 역시 둘 사이의 간격 1.00x으로 일치시킬수 있을듯요. - 수정
5. 01:39:128 (6,7,8) - 간격 -0 수정
6. 01:40:743 (4,6) - 둘의 끝이 겹쳐야 더 깔금한 모양이 될것 같기도 해보입니다. (5,6) 회전시켜서 그리드 내에서 처리 가능하게 설정해보세요. - 수정
7. 01:43:282 (9,10,11) - 1/4 리버스 슬라 이후에 연타 처리하셨는데 개인적으로는 변조라기 보다는 패턴 불일치로 느껴졌습니다. - 흠...개인적으로 이부분에 연타가 어울린다고 생각하니 냅두겠습니다
8. 01:50:205 (1,2,3) - 마찬가지로 간격 문제입니다. 간격 지키면서도 충분히 이런 패턴 만드실 수 있는데 간격 안지키면 정말 이상해보여요. - 수정
9. 02:25:974 (1,2,3) - 간격 설정이 상당히 어색해서 패턴의 유기성이 떨어져보입니다. (1)의 끝이 (4) 머리에 오도록 배치해주세요. - 수정
10. 02:27:474 (7,8,9,10,1) - 대칭 점프 이후 3연타는 상당히 인공적인 패턴으로 느껴집니다. 더 자연스럽게 만드시려면 대칭을 파괴해서 배치해보시는게 좋을것 같아요. - 일단은 수정해두고 의견 더 모아봐야겠네요. 감이 안잡히니 영...
11. 03:01:859 (4,5) - 박자상 노트-슬라 순서가 03:01:974의 다운비트를 클릭 가능하게 만들기 때문에 더 자연스럽습니다. - 오 좋네요 수정
12. 03:06:359 (3,4,5) - (4) 위치 조절하셔서 간격 1.00x 유지. - 수정
13. 03:47:205 (1) - 브픔 변화가 있어서 그렇긴 했습니다만 변속이 너무 갑작스럽게 나타났습니다. 03:46:743 - 에 0.9배속, 03:46:974 - 에 0.75배속 같은 설정을 하시면 그래도 조금은 더 지금보다 읽기 편해지지 않을까 싶네요. - 수정
14. 04:11:550 (1,1,2,1) - 마지막 04:13:506 (2,1)의 간격을 더 가깝게 가져가는게 통일성 있을듯요.
15. 04:25:735 (4,5) - 간격. - 정말 간격이.....수정
16. 04:48:235 (4,5,6,7) - 롱놋 처리하실 거면 끝까지 일관성있게 하시지 (6,7)에서 갑자기 간격 줄어서 이상하네요. - 아 (6)(7)간격 못봤네요 수정
17. 05:41:658 (1,3) - 둘다 같은 모양으로 처리하는게 더 통일성있지 않을까요? - 수정
18. 06:20:427 (3) - 간격상 문제 및 다운비트이니 뉴콤해주세요. - 수정
    초반 슬라이더와 06:13:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6) 이런 사각 패턴 좋았어요.
    슬라이더들이 전반적으로 살아있네요. 좋은 맵입니다. 장래가 기대돼요.

스타

Euny wrote:

Korean air♥

• Realize

1. 00:23:205 (1) - 뉴콤 해제해 주세요. 강조음인건 맞는데 필히 오버랩이 심해 가독성을 위한것도 아니고 상진님 지켜오셨던대로 앞부분은 그냥 뉴콤주기 맞추는게(2measure 따르신거같아보여요~그러니..) 좋을거같아요 여기 말고도 살짝 들쑥날쑥한데가 있는데 ..
2. 00:30:590 (1) - ^ 위와같아요
3. 00:41:666 (1) - ^ 역시나 위와 같구요 - 앞에부분은 슬라이더 변속따라 넣은거이긴 한데 여기 이전부분부터는 긴 슬라 아닌 이상 다운비트주기로 하고싶네요.
4. 00:53:897 (1) - 스핀시작하는 부분이 따로 강조음 없는 다운비트(빨강틱)이라 좀 어색함이 도는데요, 제 생각엔 00:52:743 - 여기서 시작하는게 더 어울릴 거라고 생각해요! - 들어보면 여기서 뭔가 커지는 음이 있길래 여기서부터 그 음을 스핀으로 강조하고싶네요.
5. 01:20:436 (1,3) - 콤보 1개 터울로 이렇게 슬라끼리 부대끼는거 플레이할때 먹먹하던데 조금만 띄워주시면 좋을거같아요 - 수정
6. 01:26:205 (1) - 이것도 굳이 뉴콤이 필요가 있는가싶은 대목이네요. - 거리가 가까운 것도 있고 01:25:974 (3,3) - 오버랩이 좀 자연스러워지는 느낌도 있으니 두겠습니다.
7. 01:42:128 (4) - 25%/50% 로 들어보세요 진짜 1/4리버스가 필요로 하는 곳은 이곳입니다. 제가 드린 예시는 3타인데요, (5,6,7)콤보 자리인 3타 대신 1/4리버스를 넣으셔도 무방합니다 - 처음 들을 때는 아무것도 안들렸는데 패턴 수정해서 다시 들어보니까 정말이네요?! 수정
   
8. 01:43:282 (9,10,11) - 그쪽 강조음 강하긴 한데, 그래도 아예 스트림이면 모르겠는데 리버스 오다가 갑자기 3타로 바뀌려니까 플레이시 혼동이 오더라구요 그냥1/4리버스가 낫지않을까 싶네요 - 이건 손닉님의 지적도 있었으나, 연타가 충분히 들어갈 수 있을거 같기에 5연타로 넣어두겠습니다.
9. 02:29:666 (8) - 뉴콤인거같아요 리버스로 끝났음 그냥 둬도되는데 , 끝이 스트림이라 플레이시 hp충당에 좋을거같네요. - 수정

01:42:128 (4) - 는 꼬옥 고치시길 바랄께용! 빠롱빠롱~

CLSW wrote:

오프라인 플레이지만 캐치 올콤자 떴습니다!
그것도 SS

1. 00:28:513 (3,1) - x389 y94쯤으로 내리는게 나은거같습니다.
2. 00:56:897 (3) - 1/1 00:57:243 - 노트 박자가 나아보입니다.
3. 01:27:820 (1) - x255 y74
4. 02:10:743 (5,6,7) - 디스턴스 벌리는게 좋아보입니다. 02:12:705 (6,7,8) - 이정도
5. 05:44:889 (7,8) - 너무 말았다는 생각이 드네요.
6. 05:49:043 (1,2,3) - 10도돌려서 05:48:927 (10,11) - 맞춰주세요. 지금 상태로는 슬밋내기 쉬울 거 같네요.

Beomsan wrote:

Project Korean Air #2 Mod here we go w

[Realize]

1. 00:28:513 (3,1) - x389 y94쯤으로 내리는게 나은거같습니다.
2. 00:56:897 (3) - 1/1 00:57:243 - 노트 박자가 나아보입니다.
3. 01:27:820 (1) - x255 y74
4. 02:10:743 (5,6,7) - 디스턴스 벌리는게 좋아보입니다. 02:12:705 (6,7,8) - 이정도
5. 05:44:889 (7,8) - 너무 말았다는 생각이 드네요.
6. 05:49:043 (1,2,3) - 10도돌려서 05:48:927 (10,11) - 맞춰주세요. 지금 상태로는 슬밋내기 쉬울 거 같네요.

good luck

Neoskylove wrote:

제대로 모딩들어갑니다.
01:09:359 (1,2,3,4) - 2,3번 위치만 바꿔주시는게... - 이건 그냥 이흐름이 좋은 거 같네요
01:40:743 (4,6) - 뭔가 제대로 스택 안된듯.... - 아 아무래도 도약님이 언급한 버그뜬듯 수정
01:42:589 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/kNqik/4de603cc16.jpg살짝 뛰워주세용 - ㅇㅋㄷㅋ
헐 잡을게 없다... 엌

Gamu wrote:

Hello everyone!

[ General]

1. 06:46:873 (T) - Volume of the red line and the green line is different. You should fix it. - Oops. fixed
   
   image

   
2. Unnecessary osb.file in folder because there is no SB. - that osb file again....fixed

[ Realize]

1. 00:59:666 (7) - According to your hitsound pattern, you might want to add a drum-hitfinish here. - Fixed
2. 01:17:897 (6) - It is not a perfect stack. you can fix it easily (move to x:376 y:316). - Fixed
3. 01:24:070 (8) - I can't hear the sound of something here and it is not unnecessary circle imo. - I think it fits well imo.
4. 01:37:916 (X) - Add a circle? I think it will fit the music. - I don't think so....
5. 01:38:436 (3) - You might want to stack it on start point of 01:37:743 (2). This means "move to x:224 y:226". - Actually, this unstack looks good, but I aim to blanket, fixed
6. 01:42:820 (2) - this placement looks a little ugly. move to x:160 y:156? - Fixed
7. 02:27:762 (10) - Same as 01:24:070 (8), I think it is not unnecessary circle. - Okay
8. 02:53:609 (9) - ^ - I think it fits well like before.
9. 03:11:205 (3,4) - Spacing is too narrow. I think it causes the rhythm mistake to the player. - okay
10. 03:38:897 (1,2,3,4) - 1/4 repeat sliders doesn't fit the music, so I would like to recommend the rhythm of the following image. I think it is a very good rhythm pattern :p If you changed to this, you might want to use a soft-hitnromal in all the end point of slider.
    
    image

    
11. 05:46:273 (1,2,3,4) - ^ - quite good!

Good luck :3

Fort wrote:

oh yeah since materialize is new diff i think i can say something important for this map

[Materialize]

1. 00:26:897 (2,3,1) - kinda hard to believe sudden jumpin here i think, just put 1/1 pattern on this slow part is better - alight
2. almost parts looks really good with jumps and streams, i like it - waaaaa thanks!!
3. 01:38:320 (2,3) - fix this overlap can make visual more good, move 01:38:666 (3) - to 92|296 can make this jump more stable without any overlap - Fixed
4. 01:59:666 (9,10,11,12,1) - well this 1/4 slider can be moved a bit to make sure some flow readed properly (move 01:59:897 (11) - to 336|244 and move 02:00:012 (12) - to 244|184 to provide some straight curve flow at 01:59:897 (11,12,1) - and make some zigzag pattern at 01:59:782 (10,11) - become better.) - Sounds good.
5. 02:14:897 (1,2,3) - im sure your pattern you used is swapped, it will be better if you CTRL+G the pattern - Hmm...I want to make this pattern slider first.
6. 02:29:205 (9,10,11,12,1) - try this pattern placement http://puu.sh/lbkgf/6abd00e5ec.jpg (best circular style for this map) - Prefer this pattern now.
7. 03:19:859 (2) - looks this can be better if you stack this circle to 03:19:512 (1) - slider end like 03:22:282 (5,6) - (and because it has vocal too, maybe put jump to slider can make that pattern more interesting - Fixed
8. 03:47:090 (2) - the jumps on 03:47:205 (1,2) - directly can make some missreading on that pattern, this should be fixed by moving 03:47:090 (2) - to 160|336 to make sure players can read 03:47:205 (1,2) - this 1/1 pattern properly, yeah slightly increasing players reactions on anti jump pattern - I'm not sure this can be missreaded, but this place looks good.
9. 04:30:581 - dam son this epic parts !!
10. 05:32:369 (14,1) - looks this spacing a little bit to high, you can put 0.70x as distance for that pattern - Yep
11. 05:55:620 (2,1) - not sure if people can reach this on first look (but idk how to make ideal flow here, im trying this jump pattern and looks it can be good i guess http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3921682, code thing: -
    THIS
    IS
    AWESOME!!!!!!
    

    156,49,355043,2,0,P|108:23|39:27,1,95,4|0,0:3|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    54,232,355273,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    81,118,355389,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    146,275,355504,5,0,0:0:0:0:
    355,210,355620,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    296,352,355735,5,0,0:0:0:0:
    340,132,355851,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    384,300,355966,5,0,0:0:0:0:
    216,316,356082,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    248,140,356197,5,0,0:0:0:0:
    436,224,356312,1,0,0:0:0:0:

    
    (this one can be good zigzag + a bit square flow i guess
12. 06:24:120 - im sure 90% players press esc button on this part (slow part meme lol) - then let thew press esc! wtf?!
13. 06:19:389 - put notes in here, support drum patterning - It looks hard to read if I place anywhere imo.
14. epic slow parts, inb4 got miss - but I want to maintain this slow part

sorry if this mod too short, because i think this map can be ready to go, im really sure of it
please rank this map
see ya later o/

1. Disable Widescreen Support.
2. A bit disappointed that most of hitsound you used in the passionate part is hitnormal. Kinda plain and boring for me.
3. 01:01:282 (7,8,9,10) - This Zig-Zag makes me feel uncomfortable. Maybe you should try to move 8 upward and 9 downward to make the flow smoother.
4. 01:03:820 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - The rhythm here actually varies. Even you want to use 1/4, try to make something different to distinguish the actual rhythm. For example, two 1/4 sliders to replace 01:04:282 (1,2,3,4) - .
5. 01:05:955 - And you left a noise blank here. Try to cover it?
6. 01:18:243 (7,8,9) - Move 8 a bit rightward will make the flow better.
7. 02:08:551 (5) - The slider tail is out of the mapping area and definitely touch the HP bar. You can use Ctrl+G to check the coordinate.
8. 02:57:128 (7,3) - Not perfectly stacked :p
9. 03:32:320 (6) - Maybe it is better to stack this on 5? I want a jump from 6 to 1.
10. 03:46:628 (2,1) - I'm not pretty sure about the flow here. The angle is big and the distance is short. Maybe swap 03:46:743 (1,2) - and then swap 03:46:974 (1,2) - to make flow like Zig-Zag? Or at least I would recommend you to move 03:46:743 (1) - a bit leftward.
11. 04:23:889 (4) - Move it rightward to make the distance between 04:23:889 (4,1) - is larger? That will be more good-looking.
12. 04:56:197 (4,5) - Try to improve the blanket?
13. 05:40:735 (5,7) - Embarassing overlap. Just make the overlap part more or disappear.
14. 06:05:427 (3,1) - blanket
15. 06:28:749 (1) - Strongly recommend you use a mute sliderslide this part. The current sliderslide hitsound really doesn't fit the music.

F D Flourite wrote:

Hi, from your forum pm request.
Yes, I want to do M4M, and I'll pm you my map to mod.
Since your map is pretty good and kinda ready, forgive me from being picky and personal.

[Materialize]

1. Disable Widescreen Support. - Oops Fixed
2. A bit disappointed that most of hitsound you used in the passionate part is hitnormal. Kinda plain and boring for me.
3. 01:01:282 (7,8,9,10) - This Zig-Zag makes me feel uncomfortable. Maybe you should try to move 8 upward and 9 downward to make the flow smoother. - Okay
4. 01:03:820 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - The rhythm here actually varies. Even you want to use 1/4, try to make something different to distinguish the actual rhythm. For example, two 1/4 sliders to replace 01:04:282 (1,2,3,4) - . - No. Prefer now.
5. 01:05:955 - And you left a noise blank here. Try to cover it? - underbeat again....Fixed
6. 01:18:243 (7,8,9) - Move 8 a bit rightward will make the flow better. - Okay
7. 02:08:551 (5) - The slider tail is out of the mapping area and definitely touch the HP bar. You can use Ctrl+G to check the coordinate. - Fixed my own way
8. 02:57:128 (7,3) - Not perfectly stacked :p - Fixed
9. 03:32:320 (6) - Maybe it is better to stack this on 5? I want a jump from 6 to 1. Sweet jump XD
10. 03:46:628 (2,1) - I'm not pretty sure about the flow here. The angle is big and the distance is short. Maybe swap 03:46:743 (1,2) - and 03:46:974 (1,2) - to make flow like Zig-Zag? Or at least I would recommend you to move 03:46:743 (1) - a bit leftward. - swapping looks make too big jump, so I moved that one for now.
11. 04:23:889 (4) - Move it rightward to make the distance between 04:23:889 (4,1) - is larger? That will be more good-looking. - Nice
12. 04:56:197 (4,5) - Try to improve the blanket? - Nah, I'll keep this
13. 05:40:735 (5,7) - Embarassing overlap. Just make the overlap part more or disappear. - Yep
14. 06:05:427 (3,1) - blanket - okay
15. 06:28:749 (1) - Strongly recommend you use a mute sliderslide this part. The current sliderslide hitsound really doesn't fit the music.- - Gonna put silent one.

Overall it is definitely a good map. Good luck on ranking it!

[C u r i] wrote:

[마테리얼라이즈]

01:17:436 (3,6,8,9) - 8을 3꼬리에 9를 6꼬리에 스택시키면 좀더 치기 편할듯 - 둘다 언스택노린거라 냅두겠습니다
01:37:051 (6,7) - 갑자기 흐름이 끊긴다는 느낌이 드는데 배치가 7을 8꼬리에 스택시키는건 어떨까요? - 디스턴스도 좀 그렇고, 이맵에서는 서클 후 슬라이더끝으로 스택시키는건 좀 그러니 냅두겠습니다
03:19:512 (1,2) - 위랑 비슷하게 끊긴다는 느낌이 듬 03:19:974 (3) - 얘를 컨 g로 뒤집고 꼬리에 2를 스택시켜보는건? - 아까랑 같습니다
03:39:128 (2) - 배치는 이게더 이쁠듯 X: 107 Y: 192 - 굳
04:41:197 (5,6) - 6번슬라를 그냥 5번을 180도 돌린모양으로 잡는게 이뻐보일듯 - 그렇긴 하겠네요 수정
04:56:197 (4,5) - 담요해주시면 이쁠듯 - 이건 위의 모딩에서도 언급했는데 그냥 안하는게 좋네요
05:20:889 (8,1) - 꼬리에 담요상태가? - 히익

증거

이시점에서 이미 쿠도스 확정 ㅋㅅㅋ

Sammish wrote:

Yo hey just dropping a mod here (sorry for nitpicking)

Realize
00:10:282 (1) - A bit too curved/contorted, makes it look ugly imo
00:17:666 (1) - ^ (Maybe make each curve/angle more pronounced and use less curves) - I don't think so...
01:20:089 (6,7,8) - Personally feel that the slight jump is unnecessary, liked 01:12:589 (5,6,7,8) - more - It emphasizes guitar sound, so I think it's necessary
01:22:051 (7) - I think it would look better like this, - Okay

LARGE IMAGE

01:33:589 (1,2,3) - switch 2 and 3 - Keep for now, because flows looks bad imo
03:18:012 (2,3,4) - Its a bit sharp, I feel this flows better - good

LARGE IMAGE

03:40:512 (4) - move this to the left, so it's in line with 5 - yep
04:35:889 (8) - Maybe move this up so that it transitions to the 9 nicer - It has danger of touch HP bar, I downed this
04:40:504 (3) - Moving left can avoid the overlap - This overlap is intended.
04:45:697 (2) - I think this looks nicer flipped upside down - I think not
05:30:581 (1) - Slider arrow shouldn't be shorter than its bow, looks ugly and you can't see the end - k changed pattern
05:48:927 (10,11) - Equal distance to the slider pls, shift down and left seems to help - What the....................
06:09:235 (6,1) - you could turn this into a sliderbow
06:39:825 (1) - ^ - no. Keep this
06:43:979 (3,4) - This feels nicer as a repeat slider, adds variation - I want to make them equal timing

Materialize
I can't mod 6*, sorry
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

EDIT: Overall it plays really well, I enjoyed it Good luck on ranking this are you doing m4m?
PM me XD

1. 00:28:743 (1,2) - something like this would flow nicely. slow section anyways so good flow is always nice
   
   ~

   
2. 00:36:590 (2) - If you could make the head-part of the slider (loop) look less squarish that'd be nice!
3. 00:57:128 (4,1,2) - Fix this spacing here? 4>1 could be bigger or equal in ds
4. 01:05:666 (1,2,3,4,5) - This rhythm feels weird for me xP I would just stick with the 5-stream rhythm you have going because musically not a lot changes here, but you've picked an entirely new rhythm
5. 01:08:436 (4) - NC here? Would fit your pattern well
6. 01:17:666 (4,5,6) - Weird to stack them when you usually make these 1/2's jumps. Since they aren't really prominent 1/2's i would just use like normal 1.00 DS
7. 01:28:281 (2) - NC'ing would help with the rhythm so players know the stream begins on a white tick not a blue one.
8. 02:00:474 (2,3) - This flow is really sharp when you consider the circular flow you had going with 1>2
   
   could try an angle like this

   
9. 02:14:897 (1,2,3) - Ctrl+G the rhythm it makes a lot more sense since you can clearly hear another drum hit on 02:15:012 - but not on 02:15:243 - Applies to everything here.
10. 02:59:205 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - This section was surprisingly simple despite the clear drum beats. You can keep i guess, but it just felt simple haha.
11. 03:00:820 (5,6) - These two drums are different if you listen, they sound much stronger. You can capture this with a larger jump, or even NC'ing those two.
12. 03:21:243 (9,1) - Visually this doesn't really flow well because after 9 you are going downward, but slider 1 is pointed upward initially
13. 03:46:628 (2,1) - I would make this jump even bigger. Generally people expect the jump onto a new NC to be bigger, it would create more emphasis anyways and i think it fits nicely here.
14. 03:53:436 (2,1,2) - Not really liking the spacing here
15. 04:16:480 (1,1,1) - I would go with sliders instead. with spinners you can spin really fast and because players are inclined to spin really fast, it doesn't really fit the section. You want players to play something really slow. Which is why the extremely slow sliders on the ranked version of this song fit so well.
16. 04:34:273 (1,2,3) - Pretty random switch to 1/2 rhythm here...
17. 05:09:120 (7,1) - Could make this jump a lot bigger imo. Hold sliders are treated like 1/2 gaps anyways.
18. 06:17:543 - There's a note here too if you want to map that.

1. 00:56:436 (1,2,3) - You use 1.1x spacing here, but 1.00 for the rest
2. 01:08:205 (3) - I would make this a 1/2 slider so you can have another circle beginning on the downbeat.
3. 02:14:897 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Niiiiice
4. 02:17:666 (1) - I think this is too simple though. same with 02:21:359 (5,6) -
5. 03:29:666 (4,5,6,7) - If you could fix the overlaps they would look realy nice!
6. 04:44:658 (5) - I would make this 1/2 too, and make 04:44:889 - a circle.
7. 04:58:966 (7,8,9) - This triplet was really sudden for me D: i would have prefered just 1/2 rhythm since this isn't Kiai.

monstrata wrote:

[Materialize]

1. 00:28:743 (1,2) - something like this would flow nicely. slow section anyways so good flow is always nice - Okay
   
   ~

   
2. 00:36:590 (2) - If you could make the head-part of the slider (loop) look less squarish that'd be nice! - I hope this is what you want.
3. 00:57:128 (4,1,2) - Fix this spacing here? 4>1 could be bigger or equal in ds - Yep
4. 01:05:666 (1,2,3,4,5) - This rhythm feels weird for me xP I would just stick with the 5-stream rhythm you have going because musically not a lot changes here, but you've picked an entirely new rhythm - I have the time to think about this part...
5. 01:08:436 (4) - NC here? Would fit your pattern well - This NC looks inconsistent
6. 01:17:666 (4,5,6) - Weird to stack them when you usually make these 1/2's jumps. Since they aren't really prominent 1/2's i would just use like normal 1.00 DS - Not for me. It fits with drum and guitar sounds imo.
7. 01:28:281 (2) - NC'ing would help with the rhythm so players know the stream begins on a white tick not a blue one. - Okay
8. 02:00:474 (2,3) - This flow is really sharp when you consider the circular flow you had going with 1>2 - try it
   
   could try an angle like this

   
9. 02:14:897 (1,2,3) - Ctrl+G the rhythm it makes a lot more sense since you can clearly hear another drum hit on 02:15:012 - but not on 02:15:243 - Applies to everything here. - I'm not sure this rhythm makes more sense. Also, I mapped this part similar to Realize diff. And lastly, it helps to emphasize hitsound on 02:15:359 (1) - part
10. 02:59:205 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - This section was surprisingly simple despite the clear drum beats. You can keep i guess, but it just felt simple haha. - Sadly, This part have no 1/4 beats
11. 03:00:820 (5,6) - These two drums are different if you listen, they sound much stronger. You can capture this with a larger jump, or even NC'ing those two. - Yep. Fixed
12. 03:21:243 (9,1) - Visually this doesn't really flow well because after 9 you are going downward, but slider 1 is pointed upward initially - Fixed this a little bit
13. 03:46:628 (2,1) - I would make this jump even bigger. Generally people expect the jump onto a new NC to be bigger, it would create more emphasis anyways and i think it fits nicely here. - Consider it. I can't decide now.
14. 03:53:436 (2,1,2) - Not really liking the spacing here - changed spacing
15. 04:16:480 (1,1,1) - I would go with sliders instead. with spinners you can spin really fast and because players are inclined to spin really fast, it doesn't really fit the section. You want players to play something really slow. Which is why the extremely slow sliders on the ranked version of this song fit so well.
    - Hmm...Sliders can work maybe, but I don't think slider can work properly. Also, I want to make difference with ranked version, but if someone point this thing, I may change this part.
16. 04:34:273 (1,2,3) - Pretty random switch to 1/2 rhythm here... - I don't think so....
17. 05:09:120 (7,1) - Could make this jump a lot bigger imo. Hold sliders are treated like 1/2 gaps anyways. - I think players can play this part.
18. 06:17:543 - There's a note here too if you want to map that. - Fixed

[Realize]

1. 00:56:436 (1,2,3) - You use 1.1x spacing here, but 1.00 for the rest - Fixed
2. 01:08:205 (3) - I would make this a 1/2 slider so you can have another circle beginning on the downbeat. - Yep
3. 02:14:897 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Niiiiice - Thaaaaanks!
4. 02:17:666 (1) - I think this is too simple though. same with 02:21:359 (5,6) - - Okay
5. 03:29:666 (4,5,6,7) - If you could fix the overlaps they would look realy nice! - Okay
6. 04:44:658 (5) - I would make this 1/2 too, and make 04:44:889 - a circle. - I don't find the reason why i mapped.
7. 04:58:966 (7,8,9) - This triplet was really sudden for me D: i would have prefered just 1/2 rhythm since this isn't Kiai. - 1/4 reapeat slider instead. I want 1/4 beats :3

Good luck Sangzin!

hanyuu_nanodesu wrote:

Okay, maybe I'll try...
M4M from your queue

Red : unrankable issue
Blue : highly suggested to fix
Black : normal suggestion
Green : random comment
Bold : slightly more important than others

[Realize]

1. 00:13:513 feel kinda weird without anything here... maybe add a note would be better - okay
2. 00:29:666 (3) - Why don't you make this point more to the next note? .-. http://puu.sh/ll3xh/edf8da84ff.jpg or maybe move the next note so it would form a direct flow with this slider - nice
3. 00:40:743 (2) - Maybe you could mirror (1) and make it like this http://puu.sh/ll3Bc/aa5e312320.jpg then move 00:41:666 (1,2) - so it would be placed at the center. It should give a nice symmetry feeling -w- - yep
4. 01:07:397 (3) - Give it a little jump to the next slider to indicate the SV change... Maybe like this http://puu.sh/ll3GD/548a777f69.jpg - okay
5. 02:29:205 (3) - Uhh, maybe make this the same distance as (1) to (2)... placing it too close to (2) don't really make sense :/ - Uh....What i gonna say is
   Holy s*nope*
6. 03:57:128 (1) - Following the violin? .-. maybe at least make a red anchor here 03:57:358 to support the piano - I think it's fine
7. 04:03:820 (1,2,3) - I think the rhythm would be better like this http://puu.sh/ll42u/58bea9939a.jpg - Prefer this one.
8. 04:19:025 (1) - Use higher beat snap divisor (I think 1/8 should be sufficient) so this spinner would last longer, since currently the sound still goes on after the spinner end - okay
9. 02:59:205 (1,2) - I think this kind of stack would be pretty confusing after a 1/4 pattern... I suggest to just unstack them. BTW the rhythm is not that nice either, at big white tick, the violin goes long so it would be better to start a slider http://puu.sh/ll4lV/273ecddd65.jpg after that maybe you can stack the circles - Fixed
10. 03:02:782 (1,2) - this kinda feel weird... I like it like this better http://puu.sh/ll4oP/7276a6c8a4.jpg pretty (too) basic maybe... - nice
11. 03:46:974 (4) - The SV reduce here don't really make sense for me. Actually the music stay the same so it's better to keep SV the same. And suddenly it goes slower, it's alright because the music does that, it would make the map more dynamic. And make it more tricky too -w- - well...ok Fix for now.
12. Even with 9.2, the AR still feel pretty slow :/ but I think it's alright, no need to increase it since it might hurt the diff spread - maybe it's because of BPM issues. and changing of AR doesn't affect star diff

Pretty good -w- XD Thanks!
Good luck ^^

Kloyd wrote:

hi

• Materialize

1. 01:45:589 (2) - try curve more http://puu.sh/lnwMC/82cf2a3913.jpg - k
2. 02:04:512 (3) - better path is here http://puu.sh/lnwQg/2f93d528c0.jpg - k
3. 02:06:474 - obviously there is a sound. recommend u to put a note here. i'd put a stack and put NC to make sure there is flowchange. http://puu.sh/lnwVm/d48350abde.jpg - Actually there has a sound, but I think it's small enough to ignore.
4. 02:23:666 (3,4) - if this isn't deliberate overlap, try to make this separated. http://puu.sh/lnwXT/1a3b1927e7.jpg. - Fixed
5. 03:12:128 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this pattern lacks of the efficiency of NC. try remove NC then u can get more playability / visibility to understand there is some changes. - Okay
6. 03:14:897 (5) - same. - ^
7. 03:31:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - based on my personal taste so u can ignore this. try this pattern. http://puu.sh/lnx9J/17f47ccd45.jpg http://puu.sh/lnxa4/a182f029cb.jpg - make similar thing first one.
8. 03:33:705 (6,7,8) - i think ctrl_ging is better http://puu.sh/lnxbx/4168dcfc16.jpg - Only (6) Fixed
9. 03:46:166 (6) - try move this like this http://puu.sh/lnxe7/4e0967afe8.jpg - Fixed
10. 03:47:205 (1) - http://puu.sh/lnxh0/c760757b92.jpg - Alight
11. 04:53:773 (2) - http://puu.sh/lnxlA/4c464879dd.jpg or http://puu.sh/lnxlM/c81aa56628.jpg - Used second one.
12. 04:57:697 (2) - u could do better with this http://puu.sh/lnxn2/04890110ad.jpg - Fixed
13. 04:58:735 (5) - for better flow http://puu.sh/lnxoi/8f76dd9adc.jpg or if u want to move that stuff that much, try this http://puu.sh/lnxpI/572dbff651.jpg - I want to keep this one.
14. 06:42:595 (1) - considering the next note, this can be better http://puu.sh/lnxwj/5f60a181a7.jpg - fixed

goodluck

CLSW wrote:

http://puu.sh/lnp8e/a4a7400d21.zip 새로 가이드라인 개정되려고 하길래 그거 맞춰서 좀 고쳤습니다

CLSW wrote:

http://puu.sh/lx1K5/eeaf72ab1b.zip 오버매핑된 부분이 있는것 같아 수정.

Krah wrote:

I just don't get why Scorpiour used "<Version 0>" (probably because of that) but it's not how the song is supposed to be called in the MATERIAL album.

Please refer to http://www.konamistyle.jp/sp/tatsh_material/index.html
Unicode Title: "IMAGE -MATERIAL-(新曲)"
Title : "IMAGE -MATERIAL-(Shinkyoku)"

Note that I'm not that good in japanese and that you should confirm the romanization by someone else.
Edit: +/- had it confirmed Shinkyoku seems to be correct.

CLSW wrote:

http://puu.sh/lG1cD/f80a3af068.zip 한군데 좀 어색한게 있길래 수정

Kalibe wrote:

Hello. M4M ~

general:

unnessesary green line :

http://puu.sh/lGSaw/38710ecf24.png - OMG thanks!

[Realize]

btw i think SV is too high for 5.19 star diffs - too fast man:( mayb just decrease it to 1.80 ? - It's too late to change SV.....

Raise AR to 9,3 or 9,4 imo ~ - Uh.....AR9.2 is fine

00:57:359 (5) - Add NC ? because of downbeat you do this in : 00:59:205 (1) - so maybe? - okay
00:59:782 (4) - Slider on red tick sounds weird here. - I followed guitar sound.
01:04:743 (5) - NC? - okay
01:07:512 (1) - Hmm try to move this slider : x:188 y: 64 ? It creates a nice transision with circle and make a blanket with 01:06:589 (1) - tho. - Nice suggestion!
01:11:551 (2,3) - Bow looks crooked. I mean it should be looks that : http://puu.sh/lGSZQ/8f21840197.jpg to have a tidieness here. - I don't know what is problem...
01:16:743 (1) - Move this slider to x: 184 y: 236 ? -Good!
01:26:205 (1) - Unnessesary NC imo. - No, I don't think. also this NC make overlap of (3) looks more natural imo.
01:34:282 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Hm maybe just my thoughts, but soft finish will be better instead of normal. - more opinion.
02:27:820 (1) - Kinda expecting a jump here D: Mayb just put in x: 152 y: 324 ? - Nice
02:46:974 (4,5,6) - Fix blanket. ~ just move to(5,6) to x: 68 y: 304 . - Fixed
03:43:397 (7,1) - I think there should be a triple buddy. - Coool!
05:01:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as in 01:34:282 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - - same as before.
05:17:543 (8,1) - Make this triple? - Okay
05:26:658 (8,1) - Please, no linear flow mate. Make this flower like x: 224 y: 256 ? - Alight.
05:34:966 (4,6,7) - Stack this properly. - ?

Ok, that's all. Good luck, nice map and sorry for delay ;w;

1. plz remove .osb file, if you don't use storyboard.

1. in 260 stream, hp 7 is so awful.
   
2. 00:55:974 - since (00:55:974 - ~ 00:56:436 - ) is silent, here is a bit noise for playing,
   consider to set volume 5% here.
3. 00:59:782 (9) - maybe, i notice you mapped here, for what.
   but, i still worried that it is little weird rhythm, because it started redline, even if it's 1/1 silder.
   you can make circle + 1/2slider here, since 00:59:897 - have a sound.
4. 01:06:128 (5) - consider to make stream here, according to same part ( 01:05:205 (1,2,3,4) - , 01:04:282 (1,2,3,4) - )
   also, consider to add nc here. for follow previous NC partten.
5. 01:11:205 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) -
   According to overusing slider in this part, it's damaged ballance of regular diffculty.
6. 01:08:897 (1,2,3,4) - remind random jump, 01:09:128 (3,4) - is so small DS, compared with 01:08:897 (1,2) -
7. 03:02:782 (1,2,3,4) - ^ 03:02:782 (1,2) - is different with 03:03:128 (3,4) - M
8. 01:25:512 (1,2) - it can improve about rhythm. example)
9. 04:52:273 (1,2) - same above issue, it look like 1/2 slider spam.
10. 01:48:589 (7) - make to curve left way, according to "01:48:128 (5,6) - is symmetry",
    01:48:359 (6,7) - use same symmetry in same NC
11. 01:55:974 (3,4) - similar above issue, according to '01:54:589 (1,2,3,4) - don't have curved flow
12. 01:55:512 (1,2,3,4) - is same music with 01:54:589 (1,2,3,4) -
13. 02:15:820 (1,2) - it's too close, compare with other partten. plz increase DS in here.
    example)
    02:14:897 (1,2) -
    02:15:359 (1,2) -
14. 02:18:589 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - same above issue.
15. 02:50:666 (4,5,6) - ^
16. 02:17:666 (1,2,1,2) - it's really downbeat ;w;
    because 02:18:128 - is loud than 02:18:012 - . Next slider is same.
17. 03:46:628 (2,1) - since you use emphasis hitsound here, this anti-jump isn't fit with song,
18. 04:45:120 (8,9) - ^ make to increase DS here. i guess it's better than now.
19. 04:55:273 (5) - since 04:55:158 (3,4,6,7) - overlapped each other, it's little weird for reading by approach circle.
    if you add NC here, it's more good about readablity.
20. 05:04:504 (8) - ctrl+G for symmetry with 05:04:273 (7) - . and it's good flow than previous.
21. 05:43:043 (8) - curve right way, according to 05:42:927 (7) -
22. 05:46:273 (1,2,3,4) - if you want to change sv here, plz add NC here, for notice to change sv here.
    player can't notice changing sv in this state.

Lami wrote:

asdf

[General]

1. plz remove .osb file, if you don't use storyboard. - blame osu.....Idk why this osb. file appear...

[Materialize]

1. in 260 stream, hp 7 is so awful. - Even it's 6 stars.
   
2. 00:55:974 - since (00:55:974 - ~ 00:56:436 - ) is silent, here is a bit noise for playing,
   consider to set volume 5% here. - Fixed
3. 00:59:782 (9) - maybe, i notice you mapped here, for what.
   but, i still worried that it is little weird rhythm, because it started redline, even if it's 1/1 silder.
   you can make circle + 1/2slider here, since 00:59:897 - have a sound. - Why people miss that guitar sound..... I followed it.
4. 01:06:128 (5) - consider to make stream here, according to same part ( 01:05:205 (1,2,3,4) - , 01:04:282 (1,2,3,4) - )
   also, consider to add nc here. for follow previous NC partten. - Consider it. I can't find same part.
5. 01:11:205 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) -
   According to overusing slider in this part, it's damaged ballance of regular diffculty. - I don't know what is problem. Although i use slider almost of this part, but it's playable and fit music, even i don't know this is damaging regular difficulty.
6. 01:08:897 (1,2,3,4) - remind random jump, 01:09:128 (3,4) - is so small DS, compared with 01:08:897 (1,2) - - make same distance
7. 03:02:782 (1,2,3,4) - ^ 03:02:782 (1,2) - is different with 03:03:128 (3,4) - M - I put jump according to violin sound, so it may be fine.
8. 01:25:512 (1,2) - it can improve about rhythm. example) - Keep this pattern.
9. 04:52:273 (1,2) - same above issue, it look like 1/2 slider spam. - ^
10. 01:48:589 (7) - make to curve left way, according to "01:48:128 (5,6) - is symmetry", - well, okay.
    01:48:359 (6,7) - use same symmetry in same NC - I don''t like that.
11. 01:55:974 (3,4) - similar above issue, according to '01:54:589 (1,2,3,4) - don't have curved flow - I want to make something difference.
12. 01:55:512 (1,2,3,4) - is same music with 01:54:589 (1,2,3,4) - - So do you mean 'make same Ds' right? No, vocal on that part have less power than before.
13. 02:15:820 (1,2) - it's too close, compare with other partten. plz increase DS in here.
    example)
    02:14:897 (1,2) -
    02:15:359 (1,2) -
14. 02:18:589 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - same above issue.
15. 02:50:666 (4,5,6) - ^ - Alight. Fixed all of this issues.
16. 02:17:666 (1,2,1,2) - it's really downbeat ;w;
    because 02:18:128 - is loud than 02:18:012 - . Next slider is same. - On this song, I can hardly hear that drum sounds, and string instruments can hear to me, so keep this.
17. 03:46:628 (2,1) - since you use emphasis hitsound here, this anti-jump isn't fit with song, - Yep. fixed
18. 04:45:120 (8,9) - ^ make to increase DS here. i guess it's better than now. - Fixed
19. 04:55:273 (5) - since 04:55:158 (3,4,6,7) - overlapped each other, it's little weird for reading by approach circle.
    if you add NC here, it's more good about readablity. - If i NC here, I should fix every part here, so I changed stream line.
20. 05:04:504 (8) - ctrl+G for symmetry with 05:04:273 (7) - . and it's good flow than previous. - I just like like this flows.....
21. 05:43:043 (8) - curve right way, according to 05:42:927 (7) - - (7) instead. It's more good to me.
22. 05:46:273 (1,2,3,4) - if you want to change sv here, plz add NC here, for notice to change sv here.
    player can't notice changing sv in this state. - maybe it does, but players aleady know this pattern is 3/4 since of previous part, so I think it's not problem.

CLSW wrote:

http://puu.sh/lKt5A/d73453d034.zip 아니 칼점프가 왜 들어가있었던거지;;
치명적 오류 하나 수정

Neoskylove wrote:

72페버릿 어떻게 하는거죠ㄷㄷ

Side wrote:

Hi for the M4M

SPOILER

I wasn't able to play this because it's really cold here and 260bpm is 2fast4me so can't confirm playability on some sections


[Materialthing]

00:36:128 (1) - This would make more sense imo if it was stacked over 00:36:590 (2) - since it's a different vocal sound and it would be cool to have movement there over to the slider instead of having a jump upward. - Keep this. I have same pattern on Realize diff, and I don't like stacking like that

00:43:513 (1) - Maybe consider moving to x:376 y:200. Would have 2.0 spacing still and sort of be blanketted by 00:41:666 (3) - - I want to this circles on upwards.

00:56:897 (3,4) - Looks like it flows awkwardly. As mentioned above I can't really test this cuz it's sooo coooold here but you take a circular flow from 00:56:436 (1,2,3) - and then suddenly snap to 4 which isn't following this flow. Doesn't feel right and nothing in the song really sounds like a flow break would make sense at least not to me. Can't really think of an easy fix that doesn't require moving the next combo around a bit. But as I said I couldn't test this myself to see how it felt so maybe get a few playtests see how that looks. - Try other pattern.

02:18:243 (2,3) - It would play so nicely if it was if you did a pattern like this. The reason is because with this pattern your fingers do a tapping pattern like this which is okay but it could be better imo. The tapping pattern from the change I made is like this gives it like a doubles tapping rhythm which compliments the violin a bit better. It doesn't have to look like the first screenshot though that was just a quick example. - Nice suggestion. Fixed

03:31:974 (5,6) - Maybe i'm spoiled by scorpiours version but this would be better following the drums in the downbeat by changing this to two 1/2 sliders :/ - Well...I don't think that timing is good.

03:57:128 (1) - Should have whistle on end not in head like 03:49:974 (1,2,3,4) - which is the same area in the rhythm. Plus the piano at 03:57:358 - is much stronger than the one at the red tick anyway. - It's true, but I put whistle with violin sound. Although I also put whistle on piano sound, If i put that whistle, It sounds weird and it's secondary I put whistle on piano sounds.

04:09:128 (1) - Remove whistle from the body at 04:09:358 - like 04:10:051 (3) - Sounds better too because the piano sound there is very low so not as strong as to be emphasized. - Agree. Fixed

04:25:043 (1,2) - Not sure why this is stacked but the other three at 04:23:197 (1,2) - 04:26:889 (1,2) - 04:28:735 (1,2) - aren't. Could easily use 1.0x snap and move it like this and it flow better too. - Nice pointing. Fixed

04:49:735 (3) - Move the middle red node a little so the wavy slider looks better. Moved 3 one tick to the right after so you might need to move 04:50:427 (5) - as well to keep the stack but nothing too hard. - Okay, Fixed

06:50:969 - I wish you had mapped that piano outro seeing as you decided to map the beginning of it anyway - Just understand me ;w; It's my private taste.


Pretty good map. Wish I could play it xD maybe later when its not 15 degrees :v

Hope this helps. Good luck!

Zectro wrote:

hilo! M4M!

[Realize]
00:10:282 (1,1) - I don't like how these are very curved :c - I don't think so....
00:29:666 (3) - I don't like this shape for some reason ;-; - I don't also know why i make this slider like this
00:36:590 (2) - I feel like this should be a long low sv slider and you should delete 00:37:974 (3) - since it's not following anything new as far as I can tell - Consider it. I can't find the best way to fix.
01:36:589 (3) - This slider is unexpected and doesn't fit at all while playing, consider replacing it with circles. - Keep it for now. I love that pattern. looks really clean
01:43:974 (3) - At least make it close to symmetric, http://puu.sh/lQgA1/d919787901.jpg - Wait. what that ugly slider...?!
01:52:743 (1,2) - Blanket these better - Fixed
01:54:589 (1) - I don't like this shape either, it's too curved - nah. I like this slider
02:01:974 (1,2) - I immediately saw that something was off about these sliders that made them look different and not visually appealing, consider deleting the red anchor point and make them curved with only 1 grey anchor point - Alight, Fixed
02:02:666 (3,4) - Try getting these to be the same shape, would look way more cleaner - Try something different.
02:41:205 (3,4) - This feels weird, it may just be that I am used to the other image material or something?
02:43:051 (3,4) - ^ - uhh......maybe?
02:53:666 (1,3) - put them at the same height, so 02:54:128 (3) - down a little - copied (3).
03:13:051 (1,1) - These overlapping like that doesn't look too good :c - But i want to keep that blankets ;w;
03:13:051 (1,1) - Perfect stack? - Looks you mean 03:13:974 (1,1) - , so stacked perfectly.
03:36:820 (4) - Make this shape better so it looks more beautiful from 03:36:589 (3) - - Hope this is what you want.
05:37:043 (1,2,3,4) - Looks kinda bad that these are touching but I guess you can't do much about it - looks no problem imo.
06:19:735 - Maybe add a note here, and stack it on 06:19:850 (2) - sliderhead? - Circle sounds bad to me.
06:45:364 (1) - I dislike this shape.Best slider shape 2015 What i'm saying...?

GOOD MAP
<3
good luck

CLSW wrote:

캐치 탑랭들이 pp 파밍 해야된다고 이거좀 빨리 어프시켜달래요 ㅋㅋㅋ

Karia wrote:

Hi, :3

• General

1. In CLSW's diff : - 헐 ㅁㅊ

• Materialize

1. 00:19:628 (1) - 스피너가 살짝 애매하게 끊겨서 끝부분 소리 죽이는것도 괜찮을꺼같네요 - 수정
2. 01:07:282 (3) - 앞뒤 DS가 뒤바뀐 느낌입니다. 음악상으론 (3,1)쪽 DS를 더 크게 줘야 어울릴꺼같네요. 당장 고칠수 있는 방법으론 (131, 163)쯤으로 옮기는것정도.. - 오 좋은 배치네요 수정
3. 01:33:589 (6) - 음,, 저라면 바로 뒤의 01:35:205 (1) - 이 뉴콤과 느낌을 비슷하게 주려고 여기도 뉴콤 넣었을꺼같은데.. (뒤의 같은 곳들도 마찬가지) - 정작 하위난이도에는 넣었는데 왜 여기는 안넣었....
4. 01:52:512 (8,9) - 바로앞보단 비교적 잔잔해서 점프노트보단 1/2 슬라가 더 어울릴꺼같은데.. 고치긴 어렵겠죠 - 복붙은 진리입니다 (8)자리에 한번 넣어봤습니다. 조금은 점프 넣어보고 싶기도 하니
5. 02:07:108 (4) - 바로앞의 리듬이 1/1까지 느슨해져서 이거 지우고 1/2로 가시는게 좋을꺼같은데 이부분은 애매하네요 - 음....일단은 보류해둘게요. 이거 없으면 또 이상한 느낌인지라....
6. 02:17:666 (1,2,1,2,3) - 음,, 지금 상태로는 이도저도아닌, 뭔가 반반씩 섞어놓은듯한 굉장히 애매한 리듬이라 생각되네요.. 바로 앞의 리듬 패턴을 유지하시거나 아니면 이런식으로 확실하게 구분지어놓는게 낫지않을까요 - 이부분은 슬라이더를 바이올린 소리 나는 데다 넣어서 좀 애매하네요. 애초에 바이올린 소리가 엇박....
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 03:07:512 (1,2) - 뉴콤 (2)에 넣어주세요, 03:04:051 (1) - 여기처럼.. - 수정
8. 03:49:974 (1,2,3,4) - 개인적으로 2개씩 묶는것보단 1 / 2,3,4 로 묶는게 나을꺼같네요, 음악상.. - 수정
9. 04:03:589 (5,1) - 음악상 (5)에서 뉴콤을 시작하는게 맞아보입니다 - 이건 좀 애매하지만....일단 수정
10. 04:05:435 (1) - 앞과 비교했을때 콤보가 너무 길어지네요 - (4)에다 뉴콤 넣어봤습니다
11. 04:53:773 (2) - (42, 293) - 여기는 드럼소리를 좀 강조해보고 싶은 감이 있는지라 냅둘게요
12. 05:43:273 (9,10,11,12) - 반대로 뒤집어주시는게.. - 이런 흐름이 좋은지라 냅두겠습니다. 사실 마제린식 흐름이라 하더라
13. 06:10:620 (4) - (13, 126) - 수정
14. 06:12:927 - 노트 추가 - 음....여긴 그렇게 딱히 들리는 음도 없고, 넣는다 해도 어디다 넣어야 될지 없어서 안넣겠습니다.
15. 06:17:427 (4,5,1) - 간격 맞춰주는게 편할꺼같네요 - 수정
16. 06:17:658 (1) - 여기 콤보 갑자기 짧아지네요.. - 헐 여기 왜넣었....
17. 06:22:504 (2) - (296, 171)? 뒤의 1/4랑 너무 따로 노는듯한 느낌이 들어서.. - 수정

Sorry for poor modding, GL!