worst posting ever too
i'm a girl btw
i'm a girl btw
forum
FacePunch, worst site ever.
posted
Total Posts
112
Who eats ice cream in autumn?
I laughed
just what you furfags deserve
just what you furfags deserve
What't wrong with eating ice cream in autumn?Trash Boat wrote:
Who eats ice cream in autumn?
plz not london[ Momiji ] wrote:
i'm a girl btw
Topic Starter
Deserve... What? Black-mark a person when you don't even know how is it?Friendan wrote:
I laughed
just what you furfags deserve
Gonna leave this for you:
aisakatayga wrote:
http://www.whatisfurry.org/
I already know what furries are.
Aisaka wasn't agreeing with you either, I don't think
Aisaka wasn't agreeing with you either, I don't think
Aurani says some edgy shings every once in a while but how is that.one?Sanxu wrote:
10/10 I cut my wrists from the edge just by reading this. You're good. Too good.
am I the only person that reads furry as FURY
it stirs my ancient instincts and I become mad as Rye Bread
it stirs my ancient instincts and I become mad as Rye Bread
being a lesbian is weird? ok
Topic Starter
That's good to hear. As far you're happy with yourself.Hika wrote:
being a lesbian is weird? ok
Hah, stop watching TV, they show the WORST of anything just to gain ratings. Also reading what most of people that doesn't understand them say about them, like TV, peeps just like to stereotype ANYTHING.Friendan wrote:
I already know what furries are.
Wrong, 'cause I've just defended myself, what I like, and what I really do.B1rd wrote:
Maybe you got banned because you're annoying.
Maybe you got banned because you're annoying.
I haven't touched my TV in mose than a year, and when I used to touch it, I wouldn't watch the news. Everything I have seen aboud furries are from personal experiences and other users. Sure, it's a stereotype, but it's a correct one.-Pikachu- wrote:
Hah, stop watching TV, they show the WORST of anything just to gain ratings. Also reading what most of people that doesn't understand them say about them, like TV, peeps just like to stereotype ANYTHING.
Right on the moneyB1rd wrote:
Maybe you got banned because you're annoying.
Honestly, I would've rather had this discussion focus on FacePunch rather than advocating furries.
Anyway, I gotta start by saying that I don't like most minorities. I can't understand why some people like it up the ass, prefer animals, or believe that there's a giant invisible spaghetti monster out there. But that's okay, because I've got my own weird things, at least things that would be weird to just about anyone else. Plus, I know that if I can look at people past all that superficial crap, I can begin to appreciate them for what they really are.
Now, the reason why I don't like most minorities is because, well, there's going to be a lot of bland, uninteresting people that can't validate their existence without sticking to something and then believing that everyone should accept them for it. Basically they're lazy attention whores. This is usually where I group furries because that's how almost every furry comes off to me. Surely I don't need to know that Hika is blacker than black to talk about shovels, and Aurani doesn't need to know I'm Catholic just to talk about the health benefits of bananas. That's personal and mostly irrelevant information. Plus if I brought that vitriol in here it'd just promote flamewars and circlejerks alike.
To bring this back to you, the essential problem is that you've made this about your identity and not about how much FacePunch sucks ass. I don't know the circumstances behind your ban, but if all you're going to give me is that picture and how you're responding so explosively to everyone here, I can only assume that you're just shoving your furry act around enough to be annoying.
i got an e621 account since 2009, I think I got into the fandom around 2005. I was ten years old touching myself to anthro animal porn.
I consider myself a cautionary tale of why not to let your children have unrestricted internet access.
But I'm an actual furry, not the kind whose just doing it to stand out. Like you probably are..
I consider myself a cautionary tale of why not to let your children have unrestricted internet access.
But I'm an actual furry, not the kind whose just doing it to stand out. Like you probably are..
A lot of people in minority groups are just there to draw attention to themselves. Although not all of them, unlike the people on tumblr who claim to be genderfluid moosekin or whatever the fuck, the entire purpose of this culture is just to draw attention to how 'unique' they are.
But do you know the real oppressed minority group? Lolicon. It is actually illegal in most counties. And Japan, the one place where it still has a flourishing culture, is under serious pressure to ban it due to the Tokyo Olympics. I fucking hate the hypocritical bigots who cry out for free speech whenever the subject is 'violence in video games' or muslims shooting people because of comics, but whenever it's something they don't like, they have no problem with it being repressed and criminalised. I feel like I have a responsibility to advocate for this because too many people don't because of real fear of actual real world consequences.
But do you know the real oppressed minority group? Lolicon. It is actually illegal in most counties. And Japan, the one place where it still has a flourishing culture, is under serious pressure to ban it due to the Tokyo Olympics. I fucking hate the hypocritical bigots who cry out for free speech whenever the subject is 'violence in video games' or muslims shooting people because of comics, but whenever it's something they don't like, they have no problem with it being repressed and criminalised. I feel like I have a responsibility to advocate for this because too many people don't because of real fear of actual real world consequences.
lolis are amazing; children are disgusting.
I am completely serious.
This. Although I don't even have a problem with paedophiles, they can do what they want as long as it's not molesting children or distributing real child pornography.Riince wrote:
lolis are amazing; children are disgusting.
its a furry
quick, to your shelters
quick, to your shelters
if they even procure child pornography without distributing they're increasing the demand, guess what that does?B1rd wrote:
I am completely serious.This. Although I don't even have a problem with paedophiles, they can do what they want as long as it's not molesting children or distributing real child pornography.Riince wrote:
lolis are amazing; children are disgusting.
I'm just gonna step out of here and I'll come back tomorrow.B1rd wrote:
I am completely serious.This. Although I don't even have a problem with paedophiles, they can do what they want as long as it's not molesting children or distributing real child pornography.Riince wrote:
lolis are amazing; children are disgusting.
How do they acquire it without them either producing it or someone else distributing it? real CP should be banned full stop.Riince wrote:
if they even procure child pornography without distributing they're increasing the demand, guess what that does?
Well if I said something you find objectionable feel free to say so...Brian OA wrote:
I'm just gonna step out of here and I'll come back tomorrow.
watch Where the Dead Go to Die, it has an interesting take on the topic.
E m i
nigga this post didn't look anything like that when you first made itRiince wrote:
i got an e621 account since 2009, I think I got into the fandom around 2005. I was ten years old touching myself to anthro animal porn.
I consider myself a cautionary tale of why not to let your children have unrestricted internet access.
But I'm an actual furry, not the kind whose just doing it to stand out. Like you probably are..
Wait, you're Catholic?!Brian OA wrote:
Surely I don't need to know that Hika is blacker than black to talk about shovels, and Aurani doesn't need to know I'm Catholic just to talk about the health benefits of bananas. That's personal and mostly irrelevant information.
PREPOSTEROUS!
But yes, I sort of agree with you there. While I did nail it right at the start with the butthurt assumption, I still think he is free to be a furry or whatever he likes, as long as it doesn't involve me.
I mean, if he keeps it to himself, why would I need to point out that I hate his kind? It doesn't do neither him nor me any good, unless I get my kicks from telling other people how disgusting they are, which I don't.... well, to a degree.
hahaBrian OA wrote:
I'm Catholic
don't actually watch it though, I became physically ill towards the end of the movie, and I had to steel myself several times to actually finish the whole thing. It's actually painful.Riince wrote:
watch Where the Dead Go to Die, it has an interesting take on the topic.
"pedophiles are OPPRESSED"
Paedophiles are oppressed. You realise they're actually people right? But they're often judged 'sub human' just because of their sexuality, which is not something you can choose. Of course child molesting and CP is wrong (and most paedophiles know this). No fictional works should be banned, because then paedophiles have no outlet, and they would probably be more inclined to actually commit a crime. And this is actually shown in the statistics, places where fictional works are not illegal have lower rates of child molestations.
Although attraction to lolis isn't the same as attraction to children, my point is that no fictional works should be illegal. No one should be prosecuted for 'thought crimes' or doing something that has no effect on anyone else.
Although attraction to lolis isn't the same as attraction to children, my point is that no fictional works should be illegal. No one should be prosecuted for 'thought crimes' or doing something that has no effect on anyone else.
B1rd wrote:
Paedophiles are oppressed. You realise they're actually people right? But they're often judged 'sub human' just because of their sexuality, which is not something you can choose. Of course child molesting and CP is wrong (and most paedophiles know this). No fictional works should be banned, because then paedophiles have no outlet, and they would probably be more inclined to actually commit a crime. And this is actually shown in the statistics, places where fictional works are not illegal have lower rates of child molestations.
Although attraction to lolis isn't the same as attraction to children, my point is that no fictional works should be illegal. No one should be prosecuted for 'thought crimes' or doing something that has no effect on anyone else.
so what is the truth?B1rd wrote:
but keep in mind transexuals are aberrations of nature. Not normal people exercising their right to choose whatever 'gender' they want.
Are you implying there is some contradiction between those quotes? I wasn't using the word 'aberration' in a negative way.
This or the fact that the groups themselves draw a lot of attention is what ends up getting people into themB1rd wrote:
A lot of people in minority groups are just there to draw attention to themselves.
I didn't give a fuck about bronies until I saw how much hate they got and I found all the hate fucking hilarious which ended up getting me into the fandom
Mahoganytooth wrote:
This or the fact that the groups themselves draw a lot of attention is what ends up getting people into themB1rd wrote:
A lot of people in minority groups are just there to draw attention to themselves.
I didn't give a fuck about bronies until I saw how much hate they got and I found all the hate fucking hilarious which ended up getting me into the fandom
people hate terrorists as well you should join ISIS so that everybody will rage
don't mind me just setting up my threadly bait
Mr Color wrote:
people hate terrorists as well you should join ISIS so that everybody will rage
An SJW is going to wrote:
HOW DARE YOU YOU ARE A HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HUMAN FOR SAYINNG THIS GO TO HELL YOU ISLAMAPHOBIC SLUTWHORE YEAH THATS RIGHT GO TO HELL AND DIE
ps equality for all no hatred here
forums are the worst in general
furries, bronies, lolicons aka criminal pedophiles
what's next: incest?
what's next: incest?
that's a good tag
no, necrophilia isSaigonAlice wrote:
what's next: incest?