Hoen
Hoen wrote:
Hiii ♥
Put the name of the singers in the TAG to make it easier to find the mapMarathon There are many errors in this map, this were the only ones who managed to find
- 00:52:739 (2) - Give a Ctrl + G in that Party. It gets better, need not be descending and ascending Flow is fine in my opinion
- 00:56:489 (2) - ^ ^
- 02:01:997 (1) - Hitfinish earlier this slider
- 03:39:497 (1) - Place a finsh at this whistle
- 03:52:622 (1,1) - Whistle Not so needed actually
- 04:02:231 (2) - Go up a bit this slider It doesn't go offscreen, that's fine
- 04:15:590 (2) - Whiiistle Mhm, not so needed in my opinion
- 04:37:270 (1,2) - Up a bit That's not offscren
- 06:09:497 (1,2,3) - You could substitute it for a spin 1/8 is fine too, there are enough spinners in the song
- 06:28:247 (1) - Soft Whistle or Normal finsh.
- 07:01:997 'O', Arcadia ♥
- 09:05:747 (1) - Hitfinish earlier this slider Too calm for a finish
- 09:50:747 (1) - Make one of these here: 10:05:629 (1) - I wouldn't emphasize such a calm end
I want to sort it soon, Good Luck ♠
Mortem
Mortem wrote:
hi.
General:
• Countdown is not necessary, disable it.
• Also disable Letterboxes during the breaks.
• If you are going to add some storyboard, don't forget to enable Widescreen Support.
•Marathon:Leader wrote:
All tags will be added later.
• 00:23:325 (5,6) - What about stack these two, considering that you've stacked preety much everything at the beginning part.
• 00:40:200 (3,4,5) - This pattern is quite confusing. Maybe if you could stack (3) on (4) then move the (5) little bit up like this? There's a NC now, it should be better
• 01:57:543 (7,1) - This blanket seems little bit off.
• 02:33:872 (3,2) - Stack with the beginning of the (3)? Nope, that would be inconsistent
• 05:01:762 (1) - This slider is unsnapped. Fix it.
• 08:41:372 (1) - Put the slider little bit up + redesign it like this. They're smooth enough
• 09:20:747 (1) - ^ ^
• Maybe put a spinner at the end and end it at 10:09:497 - ? Too calm atmosphere for a spinner, better end with the current pattern
Sorry for small mod. Map seems fine to me. Even though I was waiting for Aleks to map this but nevermind.
Good Luck!I mapped this because Aleks wasn't around anymore...
Kuki
Kuki wrote:
[Marathon]
00:36:215 (2) - Ctrl+G perhaps. That's a flow I really like, denying all these
01:09:028 (5,1) - Could blanket a little harder imo, like so.
02:05:747 (2,3) - These actually made my jaw drop, so amazing looking orz.
02:29:418 (7,8) - Ctrl+G perhaps.
03:08:324 (3) - Move to X=115 Y=24 to fix triangle (spacing is off).
04:12:778 (4) - Flip vertically and keep it in the same spot, I don't think it flows nice in it's current state. It does imo!
04:26:606 (2,4) - Move to X=413 Y=131 to fix triangle (spacing is off).
04:32:465 (2,1) - Not a fan of this overlap, you could blanket instead perhaps. They're way too distant that it doesn't even matter
04:49:340 (2,3) - Could blanket a little harder here.
05:07:387 (4) - Move to X=340 Y=316 to fix triangle (spacing is off).
06:03:637 (4) - Ctrl+G.
07:50:278 (5,4) - Fix stack / overlap.
08:54:262 (3,4) - Blanket perhaps.
09:16:528 (4) - Ctrl-G.
09:40:786 (4) - Ctrl+G, imo this plays a little awkward.
10:04:340 (2) - Very small fix but i'd like you to move this to X=124 Y=97 (and apply below changes to have it perfect) Mmm, it breaks the flow a bit in my opinion...
10:04:809 (1,2) - Move these to X=291 Y=77
10:05:161 (3) - Move this to X=381 Y=62
Starred and favorited! Love the map, excited for rank
Irreversible
Irreversible wrote:
[Marathon]
Generally, I feel like some of the 1/4 spacings are ridiculously high at some points. I'll list some up, but as there are quite many, please re-check it yourself.
I personally feel like there are many blanket issues, but I'm not sure whether they are intended or not, make sure yourself it fits for you. Most of them are intended, but let's see...
00:26:372 (1) - I feel like a less sharp angle will provide a better flow here, listening to the song more carefully. http://puu.sh/jp5dY/c783ab3ea1.jpg What do you think about something like this? That's fine for me, doesn't really make a big difference.
00:27:778 (4,5,1) - I would try going for a triangle here, for the sake of cleanliness. Just having a stack with weird flow for the sake of it is not a good idea imo. No idea how to bring up a better pattern and this is also fine, keeping this
00:31:997 (1) - Better flow would be provided at somewhere like 324 40
00:45:122 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - I can imagine increasing volume progressingly would be awesome here. Will try to make something cool then
00:52:387 (1,2,3) - Distance between those is not the same, nazi. Don't know if intended or not.
00:57:192 (4,5) - Could be stacked better.
01:22:622 (1,2) - Comparing this spacing with 01:24:028 (6,1) - this, it's almost the same, and in my opinion it could be quite confusing. I'd consider reworking this part slightly, using the appropriate distance.
02:07:622 (3) - Good job
02:12:778 (4,1,2,3) - This overmap does not fit at all in my opinion, you should go for something else and not 1/4 here. That's not overmapped and I actually think it's a cool build-up before the 1/2 patterns following this one
02:20:747 (1) - Overmap again, breaks the rhythm which is really cool completely.
02:24:497 (10) - Same, there is nothing which could be rudimentarily emphasized here.
02:28:247 (7) - Same.
03:30:122 (1) - This slider would benefit a slight increased spacing from here 03:29:887 (7) - , to get more emphasis.
04:27:661 (8) - This slider ends on nothing, you should rethink the rhythm here. I'd personally go for this rhythm http://puu.sh/jp6kT/0ad81fe5b3.jpg, screen starting at 04:27:075 - It actually ends on something...
04:28:247 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think something really weird went on here, hitsounds aren't on spot at all. Also, spacing 04:28:247 (1,2) - is way too high here, compared to the rest.
04:35:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - You followed a cool part of the track here, but the change back to 1/2 04:37:270 (1,2,3) - here while the cool track still takes place seems weird. Would consider making it similar. I wanted to follow vocals, so the cool part was kind of forced since there were no vocals on that pattern, lol...
04:51:567 (4,5) - Really high spacing compared to the rest again. I'd like to keep this for now...
04:53:207 (1,2,3) - Dat spnapping... I'd really get further confirmation on that, I feel like it's somewhat 1/8 to be honest. Mhm, I'll ask someone
06:01:059 (2,3,4) - This pattern doesn't make sense after your logic, it should be another triangle following it. I'd investigate further here, because it breaks consistency with 06:00:122 (1,2,3) - heavily. I like the flow, that's not like there's some strong logic on these patterns...
06:04:809 (2,3,4) - Same, somehow. ^
06:14:536 (4) - Unequal spacing.
07:13:715 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I personally think the hitvolume is not high enough here, I'd increase it.
09:06:332 (2) - Quite rhythmbreaking, I wouldn't put emphasis here. How about removing it? Nah, I like it!
Good luck.
Thank you!