早安~
Looks like this is well mapped. Since this is such a nice song, you should get this ranked soon~
Have fun mapping~
[Normal]
- 00:16:835 (4,5) - if you look near the bottom, you can see that there is more space between (4) and (5) than there is towards the top. You can make it a better blanket by moving the third point of 00:18:016 (5) - towards the right by a little bit to around x 332 y 216. You can also move the middle point to x 360 y 276. Not that significant, but maybe other people might point it out later.
- 00:27:465 (3,4) - this overlap doesn't look that good since most of (3) overlaps the head of (4). Looks like you did this because you ran out of space, see if you can move 00:26:520 (1) - down a bit so that you can also move 00:26:993 (2,3) - down, then place 00:28:174 (4) - like this:
- 00:44:237 (6,1) - maybe it will look better if you move 00:44:237 (6) - to the right a little and place (1) like this:
Same with 01:52:268 (6,1) - - 01:36:205 (4) - maybe move this to the left a little to make it look better:
Personally I don't think having both slider heads overlapping another slider looks very good. - 01:39:984 (3,4,1) - here you have the sliders in a line, but I think it can be made more interesting. Maybe you can try to have 01:41:165 (4) - face up and to the left:
This is just one example, maybe you will find a better way to place them.
[Hard] - 00:16:835 (3,4) - very small overlap here, I think it will look better if you spread them apart a little, maybe like this far:
Same for 00:19:906 (2,3) - - 00:20:378 (3,4) - you can blanket this better, I would say move 00:20:851 (4) - to x 346 y 366
- 00:24:394 (3,4,5,6) - like before, try to spread them out more. 1.6x distance snap should be good
- 00:25:103 (4,5,6,7,1) - maybe it will look better if you try a different pattern, here is one suggestion:
In the image, 00:25:339 (5) - is stacked on the tail of 00:25:575 (6) - - 00:27:465 (2,3,4,5) - whenever you have hit circles/sliders placed this closely apart, try to have more space between them. Maybe you can just switch to 1.6x distance snap to fix everything, or only use 1.6x distance snap when you have parts like this. I feel that it will look a lot better if you have more space between the notes than to have them barely overlapping. Anyways I will stop mentioning parts like this since I think you get the idea.
- 01:01:953 (4) - just a suggestion, but see if it flows better if you ctrl+g. However you don't have to since this pattern appears to be intentional and is fine on its own, but if you are looking for better flow you can try to ctrl+g.
- 01:03:371 (4,5) - if you want a better blanket, you can move the middle point of 01:03:843 (5) - closer towards 01:03:371 (4) - .
- 01:54:867 (4) - maybe for better flow you can ctrl+g. I feel that if you ctrl+g (4) it flows well into 01:55:339 (1) - . Same here 02:09:985 (4) -
- 03:01:245 (1) - I feel that this curve is too sharp, maybe you can get it to look better. Here is one suggestion: make it a jump and make the curve less sharp:
[Insane] - 00:33:371 (7) - It looks like you curved this so you could get a better flow from this note into 00:33:843 (1) - . However the flow from 00:33:134 (6) - into this note can be improved if you ctrl+j 00:33:371 (7) - . Even if you ctrl+j, the flow is still good between the two notes 00:33:371 (7,1) - , and you get a better flow between 00:33:134 (6,7) - .
- 01:01:953 (5) - consider ctrl+g for better flow, otherwise you can leave it since it appears to be intentional. I'll stop mentioning changes like this since I think you get the general idea of what I'm trying to say.
- 01:14:709 (1) - I believe this will look better if you try to stretch the slider a bit so you can see the gap between the head and tail. This is what I mean:
- 01:44:237 (1) - this slider is still part of the previous vocal part, so even though it's in the start of a new measure, I feel that you should remove this combo.
- 01:59:827 (2) - this slider shape could be improved, you can try copying over 01:59:119 (1) - and rotating it. If you want to use a different shape because the vocal here is stronger. Here is one suggestion if you want a different slider shape:
You might want a steeper curve though, but it's up to you. - 02:53:686 (4,5,1) - I think it will look better if you have the same distance between each note here.
- 03:08:095 (1) - maybe to make it look better, try not to have the slider head/tail overlap
I actually think it's fine the way it is, but see if you like this better.
Looks like this is well mapped. Since this is such a nice song, you should get this ranked soon~
Have fun mapping~