@Yukiteru Amano
They could easily do that, actually, but bundling baltic languages together seems about as silly as bundling scandinavian languages together, (especially since if they make it a "baltic" channel they have to include estonian, due to it's geographic definition as a baltic state, which is in a completely different language group).
Overall I think it would benefit the channel's survivability if they were split, since our languages aren't mutually-intelligible (despite their linguistic similarities) and it would most likely just create a channel with bigger potential that is actually used less than any of the language specific ones by themselves.
I don't particularly see any benefits from merging them, (except maybe making the channel list a bit shorter, which feels like a really awkward reason to be merging language specific channels).
They could easily do that, actually, but bundling baltic languages together seems about as silly as bundling scandinavian languages together, (especially since if they make it a "baltic" channel they have to include estonian, due to it's geographic definition as a baltic state, which is in a completely different language group).
Overall I think it would benefit the channel's survivability if they were split, since our languages aren't mutually-intelligible (despite their linguistic similarities) and it would most likely just create a channel with bigger potential that is actually used less than any of the language specific ones by themselves.
I don't particularly see any benefits from merging them, (except maybe making the channel list a bit shorter, which feels like a really awkward reason to be merging language specific channels).