mintong89 wrote:

Recheck as your request. no kd.

[General]
其实 Inner Oni 和 Oni 的难度没差很大...建议删一个 不强制啦不过我觉得删了会比较好. 如果你真的要删的话留Oni我觉得比较好.
其实我本身就觉得Inner Oni有点乱...
唔，我没删，再找个BAT看看意见吧
01:27:527 - 全部结尾spinner的尾部放这里吧, vocal是停在这里. Done
大圈用量最好全部一致. 比如 00:06:073 (31) - Inner Oni 这里有D但是为啥Oni没有? Muzukashii, Futsuu 和 Kantan 记得也查一遍.
Done

[Inner Oni]

00:03:164 - => 00:04:073 - 建议 k d d k d d k 才比较有层次感. (前面是d k k d k k d, 然后这里就k d d k d d k啦.) 最初是这样的._.后来改mod了._.
00:07:527 (36) - 不建议这里放D, 没听到任何鼓钹. Done
00:10:436 (54) - ^ Done
00:14:709 (82) - 建议把这个移到 00:14:527 - 这里, 毕竟 i ko~是一个词嘛. Done
00:17:164 (99,100,101) - 建议kdk这里来弄点不同 (前面kkd的这里就kdk吧) 我把几个三连位置调换了一下
00:20:436 (123) - 这里vocal高音 建议k. Done
00:30:800 (194) - 没鼓钹, 去掉大圈换小圈吧. Done
00:32:073 - 建议这里弄个note接后面的stream会比较好玩. Done
00:38:618 (243,244,245) - 根据前面的"tsu ta mu"这里ddd会比较好? 比前面的音低了点. Done
00:43:709 (278,279,280) - 不如这里kdk吧? 尾部的ra略高音. Done
00:49:345 (315,316,317) - 其实我这个建议你不要1/4换成1/2... 然后后面的k换成大K...这样玩起来比较好玩. Done
01:00:073 - => 01:00:982 - 这里节奏和前面K差不多一样吧, 弄K? Done
01:01:164 (392) - 新的一段这里就弄个D吧? Done
01:08:255 (437) - 这里d就去掉吧 没什么意义. Done
01:09:709 (445) - ^ Done
01:12:982 - => 01:13:891 - 不建议这样做, 这里只是纯vocal吧, 有点overmap的感觉了. 嗯，改了
01:20:891 - 这里加个note搞个1/4吧 Done
01:23:527 (534,535,536) - 额, 感觉还是不要大K比较好吧. 不大K总感觉不难啊。。

[Oni]

00:03:164 (9,10,11,12) - 这里和前段节奏一样吧, 这里怪怪的. Done
00:06:073 - => 00:08:982 - 这里好像比Inner Oni难. 加强了Inner的难度
01:25:709 - 这里弄个note接spinner吧. Done

[Muzukashii]

00:04:618 (9) - 这里建议k, 略高音 放d的话怪怪的. 如果接受的话最好 00:01:709 (4) - 这里放d给它一致. Done
00:12:618 (37) - 这里移到 00:12:436 - 这里然后换k, 吉他声. Done
00:13:164 - 加个note, vocal. Done
00:14:618 - ^ , 然后删掉 00:15:345 (48) - 这里来平衡节奏. Done
00:17:891 (56) - 移到 00:17:709 - , 吉他声. Done
00:18:436 (58) - 移到 00:18:255 - , ^ Done
00:26:073 (87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94) - 这里弄和前段一样吧 呃，我改成了其它的
00:31:345 - 加个note, 提琴. Done
00:52:255 (198,199,200) - Muzuakashii 不建议 ddk kkd kdd dkk...
00:55:164 (213,214,215) - ^ OK..全改了
00:53:164 (203) - 这里弄d吧 太多k了 而且也可以对到vocal Done
01:00:618 (236) - 移到 01:00:800 - 这里, 00:618好像没意义. 听起来有点怪，我直接删了

[Futsuu]

00:33:709 - 这里底拍怎能不加个note呢... Done，后面顺带一点改动
00:44:618 (82) - 这里没什么底音, 建议k. Done
01:06:436 (138,139,140,141) - 这里好像没对到vocal, 建议再弄过. Done

[Kantan]

01:00:618 (22) - 这个怪怪的 没对到 最好移到 01:00:436 - 这里. Done
01:01:345 (23) - 这个弄和刚开始的 kiai time 的节奏一样吧. Done

太多nazi啦啊啊啊
建议再找一个mod, 对不起啦. 不过还是建议你再检查多一次你的diff.
一个星期后再找我 我再弄最后一次的recheck. OK,wait for you >3<

1. HP建議改到4 ,因為3的話歌曲前面2/3我全都不打還是能過
2. 00:01:345 (2) - 和00:04:255 (5) - 都可以刪掉,跟futsuu比較分得出難度差別
3. 00:10:436 - ~ 00:22:073 - 這一段我覺得可以再改簡單一點,能夠跟下一段作區別

1. 00:10:436 - ~ 00:22:073 - 同kantan
2. 00:39:891 (73) - 這個Note可以刪掉,大圓後面做個停頓會比較好

1. 00:10:436 - ~ 00:22:073 - 同futsuu

1. 00:10:436 - ~ 00:22:073 - 同muzu,建議改簡單一點, 至少要有1/1的停頓

• [Kantan]

1. 00:06:073 (5) - consider removing the finish ? As the music is soft, it would be a bit overemphasized to use a big don there.
2. 00:08:982 (9) - you may use finish here to accompany the noticeable cymbal sound if you change ^
3. 00:40:982 (47) - D would be better for both the stressed sound and the high-pitched vocal there.
4. 00:43:164 (49,50) - swapping these notes to d k could fit the vocal pitch in a way better.
5. 01:03:164 (26,27) - k d could fit both the snare rhythm and the vocal pattern there.
6. 01:06:800 (33) - move to 01:06:982 - and 01:07:164 (34) - move to 01:07:527 - . You may use appropriate number of 3/2 notes to make the map more fun.

• [Futsuu]

1. 00:06:073 (1) - same as Kantan
2. 00:08:982 (8) - ^
3. 00:16:255 (19,20,21,22) - I strongly recommend you to use d k and k d so that the vocal pitch could be followed well. Also, this could show a contrast to 00:19:164 (24,25,26,27) - which is k d and d k.
4. 00:30:436 (45,46,47) - d k d would be much better imo, as the pitch of the vocal and the instrument at 00:30:800 (46) - are higher than that at 00:30:436 (45,47) -
5. 00:40:982 (67) - same as Kantan
6. 00:43:891 (73) - d would be better for both the downbeat and the drop in vocal pitch.
7. 00:50:800 (89,90) - d k would be better, since the vocal at 00:50:982 (90) - is higher-pitched than that at 00:50:800 (89) -
8. 00:52:255 (93,94) - ^
9. 00:53:709 (97) - k would be better if you change ^ . This could show a better contrast to the previous patterns.
10. 01:06:618 (131) - consider moving this to 01:06:800 - and change to d ? The lyric at 01:06:800 - seems to be more significant than 01:06:618 -
11. 01:06:982 (132,133) - swap these notes to k d for following the vocal again ?
12. 01:16:618 (154) - d here if you want to emphasize the next high-pitched violin sound at 01:16:982 (155) -

• [Muzukashii]

1. 00:03:164 (6,7,8,9) - k k k d as you did at 00:00:255 (1,2,3,4) - ? As the pitch of the music in both parts is identical, it'd be better to keep the consistency.
2. 00:06:073 (11) - same as Kantan
3. 00:08:982 (22) - ^
4. 00:11:709 (31,32) - d k seems better. The vocal pitch at 00:11:709 (31) - is lower than that at 00:11:527 (30) - , so d could fit well. And k at 00:11:891 (32) - could map the guitar nicely, which you did it for the identical guitar at 00:12:436 (33) - .
5. 00:17:709 (49) - similar to ^ , use k ?
6. 00:18:618 (51) - d would be much better, as it has the same vocal pitch as 00:18:800 (52) -
7. 00:26:437 (77) - k would be nice for consistency as 00:23:527 (67) -
8. 00:32:436 (98) - consider deleting this to make a break so as to allow time for players to get ready for the next triplet ?
9. 00:33:073 - move this note to 00:32:891 - ? The flow of notes could be improved imo.
10. 00:37:709 (120) - try to use big don to follow the shout as well.
11. 00:40:982 (133) - same as Kantan
12. 00:46:800 - consider changing the pattern shorter like this ? (cursor at 00:46:800 - )
13. 00:53:164 (181) - change to k , 00:53:345 (182) - delete and 00:53:527 (183) - change to d ? This could emphasize the vocal more and shorten the 1/2 pattern.
14. 01:08:436 (245) - as the vocal pitch is low, D seems to be better.
15. 01:09:891 (251) - ^
16. 01:10:982 (256) - delete this in order to reduce the length of 1/2 notes and focus on the vocal more ?

• [Oni]
  
  In general, some notes could be removed in this diff so as to improve the diff spread between Muzukashii and Oni.

1. 00:06:073 (15) - same as Kantan
2. 00:09:891 (36) - you may delete this note. It does not follow anything actually.
3. 00:10:982 (40) - delete this to emphasize the vocal more ?
4. 00:12:891 (50) - similar to 00:09:891 (36) -
5. From 00:12:800 to 00:13:345 - k d d k in 1/2 to follow the vocal in a better way ?
6. 00:13:891 (53) - same as 00:10:982 (40) -
7. 00:14:800 (59) - k would be better for the guitar sound. You mapped 00:15:345 (63) - as k as well.
8. 00:24:164 (110,111) - consider deleting these to give a break there. The 1/2 pattern is quite long imo.
9. 00:27:073 (125,126) - ^
10. 00:29:345 (135) - k would be better to follow the high-pitched vocal.
11. 00:31:527 (144) - move to 00:31:345 - to follow the instrument there ?
12. 00:40:982 (199) - same as Kantan
13. 00:41:436 (202) - move to 00:41:618 - and change to k for following the vocal better.
14. 00:44:073 (218) - I recommend you to remove this note in order to give a break.
15. 00:45:164 (225) - ^
16. 00:46:073 (230,231,232) - kkd seems to fit the music more imo.
17. 00:54:800 (283,284,285,286,287,288) - try ddddk k ? Again, k could be used to emphasize the relatively high-pitched vocal.
18. 01:00:436 (313,314,315) - kkk would be better for the long tone of the instrument.
19. 01:01:527 (319,320) - d k ? High-pitched vocal occurs at 01:01:709 (320) -
20. 01:19:527 (416) - similar to 00:09:891 (36) -

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested by qoot.

[General]

The tag "love life" seems to be irrelevant to either the song or the anime. Delete it ?

• [Kantan]

1. 00:06:073 (5) - consider removing the finish ? As the music is soft, it would be a bit overemphasized to use a big don there.
2. 00:08:982 (9) - you may use finish here to accompany the noticeable cymbal sound if you change ^
3. 00:40:982 (47) - D would be better for both the stressed sound and the high-pitched vocal there.
4. 00:43:164 (49,50) - swapping these notes to d k could fit the vocal pitch in a way better.
5. 01:03:164 (26,27) - k d could fit both the snare rhythm and the vocal pattern there.
6. 01:06:800 (33) - move to 01:06:982 - and 01:07:164 (34) - move to 01:07:527 - . You may use appropriate number of 3/2 notes to make the map more fun.

• [Futsuu]

1. 00:06:073 (1) - same as Kantan
2. 00:08:982 (8) - ^
3. 00:16:255 (19,20,21,22) - I strongly recommend you to use d k and k d so that the vocal pitch could be followed well. Also, this could show a contrast to 00:19:164 (24,25,26,27) - which is k d and d k.
4. 00:30:436 (45,46,47) - d k d would be much better imo, as the pitch of the vocal and the instrument at 00:30:800 (46) - are higher than that at 00:30:436 (45,47) -
5. 00:40:982 (67) - same as Kantan
6. 00:43:891 (73) - d would be better for both the downbeat and the drop in vocal pitch.
7. 00:50:800 (89,90) - d k would be better, since the vocal at 00:50:982 (90) - is higher-pitched than that at 00:50:800 (89) -
8. 00:52:255 (93,94) - ^
9. 00:53:709 (97) - k would be better if you change ^ . This could show a better contrast to the previous patterns.
10. 01:06:618 (131) - consider moving this to 01:06:800 - and change to d ? The lyric at 01:06:800 - seems to be more significant than 01:06:618 -
11. 01:06:982 (132,133) - swap these notes to k d for following the vocal again ?
12. 01:16:618 (154) - d here if you want to emphasize the next high-pitched violin sound at 01:16:982 (155) -

• [Muzukashii]

1. 00:03:164 (6,7,8,9) - k k k d as you did at 00:00:255 (1,2,3,4) - ? As the pitch of the music in both parts is identical, it'd be better to keep the consistency.
2. 00:06:073 (11) - same as Kantan
3. 00:08:982 (22) - ^
4. 00:11:709 (31,32) - d k seems better. The vocal pitch at 00:11:709 (31) - is lower than that at 00:11:527 (30) - , so d could fit well. And k at 00:11:891 (32) - could map the guitar nicely, which you did it for the identical guitar at 00:12:436 (33) - .
5. 00:17:709 (49) - similar to ^ , use k ?
6. 00:18:618 (51) - d would be much better, as it has the same vocal pitch as 00:18:800 (52) -
7. 00:26:437 (77) - k would be nice for consistency as 00:23:527 (67) -
8. 00:32:436 (98) - consider deleting this to make a break so as to allow time for players to get ready for the next triplet ?
9. 00:33:073 - move this note to 00:32:891 - ? The flow of notes could be improved imo.
10. 00:37:709 (120) - try to use big don to follow the shout as well.
11. 00:40:982 (133) - same as Kantan
12. 00:46:800 - consider changing the pattern shorter like this ? (cursor at 00:46:800 - )
13. 00:53:164 (181) - change to k , 00:53:345 (182) - delete and 00:53:527 (183) - change to d ? This could emphasize the vocal more and shorten the 1/2 pattern.
14. 01:08:436 (245) - as the vocal pitch is low, D seems to be better.
15. 01:09:891 (251) - ^
16. 01:10:982 (256) - delete this in order to reduce the length of 1/2 notes and focus on the vocal more ?

• [Oni]
  
  In general, some notes could be removed in this diff so as to improve the diff spread between Muzukashii and Oni.

1. 00:06:073 (15) - same as Kantan
2. 00:09:891 (36) - you may delete this note. It does not follow anything actually.
3. 00:10:982 (40) - delete this to emphasize the vocal more ?
4. 00:12:891 (50) - similar to 00:09:891 (36) -
5. From 00:12:800 to 00:13:345 - k d d k in 1/2 to follow the vocal in a better way ?
6. 00:13:891 (53) - same as 00:10:982 (40) -
7. 00:14:800 (59) - k would be better for the guitar sound. You mapped 00:15:345 (63) - as k as well.
8. 00:24:164 (110,111) - consider deleting these to give a break there. The 1/2 pattern is quite long imo.
9. 00:27:073 (125,126) - ^
10. 00:29:345 (135) - k would be better to follow the high-pitched vocal.
11. 00:31:527 (144) - move to 00:31:345 - to follow the instrument there ?
12. 00:40:982 (199) - same as Kantan
13. 00:41:436 (202) - move to 00:41:618 - and change to k for following the vocal better.
14. 00:44:073 (218) - I recommend you to remove this note in order to give a break.
15. 00:45:164 (225) - ^
16. 00:46:073 (230,231,232) - kkd seems to fit the music more imo.
17. 00:54:800 (283,284,285,286,287,288) - try ddddk k ? Again, k could be used to emphasize the relatively high-pitched vocal.
18. 01:00:436 (313,314,315) - kkk would be better for the long tone of the instrument.
19. 01:01:527 (319,320) - d k ? High-pitched vocal occurs at 01:01:709 (320) -
20. 01:19:527 (416) - similar to 00:09:891 (36) -

That's all and good luck~

mingmichael wrote:

i'm going to mod this after you apply qoot's and nardo's mods

mingmichael wrote:

okay then. here i go

Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

General

☞ okay!

Notes Structure

☞ okay!

Notes

• this spinner will make the Kantan players confused 00:48:255 (1) - . well yah it's because the spinner is too short and after the spinner comes, there's a note (big note) on 00:49:527 - , on the red strike in 1/2. ofc this 1/2 note could make the Kantan players become confused too, but it's not a big problem since it follows the vocals. so then, try to remove the spinner and add note (kat) on 00:48:073 -
and i would suggest you to keep the long break on 00:48:255 - ~ 00:49:345 - . why? this break could really help the kantan player to read the 1/2 note which comes out on 00:49:527 -

• change 00:52:618 - to be kat and move 00:52:982 - to 00:53:709 - . and also change 00:53:345 - to be kat. it will be much better to follow the pitch sounds there

====================


[ Futsuu]

General

☞ okay!

Notes Structure

☞ okay!

Notes

• this pattern is too random suddenly 00:16:255 (27,28,29,30) - . well i know that you wanted to try follow the vocals or another sounds with doublets. but actually it doesn't match and not really comfortable to be played since you used single or 3 notes patterns from 00:10:436 - . kay then try to move 00:16:618 - to 00:15:891 - and move 00:17:345 - to 00:16:982 -

• change 00:18:436 - to be kat and move 00:19:527 - to 00:18:800 - . after you change it, you can see if it has a same vocal & pattern like 00:13:345 (22,23,24) -

• move 00:20:255 - to 00:19:891 -

• try to move 00:35:527 - to 00:35:164 - and change it to be don. i changed it to follow the first vocal (after "Heyy!" comes out)
and also it will be same like 00:37:345 - ~ 00:38:073 - if you look that pattern

• move 00:38:436 - to 00:39:164 - and change 00:38:800 - and 00:39:164 - to be o o

• here, i know that you wanted to follow the vocal on 00:49:345 - , didn't you? well it's a nice idea if you wanted to do it~ but tbh this note which follows the vocal will make a confusing patterns because it comes out on 1/2 and it still has a 1/2 note+finisher on 00:49:527 - . so i deleted 00:49:345 - to give a little break to press the 1/2 finisher on 00:49:527 -

• same like above ^ . if you apply above, make sure that you delete 01:00:982 - to keep the consistency of the pattern

====================


[ Muzukashii]

General

☞ okay!

Notes Structure

☞ okay!

Notes

• add a note (don) on 00:17:527 - , like you did on 00:11:709 -

• move 00:19:345 - to 00:18:982 - and change 00:18:618 - ~ 00:19:164 - to be o o o o. it will be much better to follow the vocal pitch sounds

• add a note (kat) on 00:30:436 - . it will support the violin pitch sound

====================


[ Oni]

General

☞ okay!

Notes Structure

☞ okay!

Notes

• change 00:14:618 - to be kat

• change 00:15:709 - and 00:15:891 - to be o o. it's to follow the don kat patterns that you used (mostly kats are on the white strikes)

• how about try this from 00:20:073 - ~ 00:22:073 -

it will flow the song much better with the constant patterns (o o o o) and also it's more interesting and better to be played too

• change 00:26:436 - and 00:26:618 - to be o o. this vocal on 00:26:436 - will be much better to be emphasized by the don than a kat (i think you used kat because it has a same pitch sound with 00:26:255 - , didn't you?)

• change 00:28:618 - to be don here. the vocal has dropped there

• a missing note on 00:30:436 - . try to add a note (kat) on there. after that, change 00:30:255 - to be don

• i don't get about the triplet on 00:31:709 - actually ._. the music/vocal doesn't give any triplet sounds there, just the normal one. okay, try to delete it and add a note on 00:31:709 - ; 00:31:891 - and 00:32:073 - with o o o. if you have changed it, you will see the whole pattern too

it would be much better right? the pattern is well mapped too and it gives an interesting patterns too!

• change 00:51:891 - to be kat. it will be better with ooo-triplet IMO

====================


basically whole of diffs are nice-mapped, just need some mods more to improve your map
goodluck!

bbj0920 wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue.

love life in tags? lol. And actually you don't have to put love live into tags, it's already in source.

Kantan

SPOILER

00:40:982 (47) - No, finisher doesn't fit this part
01:22:436 (60,61,62) - d k d

Futsuu

SPOILER

00:33:709 (60) - No finisher here
00:48:073 (89,90) - K
01:02:436 (126) - k - Following the rhythm.

Muzukashii

SPOILER

00:05:164 (10) - k
00:40:982 (134) - Same as Kantan
00:50:618 (167,168,169) - k

Oni

SPOILER

00:24:073 (110,111,112,113) - This pattern kinda doesn't fit this part

qoot8123 wrote:

No KD

Kantan :

SV改成1.4,由於最近的新rule, 所以如果不是太快的歌都不要用1.20

01:14:431 - 綠線沒對齊好

00:40:982 (47) - 這裡應該不需要用到大圓

01:06:800 (33,34) - 這裡改成這樣會比較簡單

01:13:709 (45,46) - 這兩個note可以刪掉,打起來會比較簡單

Futsuu:

SV改成1.4,原因同kantan

01:14:431 - 時間軸沒對齊

00:15:527 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - 這裡建議像這樣,做個比較大的停頓,跟下一段作區別會比較好


Muzu:

01:14:431 - 同futsuu

00:32:618 (100,101,102,103,104,105) - 建議改成這樣 跟音樂會比較合

00:40:982 (134) - 同futsuu

Oni:

01:14:431 - 同muzu

00:24:073 (110,111,112,113) - 這裡改成 dd dk 跟vocal會比較合

00:55:709 (293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301) - 建議改成這樣 跟vcoal也是比較合

01:13:800 (390,392) - 這兩個有點多餘,建議刪掉

01:16:436 (405,406,407,408) - 這裡用一般的三連音就夠了

01:22:255 (435,436,437,438,439,440) - ^

01:25:618 (451) - 建議刪掉,這裡放三連音不是很恰當

00:42:618 (215,216,217,218,219,220,221) - 試試看這樣 聽起來比較舒服

大致上就這些,改好之後就叫我recheck

1. Removed some notes to represent better the song with breaks.
2. Tweaked a few patterns.
3. Changed BG for a higher quality one.
4. Added some tags.

21:21 ak74qbz95xm8: Hi ddk
21:22 ak74qbz95xm8: mod my map now?
21:24 ak74qbz95xm8: do you want to irc mod or thread mod?
21:34 ak74qbz95xm8: have to go out now...plz give me a forum PM,Thx!><
23:18 ak74qbz95xm8: Hi ddk I'm coming back
23:18 ak74qbz95xm8: have time now?
23:19 DakeDekaane: hi
23:19 DakeDekaane: yeah
23:19 ak74qbz95xm8: ok thx!
23:19 ak74qbz95xm8: irc mod plz?
23:22 DakeDekaane: let me test them again
23:23 ak74qbz95xm8: sure
23:23 ak74qbz95xm8: plz
23:29 DakeDekaane: are you ready?
23:30 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
23:31 *DakeDekaane is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/447389 u's - Donna Toki mo Zutto [Kantan]]
23:31 DakeDekaane: 00:21:345 (22) - you could remove this note to have a small break for the held vocals
23:32 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:32 DakeDekaane: 00:28:618 (30) - this one too, to keep consistency in your 3-note patterns, music is the same so not much reason to have something that different
23:33 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:33 DakeDekaane: 00:30:436 - and you could add a don here to put some emphasis for the vocals
23:34 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:35 DakeDekaane: 00:54:800 (10) - you could remove this one too, to have a small break for the vocals
23:35 DakeDekaane: 01:00:436 (19) - same
23:35 DakeDekaane: 01:06:436 (29) - ^
23:36 DakeDekaane: 01:08:982 (33) - ^
23:36 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:37 DakeDekaane: that'd be all for that diff
23:37 ak74qbz95xm8: alright
23:38 *DakeDekaane is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/447387 u's - Donna Toki mo Zutto [Futsuu]]
23:38 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
23:38 DakeDekaane: 00:09:709 (17) - this can be removed to create a break that would fit nicely between both parts
23:39 DakeDekaane: 00:31:527 (54) - ^
23:39 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah it's right
23:39 DakeDekaane: 00:44:618 (81) - ^
23:39 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:40 DakeDekaane:  00:54:436 (105,106) - these two too
23:41 ak74qbz95xm8: umm
23:41 ak74qbz95xm8: 00:55:345 (105)
23:41 DakeDekaane: for the break in vocals I mean
23:41 DakeDekaane: 00:54:436 - 
23:42 ak74qbz95xm8: but I think it keeps consistency
23:42 ak74qbz95xm8: But if you determine...alright
23:42 DakeDekaane: yeah, but as you've been following vocals, it'd be better to have a break there :p
23:43 ak74qbz95xm8: could I keep 105?
23:43 DakeDekaane: can you paste the timestamp?
23:43 DakeDekaane: just to be sure
23:43 ak74qbz95xm8: 00:55:345 (105)
23:44 DakeDekaane: without the note, because I think we're having some misunderstanding x_X
23:44 DakeDekaane: just the time
23:44 ak74qbz95xm8: this  00:54:436  I can delete it
23:44 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:45 DakeDekaane: notes in 00:54:436 - and 00:54:800 - are the ones I'm suggesting to remove
23:45 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:46 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:46 DakeDekaane: 01:06:436 - the note there could be deleted to, for the vocals
23:47 ak74qbz95xm8: ehh there's a "gan" voice here
23:47 DakeDekaane: oh right
23:47 DakeDekaane: sorry
23:47 DakeDekaane: 01:05:528 (134) - how about making this a big note? it'd fit nicely with the strong vocals
23:48 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:48 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:48 DakeDekaane: 01:08:436 (141,145) - same for these two
23:49 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:49 DakeDekaane: 01:16:982 (160) - probably remove this note to cut a bit the long pattern
23:49 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:50 DakeDekaane: 01:20:073 (167) - probably make this a big note too
23:50 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:50 DakeDekaane: 01:22:800 (173) - not really needed to, but probably remove this note too, for consistency with the previous deleted note
23:51 ak74qbz95xm8: alright.done
23:51 DakeDekaane: let's move to Muzukashii now
23:51 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
23:53 DakeDekaane: 00:20:618 (60) - you could move this to 00:20:982 - you'd follow better the vocals imo
23:54 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:54 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:54 DakeDekaane: 00:31:527 (97,98) - you could remove these notes, to have some break that would fit nice to create some tension before the kiai
23:55 DakeDekaane: wait, before the next part, I confused a bit
23:55 DakeDekaane: not kiai x_X
23:56 ak74qbz95xm8: so shall I keep them?
23:56 DakeDekaane: no, remove them, but the reason is to have some breaks, to represent the song nicely
23:56 DakeDekaane: as there's a vocal break there
23:57 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
23:57 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:57 DakeDekaane: 00:35:891 (113) - you could make this a don so you keep only kats for the "let's go"
23:58 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
23:58 ak74qbz95xm8: done
23:59 DakeDekaane: 00:38:800 (124) - same for this one
23:59 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:00 DakeDekaane: 00:42:255 (137) - this could be removed, I don't feel like the note is needed there, don't know how to explain it
00:01 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
00:01 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:02 DakeDekaane: 00:54:255 (183,184,185,186) - this ones could be removed to create a break for the vocals, as you've been basing your mapping a bit on vocals
00:04 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:05 DakeDekaane: 00:56:255 (194) - how about removing this note, it'd make the diff a bit easier and you'll keep a bit this 3-notes pattern consistency, like 00:49:891 (163,164,165,166,167,168,169) - 
00:06 ak74qbz95xm8: could I add a don at 00:54:800
00:06 ak74qbz95xm8: 00:54:800
00:07 ak74qbz95xm8: it's not link lol
00:07 DakeDekaane: well, that'd sound a bit weird
00:07 DakeDekaane: imo
00:07 ak74qbz95xm8: done above
00:08 ak74qbz95xm8: alright I'll delete it
00:08 DakeDekaane: same suggestion about removing for 01:02:073 (216) - and 01:03:527 (224) - 
00:08 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:09 DakeDekaane: and removing 01:09:164 (245) - and 01:10:618 (251) - would make the map follow vocals better, don't know if that was your intention
00:09 DakeDekaane:  01:14:073 (266) - same for this one
00:11 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah they do follow vocals better
00:11 ak74qbz95xm8: 01:14:07
00:11 ak74qbz95xm8: 01:14:073 (266)
00:11 ak74qbz95xm8: I want to keep this though...
00:11 DakeDekaane: it's okay to keep that
00:11 DakeDekaane: 01:16:527 (278,280) - and removing this notes would make it a bit more different than Oni, also it'd be consistent with 01:21:709 (296,297,298,299,300,301) - 
00:12 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah it's right
00:13 ak74qbz95xm8: donw
00:13 ak74qbz95xm8: done*
00:13 DakeDekaane: and that'd be all, now, let's finish with the Oni, which was nice
00:13 ak74qbz95xm8: Thx ><
00:13 ak74qbz95xm8: start yeah
00:14 DakeDekaane: 00:06:255 (16,25) - you could remove these notes so 00:06:073 (15,24) - could have more emphasis by being alone
00:15 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:17 DakeDekaane: 00:30:982 (147,148) - these could be removed, I think it'll keep consistency with the previous patterns for vocals
00:18 DakeDekaane: sec
00:18 ak74qbz95xm8: but I think it fits the instrument...
00:18 DakeDekaane: okay
00:20 DakeDekaane: 00:36:800 (182) - you could remove this note to have consistency with 00:34:982 - 
00:21 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
00:21 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:21 DakeDekaane: 00:43:436 (220,221) - shouldn't this be kd, to have consistency with the previous?
00:23 ak74qbz95xm8: donw
00:23 ak74qbz95xm8: done*
00:23 DakeDekaane: 00:46:164 (235) - I think this note interrupts the main instrument here, maybe remove it?
00:24 ak74qbz95xm8: alright
00:24 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:25 DakeDekaane: 01:00:527 (318,319,320) - I think these notes interrupt the vocals a bit, you should remove them, personally I think the small break would fit nicely, don't know what you think
00:27 ak74qbz95xm8: umm
00:27 ak74qbz95xm8: 01:00:800 (314)
00:28 ak74qbz95xm8: I 'll keep this
00:28 DakeDekaane:  alright
00:28 DakeDekaane: 01:08:436 (361,370) - these should be big notes like I suggested in the other difficulties
00:29 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:29 DakeDekaane: 01:20:073 (422) - this too
00:29 DakeDekaane: a big note
00:30 ak74qbz95xm8: done
00:30 DakeDekaane: 01:20:073 (422) - and this could be removed because this is a bit long considering the whole map
00:30 DakeDekaane: the pattern, I mean
00:31 ak74qbz95xm8: wait?
00:31 ak74qbz95xm8: but here is a "de" voice
00:31 DakeDekaane: wait, I highlighted the wrong note, it was 01:21:527 (430) - 
00:32 DakeDekaane: x_X
00:32 ak74qbz95xm8: ;w;
00:32 ak74qbz95xm8: alright
00:32 ak74qbz95xm8: donw
00:32 ak74qbz95xm8: e*
00:32 DakeDekaane: let me get a higher resolution for your BG so you could update it and I'll give a final check
00:33 ak74qbz95xm8: ohh
00:33 ak74qbz95xm8: thx
00:38 ak74qbz95xm8: wait.. some is wrong with my puush all the time
00:38 ak74qbz95xm8: do you have other ways?
00:41 DakeDekaane: oh
00:41 DakeDekaane: if it's for the BG I already have them
00:43 ak74qbz95xm8: and...
00:43 DakeDekaane: uploading
00:43 ak74qbz95xm8: how can I get them?
00:43 ak74qbz95xm8: ok
00:44 DakeDekaane: here's something similar to your actual BG: http://puu.sh/dtWFY.jpg
00:45 DakeDekaane: and here's something with a bit more appropriate aspect ratio (16:9): http://puu.sh/dtWLr.jpg
00:46 DakeDekaane: pick one, update, and let me know
00:47 ak74qbz95xm8: alright
00:47 ak74qbz95xm8: and I'm a little not familiar with the mapping system
00:48 ak74qbz95xm8: should I find my bubble giver again?
00:49 DakeDekaane: well, I have no problem with qualifying it as it is, as I didn't pop the bubble, but if you feel you'd want another BAT opinion, I'll rebubble
00:51 ak74qbz95xm8: umm.. could I find previous BAT who gave me the bub to pop the bub again,and let you rank my map?
00:52 ak74qbz95xm8: or actually the two ways have no difference?
00:52 DakeDekaane: I'll explain better, qoot bubbled the map, I checked the bubble and found it good to be qualified after this fixes, so no need to find qoot again :p
00:53 ak74qbz95xm8: does it means a map can be qualified though its bub is broken?
00:54 DakeDekaane: yup, bubble is always popped after any update, it's up to the checking BAT to rebubble or qualify
00:55 DakeDekaane: or find the BAT who bubbled it to repair the bubble if there's no BAT checking it in that moment
00:55 ak74qbz95xm8: oh I see
00:55 ak74qbz95xm8: Thank you for telling me
00:56 ak74qbz95xm8: and it's really kind of you ><
00:56 DakeDekaane: np, that's why we're here :p
00:58 DakeDekaane: have you updated?
00:59 ak74qbz95xm8: ok I'm going to update now
00:59 DakeDekaane: okay
01:00 ak74qbz95xm8: okay
01:00 ak74qbz95xm8: ><
01:00 ak74qbz95xm8: final check plz
01:05 DakeDekaane: let's see, in Futsuu, add a note in 00:55:891 - probably a kat to keep consistency with previous patterns
01:06 DakeDekaane: (I think this got removed in the misunderstanding)
01:06 ak74qbz95xm8: ohhh my fault
01:06 ak74qbz95xm8: done
01:07 DakeDekaane: 01:07:345 (132,135) - wasn't these big notes?
01:07 DakeDekaane: I mean, these 01:08:436 (135,139) - 
01:07 DakeDekaane: 01:10:800 (141) - and this shouldn't be a big note
01:08 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
01:08 ak74qbz95xm8: done
01:08 ak74qbz95xm8: (too many misunderstandings lol)
01:10 DakeDekaane: in Oni, 00:36:255 (178,194) - these should be the same, either big notes or normal notes
01:12 ak74qbz95xm8: does it means I should add a finsh at 00:39:164 (194)
01:12 ak74qbz95xm8: ?
01:12 DakeDekaane: that or remove the finish in 00:36:255 (178) - 
01:13 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
01:13 ak74qbz95xm8: I did former
01:14 DakeDekaane: 00:43:436 (217,218,219,220) - and this should be kd k d or dk k d
01:14 DakeDekaane: plays better imo
01:15 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
01:15 ak74qbz95xm8: I think it's another understanding
01:15 ak74qbz95xm8: ;w;
01:15 DakeDekaane: dw
01:16 ak74qbz95xm8: anything else?
01:18 DakeDekaane: why is love life in tags?
01:19 ak74qbz95xm8: ehh... previous modder's mod
01:19 ak74qbz95xm8: shall I delete it?
01:19 DakeDekaane: I don't think it's needed
01:19 ak74qbz95xm8: alright
01:21 DakeDekaane: probably copy the japanese title (ラブライブ!) from here: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/222248, don't know anything about love live, so I won't tell you to add all those characters lol
01:21 DakeDekaane: and add it in tags
01:22 ak74qbz95xm8: yeah
01:22 ak74qbz95xm8: thx a lot
01:22 DakeDekaane: that'd be all
01:22 DakeDekaane: go update and tell me when done
01:25 ak74qbz95xm8: finish updating
01:25 ak74qbz95xm8: ;w;
01:28 ak74qbz95xm8: anything alright now?
01:28 DakeDekaane: checking the tags, because dunno if the song belongs to the album
01:30 ak74qbz95xm8: ohhh my fault
01:30 DakeDekaane: delete the tags: insert song Best Album Collection Xinely
01:30 DakeDekaane: others can be kept, I think
01:31 ak74qbz95xm8: yes
01:32 ak74qbz95xm8: finish updating now
01:35 DakeDekaane: doing the last test in case I missed something else
01:37 ak74qbz95xm8: sure
01:37 ak74qbz95xm8: plz

examination wrote:

gratz

邪教胜利

Charlotte wrote:

gratz!

gokugohan12468 wrote:

Gratzz for your first Ranked Map~

woshiguabi wrote:

操你妈L狗垃圾 全家扎拉
graz!

1. Disqualified for spread concerns between Oni and Muzukashii.
2. There are also quality concerns about the vocal-beat mapping in Kantan.

1. 00:21:345 (34,35) - Hm. Might be not bad to delete these notes for another rest moment as you had at 00:15:527 and 00:31:527. Yes, at 00:21:345 are some sounds for these patterns, but you have no rest moment from 00:16:255 to 00:30:800 for 14 seconds, which is much. In case you really dislike the change, you can try to have some restmoment, starting from 00:22:073 .
2. 00:33:709~00:39:527 - This section should have less notes. When paying attention to the background and vocal, you notice that it is 'quieter'. It has less impact than the other parts before and aftwards, yet it provides the same amount of notes like the other parts. Please change that by reducing the note density here, so the differences become clear. It would also emphasize upcoming part due to rise of notes.

1. 00:24:436 (71,72) - Recommending to keep the way you mapped before by deleting such notes and have at least small rest moments between notes.
2. 00:33:709~00:39:527 - Same case like in Futsuu.

OnosakiHito wrote:

Reason for Disqualification

1. Disqualified for spread concerns between Oni and Muzukashii.
2. There are also quality concerns about the vocal-beat mapping in Kantan.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Modding

[ Kantan]

SPOILER

Kantan feels sometimes like a mix of beat-vocal mapping, which in most cases works fine with the vocal. Sometimes however, it doesn't work really well since the clash / conflict between vocal and beatmapping becomes too big (Tasha and Love noticed it and gave examples). I will mention it once again downbelow.

1. 00:33:709 (36,40) - Note (36) is a finisher while (40) isn't one. For consistency, I would either delete the finisher or change (40) to one.
2. 00:39:527~00:43:891 - That's one vocal-beat clash we have in this map. First, the previous 1/1 triplets follow the vocal in a nice way and then, suddenly at 00:39:527 it becomes a straight 2/1 pattern, which has just barely something to do with the vocal. It can be discussed about if it's now good or not, but it can confuse lower players since they do not know what to follow exactly. It might be enough to delete just the note at 00:40:255 (45) - to gain your previous mapping way back(the triplets).
3. 00:43:891~00:46:800 - Not a must, but a spinner would be possible. After all these triplets, the spinner could fungate as "fake rest moment", since it doesn't need to be hit up to the end after all.
4. 00:49:527~00:54:073 - Another vocal-beat clash. First and last patterns in this section fit to the vocal while the middle part are just straight 2/1 notes.
   I have something else to suggest, in case you want to follow the vocal(which are actually strong emphasized here):
   Highlighted notes = finisher
5. 00:58:436 (15) - How comes this is the only finisher here? I can understand if all 00:58:436 (15,16,17) - are finishers, but in current way, (15) stands as finisher rather alone.
6. 01:01:164~01:05:709 - Vocal-Beat clash. Same suggestion like above.
7. 01:20:982 - This note can be deleted to be consistent with 01:15:164 and provide some rest moments as well.

I think the Kantan can be still refined at certain parts. I see some good atempts here and if I'm not wrong, mapper tried to make it easy.
But maybe because of that try, it kinda went a bit out of hand in some parts? I'm not sure, but even so, it lacks a bit of structure on certain parts which has been mentioned before.

All done.

[ Futsuu]

1. 00:21:345 (34,35) - Hm. Might be not bad to delete these notes for another rest moment as you had at 00:15:527 and 00:31:527. Yes, at 00:21:345 are some sounds for these patterns, but you have no rest moment from 00:16:255 to 00:30:800 for 14 seconds, which is much. In case you really dislike the change, you can try to have some restmoment, starting from 00:22:073 .
2. 00:33:709~00:39:527 - This section should have less notes. When paying attention to the background and vocal, you notice that it is 'quieter'. It has less impact than the other parts before and aftwards, yet it provides the same amount of notes like the other parts. Please change that by reducing the note density here, so the differences become clear. It would also emphasize upcoming part due to rise of notes.
   
   All done.

[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:24:436 (71,72) - Recommending to keep the way you mapped before by deleting such notes and have at least small rest moments between notes.
2. 00:33:709~00:39:527 - Same case like in Futsuu.
   
   All done.

[ Oni]

To be honest, overall I'm fine with the Oni. But you should consider having at some parts less 1/4 notes like at 00:33:709 or making some patterns easier, for example the ooxox patterns. It's not a big jump from Muzu to Oni, but it is still significant at some point. While Muzu is mostly mapped to 1/2 patterns, Oni suddenly provides some complex patterns, such as two-plets bounded together with triplets or unique patterns like ddkdk in the kiai.


The spread from Muzu to Oni can be probably easy fixed. As I said, tuning down the Oni just a bit might be enough. But Kantan should have some checkes before it gets requalified again. Overall, good attempt. Good luck!

All done.

1. OD4,5 on Muzukashii? There's a big gap between Muzu and Oni so having the same OD is kinda...
2. From 00:10:436 - until 00:49:527 - and again from 01:14:436 - until the end, it's hard to hear hitsounds, while the intro's hitsounds are loud in comparison.
   Consider: The whole map at 100% audio / Vocals at 100% and the instrumental intro at 70~80%
   Or: 00:00:255 - 60~70% 00:06:073 - 80~90% 00:10:436 - 90~100% 00:49:527 - 100% 01:14:436 - 90~100%

1. 00:39:527 (44) - Add a finish here too maybe?
2. 01:08:618 (31) - Should be at 01:08:436 - to follow vocals correctly.
3. 01:10:073 (33) - Same here, should be at 01:09:891 -
4. 01:10:436 (34) - Remove this one maybe?

1. 00:51:891 (167) - Delete for consistency with 00:50:436 - ? The current pattern might be a bit too hard for Muzu too.

1. 00:36:618 (178) - d?
2. 01:00:073 (311,312) - Add finishers? Those notes and the song are similar to the previous note.

Kurosanyan wrote:

~~~

[General]

1. OD4,5 on Muzukashii? There's a big gap between Muzu and Oni so having the same OD is kinda...
2. From 00:10:436 - until 00:49:527 - and again from 01:14:436 - until the end, it's hard to hear hitsounds, while the intro's hitsounds are loud in comparison.
   Consider: The whole map at 100% audio / Vocals at 100% and the instrumental intro at 70~80%
   Or: 00:00:255 - 60~70% 00:06:073 - 80~90% 00:10:436 - 90~100% 00:49:527 - 100% 01:14:436 - 90~100%
   
   All done

[Kantan]

1. 00:39:527 (44) - Add a finish here too maybe?
2. 01:08:618 (31) - Should be at 01:08:436 - to follow vocals correctly.
3. 01:10:073 (33) - Same here, should be at 01:09:891 -
4. 01:10:436 (34) - Remove this one maybe?
   
   All done

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:51:891 (167) - Delete for consistency with 00:50:436 - ? The current pattern might be a bit too hard for Muzu too.
   
   Done

[Oni]

1. 00:36:618 (178) - d?
2. 01:00:073 (311,312) - Add finishers? Those notes and the song are similar to the previous note.
   
   All done

That's all~

Thx,very useful mod!

_Gezo_ wrote:

This is only a quick check; once you have applied the surrounding mods you may call me. #ForLuttii wait what

[General]
Preview point unsnapped! Snap to 00:49:345 - .

Done.

[Kantan]

01:02:618 (22) - For consistency with the first part, change to D.
01:13:709 (39,40,41) - Delete 40, to move 41 at 01:14:255 - . Vocally speaking it seems way more correct.
I didn't mention the other note misplacements, Kurosanyan has mentioned them already.

All done.

[Futsuu]
00:34:436 (56,57,58,59) - Why not a similar rhythm to Kantan ? Would fit a lot better to me.
00:37:345 (61,62,63,64) - ^
00:53:345 (95,96,97) - This rhythm feels a bit wrong, maybe have x . . x . x ? Something like this: http://i.chiyozel.com/eTKj9ymN, or http://i.chiyozel.com/805Vjic5 like you did on 01:04:618 (122,123,124,125) - . (Don't mind the colors! It's up to you to choose wisely)
01:14:073 (144,145) - If they were half a beat earlier, it would be correct regarding your vocal mapping.

All done

[Muzu]
00:14:800 (42) - If 00:11:891 (32) - is to the guitar, make it k. Else, if 32 is to the vocal, invert 32 and 42. To the guitar yeah~
00:30:618 (93,94,95) - No real cue for 1/4 here, you might want to delete the middle note.

All done

[Oni]
00:26:982 (125,126,127,128) - and similar, I don't really get the point of such patterns :<
00:39:800 (195,196) - bu;w;
00:41:982 (207,208) - 不;w; (both patterns do not really have a cue to them)
tbh,I don't really think the patterns are bad.They just make the rhythm more smart.Hope to make further discussion with you ;w;

Don't forget to answer Kurosanyan's mod! I didn't point out what was already pointed out

Thx!

Stefan wrote:

Good thing this will be bubbled soon. When it's bubbled, leave me a PM. Sorry for the huge delay~

1. Kantan 的 PreviewTime 跟其他難度不同

1. 00:56:800 (13,14,16) - 顏色對調,跟vocal比較合
2. 01:02:073 (21,23) - ^
3. 01:14:255 (39) - 移到01:14:436 - ,位置放錯了

1. 01:14:255 (145) - 同kantan

1. 00:23:436 (104) - 換成don,比較能加強00:23:527 (105) - 這裡的kat
2. 00:25:345 (116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125) - 這裡改成這樣,跟vocal比較合
3. 00:38:255 (189,190) - 這兩個note調換,跟00:35:164 (172,173,175) - 做對比
4. 00:53:164 (274,276) -ctrl+g,跟vocal比較合

qoot8123 wrote:

NO KD

[General]

1. Kantan 的 PreviewTime 跟其他難度不同

[Kantan]

1. 00:56:800 (13,14,16) - 顏色對調,跟vocal比較合
2. 01:02:073 (21,23) - ^
3. 01:14:255 (39) - 移到01:14:436 - ,位置放錯了

[futsuu]

1. 01:14:255 (145) - 同kantan

[oni]

1. 00:23:436 (104) - 換成don,比較能加強00:23:527 (105) - 這裡的kat
2. 00:25:345 (116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125) - 這裡改成這樣,跟vocal比較合
3. 00:38:255 (189,190) - 這兩個note調換,跟00:35:164 (172,173,175) - 做對比
4. 00:53:164 (274,276) -ctrl+g,跟vocal比較合

DakeDekaane wrote:

I don't know if Stefan will be checking this, but I'll drop a small mod anyway.

[ Kantan]
00:42:800 - A note here could be cool to have the vocal phrase fully mapped.
01:14:436 - 01:16:618 - A spinner could fit nicely for vocals, and will fit better and will be somehow consistent with your other spinners.
01:17:345 (42) - If you put the spinner I suggested above, move this note to 01:17:709 - for vocals. I add the spinner but didn't use this
01:20:073 (46) - This should be a big note, it has the same emphasis as 01:18:800 (44,45). Alternatively, you could put a spinner in 01:20:073 - 01:21:709 - to be consistent with 01:25:891 (1) - , not a must, though.
All done except the one I mention.

[ Futsuu]
00:25:345 (39) - Could be moved to 00:25:345 (39) - , so it's consistent with 00:27:164 (42,43,44) - as rhythm isn't much different here.
00:42:436 (70) - Probably remove to focus a bit more on vocals, as you've been doing.
00:43:891 - 00:46:800 - You could use a spinner here as you did in Kantan, not a must.
All done.

[ Muzukashii]
00:09:345 (23,24,25,26) - These notes could be removed to create a break that could fit nicely with the instrument you followed in 00:06:073 (11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22) -
Done

[ Oni]
00:10:073 (34) - Could be removed to have a small break. Do it if you did what I suggested in Muzukashii for this part.
ehhh..I really want to keep this...but if you determine,I'll revise it
That's all.