Granger wrote:
Whoa there, try staying objective please?
No, expressing your oponion is not bad behaviour, but being bigoted is. Say you dislike gays because their flamboyant behaviour or something is, while a gross generalization, fine, but saying because its a sin or simply because i say/feel so is not. Same goes towards the SJWs, your oponion is wrong and inapporative because i say so
Well, it says it's a sin in the bible, she's just being a good Christian. I don't see how that's so bad. But regardless of how bigoted you think someone's opinion is, if they're not actually doing anything wrong then they don't deserve any punishment.
Granger wrote:
I wouldnt consider the mere reporting of the event SJW or showing its agenda. You might be reading to much into it, it literally just said this happened. Hardly making a big deal out of it is it? For all i know this guy might be a local pastor or other semi important person, if it would be just randomguy24563 there'd not be any report on it, would there?
This kinda shit that some semi important or maybe even just popular person comes into the news because something they said or have done happens all the time... i personally couldnt care less about that person (aswell most other people that get into the news for such things) because they're not relevant to me in any way.
And i agree with you, what SJWs do is sad, nothing more to say about it really.
Ok, well I can't really prove what agenda they had so I'll leave it at that.
Granger wrote:
Have you actually used the comment function or seen it happening? I dont and i dont know. I do know however that the bolded part points toward SJW, but that doesnt mean for sure that the site has a SJWish policy. I havent even seen the comment section for that matter as i use a script blocker.
The simple message of 'report a comment if it offends you' is SJW policy. What silmarilen said.
Granger wrote:
Why and why so radical? Surely playing as male character wont hurt you or affect the game in any significant way? Pick a different character to play as if you still wouldnt want to play Rinnosuke...
No i dont, obviously, as i stated already: I dont care about the sex of video game characters. Unless the games story/mechanics involves their sex in some way, a example would be in a RPG a female character being able to charm that guard while a male character couldnt. Or maybe the other way around, the guard is gay and the player overhears that somehow somewhere. Totally could see it happenening in open world RPGs like Skyrim.
Like theres no reason to include female characters, theres no reason to exclude them, so theres that.
Yeah, most heroes of IRL were male, but you cant appeal for reallife in a video game with fantasy setting, are here Hylians? Amphibian people? What not? Also, like you say, most, how is it inaccurate if theres maybe one girl applying there and landing in Links group?
I'm not radical. It's not gonna kill me but I just don't want a guy in Touhou. It's been girls only so far, that's how I like it and that's how I'd like it to stay.
There's no reason to include them and no reason to exclude them, that's right. So there's no reason to kick up a fuss when a game happens to not have a playable female or male character.
And all I'm saying about the history thing is there is nothing wrong if a game does exclude females because of a historical context.
Granger wrote:
And nah, SJWs are not racist. They're exactly not doing this, hating other people on the grounds of their different skin color. They're not much better though with their hating other people on the grounds what you say is not what i say. Its equally stupid.
They are racist. They are racist against white people, and sexist against men. I've seen it a lot. And don't say 'it's only a vocal minority', because it's not, there is very little contention in their religion of feminism. Their whole philosophy is to draw attention to race and sex to victimise themselves so they will reap the rewards. We say 'skin colour doesn't matter, and they say 'skin colour does matter and we should focus heavily on it'. For example, in that school shooting that happened recently, the SJW crowd is making it out to be a big conspiracy, and actually stirring up contention between the races and doing cultures by doing so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAMJBEKieEGranger wrote:
Baah, too hot to agrue. I just wanna sit in my freezer.
Frankly, all people with extreme (into any direction) views are strange to me, why must you all be so hateful?
I don't think my views are extreme. I think I'm anti-extreme, but I seen so much stupid shit, in the news and media I'm fed up with it.
Railey2 wrote:
SPOILERas I see it, the SJW-culture relies on self-victimization for the sake of the extra-treatment that comes along with their self-imposed victim-status.
The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy.
At it's core, I feel like this is why "I AM OFFENDED" is such a commonly used phrase nowadays. It shifts responsibility away from you and to the person who supposedly offended you, while completely disguising the fact, that both the offender and the offended hold responsibility for offending and getting offended.
Generally, whenever you see somebody self-victimizing, be alert. It's not a mature or constructive way of dealing with things, in the overwhelming majority of cases.
Yes.
NotEvenDoomMusic wrote:
A+
