Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested in my queue.
- [Kantan]
- 00:00:417 (1) - k ? The pitch of the vocal is relatively higher, so k could fit well imo.
- 00:01:641 (3,4) - swap these notes to d k ? The vocal pitch at 00:02:049 (4) - is apparently higher than that at 00:01:641 (3) -
- 00:02:865 (5,6) - same as 00:00:417 (1) -
- 00:04:906 (8) - d would be better since it has the same vocal pitch as 00:05:314 (9) -
- 00:11:029 (16) - same as 00:00:417 (1) -
- 00:26:539 (13) - k ? The vocal pitch is the same as 00:24:906 (11,12) -
- 00:51:845 (2) - Again, k would be better for pattern consistency as 00:01:233 (2) -
- 00:54:294 (6) - same as 00:03:682 (6) -
- 00:55:519 (8) - same as 00:04:906 (8) -
- 01:05:314 (9,10) - same as 00:01:641 (3,4) -
- 01:06:539 (11) - try to make it consistent to 00:53:478 (5) -
- 01:08:580 (14) - same as 00:04:906 (8) -
- [Futsuu]
- 00:10:212 (21,22,23) - k d k would be better if you want to follow the vocal pitch.
- 00:37:968 (15) - maybe K as you did in Kantan ?
- 00:48:172 (9,10,11,12) - kd dk could fit the vocal pitch nicely.
- 00:57:559 (15) - consider removing the finish sound here ? A bit overemphasized imo.
- 00:59:600 (20,21) - similar to 00:10:212 (21,22,23) - , d k could match the vocal in a way better.
- 01:07:763 (16,17,18,19) - dkk d could result in a smoother flow imo.
- [Muzukashii]
- 00:01:233 (4) - k ? The vocal pitch is higher than 00:01:029 (3) -
- 00:02:049 (6) - k ? The vocal pitch is the same as 00:02:865 (10) - where you mapped as k.
- 00:03:682 (11) - ^
- 00:04:906 (15) - same as Kantan
- From 00:18:376 to 00:23:070 - The patterns could be reformed like this in order to fit the vocal better: (cursor at 00:20:621 - )
- 00:24:498 (34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47) - consider changing the 1/2 patterns to ddkkdkk dkddkdk ? This could follow the vocal pitch in a way better.
- 00:28:172 (48,49) - swap these notes to k d ? The vocal pitch at 00:28:172 (48) - is higher than that at 00:28:376 (49) -
- 00:31:845 (56,57,58,59) - kd dk would be better if you want to follow the vocal.
- 00:35:927 (72,74) - swap these notes to k d ? Similar reason as 00:28:172 (48,49) -
- 00:40:008 (84,85) - consider swapping these to d k ? The vocal at 00:40:212 (85) - has a higher pitch.
- 00:44:498 (96) - I think you may have missed the finish sound here ?
- 00:46:947 (105,106,107) - k d k would be great if you want to follow the vocal.
- 00:49:396 (112,113,114,115) - d kkk would be better since the vocal at 00:49:600 (113) - has a higher pitch.
- 00:55:519 (134) - same as 00:04:906 (15) -
- 01:03:274 (151) - k would be much better for consistency as 01:01:641 (148) -
- 01:19:804 (207) - A big kat here would be great.
- [xtrem3x Oni]
- 00:02:253 (8,9,10,11) - consider changing it to kkd k ? This could follow the vocal in a way better.
- 00:07:151 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32) - d k d k k d k d could result in a smoother flow while matching the vocal pitch nicely imo.
- 00:09:396 (34) - maybe k for the relatively high-pitched vocal ?
- 00:10:212 (37,38,39,40,41,42,43) - k d d k k d k ? Similar reason as 00:07:151 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32) -
- 00:20:212 (84,87) - swap these notes to k d to follow the drop in vocal pitch ?
- 00:22:661 (97) - maybe k for the relatively high-pitched vocal ?
- 00:26:845 (117) - The high-pitched vocal still lingers, so k would be better imo.
- 00:32:457 (140,141) - d k could fit both the vocal and the snare sound there.
- 00:35:723 (156) - maybe k for the relatively high-pitched vocal ?
- 00:36:743 (160,162) - k ? Such a pattern could suitably follow the background instruments.
- 00:37:968 (164) - D ? I could hear a stressed sound there.
- 00:38:580 (168) - maybe k here ? The vocal is even higher-pitched than 00:38:376 (167) -
- 00:41:845 (188,189) - k d would be better if you change ^
- 00:48:172 (221,222) - Again, k d would be good if you want to follow the vocal pitch.
- 00:50:212 (230) - K ? The vocal has the same pitch as 00:49:804 (229) -
- 00:58:988 (277) - maybe k for the relatively high-pitched vocal ?
- 01:02:763 (293) - Since the lyrics are identical, d would be better for consistency imo.
- 01:10:825 (333,340) - I think changing these two notes to k could improve the flow of notes by a bit.
- 01:13:886 (352) - maybe K for the prominent cymbal sound there ?
- 01:16:335 (369) - d ? It has the same vocal pitch as 01:16:743 (371) -
- 01:18:172 (379,380) - k d as you did at 01:17:355 (374,375) - ?