SPOILER
Thank you very much!UnitedWeSin wrote:
[Hard]
00:37:490 (1,2,3,4,5) - Why not 1.0 spacing just like you did at 00:46:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6)? I tried to make something different so that it doesn't become boring. Well, fixed now.
00:49:340 (1,2) - Try to stack the slider ends a bit better. done
01:05:540 (4) - Move to 152,240 for symmetry. Not intended here. Additionally if you use another y-value you have a new symmetry axis (if you understand what I mean) so this point isn't really valid
01:22:040 (2,3) - Switch these two to better follow the drum line. done
01:28:940 (1) - Stack on the 01:27:440 (4)? while looking nice in edit mode it has absolutely no effect in play mode, test it out
01:30:290 (2,3,4,5) - Rhythm is awkward here, I think you should continue to follow the vocals. You follow vocals at 01:28:040 (2,1,2). This is not completely true. While it might sound like I am following the vocals, I am actually following the ground beat. There is basically nothing else I could follow. I think just deleting the 01:30:290 (2,4) will make it much better. Here I am following the guitar/bass.
02:15:140 (3,4) - Instead of stacking these you should make them more circle flow. Would be more fun imo. I really liked them because they fit the "repetitiveness" of this part pefectly (this stop and go is <3 if you know what I mean). Well, you are right, changed them.
02:17:240 (2,3,4) - Space these a bit more so they don't overlap. done
02:34:790 (5,1) - No need for jump I don't think. Feels a bit awkward. okay
03:19:040 (3,1) - Spacing? Distance increase between sliders is not as hard as between circles. Changed though.
03:37:040 (4,1) - If you're going to have these jumps then at least make them consistent in spacing. I don't really get our point here...
Great diff. thanks!
UPDATE