mods reply
Alarido wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
* 00:08:507 (7,1) - This jump feels intentional due to placements made and song suggests it. It's ok :3
* 00:08:283 (6,7) - But this other jump feels a bit unintentional, no higher voice pitch... so you could set 00:08:507 (7) - at x:264 y:156, overlapping its tail with 00:08:059 (5) - perfectly. It regularizes spacing (: Same.
00:19:925 (2,3) - would be a bit closer, and also 00:23:507 (2,3), since there's no stronger voice pitch nor strong drum/instrument to justify this. It feels done by aesthetics (avoid some overlapping, etc), like you did at 00:25:074 (2,3,4) - hmm i put jump part to follow the vocal :3
smallboat wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
00:22:835 (4) - (12|72)? (I think slider cover another slider end is not good pattern.) It's fine to me.
00:24:402 (5) - Slider end rotate angle? Try it: no change. 00:31:790 (6) - Feel can make a small jump,move to (440|64)? nope.
01:11:417 (1) - Ctrl+g? (Because this music is turn up,and feel flow better.) the flow will be really bad :<
azuretwinight wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
General
Good diff. Some suggestions here.
Beats
01:06:044 (1,2,3,4,5,6) and 01:20:373 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (and 01:02:686 (1,2,3,4) and 01:17:014 (1,2,3,4) - ) - Use former one as example. This 2 part you make the same beats which find the reason. But I still think the beats is not so good in distributing hittings. You used tirple hit in the long vocal which I think is acceptable and then the slider is a little long and covered the next strong voice at 01:06:716 . And this made a feeling of missing the strong voice.Then the voice on 01:06:940 (4) is a long voice which I think is more fit in a slider, but you distributed a hit at 01:07:164 which is less important to emphasize I think. And if you want to follow drum here, the change of following is kinda rapid I think.(01:02:686 (1,2,3,4) and 01:17:014 (1,2,3,4) Here the 2 part is less important to mention the beat issue I think.) hmm it is enough for playing imo.
Placement
00:13:880 (2) - Though blanket is good but is not so consistent in flow here. It's ok to me.
00:31:119 (3,4) - Jump is not so reasonable here I think. Just suggestion. nope.
00:52:387 - Add a note here to fix the feeling of break? i didn't follow this sound.
01:06:268 (3) - Maybe you can bend the slider to make the flow smoother.Something like this. for what ? i prefer straight slider.
Mintong wrote:
[アラキャット's Hard]
00:24:850 (1,2) - i prefer don't stack here, it just no so fun to play imo at here. i prefer stack :p
00:42:761 (1,2) - ^ Same.
00:29:104 (3,4) - it's look little stiff imo with 00:28:432 (1) - , so i prefer curve here. no change. i used previous slider :3
leon1341414 wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
- 01:26:641(3,4) - Maybe like this ? :
I hear 01:27:089 - to 01:27:537 - have three stronger drum voice , just feel it will be fit in slider with repeat , and 01:26:641 - 's vocal fit a slider too. not fit to me.
Guy wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
- 00:41:193 (1) - 赤点ついた00:15:223 (5) - これと同じようなスライダー使ったほうが見た目が良いと思います。これをそのままコピペしてCtrl+Jでいいと思います。ok
- 01:09:626 (1) - シンバルのような音も見当たらないしfinishは合わない気がしました。whistleに変更してみてはどうでしょうはずしました~ ...( ばれた
- 01:13:432 (1) - ^ こちらはkiai timeを盛り上げるために必要なのではずしません
http://puu.sh/5qFaQ.zip
Thank you for modding.