i mean, making long post that lazy ass players will ignore
oh btw now that you know tanz is not a newbie you can comment on thisSephibro wrote:
he never joined a wagon for the whole d1
he said that my idea of no lynch made sense, but also didn't vote for it
he didn't do much more than just complaining about my trashtalk and trying to instil the idea of a modkill on me
he comfortably hid behind the hider fakeclaim (lesser)
if i was scum i wouldn't have outed myself at all.Sephibro wrote:
- he outed when i started making him questions
i'll answer my question for you: it means trying not to draw too many attentions imoGuyInFreezer wrote:
Being conservative with votes: don't use votes very much and usually only vote for very strong scumreads.
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.Sephibro wrote:
maybe you just didn't want to risk the CC from the real hider (if there's any in this game)
outing that fakeclaim gave you even more towncred and put you in a more comfortable situation
that's why i asked you to claim your real role
not really, as yourself said, you never claimed hider directly - so there can't be a cc without a claimTanzklaue wrote:
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.
what makes you so sure that there is a hider in this game?Sephibro wrote:
not really, as yourself said, you never claimed hider directly - so there can't be a cc without a claimTanzklaue wrote:
if there was a real hider, he should've directly cc. since he can hide, it wouldn't even have been a 1 for 1 trade. so if there is a real hider, then he missplayed this situation i guess.
also it's the first time i play with hider and i just noticed that claiming hider is pretty uncomfortable because 1. it's not confirmable in any way and 2. scum will never attempt a nk on hider
if you don't understand point 2, i mean that it's easy for a scum who fakeclaims hider justify the fact that he didn't die at night and give towncred to his partners telling that he hid behind them
thus a policy lynch on hider claim could be worth, just as i think it would be on bomb and pgo claims for the same reason
im not sure at all, i'm just underlining that it wouldn't have been comfortable for you to stay under that hider claim for youTanzklaue wrote:
what makes you so sure that there is a hider in this game?
aka wifomTanzklaue wrote:
also i fully understand point 2, but even then the confusion and time that a fake hider would create is worth more than eventual towncred from claiming this late.
ok - help me make bmin11 feel more involved in the discussion thenTanzklaue wrote:
I also won't claim my real role without good reason, since i still have faith that it has some purpose. purpose that might be lost if i claim.
hm, i don't know if that will make him talk. I have the oni kind of feel that he isn't really involved at all in this.Sephibro wrote:
ok - help me make bmin11 feel more involved in the discussion thenTanzklaue wrote:
I also won't claim my real role without good reason, since i still have faith that it has some purpose. purpose that might be lost if i claim.(read: vote him)
i already said why it wouldn't have been comfortable for youTanzklaue wrote:
if i was scum, i would've stood hidden behind the claim. especially since i would've partners, i could've played the role of hider straight.
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
i give you a suggestionbmin11 wrote:
Well, I don't have much to say other then my reason to vote rEdo for today.
He could have been weighting it with the side effect he was talking about, like misleading information and such.Raging Bull wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
if he has a stronger role, won't Tanz want to hide behind hider claim so mafia cant even shoot him?
as town, lying for too long would be dangerous, especially since i got asked out by sephi who i hid behind. if i said any name, this person would've been cleared as town.Raging Bull wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't see Tanz that scummy after saying he wasn't a hider, in fact it was a smart move if he has a stronger role, that's why I don't feel to comfy about Sephi asking his exact role.
if he has a stronger role, won't Tanz want to hide behind hider claim so mafia cant even shoot him?
So do you currently think Tanz is hiding behind the claim of hider earlier and possibly scum?Sephibro wrote:
not so easily:Tanzklaue wrote:
if i said any name, this person would've been cleared as town.Sephibro wrote:
p/2789350
don't make me repeat myself, i hate it
i've said all my opinions on tanz in the previous pagesSephibro wrote:
don't make me repeat myself, i hate it
Tanzklaue wrote:
also, what does anyone else think of this discussion (@RB, farto, redo, bmin, nyquill, dd, whoever i forgot).
don't wait for things that won't happen. it's better to get any discussion going at this point.NoHitter wrote:
Pretty much. For some reason the activity on the forum is stalling again.
I guess it's probably because of the plurality lynch/role madness.
Anyway, I'm waiting for bmin's responses.
don't hammer him, that doesn't help us either.DakeDekaane wrote:
Also the lack of interest is very awful, I'll hammer him/put a vote there, I'm developing a mania with hammers.
?Tanzklaue wrote:
don't hammer him, that doesn't help us either.DakeDekaane wrote:
Also the lack of interest is very awful, I'll hammer him/put a vote there, I'm developing a mania with hammers.
bmin11 wrote:
NoHitter wrote:
Vote: bmin
His "I don't want to interrupt discussions" and that pointless question struck me odd as I was skimming through the thread.As I said, I'm not going to interrupt discussions even if it's on the barge of going out of hand, despite my hatred for it. I'll have to admit that those could be used for future reads, so I have no intentions of stopping people from gathering info.bmin11 wrote:
Well, first of, I wish you guys to keep in mind that this is just a game through communication. I would not like to have another game like Dota Mafia nor 111111 mafia. I won't be disrupting discussions just to prevent that, but I hope you guys would know where to draw the line and how not to cross it.
My question was for my Oni's case. I guess it may have not helped getting rid of the WIFOM, but I wanted to see if there was a possible explanation on his lack of defense (or lack of panic posts).
I'll claim my role after reading your responses to my answers I have provided.bmin11 wrote:
Interfering =/= participating
My interfering is going to be like "both of you guys stfu", which I won't do that. Ofcourse I would join the discussion if I had anything to add on to the topic. Hell, I made a comment on most stuff even with a single post at least.
bmin11 wrote:
Interfering =/= participating
Jinxy wrote:
Vote Count 2.4.5
bmin11 (5) - NoHitter, Sephibro, GuyInFreezer, Tanzklaue, DakeDekaane
DakeDekaane (1) - fartownik
Sephibro (1) - rEdo
rEdo (1) - Raging Bull
Not Voting: Nyquill, bmin11
GuyInFreezer is V/LA until Friday.
Deadline is in 12 hours.
But I'm not voting you for being inactive.bmin11 wrote:
So, at the end, you guys are lynching an inactive over a wagon hopper?
that's a stretch when in the same game there are players like oni.Sephibro wrote:
bmin11 you're the most useless player i've ever played with, i hope i'll never ever have to play with you again
My vote should be on rEdo by the wayJinxy wrote:
Jinxy wrote:
Vote Count 2.4.5
bmin11 (5) - NoHitter, Sephibro, GuyInFreezer, Tanzklaue, DakeDekaane
DakeDekaane (1) - fartownik
Sephibro (1) - rEdo
rEdo (1) - Raging Bull
Not Voting: Nyquill, bmin11
GuyInFreezer is V/LA until Friday.
Deadline is in 12 hours.
you could have done this 2 or 3 days ago, now you are putting us in a very bad situationbmin11 wrote:
Character: Saigyouji Yuyuko
Role: Town 1-Shot Restless Spirit
Nyquill wrote:
I actually don't know what would be the best course of action when we have a restless spirit.
But I actually really really really don't like tanz's line of thinking.
it is ok that you die today too thenbmin11 wrote:
I can use it any night I want and I'll be able to vote the following day.
why not?NoHitter wrote:
Also, Sephi why vote me?
also excusatio non petita accusatio manifestaNoHitter wrote:
Already explained I was willing to vote anyone I wasn't reading to be town/null-town.
If you have to vote between your townread and your scumread, who would you vote?Sephibro wrote:
why rEdo over NH?