1. For normal, it is better to uniform DS as soon as possible I know orz but I couldn't resist putting some jumps in to make the play more interesting
2. 00:54:509 (3,4) - avoid stack Okay, I ctrl+g'd this.
3. 01:05:343 (1,2,3,4,1) - too difficult for normal. it is better to avoid overlap I sort of like how this looks currently. I can see what you mean though, so I'll put it on my list of things to consider and I'll see what others have to say about it.

1. 00:33:426 (2) - How about deltete?
2. 00:33:759 (6) - ^ I'll consider the above. It does match the rhythm better but I think it might make the stream awkward to play? I'll see if more people bring this up.
3. 01:06:593 (5,1) - That's fine!!!
4. 01:28:009 (1) - move to x:256 y:172 at the center of "ring.png" That's weird, I placed the ring at 320,240 which is what the center of the screen should be. I think this looks off in the editor, but seems to be more centered in actual play.

RandomEffect wrote:

[appafy's Hard]

1. 00:18:676 (1,2) - it is better to avoid stack Already did this in a previous update
2. 00:59:343 (4,5) - it is better to stack, I think sure
3. 01:07:343 (2,3) - How about this? I like it the way it is now, sorry
   

Navy wrote:

[apaffy's Hard]

00:05:343 (7) - nc

(2,3,4,5) ex)00:15:343 (2,3,4,5) ,00:20:676 (2,3,4,5) ..
repeated jump is hard for me.. I think it's fine, but if someone else mentions it I'll change it

I recommend utilizing stack (2,3) and (4,5)

I think adding circle between (1) and (2) makes the map exciting

Navy wrote:

00:28:676 (2,3,4,5) - move (3) the overlapping was hard to fix so the whole pattern has been redone as a result

00:33:843 (1) - delete nc it wouldn't fit with the music

01:24:843 (4,5,6) - distance thanks for spotting that

[Seraphin] wrote:

[apaffy's Hard]
01:12:843 (3) - start 1/2 later o- okay
01:17:843 (2) - move out from under (1) for consistency it wouldn't be consistent with 3,4 and it plays fine so no

yachiru4 wrote:

[Hard]
It's actually good, I've just started to lose my touch a bit that's all
Attempted 3 tries. There's a few things wrong here.
At 00:12:009 -, I don't like how they're stacked, its too confusing. Alright, multiple people have mentioned this now. What if I rotate 00:12:009 (1) - so while it still is stacked now the first slider doesn't overlap the second? I think the stack itself is fine but I can see how the overlap is confusing.
00:40:009 - Eh these two sliders don't look nice being overlapped, try a blanket? I actually think it looks good as is lol, and there's a couple blankets almost right after this so no sorry

Lirami wrote:

apaffy's Hard

00:12:009 (1) - I think it is more better to make like this. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/952741 slider's finish point: (40,276) imo. I did something very similar to this
00:40:009 (1,2) - Try to avoid overlap. the overlap was intentional though :<
01:30:009 (2,3,4,5,1) - avoid stack. It can be confused to Hard Difficulty player. I'll think about rearranging and see what I can come up with.

HelloSCV wrote:

apaffy's Hard

00:08:009 (1) - reduce spinner by 00:10:343 - here plz, this spinner isn't good for Hard diff imo good idea
00:12:009 (1,1) - stack perfectly? -nazi think it's better?
00:33:509 (2,5) - delete NC ok
00:37:676 (1) - clap on start ok
00:55:176 (1) - also delete NC ok
01:36:343 (1,1) - ^ this doesn't really make sense
01:48:676 (1) - ^ ok

15.42 Kecco: Ehi!
15.44 11t: hey, good morning
15.44 Kecco: 'morning
15.44 Kecco: Your map needs some combo work
15.45 Kecco: I can do it for you and then pass the osu
15.45 Kecco: I'll leave the notes untouched
15.47 11t: some of those combos are long and the NCs fall inbetween downbeats purposefully though
15.47 11t: other times i added NCs to match triangular patterns
15.48 11t: do you think you could point out some specific areas?
15.51 Kecco: I'd like you to highlight the "stairs-slider" with the new combos
15.51 Kecco: 00:35:009 (4) - 
15.51 Kecco: 00:37:676 (5) - 
15.51 Kecco: 00:45:676 (5) - 
15.51 Kecco: 00:48:343 (6) - 
15.52 Kecco: And then... new combo here 00:54:509 (5) - 
15.52 Kecco: And here there should be a new combo too 00:56:009 (3) - 
15.52 Kecco: since there's another stanza beginning
15.52 Kecco: 01:15:509 (7,8,1,2) - 
15.53 Kecco: These ruins the flow AN AWFUL LOT
15.53 Kecco: You might stack them.
15.54 Kecco: 01:31:843 (11,1) - This makes me sad
15.55 11t: i lot of people mentioned that part
15.55 Kecco: From http://puu.sh/4go1k.jpg to http://puu.sh/4go1Z.jpg (← Would be way better imo)
15.55 11t: but i really wanted to match the synth rhythm
15.56 Kecco: Actually I think that what I suggested should be more correct, it matches the rhythm more and it's also consistent with the previous notes
15.56 Kecco: It's a win win situation
15.56 11t: i feel like if i add a triple there it becomes just another triple spam
15.56 11t: whereas in the music it's different there
15.56 11t: the synth only plays two notes
15.56 Kecco: It does seem like that
15.56 Kecco: But there's actually a 3-tone there
15.57 11t: i only hear 2 at 25%
15.57 Kecco: I know right
15.57 Kecco: But you might also include the beat
15.57 11t: the only thing that i hear on the white tick is the kick drum
15.57 Kecco: Yep, that one
15.58 11t: i don't want to follow the percussion here though
15.58 11t: i want to focus solely on the synth
15.58 Kecco: Do as you wish :<
15.58 11t: it's just one of those things that everyone tells me to change but i just can't
15.59 Kecco: 00:39:843 (3) - Ruins the flow imo.
15.59 Kecco: I'd prefer two notes
15.59 Kecco: instead of a slider
16.00 11t: i think the slider more accurately captures the vocal rhythm
16.01 Kecco: Same would go for this 00:50:509 (3) - 
16.01 Kecco: But ok
16.01 11t: what makes it bad for the flow?
16.02 Kecco: Your muscle memory after you play 00:34:176 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - 
16.02 Kecco: By playing that section
16.02 Kecco: You just get used to "1 hitcircle + 1 slider; 1 hitcircle + 1 slider; 1 hitcircle + 1 slider; ecc"
16.03 Kecco: Instead, 00:39:509 (1,2,3) - this is 2 hitcircles + 1 slider.
16.03 Kecco: Resulting in ruining the flow.
16.03 Kecco: But this is just a suggestion
16.03 11t: i guess that makes sense
16.03 Kecco: It's nothing really wrong.
16.04 11t: it is a different sort of section though so wouldn't ruining the flow be sort of an inevitability?
16.04 Kecco: Yep
16.04 Kecco: I was getting to that
16.04 Kecco: But the inevitability depends on you
16.04 Kecco: You might also figure out another way to map it.
16.05 11t: what would the advantages in terms of flow be if I replaced it with 2 hitcircles?
16.06 Kecco: That's al lbtw
16.06 Kecco: all*
16.08 11t: okay, thanks for the feedback, it was really helpful!
16.08 Kecco: Pffff
16.08 Kecco: I did nothing
16.08 Kecco: lol
16.08 11t: you pointed out areas with awkward flow
16.08 11t: and also some NC issues
16.09 11t: can you post this in the thread so I can keep track of it?
16.09 11t: or I could post it if you want
16.10 Kecco: I can do that

84,43,34676,22,0,P|105:94|109:152,1,99.9999999999999,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
117,228,35343,1,0,0:0:0:0:
93,314,35676,1,0,0:0:0:0:
182,322,36009,2,0,P|243:246|337:269,1,200
272,332,37009,1,0,0:0:0:0:

Krah wrote:

[Apaffy's Hard]

- 00:40:009 (1,2) - I'm not really a fan of the superposition of this notes. I personally prefer something like that for exemple http://puu.sh/4euA0.jpg sorry, but I like it the way it is now and there's one or two blankets almost literally right after those two
- 00:44:843 (1) - Remove Nc. Fit better with the voice but not with the sb >_< think it fits better with the music the way it is now
- 01:23:176 (2) - Stack this with the end of (1) ? I'll think about it but i don't think it will look so good
- 01:30:009 (2,3,4,5) - So many stack notes :s This can be really hard to read (but I know it's a hard diff ...) imo, plays fine

5eania wrote:

[apaffy's Hard]
00:11:343 (3) - move to left 1 grid ok
00:39:009 (3) - copy 2 silder, and rotate 90° that works
01:02:176 - 01:02:259 - add circle probably easier to read that way
01:42:343 (1) - move to right 1 grid makes it worse, sorry
01:47:343 (3) - slider end point, up to 1 grid. ok

bigfrog wrote:

apaffy's Hard
00:11:009(2,3) almost overlap,try to move like 00:10:676(1,2) i don't see anything there, though this may have been fixed by a previous mod
00:12:009(1) turn 30 degrees counterclockwise i adjusted the angle here but not by that much
00:36:343 add a note? it's easy to be confusion fair enough
00:41:343(1,2) blanket adjusted
00:59:343(4,1) try to symmetry [(1) more bent] it's fine as is right now
01:23:676(4) stack 01:23:843(1) start? nah
01:40:676(2,1) parallel and (2) pointing (3) adjusted 2

Irreversible wrote:

[apaffy's Hard]

00:12:843 (1) - This is not perfectly stacked with 00:12:009 (1) - yeah, i think it should be fine now

00:34:509 - This circle is unnecessary. Please remove it, and move 00:34:676 (1) - to it's place instead. Also: Extend the slider until 00:35:009 - ! i mapped the rhythm perfectly there, there is a beat there and i do not want to use a slider to cover up the beat that is currently on the slider start

00:40:009 (1,2) - This arrangement is not really well made. The overlap is really weird! You can fix this if you just map it with a DS like.. 0.6 or something, but it should definitely touch the slider end of slider 1. why do people keep bringing this up ;~; the overlap there is intentional, i do not want it to touch the slider end of 1 sorry

01:16:676 (7) - Why that double reverse? People can't tell why it's there, and it does not fit the music at all. Replace it with a slider and a circle, please. sure

01:23:843 (1) - Same issue as 00:34:509 - : Red ticks slider tend to be unfitting. 01:23:676 (4) - Delete this one and move the slider backwards. ok

The diff is quite solid!

TheGrimOfCrazy wrote:

Hard:

00:14:343 (3) - bah don't perfectly align these. Bring this one to the right. i see what you're going for but I'm just worried about the spacing

01:09:343 (3) - Need more curve tweaked it a little

01:26:843 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't like how it goes back into the slider. You could do this better. i love this pattern :< I really like how it is now
00:39:509 (4) - Not aligned with 3's end. good catch

00:40:509 (2) - Please flip http://grab.by/pSLS

00:41:009 (3,4,1) - after flipping do this http://grab.by/pSLW I'm pretty sure you were using 1.4x spacing(lowered SV to make visible) this was actually a really cool suggestion on for this part so I did both though slightly different

Sieg wrote:

Hello, sorry for dealy
apaffy's Hard:
01:05:676 (1,1,1) - what this NC spam, consider to remove ok
01:36:009 (1,1,1,1) - ok this one is good
good hard diff

10crystalmask01 wrote:

[apaffy's Hard]
00:05:343 (7) - NC would screw up SB
00:40:009 (1,2) - Random overlap o.o finally fixed in above mod
00:51:676 (5) - Might look better if curved outwards like this:
But that's just imo. ehh, I think it's fine as is, but thank you for the suggestion anyways
01:16:676 (7) - Add finish on well... the entire thing >.< ok?
01:23:843 (1) - Add finish on the tail. slider got moved, but there's a finish added on the end of the pattern
01:50:343 (1) - NC isn't really necessary here. ok