hey boize whats going on, havent slept for 2 days
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
57,698
To a degree. At least much less than me.
I just got told that I'm socially awkward and offending when communicating with others. No shit Sherlock, where have you been for the past 22 years?
I just got told that I'm socially awkward and offending when communicating with others. No shit Sherlock, where have you been for the past 22 years?
You're a real live Tsundere aren't you?
You were socially awkward and offending when communicating with others when you were a baby too?Aurani wrote:
I just got told that I'm socially awkward and offending when communicating with others. No shit Sherlock, where have you been for the past 22 years?
Where's the guy with the lightsaberBrian OA wrote:
Streaming was fun
Ah, yes, cross-face-chan
Hang on a bit
Hang on a bit
Well okay. That makes me feel a little better.Aurani wrote:
To a degree. At least much less than me.
Oh, stop itMilkshake wrote:
you're a qtpie. not tactless, just some sass.
Ass is good.
Yoeri wrote:
Where's the guy with the lightsaber
I didn't really want to finish it
I thought people just made the final art product as it came out - none of this circles and lines shit.
you need to take spongebob's art classes for that
you know supporter is for people who play the game, not for people who spam the forumsEneT wrote:
Ayyyy look at all those people with 0 posts joining in that giveaway; leeches, the lot of them.
And for people who spend all their in game time spectating others, cough cough.
yeah and that
tell us something we didnt know yetBrokenArrow wrote:
I'm gay but nobody will read this
Get fuckin decimated, matesilmarilen wrote:
you know supporter is for people who play the game, not for people who spam the forumsEneT wrote:
Ayyyy look at all those people with 0 posts joining in that giveaway; leeches, the lot of them.
wow going somewhere on the weekends to arrive in the future 2024
so fucking future
so fucking future
Kaienyuu wrote:
And for people who spend all their in game time spectating others, cough cough.
It's as accurate as my grandfather's potato gun. The one he shoots me with.Blue Stig wrote:
Kaienyuu wrote:
And for people who spend all their in game time spectating others, cough cough.
You mean Mr Tentacles's classessilmarilen wrote:
you need to take spongebob's art classes for that
#osu inhabitants hardly qualify as people.Blue Stig wrote:
.
sameNotEvenDoomMusic wrote:
wow going somewhere on the weekends to arrive in the future 2024
so fucking future
bold and brashBrian OA wrote:
You mean Mr Tentacles's classes
sameStatic Noise Bird wrote:
same
someNotEvenDoomMusic wrote:
sameStatic Noise Bird wrote:
same
Brian, the leading Nazi, being charmed by Jews. Wake up, they're encasing you in their web of greed and 9/11.Brian OA wrote:
Oh, stop itMilkshake wrote:
you're a qtpie. not tactless, just some sass.
Mom's a virus. She's already infecting people in Germany where she currently is.
Nah, Germany is full of kebabs nowadays. It's not the glorious Reich it once used to be. That's why I view Alsace as a kingdom rather than territory belonging to either French or the Germans. They disgrace the names of the once mighty countries with their filthy kebab immigrants.
As long as you have that flag, I will still consider you as a kebab.
Hi mom.
I'm going to change it as soon as I return to my apartment around October. But let me say something: fuck the support staff and fuck whoever came to the idea that you need to show a bloody ID card to a random wanker residing in Oceania just to be able to change the flag, when you aren't even playing the game competitively.EneT wrote:
As long as you have that flag, I will still consider you as a kebab.
Really? You have to go that far just to change the flag?
wtf
wtf
I wanted to change my flag back in April last year, and I got a message saying that I need to provide my ID card along with a piece of paper saying "Aurani" just so they can be SURE that I'm a resident of Serbia (wtf, you can fucking check it with various means without needing physical proof) and that I currently reside there, so they can be SURE that I'm not just changing my flag because I'm a fanboy of that country.
I thought about writing a full essay on why I think that's utterly moronic, but then I just cba'd and never replied back again.
I thought about writing a full essay on why I think that's utterly moronic, but then I just cba'd and never replied back again.
I didn't even notice. I noticed Ippe though.
lol, wtf.
WOW I CAN CLEARLY SEE PANTIES SO NSFW OMG HIDE YO KIDS
Seriously though, it's not worth fighting over this shit.
Seriously though, it's not worth fighting over this shit.
So those guys silence you for voicing your opinion? That's more childish than me. Only people I banned on a server for voicing their opinions were bronies.
yes that's too nsfw. why do people think it is ok to use sexualised pictures of litle girls as backgrounds on a game that's supposed to be for children?
giving a silence for complaining about it is stupid tho
giving a silence for complaining about it is stupid tho
Why do people think it's ok to use backgrounds lower than the maximum allowed resolution ?
The game is not 'supposed to be for children'. It's for all ages. And saying 'sexualised pics of little girls' like it's barley short child pornography or something. It's an anime style drawing. And I've viewed a lot of art in my time, this is not a sexualised picture. You could describe its style as 'cute' or pretty', but it is not suggestive. And what, do you think that when a child sees a mildly sexual pictures that's going to somehow corrupt them? It won't affect them in the slightest, get real. They see 10x more sexual stuff in the media. God, I'm sick of these 'we must protect the children' excuses.silmarilen wrote:
yes that's too nsfw. why do people think it is ok to use sexualised pictures of litle girls as backgrounds on a game that's supposed to be for children?
And to be fair, other people complained about it and weren't silenced, I have no idea why I was, maybe it my comment was too edgy. I'll talk to the GMT when they're on.
it's a litle girl who's panties are showing and it has a censor near her ass.
yes that is sexualised
and using the "western media is just as bad" argument is no excuse.
a parent doesnt care if it's eastern or western when they see their 13 year old with a half naked woman/girl on their screen, they are gonna have second thoughts about allowing them to play this game either way.
at least western pictures use adults instead of girls who look like they are barely 10 years old...
bunch of pedophiles
yes that is sexualised
and using the "western media is just as bad" argument is no excuse.
a parent doesnt care if it's eastern or western when they see their 13 year old with a half naked woman/girl on their screen, they are gonna have second thoughts about allowing them to play this game either way.
at least western pictures use adults instead of girls who look like they are barely 10 years old...
bunch of pedophiles
Nice ad hominem attack. Fuck off mate. I thought that you wouldn't be so ignorant as to associate drawings with paedophilia, as a way to insult something you don't like, like so many people do. Maybe Aurani was right about you.silmarilen wrote:
bunch of pedophiles
So, now we're not even bothering to argue about sexualised things being bad, instead we're arguing 'oh it's under-age, it's exploiting children, it's basically child porn'. It's not a little girl, it's an anime style drawing. It's not a 13 year old, It's an anime style drawing. You can not look at that drawing and be able to accurately describe an age because the style is so too unrealistic to be able to be associated with a certain real-life age group.
Instead of arguing for common sense, you're just using your own and parent's sensibilities as a judge for what is appropriate. And not what is actually appropriate for children to see. One of the many problems with Western society is that people still have this view carried over from Christian morals that sexual stuff is 'dirty and 'bad'. Japan is not like this, and is one of the reasons why I like the country so much.
As for the actual image, just having underwear doesn't make it sexual. It's not what you would call a 'panty shot'. This is the type of art that shows of the female figure as something pleasing to the eye, but not in a way that is sexually suggestive or arousing. A picture of someone in a bikini isn't automatically a sexualised picture, is it.
Nipples will kill us all.
Who is thisEneT wrote:
i passed jumppudding i am now aim spook
look out top 1000
look out top 1000
Shinoa Hiiragi, don't ask me, I only watched the first 2 episodes of this anime.Khelly wrote:
Who is this
smug midget-chanKhelly wrote:
Who is thisEneT wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes upB1rd wrote:
And to be fair, other people complained about it and weren't silenced, I have no idea why I was, maybe it my comment was too edgy. I'll talk to the GMT when they're on.
Pediatrician?
the fact that we're even arguing about this shows how sad some people are. things like that shouldnt even be thought of as possible bgs
Personally, I wouldn't use it as a BG but I don't see why you're so against it. If he uses it in private what could be so wrong?
I don't think I'd be okay at work with that pic on display on my screen. It's not explicit but it is pretty suggestive.
Well of course, in work you need to maintain a professional atmosphere. I wouldn't think of using any other BG other than the default ones provided.
not just at work. i wouldnt want someone to see me with that picture on my pc at home either, unless they are into anime themself. which most people still arent.
and the problem is
and the problem is
silmarilen wrote:
when they see their 13 year old with a half naked woman/girl on their screen, they are gonna have second thoughts about allowing them to play this game either way.
I don't even use anime wallpapers anyways.
If you are so afraid of being judged you might as well not let people see you playing this game.
i have straight up hard pony porn as my desktop
idgaf
idgaf
gj famxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
i passed jumppudding i am now aim spook
look out top 1000
You're all a bunch of paedophiles, stop arguing about the viability of random 13 yo girl BGs in today's world.
On a brighter note, I found someone who I don't dislike, finally.
On a brighter note, I found someone who I don't dislike, finally.
What? Someone in real life?
Nah, in my mind.
Of course real life. I've never liked anyone over the internet, for every fagget here is a mere tool for my pleasure.
Of course real life. I've never liked anyone over the internet, for every fagget here is a mere tool for my pleasure.
You must be too socially awkward that's why.
EneT wrote:
You must be too socially awkward that's why.
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist. If you've been on /pol/ recently you would know that the US government bought software from a hacking group with the function of planting CP, among other things, on people's PCs.Brian OA wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes up
I'm just very bitter and have very little tolerance concerning issues like this.
Great points there! I consider myself rebutted. clap clap.silmarilen wrote:
the fact that we're even arguing about this shows how sad some people are. things like that shouldnt even be thought of as possible bgs
I want to go back to that pony porn you were talking about, wtf man.
Who said that no one likes me? I adore myself, and that's more than enough for me. If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.Kaienyuu wrote:
No wonder no one likes you irl.
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
Embrace your inner self, for infinite possibilities lie ahead.
Yeah I'd embrace my inner self, I'd give it the magic finger.
So that's your go to phrase for excusing yourself out of the argumentsilmarilen wrote:
the fact that we're even arguing about this shows how sad some people are. things like that shouldnt even be thought of as possible bgs
No matter how you look at it, Silmarilen lost the argument, decimated in fact. Just let it pass now.
If you look for yourself in other people you're doing it wrong.EneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
He reminds me of people who dismiss violence/rape against men because it's men and any mention otherwise is just sexist or any opposition against illegal immigration being pure racism.EneT wrote:
No matter how you look at it, Silmarilen lost the argument, decimated in fact. Just let it pass now.
Or at least I'm rubbed the same way.
I'd fuck a male me even harderEneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.Aurani wrote:
If only I could somehow copy myself into a woman, I'd marry her right away.
Nah I don't, don't worry. No girl can copy me anyways.
What a about a pony version of you?xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
I'd fuck a male me even harderEneT wrote:
I get this feeling all the time, I'd fuck female me so hard.
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.B1rd wrote:
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist. If you've been on /pol/ recently you would know that the US government bought software from a hacking group with the function of planting CP, among other things, on people's PCs.Brian OA wrote:
You do seem to get incredibly worked up when the P-word comes up
I'm just very bitter and have very little tolerance concerning issues like this.
I mean, just look how far we've strayed from the original point because of this.
That's the entire line of thinking that I'm fighting against: that people 'can't work out the difference between fiction and reality'. This narrative is used by both the extreme right (violent video games cause violence) and the left (video games are misogynistic and cause misogynistic behaviour). The truth is that people, who consume the stuff at least, can and do know the difference, and every single study shows this.Brian OA wrote:
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.
I mean, just look how far we've strayed from the original point because of this.
And I really couldn't care less about what people thought about it. But the problem is that people make laws, control and oppress people based on these morals and sensibilities. There is no reason why I would just accept all the shitty thing about society and allow it to dictate my life.
And about the government? Well I think my point was pretty clear, the government uses CP among other things to frame political opponents and people they don't like, because they know that would permanently destroy someone's reputation. I was looking for the article and got sidetracked, I'll post it when I find it.
sup B1rd
why do you have a white avatar? Seems kinda boring, y'know?
why do you have a white avatar? Seems kinda boring, y'know?
I got sick of my old one, I'll use this until I find something else.
I suggest Hata no Kokoro
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?B1rd wrote:
That's the entire line of thinking that I'm fighting against: that people 'can't work out the difference between fiction and reality'. This narrative is used by both the extreme right (violent video games cause violence) and the left (video games are misogynistic and cause misogynistic behaviour). The truth is that people, who consume the stuff at least, can and do know the difference, and every single study shows this.Brian OA wrote:
Not too sure what does the government have to do with this but I think you need to chill out and accept that that's just how people are going to see things. I have my own things that I wish people could see the way I do—I'm sure we all do—but getting hung up on them won't do you much good. Truth is, most people don't disassociate fiction with reality to the point that the concept of a fictional little girl is completely different to that of a real little girl. Even if you put cat ears on her head and stick a tail up her ass, most people will just read that as a little girl.
I mean, just look how far we've strayed from the original point because of this.
And I really couldn't care less about what people thought about it. But the problem is that people make laws, control and oppress people based on these morals and sensibilities. There is no reason why I would just accept all the shitty thing about society and allow it to dictate my life.
And about the government? Well I think my point was pretty clear, the government uses CP among other things to frame political opponents and people they don't like, because they know that would permanently destroy someone's reputation. I was looking for the article and got sidetracked, I'll post it when I find it.How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
Hmm, what do you mean by lolicons, people who are into lolicon material or actual paedophiles?Brian OA wrote:
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
Brian please. I know you're internet savvy enough to have come across that acronym before.Brian OA wrote:
How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
Articles: http://8ch.net/n/res/90372.html
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/07 ... sy-detail/
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/ ... am_is.html
The former, since it tries to lump them with the later in a discriminatory fashion.B1rd wrote:
Hmm, what do you mean by lolicons, people who are into lolicon material or actual paedophiles?Brian OA wrote:
So, basically, you're fed up with discrimination against lolicons and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
You have some problem with chicken pizza, then?Brian please. I know you're internet savvy enough to have come across that acronym before.Brian OA wrote:
How does Chris Paul ruin people's reputation?
Articles: http://8ch.net/n/res/90372.html
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/07 ... sy-detail/
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/ ... am_is.html
down with chris paul!!!1
Spinning and spinning and spinningBackOffMe50ft wrote:
.
Ah so that's the type of discrimination you meant. Yes, that annoys me a lot, you may have noticed. But the real issue is legality and censorship, of art no less. For example, people going to jail for having lolicon on their PC, VNs having to be censored, H sites with lolicon being threatened to have their IP be blacklisted by countries, etcetera. So the reason I am so against the misportyal and discrimination of lolicon is because the opinion of the masses directly effects the law. Even when the subject matter is proven to have no negative consequences whatsoever. Victimless crimes shouldn't be a thing.Brian OA wrote:
The former, since it tries to lump them with the later in a discriminatory fashion.
So TL;DR, I couldn't care less if people are asshats, if only the people in power weren't. That's never going to happen though so the only course of action is to fight to change public opinion.
Not the lolicons as you call them,Brian OA wrote:
and the fact that they're practically just being played as a tool to further other people's agendas?
So what I mean here is that the word paedophilia is used as a label by these prejudiced moral bigots to label lolicon, because they just don't like lolicon and associate it with paedophilia to get it banned (their agenda).B1rd wrote:
Because I'm incredibly sick of that word with it's extreme negative connotations being misused by people just to further their agenda. Moral bigots and the government that is, labelling someone a paedophile is used much the same way by the government as when people are labelled a terrorist.
And I was also talking about the government using the negative connotations of paedophilia to silence and control their opponents, but I admit that's going off on a bit of a tangent.
Are you still arguing about little girls and paedophilia even after you made your points 2 pages ago....?
Arguing? I was just having a conversation.