Yes Dap wrote:

insane

00:00:286 (1,2) - 2 지우고 1복붙한다음 ctrl+> >(아니면 180도 회전) 힛사 다시 집어넣는것도 잊지 마시고
00:00:286 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 사이사이 좀더 매핑 할 수 있을텐데요
00:06:286 (1,2) - 00:06:942여기에 2슬라 머리에 노트 놓으시고(http://puu.sh/7gpwd.jpg) 1슬라 복붙 후 ctrl+>(http://puu.sh/7gpAK.jpg), 2슬라 머리를 그 노트 있는 곳에 옮기시고 노트 제거(http://puu.sh/7gpCT.jpg) (3,4슬라도 같은 방법으로 제대로 90도씩 돌리세요)
00:17:911 (1,2,3) - 01:06:286 (4,5,6) - 01:07:786 (1,2,3) - 지금 보기 전까지 한 박자 쉬고 치는 건줄... 님 리딩이 안돼시는겁니다
00:31:786 (1) - NC
00:33:192 (1) - NC
00:33:286 (2) - remove NC
00:37:786 (1) - NC
00:40:786 (1) - NC
01:06:286 (1) - NC
01:13:598 (5,6) - http://puu.sh/7gpSZ.jpg 이렇게 하시고 6슬라 다시 ctrl+g
01:16:786 (1) - NC

iNickel wrote:

I tried to mod your map, but I couldn't find anything wrong xD

Here are some suggestions:

[Easy]
00:00:286 (1) - I don't like these breaks at the beginning. Try this : http://puu.sh/7labA.jpg (End here: 00:03:286 (1) I might try this on Normal, but I think easy is fine as it is.
00:06:286 (1) - ^ (End here: 00:09:286 (1) ^
00:22:786 (3) - Maybe a better shape? http://puu.sh/7lamV.jpg rearranged that part

[Normal]
Same as easy for the beginning. I'm still thinking about

OD - 3 Then my will have lower OD than my Easy.. So not fixed.

That's all. Sorry for so short :/

Byakugan249 wrote:

hey~ i'm here from your in-game request.

Bold: Unrankable/must fix.
Red: Should be fixed/highly suggested.
Green: Suggestion.
Blue: Comments, Advice or Other.

[General]
CLEAR~!

[Easy]
00:16:786 (2) - it'll be more fun if you follow the vocals by adding 2 1/1 sliders since i feel that the vocals stand out more than the guitar. i feel that following the guitar here feels uncomfortable for beginners during gameplay.
00:22:786 (3) - make some sliderart with this slider. i find that curving it regularly doesn't make the diff more exciting for beginners during gameplay. try something like this. it stands out more and more fun to follow during gameplay IMO
00:46:786 (3) - i don't see anything that stands out here that follows this repeat slider. stick to the 1/1 rhythm so that it'll follow the vocals nicely during gameplay.
00:54:286 (1) - i think you're forgetting a finish at the beginning of this slider. add it for emphasis in the cymbals.
00:58:786 (3) - this part is separate. if you don't understand it follows the BGM, and then the vocals. for this one replace this for a circle and a 1/1 slider to follow the music more properly during gameplay. No, I think it plays very fine. It's supposed to be a 3/4 reverse and a circle, but I didn't want to use 3/4 in Easy diff, so i replaced them with 1/1 reverse
01:17:536 (4) - i think you can make this slider look like (2) for symmetry and for an even smoother transition.
i really think you can make this diff more creative during gameplay, that's all.

[Normal]
00:15:286 (1,2,3) - move this combo like this. the difference between yours and mine is that mine is perfectly stacked on certain notes for neatness and a smoother transition during gameplay.
00:16:786 (1) - replace this for 2 circles to follow the vocals more properly during gameplay. as well as there's no hold in the vocals like the next slider since the next slider follows "kiss~"
00:46:411 (3) - stack this note on the end of 00:44:911 (4) -. same reason as 00:15:286.
00:48:286 (1,2) - consider spacing this out to the default spacing and that's 1.3x. my concern is that players might hit this a lot sooner than usual since the spacing is this close during gameplay.
00:49:786 (1,2) - ^
00:58:786 (4) - make this a NC. this follows a different part in the BGM. if this was together, the vocals would be in the same pitch.
01:15:286 (4) - maybe a whistle here to emphasize that dinging sound in the BGM?
01:24:286 (1) - i really want you to consider removing this note. even though it's a normal diff, players might get surprised over this when they play during gameplay. giving a 1/1 gap should be enough for them to recover. I don't see why it would surprise them, and they should be able to play through here just fine.

[Hard]
00:03:286 (1) - same as 00:54:286 on easy.
00:04:786 (2) - in order to be consistent, space this note out like you did between 00:00:286 (1,2) - .
01:01:598 (1) - think you can make this slider more symmetrical so that it'll flow more nicely during gameplay?
01:21:849 (2) - i really think you can space this out for more emphasis in the cymbals. i find it more exciting to follow for players during gameplay. I had it like that, but someone was like wtf spacing.. I guess i'll fix it

[Insane]
00:17:911 (1,2,3) - this might cause a lot of problems for players since the triplet appears too sudden for players to react to during gameplay. think you can reduce the spacing so that it'd be more readable for players during gameplay. This is something I see a lot or often in insane maps, and was very playable to me. But I guess I'll reduce the DS a little bit.
00:28:692 (6) - delete this note. yes it follows the BGM, but it breaks consistency with 00:26:161 (6,7) - since there's no note here.
00:30:848 (3,4) - think you can make this jump more comfortable to follow because i really feel that this jump breaks the general flow of the song during gameplay. something like this would flow a lot smoother and it'll feel more comfortable for players during gameplay.
00:48:848 (2) - i felt that the flow suddenly stopped when it's stacked. stacking it on (3) instead feels more comfortable during gameplay. I think the stacked note plays fine here with the slower SV
00:51:942 (3) - i really think the 1/4 note breaks the calmness of this part of the song even though it follows the BGM. consider removing this note to keep the calmness steady during gameplay.
01:01:411 (6,7) - the jump here feels too sudden for players to react in time during gameplay. consider stacking this on one of these notes(01:01:411 (6,7) - ). it'll keep the flow steady and it's something players would enjoy and more comfortable for players to follow during gameplay.
01:06:286 (4,5,6) - same as 00:17:911. I think its fine, and players should be able to read this pattern. and it actually is readable
01:07:786 (1,2,3) - ^ ^
the only concern i really have are those spaced out triplets. they're too far out during gameplay.

and that's all i got. your easy can be more creative, and consider fixing that problem for the insane. if it was an extra diff, i'd leave it alone. anyways GL and don't give up on the map .

iNickel wrote:

░░░░░░░░░░░████
░░░░░░░░░░█░░░█
░░░░░░░░░█░░░░█
███████▄▄█░░░░░██████▄
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░ BATs Rank This ░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░ Please! ░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█████░░░░░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░████████

Ayu wrote:

hello~

Easy

1. 00:29:161 (3) - Blanket could be a bit improved here, middle point one up?!!?!
2. 00:36:661 (2) - This one too, the slider end is too close to the hitcircle.
3. 00:40:786 (3) - Same thing here, slider end too.
4. 00:48:286 (1,2) - Could also be improved, slider starts are too close. Meh, I think i'll keep it this way

Normal

1. 00:49:036 (2) - Could put this a little bit up, for some extra design points. No, I want to keep them aligned
2. 00:50:536 (2) - This one too. ^
3. 01:00:286 (1,3) - These blankets could really be improved, slider starts are slightly too close. No, I think it's fine

Hard

1. 00:21:286 (1) - Slider is too tight here to blanket (4) nicely. I think it's fine. Not everything needs to be perfect blanket
2. 00:44:161 (6) - I'd either stack this or put it on 0,5x distance for consistency. I think it's fine. I don't want to follow the DS all the time in harder diffs.
3. 01:03:661 (2) - same here. ^

Insane

1. 00:11:911 (1) - This should be spaced 1,70x from the previous object, instead of 1,20x. They actually are pretty much (not exactly) the same DS because there is an SV change here.
2. 00:12:286 (1) - Could curve a little bit better around (1)'s end. I'll take this as "improve blanket" and fixed
3. 00:30:286 (1,2,3) - Spacing here looks and feels weird, I'd put 1,7x ds between (1) and (2). Why is it weird? :3
4. 00:44:161 (5) - 00:47:161 (2) - Those 2 are inconsistent with the patterns used before, so I'd stack them because they wouldn't look good with 1,3x ds. I think it plays very fine during game play.
5. 00:58:786 (1) - I'd rather have this made into a repeat slider instead, so it follows the more dominant beat of the song It'd be too boring for players then. I think this works fine here.
6. 01:13:598 (5) - This blanket could reaaally be improved No change
7. 01:20:161 (2,3) - This anti-jump doesn't really make sense here. I agree. Fixed

~ Pretty fun map and also pretty solid. Great work!

Project Railgun wrote:

Hm....

Thor wrote:

Easy

01:09:286 (1,2,3,4) - Neaten this please good catch. Fixed
Over all Pretty nice diff

Normal

01:11:911 (5) - I personally think you should start the new combo here I don't think so, that would ruin the NC consistency
Over all nice diff nothing really bad about this

HARD --- Nothing wrong in my eyes

Insane

00:51:848 (2) - Blanket is a bit off fixed
01:07:036 (7,8,9) - I think this could be a bit neaterI think it's fine as it is

* Just going to point out that I think in my opinion this map i great. I love it and I just spotted a few little things. :3
Good luck :3

Lapis Aoki wrote:

From Night Hotel~ TROLL MOD
00:10:786 (1,2,3,4) -The shape isn't pretty, please make it like this: I like squares o.o

SPOILER

01:19:786 (1) -Straight slider, it'll be easier for easy players~ owo I don't think it will make any difference Actually, fixed
01:24:286 -How dare you not add a circle ~ ? </3 because the circle will appear while spinning and cause confusion to beginners
[Normal]
00:28:598 (3) -Why is this a straight slider? Make it like this for good~ B ) it's straight to keep it consistent with the previous sliders

SPOILER

00:38:911 (5) -I do believe that this slider doesn't look like the slider which is at 00:38:161 (4) make them the same please~ ;w; ah.. ok
00:59:536 (2,3) -These 2 sliders look very difficult for normal players, change better~ I think it plays fine.

GL ~ Star ~ Nothing else ~ : )

Sylith wrote:

here is lazy mod as your request

[Insane]

1. 00:01:786 (2) - 끝에 휘슬삭제
   
   
2. 00:04:036 (2) - 휘슬 that would ruin the consistency
   
   
3. 00:15:098 (5,6,1) - 이런 휘슬 잘 안어울리는거 같아요. 넣으실거면 00:13:223 (5,6,7) - 나 00:18:661 (4,7,8,9) - 도 넣어주시는게 맞다고 봄.
   
   
4. 00:21:286 (1) - 슬라 시작에 피니시 슬라 끝에 휘슬 넣어보시는건?
   
   
5. 00:26:348 (7,1) - 뉴콤 스왑 I'm following the music, if you actually listen to it closely, you will hear it
   
   
6. 00:30:286 (1,2) - 뉴콤 스왑 ^
   
   
7. 00:30:661 (2) - 나지는 어지간하면 많이 안잡는 편인데 굳이 겹칠 필요가 있을까요? 슬라가 없어지기 전에 노트가 나옴 ㅜㅜ have you testplayed? It's visible
   
   
8. 00:32:348 (9,1) - 뉴콤 스왑 as i said earlier
   
   
9. 00:34:411 (7) - 휘슬 빼보세요 I'll consider
   
   
10. 00:52:786 (1,2,3,4) - 1번슬라를 00:51:286 (1) - 여기에 스택 시켜보시는게 어때요? 이런식으로 that way 2->3 jump will be gone, I want to keep this jump
    
    SPOILER

    
    SPOILER

    
    
    
11. 00:59:348 (3) - 피니시? sounds awkward imo
    
    
12. 00:59:536 (1) - 휘슬 강추
    
    
13. 01:03:286 (1) - 머리에 피니시 추천 (01:09:286 (1) - 여기처럼 2마디마다 피니시 있는게 허전하지 않고 좋을듯 해요)
    
14. 01:03:661 (2,3) - 느낌이 너무 붕 뜨는거 같아요. 거리 좀 줄여보시는게 어때요? I think it's fine
    
    
15. 01:10:786 - 볼륨조절 한번 해보세요 I don't really see a reason to add these green lines
    01:10:786 - 70퍼
    01:11:161 - 60퍼
    01:11:536 - 70퍼
    01:11:911 - 80퍼
    
    
16. 01:15:286 (1) - 머리에 피니시
    
    
17. 01:26:348 (3) - 클랩 does not follow the pattern i put them in
    
    
18. 01:26:911 (3) - 피니시 해보심이?

[Hard]

1. 00:16:411 (4) - 휘슬 지우는게 더 깔끔한듯 해요
   
   
2. 00:19:036 (6,7) - 배치모딩 안하려구 했는데....
   이런식의 배치는 어떠세요? 강조 될 음이 아닌데 00:18:848 (5,6) - 사이 디스턴스가 너무 크다고 생각해요. I think it plays fine. The concept of jump should be in somewhat introduced in hard diff
   
   SPOILER

   [img]00:19:036%20(6,7)%20-[/img]
   이게 아니더라도 한번 다른 배치 고민 해 보셨으면 해요.
   
   
3. 00:30:286 (1) - 인센에서도 언급 했는데 이런 뉴콤은 불필요하다고 생각해요. 오히려 커서 트레일? 이 생겨서 플레이할때 미워지기만 할듯... as i mentioned in insane
   
   
4. 00:37:786 (6) - 머리에 휘슬 no change
   
   
5. 00:56:161 (4) - 휘슬삭제? no, I'm emphasizing the vocal
   
   
6. 00:56:911 (6) - 클랩으로 바꾸세여
   
   
7. 00:59:161 (2) - 머리 휘슬 삭제 maybe
   
   
8. 01:03:286 (1) - 머리에 피니시
   
   
9. 01:11:911 (1) - 끝에 휘슬 삭제가 더 자연스러운듯 해요 I don't see a whistle though...
   
   
10. 01:15:286 (4) - 피니시
    
    
11. 01:18:848 (2) - 이왕 대칭으로 하시는거 그 전 슬라이더랑 복붙으로 ㅋㅋㅋ
    
    
12. 01:26:348 (2) - 클랩 as insane
    
    
13. 01:26:536 (3) - 인센처럼 끝을 피니시로?

[Normal]

1. 00:19:411 (3) - 휘슬삭제 that would ruin the consistency..
   
   
2. 00:19:786 (1) - 머리에 휘슬
   
   
3. 00:21:286 (1) - 그 전 슬라랑 일직선 되게 놔보세요 (나지 ㅎㅎㅎ) no change, and want to make it flow better with 2
   
   
4. 00:32:911 - 노트추가하시는게 어때요? no change, I don't want to fill the entire map with 1/2 that would be boring
   00:31:973 - 00:33:473 - 이부분이 전체적으로 너무 텅 빈 느낌 ㅜ
   
   
5. 00:38:911 (5) - 다른난이도랑 똑같이 여기 피니시 I don't think other diffs have finish here?
   
   
6. 00:47:536 (5,6) - 머리에 각각 클랩 넣어보세요
   
   
7. 00:58:411 (3) - 삭제하시고 노트로 대체하시는게 어때요? 동선이 너무 안좋아요 I don't see why the flow is bad here, ur cursor does not move ike "Auto"
   
   
8. 00:59:536 (2,3) - 이런거 진짜 처음하시는 분들은 치기 어려워요 ㅜㅜ좀 일자로 더 펴서 배치해보세요 i think normal diff should be somewhat challenging imo. this is not an easy diff
   
   
9. 01:03:848 - 이런리듬은 어떠세요? Don't really see a difference, except a clap will be gone with your pattern
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
10. 01:24:661 (2,3) - 대칭좀 ㅜㅜ noooooooooooooooo
    
    
11. 01:26:161 (1,2,3) - 전 흔적들이랑 안겹치게 배치 다시 해보세영ㅋㅋ 간단할듯 they will be gone by the time they see this note..

[Easy]

이지좋아요 ㅋㅋ단순하긴 한데 좋은듯 귀찮

배치 모딩은 최대한 피해서 했어요.

드럼 킥도 힛사로 있었으면 정말 좋았을텐데 ㅠ 좀 아쉽네요

Good luck :>

Jethh wrote:

Hi, little suggestions.

Easy

Really nice job there
00:58:786 - i ll prefer something like this : good, I like this
01:26:161 - maybe try to find out a way to get a better look ?

don't really know what's wrong with my current shape. care to elaborate??

Normal

Once again really nice !
00:55:786 (2) - move X294 Y174 ? could look better and emphasize spacing transition ?

No chage here. I want to keep the spacing consistent in easier diff.

Hard

Really good
01:22:411 (3) - move X197 Y239 tip : you can move elements in time to get a better position

og yes, this blanket was awfully terrible XD Thank you.

Insane

Nothing to say, really O_O great !

Get this ranked !!!!

No Dap wrote:

Teach me the secret of getting BAT mod

BeatofIke wrote:

No Dap wrote:

Teach me the secret of getting BAT mod

hue

popner wrote:

From my New Mapper Searching Queue.

[Insane]
00:11:536 (3,1) - keep the spacing consistent with 00:11:161 (2,3) - I did this on purpose, because 00:11:911 (1) - has SV an change, so I wanted to make it a bit easier for players to reach this note
00:12:848 (3) - try stacking it on head of 00:11:911 (1) - . It make 00:12:848 (3,4,5,6,7) - flow better fixed
00:17:161 (2,3) - the spacing of this blanket is too big, considering 00:16:036 (4,1) - and 00:16:786 (1,2) - I'm a little confused, I think you missed this note 00:16:411 (5) - when you mentioned 00:16:036 (4,1) - And I think 00:16:786 (1,2,3) - has consistent spacing

SPOILER

00:19:786 (1,2) - same as 00:11:536 (3,1) -I will keep this too. I wanted to add a jump here
00:21:286 (1,3) - make a blanket? no change, I want to keep 00:20:161 (2) - 00:21:286 (1) - stacked, and also 00:22:411 (3,1) - flow
00:25:036 (3,4) - spacing issue fixed
00:37:598 (5,8) - not stack properly fixed
00:51:286 (1,2,3) - spacing issue00:51:848 (2,3) - had the same problem so fixed
00:53:536 (3,4,1) - keep the spacing between them same, like moved 00:53:911 (4) - a bit to left, I think they are about even now

SPOILER

00:55:223 (4,3) - not stack properly fixed
00:59:161 (2,3,1) - spacing issue this is on purpose because I don't want to have this note 00:59:348 (3) - overlapped with 00:58:786 (1) - And I'm sure experienced players will play this without a problem because I did.
01:04:598 (5) - to make a better pattern out of 01:03:848 (3,4,5) - , you can change to a position like: Here I was trying to use consistent spacing :3 but I think yours looks better. so fixed

SPOILER

[Hard]
00:39:286 (1,2) - spacing? fixed
00:45:286 (1,2,3,4) - enlarge the spacing between them: ok

SPOILER

01:08:348 (2,3,4) - same suggestion as 01:04:598 (5) - in Insane. Move to (96,252)
01:10:036 (3) - move to (404,184) (the same reason as 00:45:286 (1,2,3,4) -) ok
01:21:286 (1,2,3) - how about: Magic?

[Normal]
00:48:286 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - avoid switching the spacing between 1.2x and 1.3x in this section how did this happen.. fiexed
00:50:536 (2) - missed whistle according to 00:49:036 (2) - fixed

[Easy]
00:17:536 (3) - missed clap on slider end fixed
00:46:786 (3) - missed clap on reverse point. Also remove the clap on the end. this slider was originally a 3/2 reverse, then i fixed to this and forgot about hitsounding DX fixed

You should ask some modders to check the consistency of hitsounds and spacings, then call me back.

Gabe wrote:

Well basically, I wasn't able to find anything, I so looked at the hitsound consistency ._.b

Savelog

18:11 Gabe: I'll look at the hitsounds consistency
18:11 No Dap: okie
18:12 Gabe: 00:26:723 - On Hard, it would be nice if you could add a whislte here to follow the vocals
18:13 Gabe: and these two points: 00:26:348 - 00:27:098 -
18:13 Gabe: 00:32:723 - Should be the same for this one too, I guess
18:14 No Dap:  okie added
18:15 Gabe: 01:17:161 - is there missing a clap here?
18:15 No Dap: oop yeah
18:21 Gabe: On Easy
18:21 Gabe: yes, I understand what you did, how ever, it's better if you keep going logically. 01:19:786 (1) - Delete this new combo and add a new combo on the last slider. It's going to keep the consistency.
18:21 No Dap: o3o
18:22 No Dap: oh yeah your right
18:22 No Dap: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1513100 like this right?
18:22 Gabe: yup
18:22 No Dap: okie fixed
18:23 Gabe: you can update
18:24 No Dap: updated

Gabe wrote:

Congratz Darling (;

Sulker wrote:

Gabe wrote:

Congratz Darling (;

-hugs Gabe-

alacat wrote:

???!!! xD

congrats No Dap

W h i t e wrote:

축하드려요~ 저한테 매핑 가르쳐 달라하지 말아주세요 ㅋㅋ;

No Dap wrote:

W h i t e wrote:

축하드려요~ 저한테 매핑 가르쳐 달라하지 말아주세요 ㅋㅋ;

헐.. 기분 안좋으셧다면 죄송합니다... 그리고 감사해요

Horo wrote:

I don't think it really matters but I noticed that shoujo is spelled wrong in the tags lol

No Dap wrote:

Horo wrote:

I don't think it really matters but I noticed that shoujo is spelled wrong in the tags lol

lol too late too change, and probably no one searches with that tag anyway :p Thanks for correcting though!