It seems like I can't read...or understand sarcasm...Sakura wrote:
So here's some discussion.
I got a townread on fartownik, discuss!
I don't even know.
It seems like I can't read...or understand sarcasm...Sakura wrote:
So here's some discussion.
I got a townread on fartownik, discuss!
Not enough sleep.Raging Bull wrote:
I mean truthfully, you blatantly said "sheeping to fart" who the hell cannot see it? (besides people who don't read the thread)
Sakura wrote:
I never did, are you even reading? I wanted to gauge reactions from people to me townreading fart outta nowhere.Raging Bull wrote:
Wait what? Now you aren't townreading Tanz/fart?
This post was after Sakura's reaction test and she never talked about it not being real until RB called her out and she just explained it as a "reaction test".Sakura wrote:
I townread fartownik because of noticing the blatant sheeping I did, and I asked to discuss that so we got out of RVS fast and we can start hunting information, and I love how I already got some reactions from my point of discussion.
Leaning Town: fartownik, Tanz
Leaning Scum: NH.
Null: Everyone else.
And no massclaiming PRs is not a good idea to hunt information.
On the last post of page 10, you talked about gauging reactions on townreading fart in reply to RB, and specifically ignored Tanz, too.NoHitter wrote:
Care to tell us why Tanz is leaning town, and I'm leaning scum? <Not Answered, specifically the underlined part>Sakura wrote:
I townread fartownik because of noticing the blatant sheeping I did, and I asked to discuss that so we got out of RVS fast and we can start hunting information, and I love how I already got some reactions from my point of discussion.
Leaning Town: fartownik, Tanz
Leaning Scum: NH.
Null: Everyone else.
And no massclaiming PRs is not a good idea to hunt information.Nice scumpainting there. <Answered>Sakura wrote:
So NH care to tell me why you think it would work, in the most likely scenario that we are all PRs?
Or did you want to claim everyone's abilities so you and your scumbuddies take out the most OP ones?
You know I feel like NH is trying to meta game this time (with specific mention to his statement last game - he's town if he suggests something ridiculous). Then again I don't really like meta so I'm taking it with a grain of salt.NoHitter wrote:
Hi guys.
Two's method again? It worked last time
Incorrect, Salvage was normal Mafia Goon. However, I'm pretty sure pieguy actually made everyone PR now, at least that was what we learnt when we did the first Touhou game.Kitsunemimi wrote:
Tbh I'm pretty sure everyone is PR, this is Touhou after all.fartownik wrote:
I'm all for not claiming the exact roles in this game. This is different than Stack the Deck. The only thing we should do is to half-claim
In the first Touhou PyP, also hosted by pieguy, everyone was PR too.
Just trying to be consistent with my metaRantai wrote:
You know I feel like NH is trying to meta game this time (with specific mention to his statement last game - he's town if he suggests something ridiculous). Then again I don't really like meta so I'm taking it with a grain of salt.
Because I discovered RQS to be ineffective. People would just answer the questions then activity would drop after that.Lilac wrote:
I also do not like how NoHitter wanted to go for a "Two method" approach. What happened to those RQSs that you did so long ago? Why bring up someone else's way of scumhunting when you can just use your own and still be perfectly viable?
Let's see.Jinxy wrote:
And Royston, after reading the thread, what is your opinion / who stands out to you as scummy as of now? Provide reasons please. (e.g. what posts and why it make you think like that)
Tanzklaue wrote:
this is pyp, and also touhou. I think it's a safe bet that everyone is a PR
This seems like a pretty big assumption to make without evidence, so it seems kind of odd to me. Not necessarily scummy, but odd.Tanzklaue wrote:
I am pretty convinced that everyone is a PR
note how it states " matching-ish ability to be your role" rather than simply "an ability and a role". But semantics.OP wrote:
After signing up, please send me a forum pm with the names of 3 Touhou characters. I'll pick one of those characters, with a matching-ish ability to be your role.
in particular this statement earlier on confused the hell out of me and seems a werid way to start discussion? With that said, I also don't know why scum would want to draw attention to theselves like that so early on anyway, so mehSakura wrote:
Everything will come with time, i wanna hear everyone's thoughts on why i'm townreading you to see if everyone's seeing the same thing i'm seeing..
Would you tell me why you think soRaging Bull wrote:
fart x Sakura scum team yay.
Sakura wrote:
Well those reads kinda sux, everyone is null to scum!
Jinxy wrote:
Sakura is leaning scum due to question avoidance and convenient excuses, covered all that already.
in other news, deep sleep.BRBP wrote:
Hi guys,
I won't participate in that massclaim.
Good night.
+1 town cred right there.Jinxy wrote:
Well excuse me princess, fartownik asked for it in case you didn't notice
I didn't fully understand what he meant by this, but I still think that mentioning this was somewhat unnecessary.NoHitter wrote:
If we are to claim though, I suggest claiming in two parts. That way we get two chances to catch someone.
i.e. If someone claims Role A, and someone else claims Role A too OR if someone claims Character A, and someone claims character A too.
Not lynched, just suspicious.. also drawing votes towards me is also part of my plan.Tanzklaue wrote:
so you think getting yourself lynched is useful to town?
Explaining that would throw my plan away, sorry. It would make scum wary of what NOT to do.Tanzklaue wrote:
so under what circumstances can it be beneficial for town to just suspect one guy and vote him/her?
Almost zero.Tanzklaue wrote:
so under what circumstances can it be beneficial for town to just suspect one guy and vote him/her?
you already did that kind of thing in other games.Sakura wrote:
Explaining that would throw my plan away, sorry. It would make scum wary of what NOT to do.Tanzklaue wrote:
so under what circumstances can it be beneficial for town to just suspect one guy and vote him/her?
Yeah, and we got out of it suspecting you mostly :fSakura wrote:
My goal with my stupid reaction test was to get town of the RVS as fast as possible, i've said that plenty of times already, is there anything else on me?
For what reason?fartownik wrote:
Yeah, and we got out of it suspecting you mostly :fSakura wrote:
My goal with my stupid reaction test was to get town of the RVS as fast as possible, i've said that plenty of times already, is there anything else on me?
If he really wanted to keep that discussion going then he should be being voted right now, that discussion would have been very detrimental to town because obv the townies with the better abilities would be right out rejecting something like that, and scum would know where to start shooting.Raging Bull wrote:
imo, discussion looked pretty nice at first, but with your claim on fart, it is hard to even know how it wiould have been in the first place. NH looked liek he would keep discussion going.
"Want to know more? Keep me alive." This looks like an attempt to buy time and not get lynched D1 instead of anything useful to me, unless she can give something concrete by the end of D1 to persuade me.Sakura wrote:
It will all make sense come D2...
I didn't really get this part of what you said, here. What's "it", the massclaim suggestion? Is it regarding the first or the second possibility?fartownik wrote:
Either Sakura is sure she can prove herself Town in the future (i.e. claiming Mason) or she's Jester, because she acts pretty crazy (SAKURA ON ACID).
The second might be possible, but it might be a also a play so we don't lynch her and she's actually scum with NoHitter whom bring the idea of it.
These types of lines always sit uncomfortably with me because they're a wish-washy way of saying I'm fine with this lynch but don't want to do anything about it. And yeah I did see his next post, which doesn't really salvage that post.Kitsunemimi wrote:
If people still want to lynch Sakura then I have nothing against that, it's just that it seems too obvious.
What exactly looks different? What are you comparing it to? Is this difference even scum worthy? You've left things absurdly vague which makes it 'look' like you are contributing but anyone could say that things look different.BRBP wrote:
I just read everything on one go so I might've missed stuff, but I'm just going to vote Sakura for now. Even if she's a jester, it's very unlikely that the game will end when she's lynched. I'd rather have a lynched jester than a breathing scum. Sakura has been doing some reaction testing in other games as well, but this time it just looked different to me.
This REALLY irritates me. NoHitter is calling people by their old names because he's too insensitive and latching on to the past instead of moving on like some of us have. That's not the point though, what actually irritates me is that you've also stated 'overall behaviour', another general term. Maybe a vote on you can actually make you become more specific as opposed to leaving out bits and pieces for us to try and generalise about. It seems to me your only reason in to wanting to vote for him is cause he mentioned the past, people's previous names and damn I am not letting you get away with that.BRBP wrote:
I don't really know what NH is doing. Maybe calling people by their old names is just a weak way of trying to breadcrumb some ancient games he has played with you, but this is just guessing :/ I'll vote him for his overall behaviour if Sakura suddenly proves she's town.
Even 'professionals' can crumble apart if you tear at them long enough in the right way.BRBP wrote:
Jinxy is too pro and unreadable to me :<