This is not about performance points but rather about the star rating system, I just don't know where else I should put it.
This map is split into three silimar parts (125, 138 and 165bpm) and gets harder every time the song speeds up. I took the Insane and cut the three parts into separate maps to be able to play them individually and I noticed this:
-Full map - 5,22 stars
-Part 1/3 - 3,91 stars
-Part 2/3 - 4,53 stars
-Part 3/3 - 5,22 stars
Apparently the star rating ignores two thirds of the map and is only based on the hardest part. I figured this might be interesting since obviously playing the whole song should be harder than playing only a third of it, no matter how easy the rest is. I know that the full map gives more pp than the individual parts would, because they have less objects, but I thought I'd point out that this is not reflected in the star rating.
I don't know if this is something that has been talked about many times before and if it is, I apologise in advance. I didn't want to read through over 100 pages before posting.
This map is split into three silimar parts (125, 138 and 165bpm) and gets harder every time the song speeds up. I took the Insane and cut the three parts into separate maps to be able to play them individually and I noticed this:
-Full map - 5,22 stars
-Part 1/3 - 3,91 stars
-Part 2/3 - 4,53 stars
-Part 3/3 - 5,22 stars
Apparently the star rating ignores two thirds of the map and is only based on the hardest part. I figured this might be interesting since obviously playing the whole song should be harder than playing only a third of it, no matter how easy the rest is. I know that the full map gives more pp than the individual parts would, because they have less objects, but I thought I'd point out that this is not reflected in the star rating.
I don't know if this is something that has been talked about many times before and if it is, I apologise in advance. I didn't want to read through over 100 pages before posting.