1. 00:14:526 (1,2,3,4,1) - well personally I don't like this pattern because you're trying to mix curved stream and that linear slider, and it doesn't fit the whole pattern: 00:14:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3). How about http://puu.sh/1YIuN?
2. 00:16:401 (6,7,1) - too intensive for a beginning. Also, you're trying to follow both vocals and the beat with 00:16:635 (7), but I would follow vocals only in the intro
3. 00:24:370 (1,2,3,4,5) - better use linear one to match other patterns around
4. 00:25:307 (8,9) - make them less curvy, they look.. broken? Don't know how to explain
5. 00:34:916 (5) - finish sounds odd, try placing it on the next note before spinner
6. 00:40:659 (4,5,1) - you can make it better by putting 00:41:127 (5,1) on the other side: http://puu.sh/1YIMc. Make sure you didn't forget to put 00:41:596 (2) closer to it lol
7. 00:47:807 - I wouldn't increase SV multipliet here, because spacing gets higher
8. 00:49:565 (6) - it will play better if you bend it to the opposite side (if yes, move it down to keep the spacing between it and the next stream)
9. 00:50:971 (2) - unstack for consistency with 00:51:557 (4)

1. 00:52:846 (2) - two grid right to make a linear triplet
2. 00:53:432 (5,6,7) - in my opinion, it works only with horizontal symmetry. Here I would recommend you to change this pattern to another one (idk really, it just bugs me)
3. 00:54:604 (2,3,4) - ouch, circles are too close to slider end, so I'd try something like http://puu.sh/1YIXy
4. 00:57:182 (7,8,9) - make it better by rotating (9) by -30 degrees (also move it up a bit)
5. 01:04:682 (7,8,9) - it will work better and look nicer if 7's end, 8 and 9's beginning will be on the line: http://puu.sh/1YJ3f. I'd also do the same with 01:06:557 (4,5,6): http://puu.sh/1YJ4K
6. 01:09:370 (1) - I see no point in using this slider, how about replacing it with two circles instead
7. 01:11:245 (1,2,3) - neat

1. 01:24:838 (3,4) - fix the spacing, it plays odd
2. 01:25:541 (1) - there's something wrong with it (idk, looks like you just had no ideas on what to map here and put this as a filler)
3. 01:26:245 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - please no (reason is the same as above), better change it to something else cause you just copied the first square pattern with no changes
4. 01:28:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - blargh it plays bad (at least for me). Why don't you delete this loop and map something instead of it? Yeah I hear that sound in the music you mapped, but long sliders are boring and sometimes don't reflect the song's rhythm or don't have a "flow"
5. 01:32:573 (4,5,6) - I would unstack it for a better visual experience (yeah this triangle with a stack in the center looks boring for me): http://puu.sh/1YJn4
6. 01:36:323 (2,3) - move them 1/2 forward and put a note on 01:36:323, they will follow the music really better
7. 01:38:432 (5,6) - looks nice, but I'd prefer it to be more comfortable for playing ("change it somehow so I don't have to move my hand in a way that's a bit unnatural for it")
8. 01:40:307 (5,6) - it's soooo shriveled (found this word in a dictionary lol), so you may want to fix 6's direction and shape
9. 01:43:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - doesn't look nice and accurate, I'd shrink the streams and change their shape: http://puu.sh/1YJC0.
   
   As you might notice, that's nearly the only way to map streams followed by a curvy slider that I like. Maybe it's just me, I don't know, but a "curvy slider and wide-spaced stream" pair rarely looks good.
   
10. 01:51:323 (2,3,4)
    
    1. First of all: 2 and 3 should be moved 1/2 forward to follow the music better. Also, you literally skipped the downbeat on 01:52:495 that has an important meaning for the gameplay. I mean, there should be a note or a slider or something a player can click.
    2. Due to the movements you make to reach the jumps, 01:50:620 (1) should be somewhere on the bottom of the playfield (implying it follows the last jump note).
    3. Don't use linear sliders near the curvy one in this way. They simply don't fit it.

1. 01:52:963 (1) and the whole calm part - you better hitsound it with hitnormal as you did in the very beginning
2. 01:59:760 - nooo, 100% is way too loud. Lower it to 70 or something
3. 02:01:870 (1) - remove it and map it in a proper way, as you mapped all the "together we can play some R&R" parts before
4. 02:04:916 (5) - http://puu.sh/1YKiH is a better idea, seriously
5. map the blue tick at 02:05:502
   
   I see there is a copypasta from the first similar part, so I'll copy and paste my suggestions as well:
   .....
6. 02:10:659 (4,5,1) - you can make it better by putting 02:11:127 (5,1) on the other side (SMIC NOW IMAGINE http://puu.sh/1YIMc BUT MIRRORED). Make sure you didn't forget to put 02:11:596 (2) closer to it lol
7. 02:18:041 - I wouldn't increase SV multipliet here, because spacing gets higher
8. 02:19:565 (6) - it will play better if you bend it to the opposite side (if yes, move it down to keep the spacing between it and the next stream)
   .....
9. 02:25:776 (6) - remove clap from the end
10. 02:29:995 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - there's no need to make it complicated, I suggest a better one: http://puu.sh/1YKr6
    
    SPOILER

    444,72,149995,6,2,P|440:116|461:167,1,86.25,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    484,236,150463,2,2,P|496:272|484:320,1,86.25,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    460,332,150932,5,8,0:0:0
    432,332,151049,1,0,0:0:0
    404,328,151166,1,2,0:0:0
    376,324,151284,1,0,0:0:0
    348,316,151401,1,0,0:0:0
    320,308,151518,1,0,0:0:0
    296,296,151635,1,2,0:0:0
    272,284,151752,1,0,0:0:0
    248,268,151870,6,2,P|196:279|172:331,1,115

11. 02:33:276 (6) - remove clap from the end
12. 02:34:213 (8) - a linear one looks better, I think: http://puu.sh/1YKwf
13. 02:35:620 (1) - booring and a bit ugly, divide it into two: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/601916
14. 02:39:370 (1) - you better bend it to the opposite side (t least it plays better for me that way)
15. 02:40:307 (4) - add a little curve to fit 02:40:776 (5)
16. 02:43:120 (1,2) - better make them curvy too: http://puu.sh/1YKDm (don't forget about 02:44:409 (4) going around it: http://puu.sh/1YKDI)
17. 02:45:932 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - well okay, but fix the spacing here: 02:45:463 (2,3)
18. 02:48:276 (6) - remove clap from the end
19. 02:49:213 (2) - ^
20. 02:49:682 (3) - I hear that you skipped that sound at 02:49:916, so you better make it 1/4 shorter and put a note on the blue tick
21. 03:00:229 and the whole quiet part: don't use 100% volume here. Go down to 50 and increase it step by step
22. 03:01:870 (7) - newcombo
23. 03:03:745 (2) - ^ (remove it from the repeating slider before)
24. 03:07:143 (2) - better replace finish with a whistle here

1. 03:08:432 (5,6) - that's even better than a similar pattern but with a note in between
2. 03:10:073 (4,5,6) - unstack it to keep a player on the move: http://puu.sh/1YKJL
3. 03:10:541 (7) - plays like a filler. Are you sure you can't map something more interesting here?
4. 03:15:698 (1,2,3,1) - doesn't have a flow. I mean, you always have to return the same way you moved before, and this is no good
5. 03:18:041 (1) - what I said about boring and uninteresting slider above
6. 03:21:323 (2,3) - move them 1/2 forward and put a circle on 03:21:323 to follow the music better
7. 03:23:432 (5,6) - what. I mean, it doesn't make sense for me. Either use a lesser distance here and change the second one, or change both sliders
8. 03:25:776 - add a circle
9. 03:28:588 (5) - well I remember I wrote it somewhere up there that I personally don't find long sliders entertaining and/or fitting in most of cases, so you should know what to do :Р
10. 03:30:698 (1,2,3) - doesn't have a flow, try this: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/601948 (don't forget to move 03:32:104 (2) somewhere or swap some notes in your square to keep it going round and round)
11. 03:33:041 (5) - long slider reminder
12. 03:33:979 (2,3) - swap them, it'll play a lot better (at least for me)
13. 03:36:323 (2,3,4) - these three sliders have eeeexactly the same problem as 01:51:323 (2,3,4), so you should know what to do. Also, remove a clap from 03:35:620 (1). In short, something like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/601958 should work perfectly. Try it out:
    
    SPOILER

    96,56,215620,6,2,P|54:216|215:254,1,368,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    296,92,216323,1,0,0:0:0
    132,188,216557,2,2,P|112:280|160:349,1,184,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
    328,148,217025,2,2,P|276:69|193:43,1,184,0|2,0:0|0:0,2:0:0
    160,349,217495,5,4,0:0:0

1. 00:26:948 (4, 5, 6, 7) - I actually believe that it would flow best and be more natural to the player ((and fit the music better in a way)) if you had made the circles come after the short sliders!
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:52:690 (1) - This slider wasn't ended properly; should be moved to a 1/4 red tick that comes after where it ends as of now; then make sure the following circles after it are spaced properly with distance snap.
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:57:651 (9) - I do believe that this would flow better if it was flipped vertically instead; goes in the direction the first slider and note after it was headed as well.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:08:198 (4) - May you please not stack this under (3)? It kind of ruins the great flow you had on the playfield spacing things out and having jumps.
5. 01:10:073 (6) - Same as mentioned above.
6. 01:28:588 (5) - From here to the end of this combo pattern- the flow seems off to me proceeding from the slider, seeing that it goes downwardsand back in the direction of where the slider started- I would say change the slider shape or find another way to make the pattern more freeflowing in a different way? ((re-map the pattern and try to find something that flows better)).
7. 01:40:776 - I think it's vital to have a note here; there's clearly a important sound/beat present in the music and i do believe it would bring more emphasis to the map if this was added; ((to be honest I thought there was one here already so it felt kind of weird to play!))
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:56:010 - Same as stated previously.
9. 02:02:573 (1) - Shorten the slider to the third repeat and add a note here instead?

AkagamiNamikaze wrote:

Hi. hey!!

Easy
01:03:745 (1,2) - Unstack pls, it would be weird for begginers. imo its fine, the approachcircles should well enough be an indicator of the time you need to click.
01:39:370 (1,2) - ^ ^
01:40:307 (3) - Ending this slider in 01:40:776 - will make it sound better and look nicer. I really wanted to accent that last part of the phrase because it's so poppy and needs to be stressed! I discussed the rhythm with some others and it looks like the syncopation should be easy to understand as well.

I do like what you're doing with this diff. thanks!

Normal
01:25:073 (1) - make it a slider.
01:32:573 (1) - ^
01:47:573 (1) - ^
02:07:495 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - nope. It sounds and looks ugly. Look at this:

SPOILER

Not the shape, but the combination, that will sound good.

03:10:073 (1) - slider pls.
03:17:573 (1) - ^

This diff needs a remap 'cuz most of the shapes are made with the old editor and they look ugly. :< uhhh, dw it will get a full remap. Sorry you modded this diff! ;_;

Ticl!ck's Hard
01:40:541 - add note here?

Amazing work. Just amazing.

Insane
00:35:737 (1) - What about mapping this instead of making a spinner? It breaks the flow imo. okay!
02:20:854 - add a break here pls.stylisticly, i don't think it fits. idk, i'll get some more opinions!

Hmm. I like your style of overmapping :3 hue
GL with rank!

Irreversible wrote:

Hi, Random mod because i found some things that maybe could help you, feel free to ignore them ^-^

[Insane]

00:16:171 (4) - I would move this to x:500 y:312. The reason is: It looks better with the next slider. Of course, yeah, it is harder to play, but with the direction of 00:15:703 (3) - you have to get there somehow anyway, just now you have to move your mouse a bit faster. Flows well, done!
00:23:906 (8) - Just for aestetics (or however this is written): Move this a bit to the left. you missed an 'h' aesthetics. anyhow, i moved it a bit further to the left. not much, because it's supposed to play like a stack!
00:38:437 (3,3) - I would add new combo here, just to get really sure that there is a SV change. agreed. done.
00:57:187 (7,8,9,10) - I don't think this extended sliders are needed, I think if you make them 1/4 shorter it will still be awesome to play (imo even better, i like listening to them more than the current version) oh dear, this has been an on-going issue with these 1/6 sliders. obviously I added them in and that means I thought they looked and played fine and I still think they do. at this point, I think it's just a matter of preferance. :s i have some people telling me to change and some people telling me to keep. im going to stick to my gut and keep it for now i think XD
Not sure about that but:
01:25:546 (1) - remove NC oh, nice catch. done and
01:26:250 (2) - add NC done

02:03:750 (1,2,3,4) - Between 1 and 2 i can see a rotation, but not at the others, why? I think it would fit remapped this pattern.
02:14:660 - You added SV changes here too, same NC suggestions as above le done
02:50:625 (1,2,3,4,5) - You can definetly improve that Star pattern, it looks weird (maybe its just me XD) waaaat how? :c

You really did a nice job here, the map is really very fitting with the song Sorry for the mod, but i felt like it :c, as I said, feel free to ignore never feel bad for modding! a mapper saying he doesnt want a mod is like saying you dont want free money and bacon. :3

[TicClicks Hard]

00:50:625 (1) - Move this one to x: 128 y: 184? It would flow pretty well with the previous slider fixed it upon his request :p also adjusted the angle of (3)

Lol, that's the only suggestion i have so far, xD I really like the stacks!

[Normal]

AI Mod tells something about the spacing (cross the tick Distance Snap) Maybe you should check that, not sure if AI Mod is right oô

[Easy]

Same for easy! (as in normal)

Normal and Easy look fine for me, good luck for rank! yay

AIMod didn't show anything for me.

take my star for this awesome job :3

jacob wrote:

https://gist.github.com/peppy/65634825af9a9f237407

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

Ijah wrote:

This can still get ranked since First of the year is still in the rankings BUT the osz is on a remote server.

If you're denied this then I'd suggest you might want to reconsider contributing beatmaps to the osu! community.

jacob wrote:

Ijah wrote:

This can still get ranked since First of the year is still in the rankings BUT the osz is on a remote server.

If you're denied this then I'd suggest you might want to reconsider contributing beatmaps to the osu! community.

what the hell are you talking about

Ijah wrote:

This can still get ranked since First of the year is still in the rankings BUT the osz is on a remote server.

If you're denied this then I'd suggest you might want to reconsider contributing beatmaps to the osu! community.

TrigonometrY wrote:

Ijah wrote:

This can still get ranked since First of the year is still in the rankings BUT the osz is on a remote server.

If you're denied this then I'd suggest you might want to reconsider contributing beatmaps to the osu! community.

It might be a good way, because result of played map is still stored, only download link was removed.

Ijah wrote:

What I meant:
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/56791
The download link was removed from the download button, but yesterday either the author or a moderator added a remote download link in the description (or first post as it were) to download it without getting osu! or peppy in any trouble.

However, someone has reverted that for some stupid reason and the first post no longer includes a download link.
This would have been fully legal and would have caused NO TROUBLE for peppy whatsoever, and if they really gave a fuck then they'd file a complaint to the remote site hosting the file.

CDFA wrote:

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

TheGrimOfCrazy wrote:

I do believe this map can still be ranked since Skrillex released this track a long time ago as a free track. It's even a free download link in his youtube video description. It was passed around as a promotional track. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOofWzI3flA Check Description.

Hope this can get cleared up.

CDFA wrote:

maybe you should make a phone call to Skrillex INC and be like "i want map rank pls help"

Roxas wrote:

CDFA wrote:

maybe you should make a phone call to Skrillex INC and be like "i want map rank pls help"

+999999999999999

Stefan wrote:

Anyway I still hate Skrillex, so.

WasteK wrote:

RIP

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

TicClick wrote:

hey smic how it's going

Hakard wrote:

SuperMICrophone wrote:

BULLSHIT

UKCKWKSFJLAMDWMS

TicClick wrote:

p[erhaps it's better to get an extra difficulty inbetween hard and insane, I don't feel like "buffing" anything now http://puu.sh/n1Eht/12181a0905.zip

Kibbleru wrote:

okayy lets see here

insane
00:35:502 (1) - a bit inconsistent here with ur rhythm choice, previously u always mapped 00:35:385 - and skipped 00:35:502 - personally i'd recommend something like this, u can also emphasize 00:35:620 - more this way. changed

SPOILER

00:51:557 (2) - imo think this could be spaced even more u could probably stack it on 00:50:151 (8) - if u want, then you can adjust the placement of the previous slider to adjust spacing. changed
01:02:924 (6,7) - minor suggestion, if u ctrl g these, it would flow to the next slider a bit better i think. agree
01:47:690 (5,6) - ^ mmm, disagree here
02:27:182 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could fit the wubby music better if you made some zig zag streams? agree

SPOILER

same applies with other places like 02:34:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - yup
as for stuff like 02:23:432 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i dont think u can change this anymore haha >< tried something
02:00:112 (2) - hmm isnt this kinda overmapped? oh well it kinda fits i guess? the "lo" of "hello" is the beat here
02:36:010 (2) - i think the small spacing should be 02:35:620 (1,2) - and the big spacing should be 02:36:010 (2,1) - agree

normal
00:15:937 (2,3,2,3) - uhm, why don't you stay consistent to ur rhythming? for 00:19:687 (3) - etc rhythms are grouped in twos, fixed some of them later on
00:36:562 (4,5) - kinda weird to map 00:37:031 - when it doesn't have a sound, i would just recommend using 1 big 3/2 slider for this part disagree, mapping to vocals
01:18:750 (1) - for these cases i think u should just ignore the 1/3 and map the dominant white ticks changed
01:24:375 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - the 1/2 chain is a bit long here imo, consider breaking it up somewhere. changed
01:48:046 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - ^ disagree here because of the 1/1 slider
02:30:937 (2,1) - uh. nothing too bad, just kinda weird u decide to stack this all of a sudden, i assume its cuz ur running out of space? eh i like this
tbh it looks more like an advanced to me due to the rhythms.

easy
00:21:562 (3) - 3/4 sliders in easy,, may need some discussion o_O. yeah idk maybe it's different nowadays

okayy. so i would rename easy to normal, and normal to advanced, and buff tic's diff a bit.
spread is kinda in a weird position atm i think. time to map another difficulty

Reditum wrote:

I remember fucking loving this map back in 2012 and I remember the mega salt when Skrillex got DMCA'd lmfao

Insane:
00:48:745 - This SV change feels REALLY sudden. It may be better to save the 1.5x until the chorus so it's more effective
01:05:620 (1) - i forget if these are rankable lmfao will clarify; also is easy to change i just like it lel
02:22:495 - I generally feel that half-time feel sections like this should be mapped more in a DiamondCrash style rather than a slowed SV stlye but like ok interesting idea, but i think i'll keep them slow for now

Hard:
fine

Advanced:
00:15:000 - there's claps on every tick why are you omitting beat 4 changed
Technically I could get mad about slidertrains but like meh. It's not too bad, and the AR is high enough to where it doesn't look clumpy

Normal:
nice thank

i really liked this map in 2012 and i still like it now

Osuology wrote:

[General]
The skin's hitcircles don't fit together completely, they don't fit. i'll have to ask ticclick lel
Timing points conflict?? good catch thanks

[Advanced]
00:19:687 (3,1) - Please do not overlap like this, not for prettyness, but for reading ability of normal players. Try to fix all the others, since I won't list them. I have a schedule you know! there's not much I can do given the fact that constant distance spacing is necessary at this level of play, with reason actually being readability! so I don't think I can really change this
00:26:015 (3,1) - This I think is fine, even though it's the same gap between the two as the previous, it's not a slider this time.

[Hyper]
00:44:409 (4) - Seems like it should start on blue tick no? I'm following the pattern used at 00:40:307 (3,4) - , but blue tick definitely has a stronger rhythm. I will get more opinions
01:05:151 (6,1,2) - Very bouncy, might be too hard. reduced spacing
01:14:760 (7) - If you're gonna have a 1/4 slider, maybe point it towards next slider? changed for now, ds is a little inconsistent but we'll see what happens
01:29:760 (9) - This twice with OD 6.8? I doubt it. I think it's fine as they're sliders
02:08:784 (4) - Again, shouldn't it start on blue tick? as above
02:24:252 (8,1) - Jump intentional? yes
02:31:752 (8,1) - You copied and pasted so ^ ^
02:35:502 (8,1) - I won't list these anymore so look out!
03:03:745 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - May be too hard. I think 1/2 stacks at this difficulty are fine
03:07:495 (1,2,3,4,5) - Whoa, I'm not even sure I could FC that, and I'm ~4k! but it's the exact same spacing as the first kiai ;w;
Difficulty at the last chorus could be too much, but that might be me.

[Insane]
00:25:073 (6) - NC? Please? doesn't follow the NC pattern; I have NC's at the start of "hello again to all my friends" and "together we can play some rock n roll"
00:34:213 (3,4) - DS plz? wow current spacing is atrocious lmao
00:56:948 (6,7) - whoa I didn't read that right, I thought it was a hit circle should be ok
01:05:620 (1) - I thought these were unrankable??? i think so too; i'll ask a qat or bn
01:22:495 (1,2,3,4,5) - Doesn't look good to me, but it fits rhythm so... (1,2,3) versus (3,4,5) movements are supposed to reflect the different sub-melodies in the music
01:40:698 (6) - Slightly offscreen slider. will look fine in play
01:41:010 (7) - Also overlaps reason is because it's 1/6 instead of 1/4 ;w;
01:45:463 (2) - Oh come on you too? Look out for offscreen stuff please... again it's fully visible in play
02:50:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - WHOA. That came unexpectedly. Doesn't match up with total difficulty. agree, scaled down 0.75

TicClick wrote:

Osuology

Osuology wrote:

[Hard]
Has a different start than normal?? It should be the same, drain time should be the same. ..what? Who told you that? Besides, it is the same

makemecool123 wrote:

You should try higher AR from insane because its a bit not fun
why do you refer ar9 or ar8?