why should i tell you?Sephibro wrote:
so what's your actual role?
why should i tell you?Sephibro wrote:
so what's your actual role?
I probably need to reread aren't I <_<NoHitter wrote:
For the record GiF, wasn't Sephi the first one to day "if we're going to lynch, make it a full wagon", and NOT Nyquill?
the wagon against oni wasn't in my taste at all, and i didn't have any solid scumreads on anyone else aswell.Sephibro wrote:
Tanz: why didn't you vote anyone for the whole d1?
Si.Sephibro wrote:
also gif are you going v/la without posting any content before?
you didn't even comment the tanz case
is this for convenience?
what do you think bmin11?
i'm just trying to involve him too, looks like he needs to be asked to post for actually postingGuyInFreezer wrote:
Also I saw you wanting to talk to bmin about it, so I'm not responding to it for now.
it was meGuyInFreezer wrote:
So whoever said NH was playing his scum meta, explain pls?
bmin wrote:
I would like to take the chance to lynch, despite reasons you have explained (which are valid). My reasons would be 1) It's one of our limited ways to actually kill a mafia and our opportunity to lynch shouldn't be wasted (we are being chased by time after all). 2) Lynch is arguably an uncontrollable factor for mafia. Yes, they can vote, but we have the majority. We shouldn't be playing scared. 3) We can't fully rely on night actions even though it's early in the game. It is highly speculated that the game is power madness, but at the same time, it is pretty clear that Jinxy tried his best to make a balance set up. Normally, a power madness results in townies getting too much info from night actions (hosts were slightly biased towards town most cases), so I'm afraid Jinxy may have done something about it and that makes me worried. Other reasons are solely based on possibility (mostly set up speculation), so I wouldn't put it as my reason, but I would be a lot more comfortable with taking the lynch opportunity rather then NL.
End of Day 1 Votecountvote: bmin
- O n i - (7) - GuyInFreezer, pieguy1372, NoHitter, Nyquill, rEdo, Sephibro, DakeDekaane
Sephibro (1) - - O n i -
DakeDekaane (1) - fartownik
bmin11 (1) - Raging Bull
What I saw in his meta was something different.Sephibro wrote:
it was meGuyInFreezer wrote:
So whoever said NH was playing his scum meta, explain pls?
but i also said "meta" is a very volatile and unreliable thing
btw i noticed that in his games as scum, NH plays lurking a lot and trying to draw as little attention as he can
i've never played with him town i guess, but from what i saw in stacking the deck, his townplay is much more proactive towards scumhunting and also more reckless
L-3GuyInFreezer wrote:
vote: bmin
Choo choo
I also played in touhou pyp IV, mystery mafia (ignore that one, i don't even know how i screwed myself this badly), Lucid Dreamers (don't remember much from that game) and information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).Sephibro wrote:
i dont remember anyone saying that
btw he's active on unusual mechanics and he played in stacking the deck iirc
my first forum mafia gameTanzklaue wrote:
information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).
I feel ya broSephibro wrote:
my first forum mafia gameTanzklaue wrote:
information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).
i got in as a replacement on d3, i read 42 pages and fartownick nightkilled me on n3
now you know one of the reasons why i hate him
it was my last game i had 5 months ago. i already lost interest and getting killed night 1 wasn't gonna fix that.Sephibro wrote:
my first forum mafia gameTanzklaue wrote:
information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).
i got in as a replacement on d3, i read 42 pages and fartownick nightkilled me on n3
now you know one of the reasons why i hate him
oh btw now that you know tanz is not a newbie you can comment on thisSephibro wrote:
he never joined a wagon for the whole d1
he said that my idea of no lynch made sense, but also didn't vote for it
he didn't do much more than just complaining about my trashtalk and trying to instil the idea of a modkill on me
he comfortably hid behind the hider fakeclaim (lesser)
if i was scum i wouldn't have outed myself at all.Sephibro wrote:
- he outed when i started making him questions
i'll answer my question for you: it means trying not to draw too many attentions imoGuyInFreezer wrote:
Being conservative with votes: don't use votes very much and usually only vote for very strong scumreads.
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.Sephibro wrote:
maybe you just didn't want to risk the CC from the real hider (if there's any in this game)
outing that fakeclaim gave you even more towncred and put you in a more comfortable situation
that's why i asked you to claim your real role
not really, as yourself said, you never claimed hider directly - so there can't be a cc without a claimTanzklaue wrote:
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.
what makes you so sure that there is a hider in this game?Sephibro wrote:
not really, as yourself said, you never claimed hider directly - so there can't be a cc without a claimTanzklaue wrote:
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.
also it's the first time i play with hider and i just noticed that claiming hider is pretty uncomfortable because 1. it's not confirmable in any way and 2. scum will never attempt a nk on hider
if you don't understand point 2, i mean that it's easy for a scum who fakeclaims hider justify the fact that he didn't die at night and give towncred to his partners telling that he hid behind them
thus a policy lynch on hider claim could be worth, just as i think it would be on bomb and pgo claims for the same reason
im not sure at all, i'm just underlining that it wouldn't have been comfortable for you to stay under that hider claim for youTanzklaue wrote:
what makes you so sure that there is a hider in this game?
aka wifomTanzklaue wrote:
also i fully understand point 2, but even then the confusion and time that a fake hider would create is worth more than eventual towncred from claiming this late.
ok - help me make bmin11 feel more involved in the discussion thenTanzklaue wrote:
I also won't claim my real role without good reason, since i still have faith that it has some purpose. purpose that might be lost if i claim.
hm, i don't know if that will make him talk. I have the oni kind of feel that he isn't really involved at all in this.Sephibro wrote:
ok - help me make bmin11 feel more involved in the discussion thenTanzklaue wrote:
I also won't claim my real role without good reason, since i still have faith that it has some purpose. purpose that might be lost if i claim.(read: vote him)
i already said why it wouldn't have been comfortable for youTanzklaue wrote:
if i was scum, i would've stood hidden behind the claim. especially since i would've partners, i could've played the role of hider straight.
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
i give you a suggestionbmin11 wrote:
Well, I don't have much to say other then my reason to vote rEdo for today.
He could have been weighting it with the side effect he was talking about, like misleading information and such.Raging Bull wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
if he has a stronger role, won't Tanz want to hide behind hider claim so mafia cant even shoot him?
as town, lying for too long would be dangerous, especially since i got asked out by sephi who i hid behind. if i said any name, this person would've been cleared as town.Raging Bull wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
if he has a stronger role, won't Tanz want to hide behind hider claim so mafia cant even shoot him?
So do you currently think Tanz is hiding behind the claim of hider earlier and possibly scum?Sephibro wrote:
not so easily:Tanzklaue wrote:
if i said any name, this person would've been cleared as town.Sephibro wrote:
p/2789350
don't make me repeat myself, i hate it
i've said all my opinions on tanz in the previous pagesSephibro wrote:
don't make me repeat myself, i hate it
Tanzklaue wrote:
also, what does anyone else think of this discussion (@RB, farto, redo, bmin, nyquill, dd, whoever i forgot).
don't wait for things that won't happen. it's better to get any discussion going at this point.NoHitter wrote:
Pretty much. For some reason the activity on the forum is stalling again.
I guess it's probably because of the plurality lynch/role madness.
Anyway, I'm waiting for bmin's responses.
don't hammer him, that doesn't help us either.DakeDekaane wrote:
Also the lack of interest is very awful, I'll hammer him/put a vote there, I'm developing a mania with hammers.
?Tanzklaue wrote:
don't hammer him, that doesn't help us either.DakeDekaane wrote:
Also the lack of interest is very awful, I'll hammer him/put a vote there, I'm developing a mania with hammers.
bmin11 wrote:
NoHitter wrote:
Vote: bmin
His "I don't want to interrupt discussions" and that pointless question struck me odd as I was skimming through the thread.As I said, I'm not going to interrupt discussions even if it's on the barge of going out of hand, despite my hatred for it. I'll have to admit that those could be used for future reads, so I have no intentions of stopping people from gathering info.bmin11 wrote:
Well, first of, I wish you guys to keep in mind that this is just a game through communication. I would not like to have another game like Dota Mafia nor 111111 mafia. I won't be disrupting discussions just to prevent that, but I hope you guys would know where to draw the line and how not to cross it.
My question was for my Oni's case. I guess it may have not helped getting rid of the WIFOM, but I wanted to see if there was a possible explanation on his lack of defense (or lack of panic posts).
I'll claim my role after reading your responses to my answers I have provided.bmin11 wrote:
Interfering =/= participating
My interfering is going to be like "both of you guys stfu", which I won't do that. Ofcourse I would join the discussion if I had anything to add on to the topic. Hell, I made a comment on most stuff even with a single post at least.
bmin11 wrote:
Interfering =/= participating
Jinxy wrote:
Vote Count 2.4.5
bmin11 (5) - NoHitter, Sephibro, GuyInFreezer, Tanzklaue, DakeDekaane
DakeDekaane (1) - fartownik
Sephibro (1) - rEdo
rEdo (1) - Raging Bull
Not Voting: Nyquill, bmin11
GuyInFreezer is V/LA until Friday.
Deadline is in 12 hours.
But I'm not voting you for being inactive.bmin11 wrote:
So, at the end, you guys are lynching an inactive over a wagon hopper?
that's a stretch when in the same game there are players like oni.Sephibro wrote:
bmin11 you're the most useless player i've ever played with, i hope i'll never ever have to play with you again