• Oni
  00:06:806 (28,29) - maybe you can try kd in here
  00:26:398 (41) - how about k in here?
  00:27:826 (46) - ^[ the pitch in here a bit high ]
  01:13:135 (291) - ^

• Muzukashii
  00:19:051 (11,12) - how about swap this note?
  00:26:398 (35) - how about k in here?
  00:27:826 (40) - ^ [ the pitch in here a bit high ]
  00:58:847 (142) - i'm not sure with this D but it's better with K
  01:22:520 (225,226,227) - i didn't hear any triple sound in here maybe you can delete 226

• Futsuu
  00:26:398 (23) - how about k in here?
  00:27:826 ( 27) - ^ [ the pitch in here a bit high ]
  00:52:520 (86) - how about d ? because the sound a bit low in here

• Kantan
  00:52:316 (42) - how about try d in here ?

Charlotte wrote:

hi~.from game-in req

[ about]

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is big don note
4. K is big kat note

[ General]

• 
  
  Good~

[ Kantan]

• 
  
  00:45:995 - add note. because,Futsuu=dkd (1/2). so I think add note? (option) Retained for simplicity since it will be a red-line note.
  
  00:49:266 - ^ ^

[ Futsuu]

• 
  
  00:58:245 - add finish or change to k I think it would be a bit overemphasized to use D. Also, d would be fine since the vocal pitch is the same as 00:58:030 -

[ Muzukashii]

• 
  
  00:21:289 - move to 00:21:188 - ? The current placement could fit the noticeable piano there. I would prefer using 3/4 notes at 00:22:520 - because of the slight change in music.
  
  00:53:949 - move to 00:53:845 - Following the main beat here would be smoother imo.
  
  00:54:157 - add k. Keeping this blank could show a better emphasis to the previous five 1/2 patterns used.

[ Oni]

• 
  
  00:53:949 - move to 00:53:845 - same as Muzukashii
  
  01:03:048 - add k. (option) Retained for pattern consistency as 01:16:091 -

Nice map Good luck

game rock wrote:

Hi Nardoxyribonucleic , from Game's Queue~ Sorry for the delay...:c

d
k
D (Big d)
K (Big k)


[kantan]

00:45:173 - Change to K to follow the pattern, D would be better since the vocal pitch is lower than 00:48:438 -
01:00:071 - ^ similar reason as ^

[Futsuu]

00:04:153 - Change to k for kd dk. The piano pitch is decreasing across 00:03:949 (8,9) - , so d would fit.
00:11:091 - Change to K? is better. Nope, the vocal pitch is the same as 00:11:704 (26) -
00:26:398 - Change to k? for dk kd. d would be better since the vocal pitch is the same as 00:26:602 (24) -
00:58:234 - Change to k? same as ^
01:08:438 - Change to d? k would mark the pitch increase of the vocal there.

[Muzukashii]

00:26:398 - Change to k? same as Futsuu
00:27:826 - ^ same reason as ^
01:27:214 - Change to K and here 01:27:622 - Change to D. D K would be better because of the increasing vocal pitch.

[Oni]

00:05:785 - Change to k? d would be fine as the vocal pitch is the same as 00:05:581 (22) -
00:26:398 - Change to k for the pattern in this part. same as Futsuu
00:27:622 - ^ same reason as ^
00:46:704 - Change to d. The current pattern has a smoother flow imo.
01:27:214 - Change to K and here 01:27:622 - Change to D. same as Muzukashii


Great Beatmap! I hope my mod has been helpful, good luck~

Niko-nyan wrote:

Hi Nardo :3 M4M from ingame

• Oni
  00:06:806 (28,29) - maybe you can try kd in here I see your point, but since the vocal pitch there is much lower comparing to 00:06:398 (26,27) - , dd would be fine.
  00:26:398 (41) - how about k in here? d would be better since the vocal pitch is the same as 00:26:602 (42) -
  00:27:826 (46) - ^[ the pitch in here a bit high ] similar reason as ^
  01:13:135 (291) - ^ Retained for hitsound consistency as 01:26:193 (362) -

• Muzukashii
  00:19:051 (11,12) - how about swap this note? d k would be better as the vocal pitch is increasing.
  00:26:398 (35) - how about k in here? same as Oni
  00:27:826 (40) - ^ [ the pitch in here a bit high ] ^
  00:58:847 (142) - i'm not sure with this D but it's better with K D would be fine because of the pitch drop of vocal.
  01:22:520 (225,226,227) - i didn't hear any triple sound in here maybe you can delete 226 There is a noticeable sound at 01:22:622 -

• Futsuu
  00:26:398 (23) - how about k in here? same as Oni
  00:27:826 ( 27) - ^ [ the pitch in here a bit high ] ^
  00:52:520 (86) - how about d ? because the sound a bit low in here Umm... As the vocal has constant pitch, k would be fine as well.

• Kantan
  00:52:316 (42) - how about try d in here ? I followed the snare there.

I like the song so much omg <3 hope it's ranked soon

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello Nardo~~ :3:3:3 Here's a Taiko Mod ~.
Very nice song and , you've already mapped to clean.
So, I will suggest to mod as just only my opinion.

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
D and K are finisher .
No Comment is already explained or opinion.
“+ ?” is opinion.(※example→ add? , remove?)
Big text is strong suggestion.
Brown Big is Serious problem. Maybe you must change to something.

Mod

[Kantan]

1. 00:20:479 (6) - .delete? rhythm is good but,,,, I think it sounds not loud.Removing is better imo. fixed

[Futsuu]

1. 00:05:785 (12) – delete? for bass sounds flow. (00:04:561 - ~~~00:07:418 -). fixed
2. add a finisher? sounds good as an accent, and easing of uncomfortable at 00:41:193 – hits as you know. It's a good idea~ :3
3. 00:39:255 (56,57,58,59) –　kd-dk? I see your point to follow the snares, but dk-kd could match the vocal in a way better.

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:28:234 (41) - k? for piano and dat sounds up something since 00:27:826 -. fixed
2. Either?
   A.00:31:704 (55) – add don? *- for violin flow, if you put 00:31:198 - k. Nice, but I think it'd be better to have a longer break here for simplicity so players will not get confused after hitting the 1/4 dd pattern.
   B. 00:30:887 (51) – change to don? * - for vocal makes more pure…? k would be better since the vocal pitch becomes higher.
   
3. 00:22:112 (22) – change to k…? for piano. I guess it can also follow the vocal…? As the pitch of the piano is the same as 00:21:295 (19) - , it would be better to use d as well for consistency.
4. 01:07:214 (167) – add note … k? for vocal, same as before part. A bit hard for Muzukashii because there will be too many 1/4 notes.
5. 01:20:275 (216) -^ ^

[Oni]

1. 00:22:112 (25) - k? same as Muzukashii. refer to the explanation in Muzukashii
2. 00:29:765 (54) – put k here? I guess it’s good to make an enhance as vocal. I think it would be better to use d for consistency with Muzukashii and Futsuu.
3. 00:50:581 (172) – delete…? and 00:51:091 (1,3) – change to (d,k) ? Deletion is not that good because the vocal pattern is similar to 00:52:214 - , so it would be fine to keep the ddk triplet.
   * 1- 00:49:867 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) – I felt this 5-3 stream made over power. So , I suggest you to decrease the density. I think such a pattern constellation could reflect the music there appropriately.
   * 2 –if delete 1/4-triplet, I guess it’s little boring dkdk…? so change color is for avoid to that. That's why I placed the 1/4 notes there

Good Luck!
( ・∀・)ﾉ ---===≡≡≡ ★☆★☆

- Racoon - wrote:

Sorry to late ㅠㅠ

[Warning]
My Mapping Style is following vocal first and mix with back melody.
My Mod Quality is bad.
And...............
My English is poor........................

[Kantan]
00:09:459 (7) - D? - Same rhythm and tone as 00:07:826 (6) K would be better as vocal pitch increases.
01:08:234 (62,63) - Ctrl+G? - Follow drum rhythm d k could accompany the pitch increase of the music there.
01:11:500 (67) - K? - I think this pattern mate with 01:09:867 (65) This would be a bit overemphasized as the sound is not very strong.
01:21:296 (81,82) - Ctrl+G? - ^ [01:08:234 (62,63)] same as 01:08:234 (62,63) -
01:24:562 (86) - K? - ^ [01:11:500 (67)] same as 01:11:500 (67) -

[Futsuu]
00:03:949 (8) - k? - Follow melody d would be fine since the piano is lower-pitched than 00:03:540 (7) -
00:09:459 (20) - Same as Kantan refer to the explanation in Kantan
00:27:010 (25) - Add d? - Follow Vocal - I think you follow melody I would prefer a similar break pattern as 00:26:193 - for simplicity.
00:49:255 (77) - K? - I think this pattern mate with 00:45:989 (71) This would be a bit overemphasized as the sound is not very strong.
00:51:908 (84) - K? - ^ [00:50:275 (79)] ^
01:11:500 (132) - K? - ^ [01:11:500 (132)] refer to the explanation in Kantan
01:24:562 (165) - K? - ^ [01:22:929 (161)] ^

[Muzukashii]
Good!
01:01:295 (148,149) - d K? k D would result in a sharper contrast to 01:01:908 (150,151) -

I am poor at Oni Mod... Sorry

[Oni]
Good!

Here is

Good Luck !!!

rew0825 wrote:

Hi from rew0825's Modding Queue

[Kantan]

1. 00:24:153 (9) - change to d The pitch becomes higher when compared to 00:23:949 - , so k would be fine imo.
2. 00:33:540 (22) - Delete ? Keeping this note could follow both the snare and the vocal there.
3. 00:52:724 (41) - change to d It has the same vocal pitch as 00:52:316 (41) -
4. 01:07:418 (60,61,62,63) - change to d kdk The current pattern could fit the vocal in a way better.
5. 01:20:480 (79,80,81,82) - ^^^ same as above.

[Futsuu]

1. 00:01:908 (3,9) - Delete ? I followed the piano there.
2. 00:09:459 (18) - change to D The vocal pitch becomes higher comparing to 00:07:826 (16) - , so K would be fine.
3. 00:24:561 (18,19,20) - change to kdk The vocal at 00:24:765 - has the highest pitch.
4. 01:11:908 (133,134,135) - change to dk d ? The current one could maintain a better snare consistency.
5. 01:24:970 (166,167,168) - ^^^ ^

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:00:887 (3) - change to d The vocal is still high-pitched.
2. 00:01:704 (2,3,4) - change to d k d k d k could follow the pitch changes there in a way better.
3. 00:05:785 (16) - change to k It has the same vocal pitch as 00:05:581 (15) -
4. 00:09:867 (29,30,31,32) - change to d kk d same as 00:01:704 -
5. 00:23:949 (28,29,30,31,32) - change to kd k dk ^
6. 00:36:398 (70,71,72,73,74,75,76) - change to k k dk d kd The current pattern could follow the pitch drop there.
7. 00:40:275 (83,84,85) - change to kDk The cymbal sound is very strong at 00:40:479 - , so K would be better.
8. 01:04:765 (157,158,159,160,161,162) - change to d k k d kk same as 00:01:704 -
9. 01:11:295 (182,183,184,185,186,187) - change to dk d kk k ^
10. 01:17:826 (205,206,207,208,209,210) - change to d k k d kk ^
11. 01:24:356 (233,234,235,236,237) - change to d k d kk ^

[Oni]

1. 00:00:887 (4) - change to d same as Muzukashii
2. 00:17:418 (7,9) - ctrl+g The vocal pitch is increasing.
3. 00:20:479 (18) - change to d The vocal pitch is still high.
4. 00:31:091 (61) - change to d k could maintain snare consistency.
5. 00:44:969 (143) - change to k The vocal pitch and the drums are constant.
6. 00:47:010 (152,153,154,155,156) - change to K kkd K
7. 00:48:030 (157,158) - change to k Again, I would prefer following the vocal there.
8. 01:03:132 (235) - change to k Retained for consistency as 00:01:091 (5) -
9. 01:16:193 (303) - change to k ^

Good luck

rew0825 wrote:

[JuDa's Oni]

1. 00:17:010 (4) - change to d no bass hits.
2. 00:19:255 (1) - change to k bass piano sounds, and its not made a link ,before part d-dk-kd.
3. 00:21:500 (3,4) - change to d no bass hits.
4. 00:46:398 (12,13,14,15) - change to d kkd back sounds up, not low.

Stefan wrote:

[Oni]
00:41:500 (118,119,120,121,122,123,124) - I don't like the usage of ddkkdd... here, sounds too early as that you could use it properly, remove 00:41:602 (119,121). fixed
00:43:030 - now here would ddkkdd... fit nicely. Add a k here. ^
00:43:642 - no idea if you want to connect this in case you make the suggestion above. You also could only connect this by using k here. up to you. At all the first suggestion above makes it more fitting to the song. I would prefer leaving it blank to allow time for the next big note.
01:02:520 (232,233,234,235) - Make a smoother SV increase here, put for every new circle +0.02 in SV. To make 01:02:316 (230,231,232) not messed up put on 01:02:418 1.01x. Done.

[Muzukashii]
I find that some notes could be removed. not to lower the overall difficulty such as Doubles but to break up some combo pattern.
00:21:295 (19,20,21) - Remove them and add at 00:21:091 a Double. fixed
00:30:887 (51) - split combo pattern here. I find it a bit weird to remove the note because of 00:17:826 (7) - . Players would expect a slight increase in note density as the music intensifies.
01:07:826 (169) - ^

Another issue I've found is that Futsuu and Muzukashii got a quite similar density on some parts of the Difficulties.

[Futsuu]