1. Timing is have some problem,you should ask bat to test it.because I find ave 10±4 late when I playing.

• Useless Green line

  1. Fine.
  
  
  
  Rhythm
  
  
• Fine.
  
  

• Useless Green line

  1. None.
  
  
  
  Rhythm
  
  
• 00:34:192 (1,2,3) - To be honest, I don't know why you want to use different ds,and 00:35:906 (3,4,5) - 3 4 is 0.63,but 4 5 is 1.0 ,00:36:764 (5,1) - is 0.55
• 00:37:621 (1,2,1) - The same problem as 00:34:192 (1,2,3) -
• 01:00:549 - and 01:01:406 - you should add notes.
• 01:05:906 (1,2,3,4) - Not beautiful and have a little messy.
• 01:13:621 (1,3) - Not beautiful.
• 01:43:621 (3) - NC & 01:43:835 (1) - delete NC .
• 01:46:621 (6,7) - If you use blanket with 01:45:335 (4) - >.<
• 01:47:692 - should add a note.
• 01:51:764 (2) - blanket with 3?
• 01:58:621 (4,5,6,1,2) - I'm not recommend you use this ds idea.
• 02:23:478 (6) - blanket not well
• 02:54:764 (1,2) - shape not beautiful
• 03:53:692 (1,2) - stack?
• 03:54:764 (4) - blanket not well.
• 03:59:478 (3,5) - stack?
• 04:01:192 (5,1) - flow not well
  
  

• 1. Tick 1 is a good choice.
  
  
  Useless Green line
  
  
• None.
  
  

456,324,122906,2,0,B|380:280|288:316,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
208,328,123549,1,0,0:0:0:0:
49,273,123764,2,0,B|81:301|124:312,1,85
130,150,124192,2,0,B|130:195|152:232,1,85,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
255,123,124621,2,0,B|236:164|232:204,1,85,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

Rotte wrote:

Hi~ m4m

[General]

1. Timing is have some problem,you should ask bat to test it.because I find ave 10±4 late when I playing.

---------------------------------------------------------

[Normal]

• Useless Green line

  1. Fine.
  
  
  
  Rhythm
  
  
• Fine.
  
  

Sound Effect

Fine.

---------------------------------------------------------

[Hard]

• Useless Green line

  1. None.
  
  
  
  Rhythm
  
  
• 00:34:192 (1,2,3) - To be honest, I don't know why you want to use different ds,and 00:35:906 (3,4,5) - 3 4 is 0.63,but 4 5 is 1.0 ,00:36:764 (5,1) - is 0.55
• 00:37:621 (1,2,1) - The same problem as 00:34:192 (1,2,3) -
• 01:00:549 - and 01:01:406 - you should add notes.
• 01:05:906 (1,2,3,4) - Not beautiful and have a little messy.
• 01:13:621 (1,3) - Not beautiful.
• 01:43:621 (3) - NC & 01:43:835 (1) - delete NC .
• 01:46:621 (6,7) - If you use blanket with 01:45:335 (4) - >.<
• 01:47:692 - should add a note.
• 01:51:764 (2) - blanket with 3?
• 01:58:621 (4,5,6,1,2) - I'm not recommend you use this ds idea.
• 02:23:478 (6) - blanket not well
• 02:54:764 (1,2) - shape not beautiful
• 03:53:692 (1,2) - stack?
• 03:54:764 (4) - blanket not well.
• 03:59:478 (3,5) - stack?
• 04:01:192 (5,1) - flow not well
  
  

Sound Effect

None.

--------------------------------------------------------

[Insane]

• 1. Tick 1 is a good choice.
  
  
  Useless Green line
  
  
• None.
  
  

Rhythm

01:14:692 (3) - You can use "ctrl + g"to change the direction,and create a jump in this place.01:23:049 (1) - This jump space is a little far. 01:45:335 (3) - This slider's flow is not well,I suggest that you can use the ctr+g .01:47:906 (3,4) - This sliders are not beautiful.01:53:906 (8,9) - If you want to use blanket,plz re-blanket it.01:57:978 (5,1) - I think you should keep the jump space on 01:57:764 (4,5) - 02:02:906 (4,5,6,7,8) - Ihis idea of mapping is not beautiful

456,324,122906,2,0,B|380:280|288:316,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
208,328,123549,1,0,0:0:0:0:
49,273,123764,2,0,B|81:301|124:312,1,85
130,150,124192,2,0,B|130:195|152:232,1,85,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
255,123,124621,2,0,B|236:164|232:204,1,85,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

02:10:192 - I know you want to flow vocaloid. If I were you, I'll in 02:09:978 create a circle and 02:10:192 - create a 1/2 slider.02:48:764 (1,2) - I think this ds should use 1.003:58:621 (2) - not beautiful.

Sound Effect

should turn up the clap volume.

1. I believe you should map all diffs 15 seconds earlier for emphasis with the vocals/stanza. Shouldn't be too hard, right?

1. Please use tick rate 1. Having a higher tick rate is simply unreasonable for an SV as slow as this. I understand you're using tick hitsounds, but there's no reason why the tickrate should be this high. This also means you have to remove the inherited sections that are used for your tick hitsounds.
2. 00:48:764 (3) - Would be better if you could change the slider to be like this.
3. 00:59:478 (1,2,3,4,5) - Change the positioning to be a little something like this for consistency?
4. 01:16:621 (1) - Change into a single note perhaps?
5. 02:04:192 (4) - Same suggestion as 00:48:764.
6. 02:21:764 (1,1) - Same suggestion as 01:16:621.
7. 02:29:906 (1,2) - Into this
8. 02:56:049 (1) - Same suggestion as 01:16:621.
9. 04:03:335 (1,2,3,4) - I suggest to change these sliders to this for the sake of a normal/friendlier combo to hit.
10. 04:08:049 (2) - 01:16:621 suggestion

1. 00:29:049 (1,2) - Directly stack 2 at 1's sliderend.
2. 00:35:906 (3,4,5) - Why not space these out equally for consistency?
3. 00:49:621 (3,4) - Same as 00:29:049.
4. 00:52:192 (7,1) - ^
5. 01:49:621 (1,2) - ^

1. 00:31:406 (5,7) - Directly stack 7 at 5's sliderend.
2. 00:38:906 (3,4) - ^
3. 00:52:192 (2) - Change it to this for better presentation.
4. 00:55:192 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I love this combo! Great job.

dkun wrote:

modding key

this is unrankable.
this should be highly considered.
this is just a normal suggestion/praise.

General

1. I believe you should map all diffs 15 seconds earlier for emphasis with the vocals/stanza. Shouldn't be too hard, right?

the map following the drum mostly, only few really follow the vocal. last of all. I ran out of idea already

Normal

1. Please use tick rate 1. Having a higher tick rate is simply unreasonable for an SV as slow as this. I understand you're using tick hitsounds, but there's no reason why the tickrate should be this high. This also means you have to remove the inherited sections that are used for your tick hitsounds. Fixed
2. 00:48:764 (3) - Would be better if you could change the slider to be like this. Fixed
3. 00:59:478 (1,2,3,4,5) - Change the positioning to be a little something like this for consistency? Fixed
4. 01:16:621 (1) - Change into a single note perhaps? Fixed
5. 02:04:192 (4) - Same suggestion as 00:48:764. Fixed
6. 02:21:764 (1,1) - Same suggestion as 01:16:621. Fixed
7. 02:29:906 (1,2) - Into this Fixed
8. 02:56:049 (1) - Same suggestion as 01:16:621. Fixed
9. 04:03:335 (1,2,3,4) - I suggest to change these sliders to this for the sake of a normal/friendlier combo to hit. 04:03:335 (4) - Fixed
10. 04:08:049 (2) - 01:16:621 suggestion

Fixed

Hard

1. 00:29:049 (1,2) - Directly stack 2 at 1's sliderend. Fixed
2. 00:35:906 (3,4,5) - Why not space these out equally for consistency? Fixed
3. 00:49:621 (3,4) - Same as 00:29:049.Fixed
4. 00:52:192 (7,1) - ^ Fixed
5. 01:49:621 (1,2) - ^

Fixed

Hard

1. 00:31:406 (5,7) - Directly stack 7 at 5's sliderend. Fixed
2. 00:38:906 (3,4) - ^ Fixed
3. 00:52:192 (2) - Change it to this for better presentation. Fixed
4. 00:55:192 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I love this combo! Great job.

thx xD

Please, feel free to call me back when you've gone through my suggestions.

Lanturn wrote:

[Normal]
00:31:621 (4,2) - There is no way this is intentional. These notes are 1/4 too long no matter how you look at them or play them.

MaxiMilliaN wrote:

SPOILER

Congratz~

haha5957 wrote:

"HAYO"

popner wrote:

Some small changes via irc, and offset+15.

why did you do that?

more like -15 I guess

is this only me?


oh btw gratz mercuregi HAYO

ah maybe cuz I download this long time ago, redled and fine