Hi Hollow Wings~ for your m4m queue! Hope this is helpful!.
[Normal]
00:24:467 (4) - Can't really hear a note here. How about extending 00:23:950 (3) - to a slider?
00:50:593 (5,6) - Also not very audible sound... Why not move them to 00:50:852 - . Beginning here makes more sense imo.
00:54:732 (4,5) - ^ Same. You can't really hear anything at 4, Move them down to 00:54:990 - .
01:41:033 (8) - Consider shortening this slider to 01:41:291 - And begin another slider (1/1) at 01:41:550 - . Try a rhythm like This.
02:55:528 (8) - ^Same as above, consider shortening to 1/2 slider and beginning another slider (1/1) at 02:56:046 - .
03:07:944 (7) - Begin this at 03:07:686 - And begin 03:08:720 (1) - at 03:08:462 -
03:09:496 - You can then add a circle here. Something like this.
03:14:152 (3) - Might be better to make this a slider instead of a circle.
03:22:947 (3,1) - Could improve this blanket.
03:33:293 (5) - NC; remove NC from 03:34:328 (1) - .
04:18:301 - There is another note here you can map. How about this pattern? I think adding an extra circle in the beginning is nice, and fits with the pattern you used in your intro (00:50:851 (5,6) - ) and (00:54:732 (4,5) - ) for example.
[Easy]
01:41:550 (3,4,1) - How about making 1 the same shape as 3, 4 for a similar pattern.
03:00:184 (1,2,3,1) - Might want to consider a pattern like this. Screen Right now this slider 03:02:254 (2) - . Is unnecessarily short, and there is uneven timing in between the notes.
03:14:669 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This is a good rhythmic pattern to follow. Slider then circle, then slider. but sometimes, you decide not to map the circle even though there is a vocal or drum beat to map them too. I understand some parts the vocals or melody are quiet so I will only include the notes where there is a significant vocal or drum beat.
03:10:013 - Could map this note. It makes your rhythm more consistent.
03:14:152 - ^
03:49:331 - ^
03:51:529 - ^
03:51:917 (2) - You can extend this slider to 03:52:435 - .
[Normal]
00:24:467 (4) - Can't really hear a note here. How about extending 00:23:950 (3) - to a slider?
00:50:593 (5,6) - Also not very audible sound... Why not move them to 00:50:852 - . Beginning here makes more sense imo.
00:54:732 (4,5) - ^ Same. You can't really hear anything at 4, Move them down to 00:54:990 - .
01:41:033 (8) - Consider shortening this slider to 01:41:291 - And begin another slider (1/1) at 01:41:550 - . Try a rhythm like This.
02:55:528 (8) - ^Same as above, consider shortening to 1/2 slider and beginning another slider (1/1) at 02:56:046 - .
03:07:944 (7) - Begin this at 03:07:686 - And begin 03:08:720 (1) - at 03:08:462 -
03:09:496 - You can then add a circle here. Something like this.
03:14:152 (3) - Might be better to make this a slider instead of a circle.
03:22:947 (3,1) - Could improve this blanket.
03:33:293 (5) - NC; remove NC from 03:34:328 (1) - .
04:18:301 - There is another note here you can map. How about this pattern? I think adding an extra circle in the beginning is nice, and fits with the pattern you used in your intro (00:50:851 (5,6) - ) and (00:54:732 (4,5) - ) for example.
[Easy]
01:41:550 (3,4,1) - How about making 1 the same shape as 3, 4 for a similar pattern.
03:00:184 (1,2,3,1) - Might want to consider a pattern like this. Screen Right now this slider 03:02:254 (2) - . Is unnecessarily short, and there is uneven timing in between the notes.
03:14:669 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This is a good rhythmic pattern to follow. Slider then circle, then slider. but sometimes, you decide not to map the circle even though there is a vocal or drum beat to map them too. I understand some parts the vocals or melody are quiet so I will only include the notes where there is a significant vocal or drum beat.
03:10:013 - Could map this note. It makes your rhythm more consistent.
03:14:152 - ^
03:49:331 - ^
03:51:529 - ^
03:51:917 (2) - You can extend this slider to 03:52:435 - .