1. The starting spinner can start earlier in my opinion

1. 00:25:237 (1) - remove NC?
2. 00:50:737 (1) - ^
3. 01:55:612 (1) - ^, 01:55:987 (10) - add here, just my opinion, next 2 lines too..edit: oh i just noticed, that you have the same moment in song on 00:42:487 (1) - and have the NCs just like was mentonied here >_>
4. 01:56:737 (1) - and remove here
5. 01:58:612 (1) - and here, add here 01:58:987 -
6. 00:09:674 (2,3) - ctrl+G? (don't forget to replace hitsounds if you do)
7. 00:22:987 (1,2,3,4) - it's hard to keep consistency and accuracy on mini-streams, that have 4,6,8 etc circles, maybe add a slider instead of 4th circle?
8. 00:37:049 (4) - not really sure about this move, maybe make diamond and then move next circles, like this http://puu.sh/jpxhH/387ac31c43.jpg? and even stack (8) with (3)
9. 01:06:487 (1,2,3,4) - make it smoother?
10. 01:10:987 (1,2,3) - can't get idea of this pattern, how about making triangle of 1,2,3 or 2,3,4? I mean balanced spacing
11. 01:12:674 (2,3) - ctrl+g? looks so epic for me
12. 01:16:799 (8,9,1) - i don't like placement here, maybe move it down, like a continue of triangle? next circles are up to you
13. 01:19:612 (6) - isn't it too close?
14. 01:24:674 (2) - i'd like to see any kind of balance again, example http://puu.sh/jpxRJ/19cb8ec3c5.jpg move any objects here as you want, it will be cool
15. 01:27:112 (4) - how about removing anti-jump and stacking it with (1)? (needs to change next pattern with it)
16. 01:57:299 (3,1,2,3,4) - not really a nice star (http://puu.sh/jpy7U/60fb6ff7a7.jpg) can it be smoother or it's just me?
17. 02:07:424 (4) - this diff has too many sliders like this, how about rotating, like this http://puu.sh/jpykh/d8e63b4919.jpg? also this pattern is looking like rough star too, but i won't complain about it, because it doesn't matter i guess
18. 02:36:542 (1,2,3,4,1) - and obvious star again. here is some fix, that will make it smoother 02:36:764 (2) - move to x:124 y:209, 02:36:986 (3) - to x:329 y:148, 02:37:208 (4) - to x:126 y:77 02:37:431 (1) - to x:251 y:255, next circles edit as you wish
19. 03:09:875 (6,7,1,2,3) - ugh star again, you can always fix it yourself, by using "create polygon circles" option

1. HP -1
2. 00:21:112 (1) - you started new pattern and new combo a bit early, check out the big white tick, in terms of logic this song is linear and has equal segments every 8 white ticks, you can even try to hear it. i think you can understand me
3. 00:27:112 (1) - same as ^, remove NC and add 00:27:487 (4) - here. You can see right variant for example in [Chen] diff
4. 01:53:643 (6) - replace NC to this circle?
5. 00:07:049 (3) - stack with start of 00:05:924 (2) ?
6. 00:30:487 (1,2,3,4) - not really nice, how about this http://puu.sh/jpAW2/7969095336.jpg ?
7. 00:45:862 (2) - stack with 00:44:362 (3) ?
8. 00:46:612 (6) - i think it's too close to the previous one
9. 00:58:237 (3,4,5,6,1) - and i think you can increase DS here a bit
10. 01:18:862 (2,3) - ctrl+g?
11. 01:23:924 (5,6) - hmmm, this moment is questionable for me, i want to ctrl+g it, but then the balance of spacing is required. this moment is up to you.
12. 01:29:830 - low-spacing stream can be added here, instead of emptiness, or i don't know, but it looks strange for me atm
13. 01:58:237 (5) - http://puu.sh/jpBOS/860744c76c.jpg awwwww so close, move it a bit to the left?
14. 02:00:112 (4,5,6) - stack with 01:58:987 (1) ?
15. 02:01:799 (1) - not sure that this upbeat is ok, but i think it's easy replaceable with 2 circles
16. 02:16:987 - add circle here
17. 02:25:875 (1) - stack with 02:24:542 (4) ?
18. 03:02:542 (4) - more stacks for the god of stacks stack it with whatever you want . _.
    Nice diff, somehow reminds me my maps

1. HP -1
2. Well, I didn't found any NC issues, looks good.
3. This map is all about blankets, more than patterns, not sure that i can provide something, but i'll try.
4. 00:15:112 (3,4,1) - move to x:241 y:157 <- first obvious blanket that i found
5. 00:17:362 (2) - you can stack this with 00:15:862 (2) and then move (3) or (1) to make balanced triangle
6. 00:18:487 (1) - then move this for blanket..
7. 00:33:674 (2,4) - ctrl+g?
8. 01:33:862 (4) - looks too close to the prev triplet, i'd recomment to move it a bit higher
9. 01:37:237 (1) - very confusing rhythm, at least for me, very easy to get 100

1. 00:08:362 (3) - isn't it overlap?
2. 00:30:487 (1) - in sliders like this i'd recommend to remove second repeat and add circles or remove repeats at all and add another slider, 2x repeats are kinda confusing
3. 01:04:987 (2,3,4,5) - this moment looks ugly ingame, but i can understand logic :\

Morbon wrote:

Hello, M4M here. I'll start with the hardest diff, because i can't do it otherwise.
Keep in mind, that i'm not very good in easier diffs, instead of this i can provide more feedback with extra+ diffs.
Also my english sux
[General]

1. The starting spinner can start earlier in my opinion it's following a specific sound,can't really explain xd

[Chen]

1. 00:25:237 (1) - remove NC? yap, I completely forgot to recheckthe NC's in this diff >.<
2. 00:50:737 (1) - ^ fixed
3. 01:55:612 (1) - ^, 01:55:987 (10) - add here, just my opinion, next 2 lines too..edit: oh i just noticed, that you have the same moment in song on 00:42:487 (1) - and have the NCs just like was mentonied here >_> fixed all of them
4. 01:56:737 (1) - and remove here yap
5. 01:58:612 (1) - and here, add here 01:58:987 - ^
6. 00:09:674 (2,3) - ctrl+G? (don't forget to replace hitsounds if you do) I guess it's ok if I do, becomes easier to read
7. 00:22:987 (1,2,3,4) - it's hard to keep consistency and accuracy on mini-streams, that have 4,6,8 etc circles, maybe add a slider instead of 4th circle? I'll have to keep this, feels wrong to skip the main beat with a slider end, even if it's a 4 note stream
8. 00:37:049 (4) - not really sure about this move, maybe make diamond and then move next circles, like this http://puu.sh/jpxhH/387ac31c43.jpg? and even stack (8) with (3) I like that pattern :c
9. 01:06:487 (1,2,3,4) - make it smoother? fixed and also made some changes to the chorus in general
10. 01:10:987 (1,2,3) - can't get idea of this pattern, how about making triangle of 1,2,3 or 2,3,4? I mean balanced spacing done
11. 01:12:674 (2,3) - ctrl+g? looks so epic for me done, follows the vocals better
12. 01:16:799 (8,9,1) - i don't like placement here, maybe move it down, like a continue of triangle? next circles are up to you keeping this
13. 01:19:612 (6) - isn't it too close? I think fixed?
14. 01:24:674 (2) - i'd like to see any kind of balance again, example http://puu.sh/jpxRJ/19cb8ec3c5.jpg move any objects here as you want, it will be cool need to highlight the jump to the snare
15. 01:27:112 (4) - how about removing anti-jump and stacking it with (1)? (needs to change next pattern with it) I really want to keep this pattern
16. 01:57:299 (3,1,2,3,4) - not really a nice star (http://puu.sh/jpy7U/60fb6ff7a7.jpg) can it be smoother or it's just me? all notes are pretty far away in timing, I guess it wouldn't make much difference
17. 02:07:424 (4) - this diff has too many sliders like this, how about rotating, like this http://puu.sh/jpykh/d8e63b4919.jpg? also this pattern is looking like rough star too, but i won't complain about it, because it doesn't matter i guess changed one or two, but I think it's ok for the most part
18. 02:36:542 (1,2,3,4,1) - and obvious star again. here is some fix, that will make it smoother 02:36:764 (2) - move to x:124 y:209, 02:36:986 (3) - to x:329 y:148, 02:37:208 (4) - to x:126 y:77 02:37:431 (1) - to x:251 y:255, next circles edit as you wish fixed
19. 03:09:875 (6,7,1,2,3) - ugh star again, you can always fix it yourself, by using "create polygon circles" option

I suck with shape patterns
I can't check blankets\some flow problems, because it's not my best ability, sorry.
[Hard]

1. HP -1 good point
2. Well, I didn't found any NC issues, looks good.
3. This map is all about blankets, more than patterns, not sure that i can provide something, but i'll try.
4. 00:15:112 (3,4,1) - move to x:241 y:157 <- first obvious blanket that i found fixed, the rest is due to the stack
5. 00:17:362 (2) - you can stack this with 00:15:862 (2) and then move (3) or (1) to make balanced triangle no need for it imo
6. 00:18:487 (1) - then move this for blanket..
7. 00:33:674 (2,4) - ctrl+g? ok, test with the new spacing, also changed the other pattern
8. 01:33:862 (4) - looks too close to the prev triplet, i'd recomment to move it a bit higher this is due to the stacking rules
9. 01:37:237 (1) - very confusing rhythm, at least for me, very easy to get 100 it's following the song, using sliders would make it too easy / uninsteresting

That's all for me
[Normal]

1. 00:08:362 (3) - isn't it overlap? it's allright
2. 00:30:487 (1) - in sliders like this i'd recommend to remove second repeat and add circles or remove repeats at all and add another slider, 2x repeats are kinda confusing while I usually agree with this, on this diff the song ask for this, and it's consistent so I think it's rankable
3. 01:04:987 (2,3,4,5) - this moment looks ugly ingame, but i can understand logic :\

I can't find other issues, sorry.
[Easy]
zzzz i can't find anything


Good luck with map!

Morbon wrote:

[DavidEd's Insane]

1. HP -1 true... i missed once in a stream and half my hp was gone xD
2. 00:21:112 (1) - you started new pattern and new combo a bit early, check out the big white tick, in terms of logic this song is linear and has equal segments every 8 white ticks, you can even try to hear it. i think you can understand me i see what you mean. fix
3. 00:27:112 (1) - same as ^, remove NC and add 00:27:487 (4) - here. You can see right variant for example in [Chen] diff fix
4. 01:53:643 (6) - replace NC to this circle? it kind of follows with the 1/6 slider and the snare is a much louder and recognizable sound so that's why i put it there.
5. 00:07:049 (3) - stack with start of 00:05:924 (2) ? fix
6. 00:30:487 (1,2,3,4) - not really nice, how about this http://puu.sh/jpAW2/7969095336.jpg ? fix
7. 00:45:862 (2) - stack with 00:44:362 (3) ? fix
8. 00:46:612 (6) - i think it's too close to the previous one
9. 00:58:237 (3,4,5,6,1) - and i think you can increase DS here a bit nah, i like how smooth it is already
10. 01:18:862 (2,3) - ctrl+g? fix
11. 01:23:924 (5,6) - hmmm, this moment is questionable for me, i want to ctrl+g it, but then the balance of spacing is required. this moment is up to you. just stacked it with the previous (1) slider
12. 01:29:830 - low-spacing stream can be added here, instead of emptiness, or i don't know, but it looks strange for me atm the drum part stops here, and thats kind of what i was going for here
13. 01:58:237 (5) - http://puu.sh/jpBOS/860744c76c.jpg awwwww so close, move it a bit to the left? fix
14. 02:00:112 (4,5,6) - stack with 01:58:987 (1) ? wasnt it already? xD
15. 02:01:799 (1) - not sure that this upbeat is ok, but i think it's easy replaceable with 2 circles nah, its ok
16. 02:16:987 - add circle here added
17. 02:25:875 (1) - stack with 02:24:542 (4) ? fix (misstake by me) xD
18. 03:02:542 (4) - more stacks for the god of stacks stack it with whatever you want . _. stacked it wherever i want

Tarrasky wrote:

mod in Insanes diff suggest by - Milhofo -

Chen

00:23:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - porque essa stream está tão desregulada? dá para fazer algo mais bonito aqui já está mais bonito xd
00:28:987 (1) - adicione clap okay
uma dica que pode ser aplicada em todas as dificuldades, essa parte 00:06:487 - 00:18:487 - é um refrão como os outros 2 kiais, o que acha de adicionar kiai time aqui tambem? eu acho que fica bacana ^^ adicionei tambem, não tinha posto porque achava que ficava kiaia a mais ahah

caso queira que eu veja as outras dificuldades só falar comigo em jogo, vc pediu só as insanes então ta ai ^^ era só essas, obrigado o/(

Tarrasky wrote:

DavidEd's Insane

00:09:487 (1) - Finish here to be constant like 00:15:487 (1) - added
00:11:737 (7) - this slider can finish in 00:11:924 - and you add a circle in 00:12:018 -, if you listen in 25% slow, the song seems perfect i like it
00:27:862 (1) - unnecessary new combo mustve forgotten hehe
00:40:987 (1) - i dont like this kind of spin in the middle of the song, It gives to clearly hear that this part can be mappable. Of course the spin is not wrong, just think what could be better ill concider it
00:53:362 (2) - same about 00:11:737 (7) - like it
01:18:487 (1) - finish, of course added
01:39:487 (1) - same about 00:40:987 (1) -, THIS 01:49:987 (1) - is a good example of spin, i like ^^ i wanted to capture that ''windy'' tone that builds up. mapping it would only make the note at 01:42:487 be awkward to map, unless i put a spinner from 01:41:737 and i dont like fast spinners xD

CSLM wrote:

David

1. 00:16:987 (1) - reduce a reverse, it's 1/6 until 00:17:174 - not until 00:17:237 -
2. 00:52:987 (1) -
3. 00:56:737 (3,4,5,6,1) - *nazi* bad star pattern, make a better with the tool of polygonal circle creation (in compose, or push Ctrl-Shift-D)
4. 02:04:987 (1) - same thing what i said in 00:52:987 (1) -
5. 02:05:362 (2) - reduce a reverse

CSLM wrote:

hi, m4m from your queue, sorry for the late
new page wow

Unrankeable
Important
Suggestion

General

1. i think will be better the unicode source: 東方Project sure thing
2. don't you think the gap of CS between Easy, Normal and Hard a little strange? CS2.5 => CS3.5 => CS4? :/ reduces the CS of normal to 3.2, looks more equilibrated and more apropiated for a Normal diff imo [/color]

Easy

1. 01:54:112 (1) - i think will be better if you delete this, 'cause also what is less unrankeable, it's less confusing for the newbies imo, for the strong vocal. [/color]
2. 02:16:987 (1) - due to the change of BPM, a pattern of sliders can't be more confusing, why? because you maked the same in the 160 BPM part, i suggest what you change this to a spinner, make a transition less confusing [/color]
3. 03:00:098 (2,3,1) - a spacing of this kind (in triangle) is never good on a easy diff, 'cause the newbie can hit (1) instead of (3). Make a longer space between (2) and (1) for avoid this I'll see what I can do

Normal

1. 00:31:424 (2,3) - it's better imo if you delete one reverse of (2) and move (3) to 00:31:987 - of that way follow more the vocal and the drums imo I'm following the guitar xD
2. 00:37:424 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:55:237 (3) - i think what wll get better the flow if you change the curvature of this slider, make a better effect regarding 00:56:737 (5) - and it's less confusing imo ok
4. 00:59:174 (4,5,6) - follow more the instruments imo if you delete (6), move (5) to 00:59:737 - and make a reverse in (4), that apply too with 01:09:487 (1,2,3) - 01:21:487 (1,2,3) - 02:50:764 (1,2,3) - 03:04:986 (1,2,3) - I like how it is now :3
5. 01:00:862 (2,4) - try of avoid overlaps like this ones, looks very ugly and could be confusing ok, changed
6. 01:31:237 (2,3) - this patterns would look better imo if make instead of 2 3/4 reverse sliders, 3 3/4 sliders without reverse: http://puu.sh/jzbzj/e82cb49ca6.jpg the same with 01:34:237 (2,3) - 01:37:237 (2,3) - and 01:40:237 (2,3) - (but with this one a pattern like this: http://puu.sh/jzc0Y/6dbd60d232.jpg will follow more the instruments imo) idk yet
7. 01:59:737 (5,1) - overlap fixed
8. 02:13:237 (3,6) - ^ yap
9. 02:16:987 (1,2) - the same thing what i said in Easy, it's better a spinner what a slider/hitcircle pattern

Hard

1. 00:16:987 (1,2,3,4) - i think better a square pattern, make a better flow imo it's ok
2. 01:00:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i like this <3
3. 01:06:112 (4,5) - mmm, stack? not really needed
4. 01:29:549 - you should add a note here, 'cause the calm part of the chorus start in 01:29:737 - not in 01:29:362 - and without a note there you'll give a bad impression imo I had on but apparently I had to reduce the difficulty to have a better spread
5. 01:41:643 (8) - transform this in a note with a slider, don't leave 01:41:737 - 01:42:112 - in white plzz, it's where have most intensity that part imo the snare is the most intense part, hence why I highlighted it
6. 02:16:987 (1,2) - the same thing what i said in Easy/Normal

i don't know mod extras, sorry ;3;
GL with rank
choo choo~

1. 00:31:987 (3) - 00:37:987 (3) - not seeing what the repeats are supposed to be following here. the emphasis for vocals and instrumentals are on white ticks for both of them
2. 02:53:431 (3) - would be way better to have the finish on the tail of this actually clickable cuz important beat dfdfdfsdfx

1. difficulty settings (aside from cs) should be buffed by at least 1
2. 00:30:487 (1) - when there's multiple repeats on a 1/2 slider, there's like no time to react to the second repeat. using 1 reverse+circle would work better, especially on ones like 00:31:424 (2) - since there would be snarehit on the circle
   yea that's kinda it lol. the section with lots of 3/4 sliders is kind of awkward but like cant really do much about it cuz of difficulty restrictions

1. 00:06:112 (2) - first strong beat of the song is on a sliderend nice111111111111 same on extra too could you not
2. 00:31:799 (7,1) - so this is the only spacing variation thing on the entire diff. spacing variation is fine on hards, but like if you're gonna include it, do it consistently and in more places than just this. 00:37:799 (7,1) - is the same as the first thing, yet no spacing change. all the downbeat cymbal stuff in the kiai could also work, etc. easiest thing ot do is just not have the spacing variation tho
3. 00:32:174 (2) - 00:38:174 (2) - not seeing how the reverse on this is supported at all. red tick has nothing important, same as easy lul
4. 01:25:612 (5) - 01:26:362 (2) - the points of emphasis are on both of these sliderends i dont understand rhyhtm choiceeeeeeee. 01:28:049 (2) - and the reverse here nice
5. 01:32:737 - ignoring these is more acceptable on normal since you can't really do 1/4 spacing stuff there, but here you could easily cover the snare by using a 1/4 slider after these (and every other time this happens cuz it's everywhere)
6. 02:11:549 (2,3,4) - hello milhofo or should i say mil-i-dont-have-stacks-enabled-in-the-editor-or-testplay-my-maps-hofo yay

1. source is wrong oh no!!
2. 00:20:643 (5) - sounds way better to not have the snare on the slidertail. circle+1/2 slider like 00:22:424 (4,5) - works great fantastic wonderful do it
3. 00:40:987 (1) - ending spinner on the downbeat followed by 1/2 spam ew. ending the spinner 1/2 earlier (where there's a vocal!!) and having a circle on the downbeat is a good idea
4. 00:50:174 (2) - not liking the sliderending on strongbeat you've got here and no where else in the entire map why:(
5. 00:53:362 (2,3,4) - 02:31:209 (1,2,3) - new combo on the white tick like 01:53:362 (5,6,1) - makes the 1/6 wtf rhythm way easier to comprehend
6. 01:35:737 (4,5,6) - pretty weird rhythm when the points of emphasis are here and not what you mapped at allllllllll

1. 00:12:018 (1,2) - swapping new combos on these makes it way easier to comprehend how long to hold the 1/6 slider. david's diff does it at 01:53:362 if you want a reference
2. 00:17:737 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - lower jump and stream spacing would fit with the percussion disappearing reeeeally nicely. having them the same as everything else in the section is weird when music is not the same at all. would probably apply to the section at 01:45:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too smaller sapcing is cool
3. 00:20:643 (5) - reading hwat i said about this on david's diff = good idea. would work fine with the example there, or just a double instead of circleslider since that seemst o match your overall rhythm choices better
4. 00:49:424 (5,6) - sounds way better to not have slidertail on uh the place where it is for emphasis reasons yeah. reverse on 00:50:174 (2) - is pretty much the same thing. don't do that thx
5. 00:53:362 (1,2,3) - nice 1/6 u got there
6. 01:30:112 (4) - cutting off a reverse on this makes it way easier to not break when transitioning into the next object. i remember someone calling this "buffering the repeat" and that sounds pretty legit right
7. 01:32:643 (3) - 01:38:643 (3) - UH maybe don't do that since there isn't actually 1/8 there. the effect of silent 1/8 sliderends for the previous stuff is probably fine, but a 1/8 reverse when there's nothing is what. doing a double like 01:41:643 (3,4) - is way better
8. 01:35:643 (3) - should see what i said on david's diff here and arrange comboing/stream angles accordingly
9. 02:53:653 (5,6) - 03:07:875 (5,6,7) - "i have 4 beats to cover, so 2 sliders works great!" <-- hopefully not what you're thinking. for rhythm that actually makes sense to play, clicking on the last beat of the stream is best. it's the most powerful and it gives you an easily understandable time between clicking it and the next note (1/2, instead of your current 4/6 wtf). 4 circles, 1/6 slider with 1 repeat + circle, or full on 1/6 slider with 2 repeats all work great, but what you have doesnt
   
   now for the recurring things that are more like overall thoughts rather than "pls fix"
   
10. spacing is pretty what a lot of the time. jumps emphasize the object being jumped to (which i think you know already), but it gets misleading in a lot of places here. for example, 00:09:112 (8,1,2) - 1 is more emphasized than 2, yet there's smaller spacing to 1 than to 2, making it seem like you're emphasizing 2 more. same sorta thing happens everywhere, like 02:27:209 (4,1,2,3) - 01:12:112 (7,1,2) - 01:15:112 (6,7,1) - etc yhou get it. weird emphasis paired with the "everything is a jump hype!!!" you've got going on makes it look like a lot of your spacing is unstructured which is no bueno and explaining how to make things structured is impossible B)))))))))
11. i can't really say problems with flow because people say it's too subjective, but i'm thinking that anyway. most of the time you've got great circle->circle movement, but you're ignoring the way sliderbodies influence movement a lot. 01:21:674 (2,3) - 01:22:424 (5,6) - so for these, the angle between the previous object and sliderbody is really sharp, forcing super uncomfortable movement. 01:18:674 (2,3) - 01:19:424 (5,6) - on the other hand do the exact opposite with nonsharp angles and they play nicely. a similar thing applies to sliderend stuff too, but yeah. i won't say you need to change that kind of stuff, but it's part of what's keeping me from saying "great map!"

pishifat wrote:

. . . . . ., ,. ,. n,. nm,./d.g dhhbng.thm,f.hmfrth,fth

[easy]

1. 00:31:987 (3) - 00:37:987 (3) - not seeing what the repeats are supposed to be following here. the emphasis for vocals and instrumentals are on white ticks for both of them
2. 02:53:431 (3) - would be way better to have the finish on the tail of this actually clickable cuz important beat dfdfdfsdfx

[normal]

1. difficulty settings (aside from cs) should be buffed by at least 1 ok I suck at spreads I know
2. 00:30:487 (1) - when there's multiple repeats on a 1/2 slider, there's like no time to react to the second repeat. using 1 reverse+circle would work better, especially on ones like 00:31:424 (2) - since there would be snarehit on the circle
   yea that's kinda it lol. the section with lots of 3/4 sliders is kind of awkward but like cant really do much about it cuz of difficulty restrictions

[hard]that sv jump from normal tho lol...

1. 00:06:112 (2) - first strong beat of the song is on a sliderend nice111111111111 same on extra too could you not
2. 00:31:799 (7,1) - so this is the only spacing variation thing on the entire diff. spacing variation is fine on hards, but like if you're gonna include it, do it consistently and in more places than just this. 00:37:799 (7,1) - is the same as the first thing, yet no spacing change. all the downbeat cymbal stuff in the kiai could also work, etc. easiest thing ot do is just not have the spacing variation tho changed it because of a previous mod, changed it back
3. 00:32:174 (2) - 00:38:174 (2) - not seeing how the reverse on this is supported at all. red tick has nothing important, same as easy lul
4. 01:25:612 (5) - 01:26:362 (2) - the points of emphasis are on both of these sliderends i dont understand rhyhtm choiceeeeeeee. 01:28:049 (2) - and the reverse here nice
5. 01:32:737 - ignoring these is more acceptable on normal since you can't really do 1/4 spacing stuff there, but here you could easily cover the snare by using a 1/4 slider after these (and every other time this happens cuz it's everywhere)
6. 02:11:549 (2,3,4) - hello milhofo or should i say mil-i-dont-have-stacks-enabled-in-the-editor-or-testplay-my-maps-hofo yaynoob mapper pls teach how to map

[x]tfw you have a lot to say about a diff but you have no idea how to say it

• it has potential but the mapper fcked it up D:

1. 00:12:018 (1,2) - swapping new combos on these makes it way easier to comprehend how long to hold the 1/6 slider. david's diff does it at 01:53:362 if you want a reference
2. 00:17:737 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - lower jump and stream spacing would fit with the percussion disappearing reeeeally nicely. having them the same as everything else in the section is weird when music is not the same at all. would probably apply to the section at 01:45:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too smaller sapcing is cool
3. 00:20:643 (5) - reading hwat i said about this on david's diff = good idea. would work fine with the example there, or just a double instead of circleslider since that seemst o match your overall rhythm choices better
4. 00:49:424 (5,6) - sounds way better to not have slidertail on uh the place where it is for emphasis reasons yeah. reverse on 00:50:174 (2) - is pretty much the same thing. don't do that thx
5. 00:53:362 (1,2,3) - nice 1/6 u got there I had it on previous versions of the map but removed it due to popular demand ("too confusing and hard to play"), added it back though
6. 01:30:112 (4) - cutting off a reverse on this makes it way easier to not break when transitioning into the next object. i remember someone calling this "buffering the repeat" and that sounds pretty legit right weird, but ok
7. 01:32:643 (3) - 01:38:643 (3) - UH maybe don't do that since there isn't actually 1/8 there. the effect of silent 1/8 sliderends for the previous stuff is probably fine, but a 1/8 reverse when there's nothing is what. doing a double like 01:41:643 (3,4) - is way better doubles are scary
8. 01:35:643 (3) - should see what i said on david's diff here and arrange comboing/stream angles accordingly
9. 02:53:653 (5,6) - 03:07:875 (5,6,7) - "i have 4 beats to cover, so 2 sliders works great!" <-- hopefully not what you're thinking. for rhythm that actually makes sense to play, clicking on the last beat of the stream is best. it's the most powerful and it gives you an easily understandable time between clicking it and the next note (1/2, instead of your current 4/6 wtf). 4 circles, 1/6 slider with 1 repeat + circle, or full on 1/6 slider with 2 repeats all work great, but what you have doesnt I changed the first one, agreed that it shouldn't start on a 1/6, but going to keep the pattern that's made of a triple + kick slider, the last note isn't clickable, but it's the most straight forward pattern imo
   
   now for the recurring things that are more like overall thoughts rather than "pls fix" tried to fix flow and spacing, literally went through the whole map, hopefully I fixed most if not all of them
   
10. spacing is pretty what a lot of the time. jumps emphasize the object being jumped to (which i think you know already), but it gets misleading in a lot of places here. for example, 00:09:112 (8,1,2) - 1 is more emphasized than 2, yet there's smaller spacing to 1 than to 2, making it seem like you're emphasizing 2 more. same sorta thing happens everywhere, like 02:27:209 (4,1,2,3) - 01:12:112 (7,1,2) - 01:15:112 (6,7,1) - etc yhou get it. weird emphasis paired with the "everything is a jump hype!!!" you've got going on makes it look like a lot of your spacing is unstructured which is no bueno and explaining how to make things structured is impossible B)))))))))
11. i can't really say problems with flow because people say it's too subjective, but i'm thinking that anyway. most of the time you've got great circle->circle movement, but you're ignoring the way sliderbodies influence movement a lot. 01:21:674 (2,3) - 01:22:424 (5,6) - so for these, the angle between the previous object and sliderbody is really sharp, forcing super uncomfortable movement. 01:18:674 (2,3) - 01:19:424 (5,6) - on the other hand do the exact opposite with nonsharp angles and they play nicely. a similar thing applies to sliderend stuff too, but yeah. i won't say you need to change that kind of stuff, but it's part of what's keeping me from saying "great map!"

[]

tldr the first 4 diffs could easily be rankable but the last one ehhh idk i tri v hard

Yoges wrote:

Here from Q

[General]
Only 2 combo colours? Add at least 2 more. I think it's ok to have 2 ._.

[Easy]
00:16:987 (2) - As far as I'm aware, sliders in easies with 3+ repeats are unrankable.~ there can be exceptions, this part is memorable so players won't be surprise if they know where it is
00:48:487 (1,2) - Not good flow. It just goes from curving to the left to a sharp up. rotated a bit
01:04:987 (2) - Same as 00:16:987
01:28:987 (3) - ^
01:31:237 (2,3) - Again flows not good. Mouse movement goes from diagonally up to the left to all of a sudden diagonally up to the right I think this is ok
02:16:987 (1) - Same as 00:16:987
03:13:875 (3) - ^

Some parts throughout this diff have minor flow issues too. Too many to point out.

[Normal]
00:16:049 (2) - That's going to be fast for newbies. Just replace it with a not at 00:16:237 In a normal a 1/2 is ok, as long as I don't go 1/4
00:30:487 (1,3) - Same as ^ but I cant suggest a replacement
00:33:487 (1,3) - ^ I'm not going to point out all of these notes. 1/2 notes should be used more often in normals to make them more challenging than easies but you should not have them too frequently and you definitely should not have them one after another like this. Like how you're using them in 00:42:487 (1,2,3,4,5) - And in the 2nd kiai is perfect. But you're using them too much in other places. Consider undermapping in parts if necessary. do you mean 1/1? ._. that's be really boring, even for a normal

[Hard]
00:36:487 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - That might be a bit awkward to read. Square/Diamond patterns maybe? it's a hard, and it needs to transition into the insane as well
00:54:487 (1,3) - Rotate these sliders slightly. Here I rotated the (1) 15 clockwise, the (3) 15 anticlockwise and then put them back where they were and adjusted the notes around them. It's a small change but it improves flow so much because of the more oval path the mouse is taking. allright
00:55:987 (1,3) - ^ ok

I don't really like the patterns in the two insanes so I'm not going to mod them

Maakkeli wrote:

M4M from my que. Since Yoges focused on Easy, Normal and Hard, I'll focus on Insane and Chen

[General]

More combo colors cuz why not
One spacing problem in Easy check AiMod
Yea nuthing else here

[Chen]

1. 00:07:612 (6) - ctrl + g? I had fixed this pattern on my own previously, did not like it very much
2. 00:09:112 (8) - Blanket this to 00:09:674 (2) - and adjust the spacing of the notes in that part accordingly flow is more important than the blanket here
3. 00:12:487 (1,2) - This is something that does not just fit my eye. 00:13:049 (2) - Maybe move 00:13:049 (2) - to x:395 y:28 and then move 00:13:237 (3) - just a little bit down reworked the pattern, the main beat was on a repeat, I suck at this x.x
4. I would ctrl+g 00:25:612 (6,7,8) - and move it a bit up. Adjust the coming stream so it flows again mhm I don't really like that
5. 00:29:268 (4,5) - The spacing with these is unexpected. Just use the same old 0.8x ds like you did with the stream they're perfectly playable, and it adds that highlight to the change between snare and toms
6. 00:29:737 (6) - Move this so it doesn't overlap overlap with what?
7. 00:30:112 (7,8,9,10,1) - You can move this stream a bit further from 00:29:737 (6) - only if I changed the previous
8. 00:44:737 (5) - ctrl+g would flow better imo. Maybe also move it a bit left and the move 00:45:112 (6) - also a bit left
   
   Highlighted notes

   
   This would look cool imo
   made a slight change
9. 00:46:612 (7,8,1,2,3) - Claps, whistles? oh god I prob forgot to add them here, nice catch!
10. 00:54:487 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2) - This spacing is just too damn big. At least for a "slow" part like this it's ok :c
11. 01:10:237 (5) - ctrl+g would flow better imo ok, I'll take this one
12. 01:21:112 (6) - ^ the jump needs to be highlighted
13. 01:46:049 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g?
14. 01:49:049 (1,2,3) - ^
15. 01:52:049 (1,2,3) - ^
16. 01:57:112 (6) - I think this note is too far from the slider highlight as well
17. 01:58:612 (8) - This just feel awkward. Idk how to explain it, it just feels
18. 02:06:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - It's sooooo big. That's what she said but really too big jumps here. This is again the "slow" part.
19. 02:49:875 (5) - ctrl+g flows better imo also a highlight for the snare

Good luck with this!

• - bolded difficulties are the ones that I modded

SPOILER

SPOILER

SPOILER

SPOILER

1. 00:16:987 (2) - Personally, I don't like if slider goes reversed more than one time, because it's confusing @@ (I found it too many, it's up to you tho, it's not inappropriate things, just my personal preferences)
2. 01:54:112 (1) - It's too close for an Easy, which should be have 1500 ms recovery time after a spinner, delete it or do something to start it more late than this
3. 02:16:987 (1) - For me actually, this BPM change really unnoticeable for beginners, since it's too big impact around the objects afterwards . I would rather to replace this slider with a single circle, then start a spinner here 02:18:764 - , like this image (The object before this spinner must be just that single circle, in a nutshell, leaving it empty after that circle) . Then, the rest of objects after spinner will be deleted until 02:32:098 (4) - , so that there will be a break until this slider 02:32:986 (1) - . At least, please consider this one, since it was too hard to distinguish the BPM change here (If you think it's right, consider to apply it on Normal too)

1. 00:59:549 (5) - Playing 1/2 instead of this slider would be more greater to represents how the beats sounds here, since there's a bit peak on 00:59:737 - and would be great to having it clickable/gets emphasis
2. 01:31:237 (2,3) - Slightly hard to read for a Normal . Consider to rework again on the rhythm here . Would rather to having them like the image below . It would be fine because there's a faded sound on 01:31:612 - , so that putting something on it would be reasonable . Then, 1/1 would suits as well after this, as it played on 01:32:362 - in the image below . My suggestion is, don't trying to follow something hard like this guitar, since the sound doesn't really suits well to be played on such lower diff like Normal (This suggestion also applied into another similar/same part)
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:16:987 (1) - Follow my suggestion on Easy
4. 03:05:431 (2,3) - To follow the vocals correctly like the others, this should be switched, I mean, the rhythm, using Ctrl+G the pattern . I will plays a lot nicer than the current works

1. 02:23:209 - I assume you forgot to place a break here

Doormat wrote:

Hello, from my M4M Queue. Thanks for the mod! Now I return the favour

Oooh, Touhou music. Haven’t listened to much of these as often these days..

Difficulties looked at: Easy, Normal, Hard, DavidEd’s Insane, Chen

• - bolded difficulties are the ones that I modded

General

- add touhou to the tags? allright

Easy

00:03:487 (1) – I think it’d make more sense for the spinner to end at 00:05:737 true, I prob forgot changing x.x
00:14:549 (3) – Maybe you can put a clap here? I'm using snares when the drummer plays them, so here isn't needed one
01:10:049 (1) – ^ same
01:54:112 (1) – I think you should delete this note so that there’s more emphasis on the downbeat I need to map that part :c
02:32:986 (1,3) – Stack these two yeap that needed to be done

Normal

00:19:987 (4) – Maybe you can try something like this here instead?

SPOILER

doesn't go too well with the beat tbh
00:22:987 (4) – ^ same, since I'm following the instrumental
00:59:549 (5) – I don’t think a 1/1 slider is the best idea here since there’s a beat on the white tick in the middle of slider. Maybe try a circle followed by a 1/2 slider? this would be a good option, but would feel a bit overmapped for a normal on that part, which I try to avoid

SPOILER

01:54:112 (1) – Maybe delete it to emphasis the downbeat same as easy

Hard

00:57:487 (1,2,3,4) – I don’t think 1/2 repeat sliders and circles are the best pattern here because I feel like it’s a little off with the rhythm of the song. Maybe try 3/4 repeat sliders and leave the downbeat empty?

SPOILER

doesn't really fit the music
02:09:487 (1,2,3,4) – Similar situation to the above
00:59:549 (3) – I feel like you missed a beat on the white tick here; maybe turn this slider into three circles? The highlighted note in the screenshot is the one I added in I did D: fixed

SPOILER

01:29:549 – I feel like you can add in a beat here; maybe a circle?could be added, but I like it more like this
02:59:875 (2) – I feel like if you delete this note, you can place more emphasis on the vocals following the instrumental :b

Chen

00:55:424 (4) – I feel as if this can be made into a 1/4 repeat slider or a triplet doesn't fit the music I think

--
Sorry if this feels sort of lacklustre; I thought all the maps were really well done. Hope this helps

Ipas wrote:

Hello, from my Queue~

[Easy]

1. 00:16:987 (2) - Personally, I don't like if slider goes reversed more than one time, because it's confusing @@ (I found it too many, it's up to you tho, it's not inappropriate things, just my personal preferences) due to popular demand, fixed
2. 01:54:112 (1) - It's too close for an Easy, which should be have 1500 ms recovery time after a spinner, delete it or do something to start it more late than this I think it's allright, gives plenty of time to read, that rule is in the suggestions section
3. 02:16:987 (1) - For me actually, this BPM change really unnoticeable for beginners, since it's too big impact around the objects afterwards . I would rather to replace this slider with a single circle, then start a spinner here 02:18:764 - , like this image (The object before this spinner must be just that single circle, in a nutshell, leaving it empty after that circle) . Then, the rest of objects after spinner will be deleted until 02:32:098 (4) - , so that there will be a break until this slider 02:32:986 (1) - . At least, please consider this one, since it was too hard to distinguish the BPM change here (If you think it's right, consider to apply it on Normal too)

It has to fit the music though, and this is how it seems best for me, but it's still perfectly readable and playable

[Normal]

1. 00:59:549 (5) - Playing 1/2 instead of this slider would be more greater to represents how the beats sounds here, since there's a bit peak on 00:59:737 - and would be great to having it clickable/gets emphasis I just don't want it to feel overmapped here
2. 01:31:237 (2,3) - Slightly hard to read for a Normal . Consider to rework again on the rhythm here . Would rather to having them like the image below . It would be fine because there's a faded sound on 01:31:612 - , so that putting something on it would be reasonable . Then, 1/1 would suits as well after this, as it played on 01:32:362 - in the image below . My suggestion is, don't trying to follow something hard like this guitar, since the sound doesn't really suits well to be played on such lower diff like Normal (This suggestion also applied into another similar/same part)
   
   SPOILER

   
   it has to fit the music and this is the only way I could find that had good flow
3. 02:16:987 (1) - Follow my suggestion on Easy
4. 03:05:431 (2,3) - To follow the vocals correctly like the others, this should be switched, I mean, the rhythm, using Ctrl+G the pattern . I will plays a lot nicer than the current works

That would make sense, but to kleep consistency with the rest of the patterns I'll keep it as it doesn't differe much from that way
[]
The song really makes me bored, sorry, I just could give you this gotta go fast
Good Luck!

Keada wrote:

heyyy, finally got some time to mod this

• 
  

  Extra

1. 00:08:924 (7) - move to x376 y68 to correct the blanket, if it was your intention to blanket with these 00:08:549 (4,5,6) - fixed
2. 00:11:737 (9) - NC this instead of 00:12:112 (1) - it's easier to read when to let go of the reverse this way
3. 00:14:549 (4,5,6) - this is more fit to be a jump dont you think? just a suggestion, rotate them 45* and place them at x183 y186 changed it, not that exact way though
4. 00:17:737 (5) - it looked a bit ugly where it was placed, but if you place it at x352 y132 it would be better imo ok
5. 00:21:487 (1,7) - this overlap was a bit meh ;w; it's not noticeable when playing :b
6. 00:23:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this stream didnt fit the music that much D: I would do something like this http://puu.sh/klni4/3220de070d.jpg I like it
7. 00:25:237 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - would flow better if you did something like this http://puu.sh/klnky/abdff978b4.jpg I like how it plays out rn, that would be bad though
8. 00:31:049 (4,5) - here fits more with an antijump imo, cause its the same tone after the breakdown stop like you did here 00:37:049 (4,5) - I wanna keep variety here, idk just my style xd
9. 00:40:049 (4,5) - ^
10. 00:51:299 (6,7) - just a suggestion: to stack these with 00:51:487 (1) - plays nicely with the music made them more straight, but I don't really want to put stacks in here
11. 00:53:362 (1) - remove NC hai
12. 00:56:549 (3,4,5) - do the same thing here as you did 00:55:799 (5,6,1) - to make it consistent hai
13. 01:10:799 (7) - stack with 01:09:674 (2) - to make the overlap not look so ugly D: it's not noticeable while playing :c
14. 01:20:174 (2) - ^ with 01:18:674 (2) -
15. 02:08:737 (3) - ^ with 02:07:049 (2) -
16. 02:16:987 (1) - this was okay, but the rhythm in her voice was really weird xD first 1/8 and then 1/6 D: but its okay, just wanted to tell you the bpm change is awesome xD
17. 02:29:209 (7,8,1) - place so its stacking with 02:28:098 (3) - you may need to change the other note too, to get the sliderend stacked too
18. 02:42:986 (6,7,8,9) - this was really hard to read D: cant really read that it is 4 notes D: try with 0.1x in spacing and place the notes changed a bit, I guess I should have done that ahah
19. 02:46:098 (4,5,6,7) - ^ here people already know the rhythm
20. 02:53:653 (5,6,7) - less spacing to make it more readable. 1/6 op
21. 03:07:875 (5,6,7) - ^

Didnt find anything in the Insane D: but Good luck~ Love the song <3