Actually never mind about the title, just realized it's not commonly used there, not sure where did I get the idea from.
Would be handy on the opening post, though.
Would be handy on the opening post, though.
Events tab?Static Noise Bird wrote:
@mod: Mind putting the deadline in the title or/and the opening post?
Well I'm stupid. Thanks.Navizel wrote:
Events tab?Static Noise Bird wrote:
@mod: Mind putting the deadline in the title or/and the opening post?
Substantiate this.rEdo wrote:
All I would like to say for now is that they were made basing on Frostings, Zexion and Amianki being scum.
Actual reason.Zexion wrote:
Also @Aminaki: you voted me quite a while ago and never said anything. RVS or actual reason?
So apparently I can't defend somebody whose reads are pretty close to mine because that immediately gives me scumcred, even though I know I'm town. Nice. To your question. If her thinking is close to mine, then either I need to rethink this whole game because I was wrong the entire time or there is some truth in what she's saying and we might want to search for scum in these people. I prefer the latter for now.fartownik wrote:
Don't wanna explain why Tess is having a good game in your eyes? It really is easier to explain why she's having a bad one than why she's having a good one. You seem to be close to the only one thinking she's having a decent game.rEdo wrote:
Don't wanna explain why Tess is having a bad game in your eyes?
Also I love how Zexion's quote pops right under your question and ironically gives you an example / answers it.That. Sentence. Just. :facepalm:Tess wrote:
It's almost like you really don't want to be considered scum.
Lynching me is the silliest thing you can do today if you want to get a lot of information. Don't ask why or I'll consider that a scumclaim.fartownik wrote:
There's plenty illogical posts similar to this (maybe not as strong) and you overlooking them is really fucking weird in my opinion.
Well, I may as well vote you since I think your lynch would be more valuable than Tess' lynch today. No matter what you flip we get a lot of information, while when we lynch Tess and she flips Town we're left only with a shitton of confusion.
Unvote
Vote: rEdo
Nothing much to say here, I just chose people that might be scum to me and tried to make reads basing on interactions around them. I included my dead-null reads onto that as well. I thought I'll end up with getting people that I had in mind as my origin scumreads, and it turned out I was right.Amianki wrote:
Substantiate this.rEdo wrote:
All I would like to say for now is that they were made basing on Frostings, Zexion and Amianki being scum.
Yes, because many of your posts are really inconsistent, it makes you an easy scumread for town, and an easy mislynch for scumTess wrote:
everything I say is used in some form or another to paint me as scum.
So you're saying Sniverre DID do something suspicious.Tess wrote:
I null-read Amianki because he didn't do any things I've found suspicious, while not the same can be said of Sniverre
so he DIDN'T do anything suspicious.Tess wrote:
He didn't do anything that stood out in particular other than constantly say that he needs to think more about this.
Ok. so what about this makes him scummy to you?Sniverre wrote:
It is only round one. Like Drezi said, we better not jump through conclusions that easily I'd rather think through a little more first.
This post happened AFTER your scum read on himSniverre wrote:
Oh god...Frosting...
Gotta be more careful from this point onwards
Tess wrote:
And some others that I don't feel like digging for right now since this isn't even the main topic of discussion at the moment
I don't what to say, so let's say "I don't think rEdo would do that".Static Noise Bird wrote:
Yeah alright. I've read things and would have expected better from rEdo. Now in turn they were accusing me of scumpainting while all their reasons were that I were "calling Tess names" with the exception of "I don't even know why Tess' play would be bad as town". I don't know, should I take meta as a valid argument here? This doesn't sound like the usual scumhunting rEdo to me.
Good job, fartownik said the exact same thing a page ago. You just added a little bit of powdered sugar on the top.Static Noise Bird wrote:
So anyway, rEdo might be doing this as a scum because if Tess flips town (no she won't) I'm going to be an easy mislynch tomorrow. I think someone said this, but it could very well be that rEdo might have seen Tess' play as a perfect opportunity for protecting her while knowing that Tess in fact is a townie, thus making my accusations look false over night if that lynch happened. Also talking about how Tess' townplay isn't bad at all would be a perfect setup for a progressive 180, making Tess a possibly valuable mislynch for endgame. Just theorizing here though (inb4 called scumpainting again ).
You answered your own question, good job!Static Noise Bird wrote:
Tess mentioning that it wouldn't make sense for rEdo to not jump on the wagon if he was scum is not a valid point in any way, either. Not jumping on the wagon can mean:
- Protecting a scumbuddy.
- Trying to look like the Mr. Nice Guy if the Tess lynch would happen anyway and Tess flipped town.
- Actually seeing something townish in Tess' play that nobody else is seeing.
Almost as if rEdo knew and wanted to not vote for the most suspicious person in town.
I don't even see your first post telling Tess that scum doesn't get a daychat, so I suppose it's easily forgettable.Drezi wrote:
I'd think of this is an intentional "townslip" done by scum to earn towncred, but the fact it you did not bring it up, and only happened while answering someone else makes me uncertain tbh. You could have simply used the chance to drop it there though. I kinda have a hard time believing you simply forgot what I told you and would have asked the mod FIRST anyway before making a read based on assumptions wrt daytalk.
@Everyone else what do you think about this?
Tess wrote:
Not exactly sure why.Drezi wrote:
Why would you assume they have daytalk if there's nothing in the rules about it?
Frostings wrote:
In our last game there was a scum daychat, so it could be townslip, who knows
Tess wrote:
Also, it's because of the last game that I wondered if this game had a daychat.
Why not actually try to adjust your own attention instead of putting false thoughts into my brain. I was just trying to express that you have been a good townplayer earlier (nice way to take a compliment, jerk ), which is why I thought your words and actions in this game must be coming from a scum.rEdo wrote:
I don't what to say, so let's say "I don't think rEdo would do that".
Just like I mentioned it - I thought someone had said it already but I didn't care since I was focusing on your ISO at that moment. And yeah, I did add more to it, so it was only relevant to my post. Big deal, huh? Give me those scumpoints then.rEdo wrote:
Good job, fartownik said the exact same thing a page ago. You just added a little bit of powdered sugar on the top.
I laughed my own ass off. Anyway, if you really do see something townish in Tess' play, could you give examples? The fact that you're agreeing with her reads is hardly a sign of a good play from either of you.rEdo wrote:
You answered your own question, good job!
I actually tried to take mafia seriously but I found out that mafia was not my type of game. I found out that I cannot express my thoughts properly so I might as well just ask for a replacement.Drezi wrote:
Sniverre I wanted to suggest you an other forum game and thought this was a perfect match t/341539&start=165 but I see you're already playing, so I guess I wasn't too far off... But this game is not like those in the other section, where you just fool around, please try to understand that and either start to take it more seriously or ask for a replacement.
50/50,honesty.Drezi wrote:
Jess I see you're here, please answer with full honesty - are you completely sure you're town, or is there a chance you're scum this game?
Why xDrEdo wrote:
Lynching me is the silliest thing you can do today if you want to get a lot of information. Don't ask why or I'll consider that a scumclaim.
let me check....yes it said Town.Drezi wrote:
But you recieved a role PM from Navi. Doesn't it say you're a pokemon from the Town faction? We don't know it but you do
yes.Drezi wrote:
why did you say 50/50 first then? are you sure you're not lying to me? don't lie to me it'll make me angry.
roleclaim: Doublevoter.fartownik wrote:
Jess, what is your role?
But you're not explicitly claiming Town Doublevoter, are you?-[Jess]- wrote:
roleclaim: Doublevoter.
i just say,no.Static Noise Bird wrote:
But you're not explicitly claiming Town Doublevoter, are you?