Respectfully, I disagree. Easy falls well within the spec and is full of recovery space. If I made it any easier, it'd barely follow the music and hence be exceedingly dull.bbj0920 wrote:
It'd be just fine to be iNiS map, this is really great map.D33d wrote:
For artistic reasons, I've decided to go with a familiarly spacey set of combo colours... Or should I stick with my classic iNiS set? Decisions, people!
I find diff spread okay to go, but I think diffs should be renamed.
Easy -> Normal, Normal -> Hard, Hard -> Light Insane.
Easy contains many notes. It's fairly easy but still I find it kinda hard to be Easy diff.
Normal contains a few 1/3 and spacing is quite large.
And Hard diff contains spaced 1/4 which is just not appropriate for Hard diff.
Just in my opinion, I hope you consider about diff names once again.
Except this you can really get this bubbled now. Amazing work.
Normal is on the upper edge of normal, in the context of H/I being quite pacy. I don't want to neuter the lower diffs, as I'd then be left with a huge gap before insane--instead of adding a superfluous diff, I'd rather have a slightly wide spread. Having said that, I'll look into ways to soften normal anyway, but I'm holding my ground on this.
Hard only has spaced 1/4 after a slider, which does nothing to affect readability or playability. iNiS used this plenty, I've used it plenty and the follow circles create enough leniency that the gap is completely mitigated. However, the diff as a whole is a little intense and it may be easy enough to simplify. The old me would always make hards and insanes a lot easier, but I feel the need to keep up with what other mappers were doing.
I hope that doesn't sound too curt, but I have a very particular approach to spreads, as single diffs vary depending on the overall difficulty tier. Not trying to be nasty at all, especially when you complimented the set.
Sonnyc, thanks for the mod. I'll respond to it properly later, as I'm currently unsure whether or not I should go to sleep at 6am.
...Fancy that!Yuii- wrote:
"With" should be removed from tags since it's already in the title xd