You can dock your battleship into my port anytime
I remember when Bad Apple got ranked, most played, and unranked all within 24 hours. Now that was a fun rollercoaster.IppE wrote:
I remember when bad apple was most played.
Good times.
Atleast you have food nearby.Aurani wrote:
Eating a lot of Mexican food on a completely empty stomach = bad decision.
You're in Norway... you can fish for free. :pGumpyyy wrote:
Atleast you have food nearby.Aurani wrote:
Eating a lot of Mexican food on a completely empty stomach = bad decision.
Made my dayAurani wrote:
and your guns fire bloody planets at other ships
Of course it's cool, it's ships we're talking aboutAutoMedic wrote:
I'm not a big strategy and military nerd but for some reason I got into the gameplay because it looked really cool. I wouldn't probably play with you due to our distance but I'd really look forward to it
Also fuck yeah, Carriers
Clearly you're not a 11y old minecraft player.Aurani wrote:
Carriers aren't sexy at all mate, all blocky 'n' shit. :V
Damn right you are, who wouldn't fight after imagining this girl as a reward. :VGranger wrote:
Warfare is all about being fashionable, rite?
Well they do have some subs, but they're all just copies of NATO standard subs, which is, essentially, 'murrican bullshit design copy-pasted.Granger wrote:
Im not really keeping up to date with military stuff but doesnt DE still produce subs and sell them to other lands?
The Leviathan Trilogy by Scott Westerfeld is pretty nice as well as the Inheritance Cycle series by Christopher Paolini. The Tunnels series written by Roderick Gordon and Brian Williams is pretty sweet too. I don't remember much of the Inkheart trilogy by Cornelia Funke, but I'm pretty sure it's good. There are a few others that I can't remember the name of sadly.B1rd wrote:
So, I have one credit on audible and I'm wondering which book I should get.
>implying that theres an universal set of tastesYoeri wrote:
Correction, everyone has shit taste
So you don't like ships, tanks or aircraft, but you like submarines? I wonder what Freud would have to say about that.Aurani wrote:
Subs, on the other hand, are perfect for immersion and letting my imagination run wild. I can listen to Wagner for hours while sneaking around and sinking ships, or just plain look at the lovely design and pretend to be a commander, because even I need a break from all the idiocy of this world, and just let my inner child out.
No no no, it's not that I don't particularly dislike any one of those, but (like I mentioned in that post), when I need my relax-and-enjoy time, I'm not in the mood for them, but rather the subs.B1rd wrote:
So you don't like ships, tanks or aircraft, but you like submarines? I wonder what Freud would have to say about that.
need help?Frostei wrote:
EveryoneTrash Boat wrote:
>implying that theres an universal set of tastesYoeri wrote:
Correction, everyone has shit taste
>doesnt reply
The curves, it kills you slowly man. It's like that girl that slowly seduces you or something but she has like a fucktom of surprises in her sleeveKaienyuu wrote:
What's so sexy about a submerged metal can
Ew yuriIppE wrote:
Why not navel warfare?AutoMedic wrote:
We're talking about naval warfare here
it was so goddamned slow to load anything that i wanted to die, reminded me of back in like 2006 when i had roadrunner thats how bad it wasIppE wrote:
Thats still 58,59 ethernet packages per second.Riince wrote:
i usually get 120 mbps right now im getting 2
nice ISP
and with 0.03 mbps upload [lol?] its going to take quite awhile to send this post.
American wiffyRiince wrote:
i usually get 120 mbps right now im getting 2
nice ISP
and with 0.03 mbps upload [lol?] its going to take quite awhile to send this post.
Still faster than the average internet speed in Indonesia.Riince wrote:
i usually get 120 mbps right now im getting 2
nice ISP
and with 0.03 mbps upload [lol?] its going to take quite awhile to send this post.
I don't know what you mean. Skyrim is a greats game. The biggest problem is not being able to play above 60fps because of physics issues (yeah, fuck dumbing down the game through catering to casual console peasants)GladiOol wrote:
people still play skyrim? damn. i played that game quite a lot - never enjoyed it once. the game has so much potential, but everytime it just shits on your face. and for some reason you go on, hoping that in the next area things will become fun. but they never do. it just keeps unloading their fury on your face. 4/10 would not recommend.
Because consoles.Yoeri wrote:
Why do people talk about 60 fps like it's the new cool thing
Hasn't it been the standard for like 10 years
It just feels like a big, giant, epic world that lacks the most important element (for me) when it comes to RPGs. Character. There's litteraly not a single person in the entire realm of skyrim of which I can recall the name other than Ulfric because his name is in the one song that keeps going on and on and on and on in every single bloody inn I enter. I have tried to enjoy the game. But the story is weak, quests are weak, characters are weak. It just feels so weak. I think the witcher 2 just ruined skyrim for me. Even though the witcher had a lot of problems, probably more than skyrim, it had character. The quests meant something, you meant something. Everything you did changed everything around you. I don't have that in skyrim. I feel more like a tourist than an actual bloody dragonborn at times.B1rd wrote:
I don't know what you mean. Skyrim is a greats game. The biggest problem is not being able to play above 60fps because of physics issues (yeah, fuck dumbing down the game through catering to casual console peasants)GladiOol wrote:
people still play skyrim? damn. i played that game quite a lot - never enjoyed it once. the game has so much potential, but everytime it just shits on your face. and for some reason you go on, hoping that in the next area things will become fun. but they never do. it just keeps unloading their fury on your face. 4/10 would not recommend.
Oh. I'm so sorry.Kheldragar wrote:
Because consoles.Yoeri wrote:
Why do people talk about 60 fps like it's the new cool thing
Hasn't it been the standard for like 10 years
You think I didn't try that? I'm just remembering vague details of what happened since I've uninstalled Skyrim since then and it was a long time ago.Zelda wrote:
The cursor feels laggy because of vsync, not because it runs at 60fps. It doesn't take a lot of file tweaking to fix this problem, just editing one little line in SkyrimPrefs.ini.
If you can be bothered to take 5 seconds to googe "fix skyrim laggy cursor", the first link describes how, even.
The fun part for me is the combat and making my character more powerful. The quests and characters are fairly weak, but you can use your imagination and roleplay to add depth to the shallow storyline. Personally I don't like RPG's where there's already have a predefined MC. You should try Morrowind, that was a lot more immersive, you actually had an effect on the world; it was the greatest thing to start as an 'outlander' where you were inherently disliked to being recognised as the reincarnated Nerevarine, basically the hero of Morrowind.GladiOol wrote:
It just feels like a big, giant, epic world that lacks the most important element (for me) when it comes to RPGs. Character. There's litteraly not a single person in the entire realm of skyrim of which I can recall the name other than Ulfric because his name is in the one song that keeps going on and on and on and on in every single bloody inn I enter. I have tried to enjoy the game. But the story is weak, quests are weak, characters are weak. It just feels so weak. I think the witcher 2 just ruined skyrim for me. Even though the witcher had a lot of problems, probably more than skyrim, it had character. The quests meant something, you meant something. Everything you did changed everything around you. I don't have that in skyrim. I feel more like a tourist than an actual bloody dragonborn at times.