Okoratu wrote:

thinking.gif

[g]
so why exactly are diffnames numbers? only if u have to do something like this in all cases uhh cant u like name them lv. <number> or something numbers only are like stoopid if i do like Easy Normal etc, difficulties will permanently have the "Update to Latest Version" thing linking to the already ranked set lol. i roman numeral'd tho/color]
the part where 01:33:166 - in the mp3 does sound so damn weird especially since the first part of the stream doesn't get the the instrument added
'snapping' your preview point in this kind of song is kind of pointless im o very
i thought you hated letterboxing in breaks
or am i confusing this with ringating same i can change it if you want tho

[7]
i think it's be better for the large part of it that isn't 250 bpm or something that ar decreased - 9.3 or 9.2 are things that worked lowered ar for 5,6,7 by 0.2
01:24:427 (2) - either im shit or wanting to aim this a bit higher than it is atm can easily happen here, moving it up and to the left is what i would do as it also keeps the emphasis of the next 1/2 thing 0k
01:08:760 (5,6) - these feel like super close because of the jump things you previously did for these i dunno how much youd want it moved but i did
02:22:937 (2,3) - crtl+ging this works much better for me instead of changing directions in that triplet SO TRU
02:36:778 (2,3,4,5,6) - starting here this becomes kind of tiring and at 250 bpm also really easy to shitbreak on, would recommend simplifying because playability but i could also be shit.. 4 circles --> 2 sliders
at least the 02:37:020 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - plays really odd to me
02:35:680 (2) - id prefer that a bit more to the left instead of where it currently is like http://puu.sh/jInTM/f87ecc86ac.jpg because current placethings feel close yo
02:44:706 (1,2,3) - this completely breaks all movements that have been going on for the last 2 combosaSDFaslkdfhjasdfaA?SD:F> dam i tried
02:46:263 (1) - 255/380 ish is kind of a lot better for me in this case it's more over there after adjusting previous stuff so nice

end of this diff is kinda sketchyy yy idk if it needs more feedback or testplays from players who can actually play and im just shit and suggesting nerfs which aren't necessary? from what i can tell the one flow thing in the end would probably be better off changed and the one readability derp

[6.3]
02:04:500 (1) - more space becaus4e the other one has more wtgfsd
02:18:537 (1,2) - this rhythm laksjdf;lk 02:22:803 (1,2,3) - i s so much better asdf
02:45:884 (3,4,1) - this transition is like a lot easier to break on than the first 3 sliders on it and the end ;;asffsad

[4.7]
00:54:271 - the beginning of this section... like the part of it which is actually slow could use more overall spacing imo atm it's like really babyish dam i tried
00:57:687 (1,2,3) - isn't this a bit very simplified?? ya
why is only 01:57:751 (1,2) - different in 6 like now i don't get it anymore idk they both work
01:52:483 (1,2,3,1,2) - dont u think this is a bit too simple...? like you could easily do more with it because bpm is just 160ish all reverse sliders are now slider-circle
02:23:870 - i can get why this is a break on everything below this but uhh this is like a giant anticlimax for this diff imo if i mapped it tho, it would be just constant reverese sliders. "7" uses 8 object streams, "6" uses 4 object streams, so this would be 0 and thats dumb

[4]
01:38:273 (1) - adfskl;jasf i found it difficult to get that this one is slower than the previous one... choosing a sv which is bigger would probably avoid misreads of any sort faster
01:53:983 (1,2,3,4) - even these are more complex than the things on 5 at this point whalskd;fhad A?SDF>> WOOPS
just random thought while looking at this 02:31:870 - i find it weird that this one is not mapped though it's such a strong sound idk i would just expect to click there if i knew the song?? dont need 2 pick up notes dood
02:51:312 (1,2) - this is unexpectedly big asd asd all the other sliders are changing tempo so i would be a bit more friendly with that one even tho it's the end df

[3.2]
01:27:688 (1,2,3) - 01:31:862 (1,2,3) - after that many 3/2 slider this can throw you off a lot idk just my opinion but i think more simple would be better here 0j


[2]
honestly im unsure if the part where sliders become shoooort is gonna be ok or meh, but the only other options would be increasing sv which would be MEH or simplifying rhythm a bit more from 02:40:346 - to end simplified rhyhtnsmt


[1]
01:10:616 (4,5) - 01:15:273 (4,5) - these are sure as hell going to confuse someone who just started k
01:33:949 (2,3) - 01:36:036 (2,3) - doing 2 sliders instead of repeat slider circle repeat slider may be easier to comprehend while sacrificing only a bit of emphasis imo j
01:38:273 (1) - distance between these is like tiny compared to what you did to 2 135 bpm things in 00:54:271 (1,2) - ;;
idk if distance in the end is comprehendable enough h

that's all idk if i want to thinking.gif this or not right now
because i never had the pleasure to deal with multibpm easy and normal
and im concerned end of 7 is sketch

will ask big people about them I DID

that's all u would need to sort out before i'd be confident in iconing it
numbers represent how the spread felt to me