m4m, id like to keep a ticket since I still need to finish up my map
Nice map and song, I hope it can get ranked
[Smoothness]
- 00:05:929 (4,1) - swap nc since that piano melody starts from 00:05:929 (4) -
- 00:07:653 (5) - You could try this to catch both piano hits.
- 00:11:877 (2) - Not snapped to the piano hit, Id suggest making 00:11:791 (1) - a 1/8 slider and have a circle at 00:12:136 - instead, would probably be better than a 1/8 doublet.
- 00:17:653 (8) - I don't like the slider here, it's a fading piano hit but the sliderticks makes it so noisy. But if you want to keep the slider, id suggest silencing the sliderticks. and have the curve on the first slidertick so it turns on the beat.
- 00:25:411 (4) - unnecessarily long slider, youre missing several white ticks and a particularily strong beat at 00:25:756 - id suggest this instead, youll catch all the white ticks because they are important for the percussion and the 1/1 slider should emphasize the long synth hit a bit.
- 00:30:929 (5) - same as above
- 00:36:446 (4) - same as above
- 00:35:239 (1) - Make this parallel with 00:34:894 (6) - so make it look better
- 00:36:446 (4) - Ill stop here, you get the drift.
- 00:53:429 (2) - blanket is off.
- 00:55:929 (2) - blanket is off
- 00:55:929 (1,2) - unnecessary sliders, its overmapped and its pretty noisy, just change to circles, and you could use a big jump between them to emphasize the double kick
- 01:09:894 (4) - bad flow, rotate it like -50 and blanket it again and move away 01:10:239 (5) -
- 01:19:032 (5) - could make a turn here.
- 01:30:411 (1) - the long sliders in this section is pretty fine though i think since youre almost exclusively following the synth in this part.
- 01:31:791 (2) - could blanket this slider with (1) to make it look better
- 01:45:929 (5,6,7) - bad flow, [urlhttp://puu.sh/h2ghv.jpg]try this[/url]
- 01:50:411 - really random sv change, I hear nothing in the music that calls for a change, the stream from 01:51:101 (1) - is a bit higher pitch so the increased spacing there is fine but I think its a bit too much, consider reducing,
- 02:04:377 (3) - blanket is off
- 02:12:825 (5) - should probably stack with 02:11:618 (7) -
- 02:35:411 - this is really cool!!
- 02:40:411 (1) - blanket is off on sliderhead
- 02:40:929 (2) - straighten it out a bit so it blankets better
- 02:53:515 (2,3) - these are off, notice how the followpoints between (2) and (3) is slanted
- 02:58:342 (2,3,4,5) - these could easily be confused to 1/3 because the spacing change is so sudden
- 03:47:480 (2) - stack
- 03:54:204 (2) - can blanket with (1) and (3) better
- 04:51:199 (3) - I like this pointed downwards
- 04:59:131 (2,3,4) - could use a bit of movement, and the bigger movement from 05:00:165 (1) - would nicely imo
- 05:11:199 (1) - center this?