基本上全部更改
除了00:47:351 (138) - delete for simplicity if you change ^
我覺得那或許是必要的(?
除了00:47:351 (138) - delete for simplicity if you change ^
我覺得那或許是必要的(?
謝謝您的Mod^^Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested.
- [General]
- Increase the volume of all timing points by 10% ? The current setting is a bit low imo.
- According to the official website, you need to change the title to KiRa-KiRa Sensation! (TVサイズ) and the romanised title to KiRa-KiRa Sensation! (TV Size) :
- [Kantan]
Both HP and OD -2 ? Kantan with OD 5 is just too harsh for beginners.
Remove Widescreen Support.
- 00:26:428 (19) - D ? The music has equal stress as 00:25:351 (18,20) -
- 00:51:197 (51) - consider removing the finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo.
- 01:15:197 (79,80,81) - maybe d k k for following the vocal pitch ?
- 01:18:274 (86) - similar to ^ , d would be better.
- 01:21:812 (90) - move to 01:21:659 - and add k at 01:21:966 - ? This could fit the vocal well.
- 01:23:043 - add k here if you change ^
- 01:24:428 (93) - I think you may have missed the finish here ?
- 01:26:889 (98) - k would be better for the stronger music.
- 01:27:505 (99,100,101) - make it the same as 01:17:659 (84,85,86) - for consistency ?
- [Futsuu]
Both HP and OD -1 for a better spread ?
- 00:30:889 (45) - change to d and add k at 00:31:351 - for following the pitch of the guitar ?
- 00:39:812 - you may add k here for the noticeable beat.
- 00:40:120 (65,66) - k d could result in a better flow if you change ^
- 00:55:505 (99) - k would be better for the relatively high-pitched vocal.
- 01:02:274 (114,115) - k d , ^
- 01:03:505 (116) - move to 01:03:351 - for both the beat and vocal ?
- 01:05:351 (120) - same as 00:55:505 (99) -
- 01:15:197 (143,144,145) - same as Kantan
- 01:16:428 (146) - k as you did in Kantan ?
- 01:21:505 (157,158) - d k would be better as the vocal at 01:21:812 (158) - is higher-pitched than that at 01:21:505 (157) -
- 01:24:428 (163) - same as Kantan
- 01:32:889 (180,181,182) - adding finish here could result in a better emphasis of the lyrics.
- 01:46:120 (205) - K as you did at 00:29:812 (43) - for pattern consistency.
- 01:47:197 (207) - change to d and add k at 01:47:659 - for following the pitch of the guitar ?
- 01:47:812 (208) - move to 01:48:120 - if you change ^
- [Muzukashii]
Maybe HP -1 for a better spread ?
- 00:14:428 (21,22) - consider deleting them ? A bit unnecessary imo.
- 00:30:274 (63,64) - d k would be better for following the snare rhythm.
- 00:46:428 (134) - move to 00:46:736 - and 00:46:889 (136) - move to 00:47:043 - for following the vocal ?
- 00:47:351 (138) - delete for simplicity if you change ^
- 00:51:197 (157) - k ? It has the same vocal pitch as 00:49:966 (151) -
- 00:59:197 (185) - k could match both the snare and the relatively high-pitched vocal imo.
- 01:03:197 (198,199) - d k could follow the increase in vocal pitch at 01:03:351 -
- 01:09:966 (226,227) - d d could fit the drop in vocal pitch in a way better.
- 01:14:274 (243) - you may delete this note to give a nice rest before the kiai.
- 01:17:505 (256) - It seems that d could suit the lower-pitched vocal there.
- 01:20:889 (273) - k would be better as it has the same vocal pitch as the previous 01:20:274 (271) -
- 01:22:120 (278) - move to 01:21:966 - to follow the prominent beat there ?
- 01:27:966 (310,312) - d and k to follow the vocal and the snare respectively ?
- 01:29:043 (315) - k for pattern consistency as 01:19:197 (266) -
- 01:31:966 (326) - move to 01:31:812 - ? Similar case as 01:22:120 (278) -
- 01:45:197 (374,375,376,377) - D D K K for pattern consistency as 00:28:889 (59,60,61,62) -
- 01:51:197 (402) - I think you may have missed the finish here ?
- 01:52:736 (406) - As this is a high-BPM Muzukashii and you used single-colour triplets throughout the diff except this one, k here to make it easier as well ?
- [Oni]
That's all and good luck~
- 00:29:506 (67) - K as you did in Muzukashii for consistency ?
- 00:38:429 (114) - delete this note to make it the same as 00:35:966 -
- 00:41:198 (131,132,133) - maybe kkd to follow the vocal better ?
- 00:43:967 (146) - consider removing finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo.
- 00:45:506 (155) - deleting this note would be better, as it does not follow any sound.
- 01:08:583 (287,288) - d k for mapping the snare and the guitar at 01:08:736 - ?
- 01:09:659 (295) - k would be nice for the high-pitched vocal there.
- 01:12:736 (315) - I think you may have missed the finish here ?
- 01:16:736 (344,345) - you may use k d to follow the snare rhythm.
- 01:19:198 (361) - k would be better as it has the same vocal pitch as 01:18:890 (358) -
- 01:21:429 (377) - moving to 01:21:274 - could follow the vocal better.
- 01:26:583 (417,418) - same as 01:16:736 (344,345) -
- 01:29:044 (434) - same as 01:19:198 (361) -