inverness wrote:

ktg i luv u bby - O-Okay

At least use different name for difficulty ok, this doesn't make sense right - lol

1. 00:08:682 (1) - mhm I'm not sure about this curve, how about http://puu.sh/9EHfm/081e8ea3cf.jpg - nah, that ruins the flow in both going in and going out. I did fix the curve though
2. 00:21:182 (1,2) - what about something like http://puu.sh/9EHvO/6940e877e3.jpg - its not my thing to cover up so much of the slider body unless it's long
3. 00:25:869 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/9EHBb/619fa35953.jpg maybe? - okay
4. 00:36:182 (1) - idk, maybe Ctrl+G here? with the flow from 00:35:557 (3,4) - I kinda expects that you know - just by this one change, the whole first part goes in shambles. It would be the only jump in this part and preventing that would be a nightmare
5. 00:46:807 (4,5,6,7) - idk? why don't you just put these right straight instead - why not? On a more serious note, it's to form a triangle with 1 2 from earlier.
6. 00:53:682 (1,2) - I would suggest to merge this into a slider for better transition since yeah, as there are too much circles in the pattern already - too many although this is not the best time to add a slider. I did add one though
7. 01:05:088 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - not spaced enough, make it atleast spaced this way http://puu.sh/9EIEe/d388c1871a.jpg - man the jumps, fixed with magic
8. 01:06:494 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1) - i love u
9. 01:07:744 (3,4) - maybe swap place? after streaming i feel very awkward with this zigzag - done
10. 01:08:057 (1,2,3,4) - same here, should use diamond flow instead of zigzag
11. 01:23:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - heee idk it's just not your style this kind of superstraight streams hee - yeah, I spent a good 10 minutes trying to find something suitable
12. 01:25:557 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this is just totally 2010. maybe something new ok - wat is 2014?
13. 01:31:416 (4,5) - not circle enough? - not intended to be a circle and I suck at making those regardless
14. 01:39:932 (3,4) - could you please manual stack here, ingame stack ruins spacing with 01:40:244 (1) - oh come on, it can't be that bad
15. 01:52:744 (2,3,4,5) - mhm these circle feels like forced, as the next patterns were also circles. use sliders here instead? - No change. The song actually does 1/2 here and its a buildup using spacing
16. 01:58:682 (5,6,1,2) - ruined by ingame stacking. well, the whole triangular circles pattern feels kinda too forced anyway, idk - oh god, manual stacking would just make it worse imo. It's fine and I don't really want to lower stack leniency
17. 02:23:369 (1,2,3) - wHY this isn't even the final form wtf - fixed
18. 02:26:025 (2,3,1) - stacking ruins everything;;;;; - manual stacking is dumb
19. 02:31:807 (1,2) - stack? this looks awkward - It's fine and it just go well with the song much better
20. 02:52:274 (4,5,1) - apply manual stacking
21. 02:52:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i can't seem to see what kind of shape you're trying to make here, what is this? like 02:53:369 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - here too? - wow, all I did was combine 2 triangles together. Okay...
22. 03:02:275 (4,5,6) - im not sure about this lol this is like forced - fixed
23. 03:14:932 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - this shape why. just why. you should try curving the centre more lower - making patterns like these are annoying and I, instead, used a straight stream which fits pretty well.
24. 03:42:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - idk, super awkward to play. why zigzag anyway? - why not, these snare do feel like you should snap to them
25. 04:08:760 (2) - why out of curve? why don't just join it like http://puu.sh/9GhfY/b1d01970ad.jpg - because I'm a jerk. After 1, the song is basically indicating a switch in pitch hence the back and forth sorta play
26. 04:37:900 (3,1) - huh? really? - brb making ex- nah, fixed
27. 05:04:932 (1) - could you use like different shape i mean i swear i see like donuts like this everywhere - I'm not making a shape which makes less sense than the donut
28. 05:09:932 (1) - lol another donut - the default skin spinner blankets this slider so not even changing this

awesome.
if you need something like lower diffs, hard, i can help. or maybe i would make something. heh heh idk this song is way too awesome for just one single diff
2KD YE - isn't that like, every approved song not named compilation?

[-Sophie-] wrote:

Get ready for my terribad mod, for a pro mapper ;w;.
[Redemption]
01:42:900 - Could use a note - thats a chime that plays 1/2 constantly in this calm part. I'm following the melody here as it is much more prominent
03:40:400 (6) - Don't think that should be there - a sound is there, but I can see what you're saying. Denied as the map is attempting to get harder in the kiai
Goodjob , inv did all of the good moding ;(

waxman wrote:

QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ



00:27:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - change them to 1/2 sliders only or circles+sliders combo~ Because 00:27:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 16 circles too hard to beat. This section would be hard gradually. 02:14:932 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - fine at this section due to not beginning of the song. - except putting any sliders in these 16 notes makes the map less emphasized to the song. It's stacked like that so it isn't as difficult as the ones coming later in the map
00:47:353 (7,1) - It seems to be far. But I don't know why distance is 1.99x. In addition, 00:47:119 (6,7,1) - this spacing gets me cancer. Especially 00:47:119 (6,7). 2 hard to beat. - fixed
01:19:098 (4,5,6,7) - How did you place these sliders? I'm taking about timing. tell me? It looks good tho. <3 - uhhh 1/3 beat snap divisor?
01:19:072 (4) - maybe NC - changed to 3/4 NCing style
01:49:619 (1,2,3) - My idea not too bad. 01:48:682 (1,2,3) - Sound vol. is up here. So it would keep easy sliders like yours as we need a time to ready to beat at the beginning of vol. up. 01:49:619 (1,2,3) seems to say need new pattern. 01:50:557 (1,2) - It's necessary to use like 01:48:682 (1,2,3). - this is really hard to understand. Are you asking for an adjustment for volume or a pattern change. Please PM and that screenshot seems to be broken. After seeing the screenshot, I'm going to say no since it will lower the emphasized music and the unneeded jump is unnecessary
01:57:744 (5,1) - No issue as you NC'D. But I'm confused. According to 01:57:744 (5,1). and these spacing 01:58:057 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6). - fixed
02:11:182 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - really need 1~2 triples. - huh?
03:14:932 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - lol. I'm considering this stream. I maybe post about this later. XD
03:26:103 (10,1,2) - My pencil doesn't feel good. I have no idea. sorry o3o - okay?
03:32:666 (4) - NC? Maybe it's a bad idea XD I just followed standard spacing - bad idea. You're placing a NC after 2 notes with nothing that indicates a pattern, downbeat, or certain notes
05:07:432 (3) - NC? - fixed
05:15:010 (1) - Too loud. it is vol. 5% tho... I hate this game. XD - I'm lazy

hmm awesome
I can't beat BPM 192 anymore so sad... ;w;

(ﾉ≧∇≦)ﾉ

Chupalika wrote:

I think you have a mistake at 00:47:353 (7) - fixed
01:29:619 a small break time here would be nice - a break wouldn't really fit here
also offset should be 10ms earlier - no idea if it was 10ms earlier, but I did change the offset

mod my map too pls - maybe

-GN wrote:

oi

00:13:838 (2) - this doesn't feel necessary. also there's less nice triangle/square shapes here than in the first measures, dunno though - to the first 5 points below, these 1/2's are meant to add buildup and its not like super overmapped. Also shape spam isn't good
00:16:338 (2) - ^
00:18:682 (1) - this slider end also
00:21:182 (1) - ^
00:23:682 (1) - ^
00:26:182 (1,2) - i'm thinking this should be a slider to be consistent with the three above occurrences, if you don't want to change it that is - done
00:47:353 (7) - misplaced - 4th in a row mod asked for this
01:09:775 (4,1) - this antijump feels weird to play considering it follows several jumps, keep it dynamic man - blame inverness for this change. Changed to square
01:11:182 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this needs some stronger hitsounds(claps?) for the parts you actually hit, i think, the ending is a bit hard to get but should be doable if you had a better audio cue for it - well you have hitnormal for that and that really should be it. Raised to 90% if that helps
01:30:166 (2,3) - make these two curve more into each other, sort of, it's sharp compared to the rest - maybe like this?
02:13:994 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - streams pls!! it's a bit tame compared to the earlier parts of the song. it's a kiai after all - this is kiai? Are you sure this is the right timestamp because streams here would be overmapping and it is totally not a kiai
02:58:057 (1) - i think you should remove the repeat for this and use four circles instead just to stay consistent - it's not suppose to be consistent here since the melody goes to triple rhythm. I did, however, made it consistent to that.
03:26:494 (3) - reverse? it's pretty hard to see this coming - fixed
03:28:994 (3) - ^ - since I didn't reverse, this is left unchanged
03:48:760 (2,3,4) - hmm this part is done differently, it's pretty nice though so maybe consider this approach for the earlier parts - it's just a little spice
03:54:541 (2,3) - i'd prefer these spaced in a way - okay
03:58:994 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - ctrl+g? the four triples in the next part of the chorus flows similarly(although is differently constructed(and does not have a NC in the middle)) 04:18:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) -!!"!!¤#" - did NC's to all of the triples

I've got nothing more to add, although that kiai at the end is pretty brutal. good song and good map, though - yay

Lust wrote:

Modding by request

Note that I wasn't able to pass this without no fail, so if I point something out gameplay wise don't take it without others consideration

Wow nice BG

[Redemption]

1. 00:48:286 (10,11,12) - I think the curve here is a bit too sharp for a stream, makes it hard to hit. Maybe make it smoother? - fixed
2. 01:11:177 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - These don't really fit what is going on here, I suggest you replace them with 1/2 sliders or something. The last one can stay though - b-but they're cool. Seriously though, I don't think they need a change, I'll seek more opinions on it
3. 01:29:614 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is pretty cool, I like what you did in this pattern
4. 02:11:958 (4,1) - Blanket can be improved and you know it. Use 4's approach circle to help you out with this - its pretty much perfect
5. 02:31:802 (1) - Shorten this to 1/2 slider, the 3/4 seems a bit excessive. I found that the 1/2 played better (current one caused me to slider break first time) - okay although there's actually a sound for that 3/4
6. 02:39:770 (2,2) - (Nazi) Blanket can be improved - not going to bother since this'll mess like the next set of blankets
7. 02:51:801 (2,6) - I know this is a bit nazi, but down the line someone is going to point this out. Try and stack this perfectly - and if I do, the spacing gets messed up and everything just scrambles.
8. 03:14:927 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - Wow you don't see these very often - indeed
9. 05:09:927 (1) - This is too awesome - I can' tell if this is sarcasm or not

Epic map, good luck

pieguy1372 wrote:

00:04:927 (1) - whistle on start to keep flow going. also matches bass - the whistle is placed along with the piano. Doing this is inconsistent
00:36:802 (3) - stack on 00:35:395 (2) - ? - okay
01:07:426 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - weird flow imo. mb move 01:08:677 (1) - to x324 y268 makes more sense? - considering the 1/2 beat, the flow is fine here. your suggestion to move the triangle does screw up my next sets of patterns though although it might need to be changed
01:33:677 (1,2,3) - ee.. i personally dislike linear patterns like this, maybe try smth like this instead? http://puu.sh/astQs/dcda856e3e.jpg (also on 01:34:614 (1,2,3) - ) up to you - except that it fits less to the chimes. Since they are similar sounds, linear slider patterns like these fit the best especially on a calm part like this
01:34:614 (1,2,3) - if you take above, http://puu.sh/astTE/50eef9453b.jpg
01:37:114 (3) - whistle to keep flow - applied all hitsounds
01:38:052 (4) - ^
01:45:552 (4) - ^
02:06:177 (4) - try soft whistle here? sounds nice IMO. ofc it's up to you (if you take it don't forget to fix others 02:13:677 (3) - 02:21:177 (6) - etc.)
02:15:864 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - stack (3) on 02:14:614 (3) - might make more sense - doing anything of this will destroy my distance snapped spacing. It's not really something easily seen in play and shouldn't be a hinderance
02:36:333 (4) - imo, move left a bit flows better - done
02:52:895 (4,5,6) - stack (6) on 02:51:801 (2) - ? - as said before, ruins spacing
03:26:098 (10,1,2) - should prob make spacing consistent - intentional to emphasized the increased pitch
03:35:864 (8) - stack on 03:34:145 (3) - ? don't forget to fix spacing - done
05:04:927 - mb try using inherited sections to put 5% volume sliderticks? matches the calm slow-down atmosphere of the song better imo. up to you - used 20% volume to put a use for sliders

awesome map & song. take some stars - yay
good luck >3<

Low wrote:

from my queue.

- "Voltage Ignition 2" to tags
- please add a silent soft-sliderslide for the softer parts in the music. it ruins the atmosphere of the song when i hear the really obnoxious sliderslide sounds in some parts - added
- i think tick rate should be 1. there are a lot of places where tick rate 2 doesn't fit the music and sounds odd. in fact, tick rate 2 sounds odd more often than not to me. it's especially jarring in the quiet parts. - sure
- this song really deserves at least AR 9.3 or 9.4. there are a lot of fast parts which i feel are lacking power and speed. also, some patterns you made are a bit tricky to read and this helps the reading process quite a bit. - tricky!? This is the most complicated pattern in the map imo and it really isn't that hard to read. Me and some other players didn't mind it. Of course if someone mentions this, maybe it could be change, but for now, no
00:01:177 (1) - this spinner should start an entire beat earlier to match when the sound in the music begins. to me, it feels and sounds off to start so late. it should also get gradually louder with the music - no headphones so I couldn't hear the wind-up sound 1 beat earlier. Added
01:23:208 (2) - end is unsnapped - fixed
01:29:614 (1) - this section is one of the parts that really emphasizes my point on using a silent soft-sliderslide and tick rate 1.
03:16:802 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - having a finish on every circle here ruins the short, staccato sound in the music. i suggest you remove them all as they don't fit very well - used soft-whistles instead
03:23:052 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - make the spacing increase more noticeable with larger spacing. right now, it's not very noticeable on first sight and doesn't really match the song as well as it could. make it more intense - increased spacing by .1

GL

Cherry Blossom wrote:

From my modding queue.
Here is my testplay, first try.

SPOILER

This map is pretty simple, and the star diff looks a bit overrated lol. - streams are overrated
Things are more or less carefully done that's why i liked it, great map (just forget what Kloyd and I said about this map). There are still things i find a bit weird but i'll point them later.
I'll mod in few days, i may edit this post, stay tuned.

Another

1. 00:28:520 (6,1) - this jump seems a bit extreme compared of 00:29:770 (6,1) - , this is not really a fast part, so i think long jumps are not really expected here, also since there is no 1/2 jumps before this pattern. So we can think that the first jump is the longest jump of this map. So try to reduce a bit the distance between 00:28:520 (6,1) - zzzzz no space, fixed
2. 00:31:177 (1,2,3) - try to increase the distance between these circles, it could make this pattern playing better, up to you to change. - I love how this one little change made me move an entire section one by one. Done regardless
3. 00:53:286 - imagine that there is a circle here, among this stream with 5 circles, this blue tick is more audible than 00:53:130, so the pattern should be
   
   SPOILER

   
   but i think it was intentional since you didnt follow the same note on this tick here 00:54:536 - took the suggestion since it has more of an audio cue
4. 01:59:927 (1,2,3,4,5) - i think you could improve this shape for the sake of visual and for a better movement, just see - man I wish I had more room, done
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 02:04:302 (2) - move this slider a bit downward for a better transition with 02:03:677 (1) - , the movement will be smoother. - sure
6. 02:31:802 (1,2) - this is the only 3/4 slider i've seen, i didnt see any 3/4 before, it should be better if you avoid this 3/4 slider because this tick 02:31:958 is audible and it sounds odd because it is skipped. So make something like this instead 02:37:114 (3,4,1) - done to keep consistency
7. from 04:59:614 - to 05:02:427 - You added a normal-hitnormal on every white and red tick, so it sounds a bit odd since you didnt decide to follow these ticks 05:00:864 and 05:02:114 - If you want to follow everything, the most suitable pattern is - intentional, the way you put it doesn't really play well with 04:59:770 (12) which is a note being held. A slider fits this nicely and the way you put it. I know this is to keep consistency of the hitsounds, but that can be said for the whole 2nd kiai tbh
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   Cool diff, everything looks nice and well structured, this diff is simple and plays very well.

Redemption

• 
  
  Just minor things.

1. 00:47:270 (7,3,4,5) - this square looks a bit clunky compared to what you did before for triangles, try to improve its shape a bit. - fixed
2. 00:49:614 (6,7,5) - stack them properly if they were supposed to be stacked. - no idea how that happend but fixed
3. 01:35:864 (2,3) - due to the stack leniency they are overlapped (just see on the screenshot below), so it should look better to move 1-2 grids right to avoid that overlap - moved 2 grids diagnally
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:39:927 (3,4) - stack them properly, they are not well stacked, it is more visible when playing, or it was intentional to stack like this ? - was intentional due to some people asking, but I personally believe it really doesn't look good
5. 03:27:270 (6,1) - these stacked objects look odd because they look inconsistent with 03:47:270 (6,1) - , 04:07:270 (7,1) - etc., for the same sound.
   It should be better if you make things consistent, but i don't find that stacking notes is a good idea for the kiai part so the best idea may be unstacking notes to make this kiai part more fast/challenging. Up to you to do whatever you want because ignoring consistency is a choice. - changed into a slider since its suppose to be one
6. 04:42:427 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - i see your idea here, but it should be better if there is a higher distance between these objects 04:43:052 (1,2,3) - than 04:42:427 (1,2,3) - . It makes more sense according to your idea - I see what you're getting at, but I really don't think there is a volume increase in parts like these which is why I didn't increase the 2nd set. It just didn't feel like a need for higher spacing
7. 05:07:427 (1) - why didnt you end this slider on the red tick here 05:07:895 ? as you did for Another diff, you can hear something on this tick, and you can't hear anything on the white tick where the slider end. - I forgot
8. 05:08:677 (2) - same as ^
   
   Great diff, this map is kinda overrated (5.75 stars), i don't see any extreme jump patterns or weird progressive 2014 sv changes x) - pressing 2 keys is hard
   This look simple and well done.

I hope it was helpful.
Good Luck ~