smug midget-chanKhelly wrote:
Who is thisEneT wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes upB1rd wrote:
And to be fair, other people complained about it and weren't silenced, I have no idea why I was, maybe it my comment was too edgy. I'll talk to the GMT when they're on.
silmarilen wrote:
when they see their 13 year old with a half naked woman/girl on their screen, they are gonna have second thoughts about allowing them to play this game either way.
gj famxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
i passed jumppudding i am now aim spook
look out top 1000
EneT wrote:
You must be too socially awkward that's why.
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist. If you've been on /pol/ recently you would know that the US government bought software from a hacking group with the function of planting CP, among other things, on people's PCs.Brian OA wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes up
Great points there! I consider myself rebutted. clap clap.silmarilen wrote:
the fact that we're even arguing about this shows how sad some people are. things like that shouldnt even be thought of as possible bgs
Who said that no one likes me? I adore myself, and that's more than enough for me. If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.Kaienyuu wrote:
No wonder no one likes you irl.
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
So that's your go to phrase for excusing yourself out of the argumentsilmarilen wrote:
the fact that we're even arguing about this shows how sad some people are. things like that shouldnt even be thought of as possible bgs
If you look for yourself in other people you're doing it wrong.EneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
He reminds me of people who dismiss violence/rape against men because it's men and any mention otherwise is just sexist or any opposition against illegal immigration being pure racism.EneT wrote:
No matter how you look at it, Silmarilen lost the argument, decimated in fact. Just let it pass now.
I'd fuck a male me even harderEneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
What a about a pony version of you?xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
I'd fuck a male me even harderEneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.B1rd wrote:
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist. If you've been on /pol/ recently you would know that the US government bought software from a hacking group with the function of planting CP, among other things, on people's PCs.Brian OA wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes up
I'm just very bitter and have very little tolerance concerning issues like this.
That's the entire line of thinking that I'm fighting against: that people 'can't work out the difference between fiction and reality'. This narrative is used by both the extreme right (violent video games cause violence) and the left (video games are misogynistic and cause misogynistic behaviour). The truth is that people, who consume the stuff at least, can and do know the difference, and every single study shows this.Brian OA wrote:
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.
I mean, just look how far we've strayed from the original point because of this.
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?B1rd wrote:
That's the entire line of thinking that I'm fighting against: that people 'can't work out the difference between fiction and reality'. This narrative is used by both the extreme right (violent video games cause violence) and the left (video games are misogynistic and cause misogynistic behaviour). The truth is that people, who consume the stuff at least, can and do know the difference, and every single study shows this.Brian OA wrote:
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.
I mean, just look how far we've strayed from the original point because of this.
And I really couldn't care less about what people thought about it. But the problem is that people make laws, control and oppress people based on these morals and sensibilities. There is no reason why I would just accept all the shitty thing about society and allow it to dictate my life.
And about the government? Well I think my point was pretty clear, the government uses CP among other things to frame political opponents and people they don't like, because they know that would permanently destroy someone's reputation. I was looking for the article and got sidetracked, I'll post it when I find it.How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
Hmm, what do you mean by lolicons, people who are into lolicon material or actual paedophiles?Brian OA wrote:
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
Brian please. I know you're internet savvy enough to have come across that acronym before.Brian OA wrote:
How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
The former, since it tries to lump them with the later in a discriminatory fashion.B1rd wrote:
Hmm, what do you mean by lolicons, people who are into lolicon material or actual paedophiles?Brian OA wrote:
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
You have some problem with chicken pizza, then?Brian please. I know you're internet savvy enough to have come across that acronym before.Brian OA wrote:
How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
Articles: http://8ch.net/n/res/90372.html
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/07 ... sy-detail/
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/ ... am_is.html
Spinning and spinning and spinningBackOffMe50ft wrote:
.
Ah so that's the type of discrimination you meant. Yes, that annoys me a lot, you may have noticed. But the real issue is legality and censorship, of art no less. For example, people going to jail for having lolicon on their PC, VNs having to be censored, H sites with lolicon being threatened to have their IP be blacklisted by countries, etcetera. So the reason I am so against the misportyal and discrimination of lolicon is because the opinion of the masses directly effects the law. Even when the subject matter is proven to have no negative consequences whatsoever. Victimless crimes shouldn't be a thing.Brian OA wrote:
The former, since it tries to lump them with the later in a discriminatory fashion.
Not the lolicons as you call them,Brian OA wrote:
and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
So what I mean here is that the word paedophilia is used as a label by these prejudiced moral bigots to label lolicon, because they just don't like lolicon and associate it with paedophilia to get it banned (their agenda).B1rd wrote:
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist.