1. Advanced (4.8 stars, 248 notes)
2. Color's Another (5 stars, 531 notes)
3. Extra (5 stars, 575 notes)
4. Normal (2.89 stars, 125 notes)
5. Priti's Hyper (4.91 stars, 377 notes)

Seph wrote:

FUCK U

ThoomyyxD wrote:

I can make Hard?

Faust wrote:

Looks rather splashy with the standard combo-coloring. Not a problem though.
I did think - 01:13:529 - to - 01:25:529 - could have had kiai, I felt the glowing would act as a nice effect for the slow section since it's the prelude.
Experimenting with not using kiai, otherwise the breakdown would have it. I think the jump in difficulty is flashy enough.

Advanced:

- 01:33:967 (3) - Linear for a reason, I suppose ? Yes, every time the song goes pew pew (short high pitched bursts), there is always a linear slider covering it.

Extra:

Nice to see plenty of deliberate takings on this difficulty, like tickrate 2.0 and the volume decrease afer the second-half to match the track.
Honestly, I quite like the way this is already mapped.

- 00:47:092 (4) - Might as well touch the curving on this up to make it seem less randomly-made. Less dramatic now

- 02:00:310 (2) - Could try shifting this to x:196 y:332 to have similar gaping like - 01:57:310 (2) - oooooooooooooooooooooo

Faust wrote:

Priti's Hyper:

Pretty good at maintaining a consistent pace throughout despite it not being as conformed to any particular kind of strict mapping structure.

- 00:28:529 (1,2) - Small shifting, could give it a shot if it makes you happy: Didn't like it since it ruins the symmetry between them, it looks awkward.

- 00:49:904 (3) - Feel that it could look better if you mirrored - 00:50:654 (6) - I ain't feelin it man

- 01:33:029 (1) - Kind of an odd-shaping to take considering the slider you're running into next. Suppose you could flip - 01:33:404 (3) - horizontally Changed

As a bit of a nit-pick, you might want to remake (3) for precaution.

- 01:44:279 (5) - Rotate selection-centre by 16 degrees and place at x:120 y:240, then rotate - 01:44:654 (6) - by -31 degrees. Looks nice, changed ^^

- 01:52:154 (6,1) - Here's a little suggestion for placement:

Doesn't that ruin everything, including the flow? unchanged.

Design-wise, this difficulty is pretty much characterized by streams going into sliders going into another slider, and then repeating.
Not a big issue, though things can look cluttered and even more so when you apply sliderpoints on the linears so there's this whole mash-up of curving and zig-zagged objects going about. Well, my main intention was making a stressful clusterish diff, which turned out pretty well for a Hyper(active)

Seph wrote:

AW YIS

MOTHAFUCKIN

NEW

ASTRONOMAS

another star for you (i gave 3 now what?)

Faust wrote:

Color's Another:

Kind of reminds me of the way I mapped ICARUS, since there's plenty of the same slider shaping paired with the slanted back-forth jumping. Incidentally, ICARUS is one of my favorite maps of yours, so I'm a bit flattered by this comment, I gotta say :p

- 00:59:373 (7,8,9,1,2,1) - This really hits well right after the previous stream. Captures the part so well; amazing aesthetics here. Thanks!

- 01:30:029 (1) - Thought this wouldn't look so good since the slider before curves to the same direction. Try going inverse, perhaps ? I tried it reversed, but I don't think it changes much? The follow-up makes it pretty cluttered too, which I kind of want to avoid. I'll stick with my own version for now.

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Priti's Hyper

1. 00:24:029 (1) - - it might be better if you do something like this imo : Ruins the cut with 6, and I prefer the cut over the blanket, no change.
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:37:529 (1,2,3) - it's just me or not, but it might be surprising for Hard players after a short spinner. 1. This is a light insane, not a hard. 2. From what I have seen in playtests, this wasn't an issue for anyone.
3. 00:43:529 (1) - move this slider a bit further than 00:43:154 (5) -, when iplayed it i thought there was a 1/4 spacing. Changed.
4. 00:57:685 (4,5) - it might be better if you unstack these notes and making something like 00:56:560 (5,6) - Changed.

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Normal

1. 00:13:529 (1,2,3) - it will be better if you make an equilateral triangle for aesthetics imo. And also there an equilateral triangle here 00:16:529 (1,2,3) Did both
2. 00:24:029 (3) - why dont to use a finish with clap at the slider's end ? Oops added finish
3. 00:49:529 (1,2) - why don't to make this ? : Also added rotation for blanket
4. 00:52:529 (1) - since i'm a nazi modder, you might fix this overlap. They're not touching :O
5. 01:21:029 (3) - it might be better if you don't use a red anchors for this slider, i prefer this : Did a slight variation of that

Advanced

1. 00:09:779 (2,3) - it will be nice if you make a blanket here (if you did it, don't forget to change 00:09:029 (1) - ) Moved the 3
2. 00:12:779 (3) - why don't to add a finish ? (beginning) Specifically avoiding hitsounds for the intro bit
3. 00:54:029 (1,2) - if it is supposed to be a blanket, you might fix. Moved 1 a few pixels, moved 5 a pixel to fix spacing
4. 00:57:029 (1,2) - also here, blanket to fix and i suggest you to make sliders like this : These are meant to subtly descend
5. 01:16:154 (3) - maybe ctrl+g here ? I want jagged movement for this pattern
6. 01:36:779 (1) - seems extreme to play after a fast pattern for normal/hard players imo, and has a different sv than 01:37:154 (2) - , so add a NC here maybe ? The 1 is curved in a such a way that even if the player does think it's slower or immediately heads to the 2, they will still complete the slider. I think they will be fine.
7. 01:56:092 (2,3) - Blanket here. Just moved 3 to the left, not going for major blanket here

Extra

1. 00:42:967 (3) - move 1 grid down for a better shape. Moved 1 grid down and 1 pixel to the right. Hopefully this 0.03 won't trip people up and hopefulyl the better shape will make it play easier
2. 00:49:154 (1,2,3,4) - it might be better if you make a curve with these notes imo. I want strong contrast with the previous curving
3. 01:38:279 (3) - NC here ? Nah I think that would mess up the HP drain more than it already is

Oracle wrote:

Priti's Hyper
00:09:779 (3,1) - Why not a blanket for them? Because it's not a blanket pattern.
00:42:779 (1) - Remove new combo. I will discuss this with Charles, for now I am keeping it there.
00:54:310 (2,3) - Move them left a bit. Changed the whole combo so it fits better.
00:58:342 (7) - Ctrl+G? Did Ctrl + H instead, makes it look nicer imo
01:24:029 (1) - A bit noisy. Try reducing the volume to 50%. Sounds much better. Changed to a custom sample and actually increased the volume to make it work better
01:31:623 (1,2) - Move them up a little.Flows better. nudged it up by a few grids.
01:41:373 (5,6,7,8) - Should make them in a straight line with same spacing. lol charles don goofed, fixed.
01:58:529 (1,2) - Better make a blanket. okie

Oracle wrote:

Hi Charles,
M4M From my queue
A bit late, sorry.
They're mainly suggestions, feel free to ignore them but tell me the reason so I'll do better next time.

General
I suggest you rename [Normal] as [Beginner] Since you're using Beginner/Basic,Advanced,Hyper,Another here. A [Normal] sounds a bit out of set.
Sets do this all the time

Normal
00:23:279 (2) - I'd prefer something like this http://puu.sh/6sACK.jpg I'd agree if this wasn't a Normal difficulty. The player is going to follow the slider to the end so the 2 should catch their movement from up top.
00:29:279 (2,3) - Why sudden spacing change to 1.2x? Because symmetry
00:58:529 (1) - Too many green lines between this spinner..I suggest placing them uniformly through the spinning time. It's only meant to accentuate the end.
01:28:529 (3) - whistle on reverse and slider end. Consistent with Advanced and Extra That's the red tick, not the blue tick.
01:34:529 (3) - ^ That's the red tick, not the blue tick.
01:40:529 (4) - ^ That's the red tick, not the blue tick.
01:46:529 (3) - ^ That's the red tick, not the blue tick.
01:46:529 (3) - Move it right a bit. Flows better. Redid 1 and 2 to make it a little better.
01:59:654 (4) - Deleted this circle? As the previous places like this is empty(01:53:654 - 01:55:154 - 01:56:654 - ) The song ups the pace a few seconds earlier so this circle maintains that.
02:00:029 (1) - Same suggestion about green lines as above. Again only meant to emphasize the end.

Advanced
00:15:592 (2,3,1) - Fix spacing? No reason for this slightly spacing change. That's like, 0.04. Turned off grid snap to make it 1.2 both
00:36:029 (5) - Add new combo. No, the slider at 00:37:904 (1) - is supposed to make up for it
01:11:467 (1) - Use similar green lines trick as Normal? ok
01:16:154 (3) - Ctrl+G? Want it to be antiflow here
Very well-made

Color's Another
00:37:529 (1,2) - Is this 1/4 jump intentional? Would easily get confused with 00:39:029 (1,2) - He's keeping it lol
01:25:904 (1,1) - Blanket master!!!<3 yay
01:56:654 (10,1) - Make them parallel? Looks better to me. Fixed

Extra445
00:22:154 (1) - Consider removing this new combo since there's no spacing change. Direction change, want to make it clear where it starts.
01:15:404 (5) - New combo,different spacing. Hey you shoulda said that about the first one

Since patterns on high diffculty diff are pretty subjective and this one is very solid. I couldn't find much. The overall placement for this diff could be tidier tho. But that's also subjective. Not gonna point them out since I focus less on visual side of a diff now.
Interesting streams!

Fun map. Have my star. Good luck on this!!

Priti wrote:

Custom sample I added for only 1 note (keep it as 3

Charles445 wrote:

>:(

jacob wrote:

[Normal]
00:24:029 (3) - this slider's design looks odd compared to everything else Improved it
00:33:779 (5) - align this horizontally with 00:33:029 (3) No real reason to other than make things more rectangular
00:51:029 (3,1) - slight overlap between these two sliders, looks ugly. fixing it shouldn't be hard They aint even touching
01:46:529 (3) - same as my first suggestion I like this one though. Did a slight change on the end angle.
01:49:529 (4) - ^ for this instance, i suggest something like this It changes direction to the music.

[Advanced]
00:37:904 (1) - what's with the one note combo? seems pointless The spinner doesn't have a new combo so that slider can have a new combo so the next slider can start off the next part with a new combo on the white tick. It's very much intentional.
01:15:779 (2,3) - i feel this pattern would flow better if you reversed (2) Everyone keeps suggesting this and no I'm not going to change it, it's not supposed to flow here.
01:40:529 (1,2) - try this with (1), i think it looks cooler I think that'd cause overlap problems, also I like its original position

[Color's Another]
00:37:529 (1) - i think it would be cool to make this a one note combo due to the sv change and the way the song is at this part It's not a new combo to make sure HP is consistent.
01:41:373 (7,8) - these almost overlap and it looks kinda weird. seperate them by a grid or two Better they not touch the score up top or the objects down below. This is a good place for them to be.

[Extra]
00:28:529 (1,2,3) - these almost overlap and it looks ugly not really
00:51:029 (1,2,3) - ^ This is going by so quickly I don't think anyone would mind objects that aren't even overlapping

gl