rEdo wrote:

All I would like to say for now is that they were made basing on Frostings, Zexion and Amianki being scum.

Zexion wrote:

Also @Aminaki: you voted me quite a while ago and never said anything. RVS or actual reason?

fartownik wrote:

rEdo wrote:

Don't wanna explain why Tess is having a bad game in your eyes?

Don't wanna explain why Tess is having a good game in your eyes? It really is easier to explain why she's having a bad one than why she's having a good one. You seem to be close to the only one thinking she's having a decent game.

Also I love how Zexion's quote pops right under your question and ironically gives you an example / answers it.

Tess wrote:

It's almost like you really don't want to be considered scum.

That. Sentence. Just. :facepalm:

fartownik wrote:

There's plenty illogical posts similar to this (maybe not as strong) and you overlooking them is really fucking weird in my opinion.

Well, I may as well vote you since I think your lynch would be more valuable than Tess' lynch today. No matter what you flip we get a lot of information, while when we lynch Tess and she flips Town we're left only with a shitton of confusion.

Unvote
Vote: rEdo

Amianki wrote:

rEdo wrote:

All I would like to say for now is that they were made basing on Frostings, Zexion and Amianki being scum.

Substantiate this.

Tess wrote:

everything I say is used in some form or another to paint me as scum.

Tess wrote:

I null-read Amianki because he didn't do any things I've found suspicious, while not the same can be said of Sniverre

Tess wrote:

He didn't do anything that stood out in particular other than constantly say that he needs to think more about this.

Sniverre wrote:

It is only round one. Like Drezi said, we better not jump through conclusions that easily I'd rather think through a little more first.

Sniverre wrote:

Oh god...Frosting...
Gotta be more careful from this point onwards

Tess wrote:

And some others that I don't feel like digging for right now since this isn't even the main topic of discussion at the moment

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Yeah alright. I've read things and would have expected better from rEdo. Now in turn they were accusing me of scumpainting while all their reasons were that I were "calling Tess names" with the exception of "I don't even know why Tess' play would be bad as town". I don't know, should I take meta as a valid argument here? This doesn't sound like the usual scumhunting rEdo to me.

Static Noise Bird wrote:

So anyway, rEdo might be doing this as a scum because if Tess flips town (no she won't) I'm going to be an easy mislynch tomorrow. I think someone said this, but it could very well be that rEdo might have seen Tess' play as a perfect opportunity for protecting her while knowing that Tess in fact is a townie, thus making my accusations look false over night if that lynch happened. Also talking about how Tess' townplay isn't bad at all would be a perfect setup for a progressive 180, making Tess a possibly valuable mislynch for endgame. Just theorizing here though (inb4 called scumpainting again ).

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Tess mentioning that it wouldn't make sense for rEdo to not jump on the wagon if he was scum is not a valid point in any way, either. Not jumping on the wagon can mean:
- Protecting a scumbuddy.
- Trying to look like the Mr. Nice Guy if the Tess lynch would happen anyway and Tess flipped town.
- Actually seeing something townish in Tess' play that nobody else is seeing.

Almost as if rEdo knew and wanted to not vote for the most suspicious person in town.

Drezi wrote:

I'd think of this is an intentional "townslip" done by scum to earn towncred, but the fact it you did not bring it up, and only happened while answering someone else makes me uncertain tbh. You could have simply used the chance to drop it there though. I kinda have a hard time believing you simply forgot what I told you and would have asked the mod FIRST anyway before making a read based on assumptions wrt daytalk.

@Everyone else what do you think about this?

Tess wrote:

Drezi wrote:

Why would you assume they have daytalk if there's nothing in the rules about it?

Not exactly sure why.

Frostings wrote:

In our last game there was a scum daychat, so it could be townslip, who knows

Tess wrote:

Also, it's because of the last game that I wondered if this game had a daychat.

rEdo wrote:

I don't what to say, so let's say "I don't think rEdo would do that".

rEdo wrote:

Good job, fartownik said the exact same thing a page ago. You just added a little bit of powdered sugar on the top.

rEdo wrote:

You answered your own question, good job!

Drezi wrote:

Sniverre I wanted to suggest you an other forum game and thought this was a perfect match t/341539&start=165 but I see you're already playing, so I guess I wasn't too far off... But this game is not like those in the other section, where you just fool around, please try to understand that and either start to take it more seriously or ask for a replacement.

Drezi wrote:

Jess I see you're here, please answer with full honesty - are you completely sure you're town, or is there a chance you're scum this game?

rEdo wrote:

Lynching me is the silliest thing you can do today if you want to get a lot of information. Don't ask why or I'll consider that a scumclaim.

Drezi wrote:

But you recieved a role PM from Navi. Doesn't it say you're a pokemon from the Town faction? We don't know it but you do

Drezi wrote:

why did you say 50/50 first then? are you sure you're not lying to me? don't lie to me it'll make me angry.

fartownik wrote:

Jess, what is your role?

-[Jess]- wrote:

roleclaim: Doublevoter.

Static Noise Bird wrote:

But you're not explicitly claiming Town Doublevoter, are you?

Drezi wrote:

why aren't you using your doublevote? are you saying you're not a town doublevoter, or not a doublevoter at all?

Drezi wrote:

No problem, I'd rather have it gone.