HakuNoKaemi wrote:

I think Video Offset -1600 will work better.

nope, it's too early like you said. But a recontrol made me use -1320 ms
You didn't apply the offset to all difficulties.
Actually, take a look at the end of the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVvoD_ErXUo . Notice how the moon appears on the red tick in the song. On your map it appears at about 1:30:00, when it should be at 1:29:773 . This is off by 227 ms, so your offset shouldn't be -1400 but instead something around -1627. (which is why I picked -1600)

[*]The first part of the song might need its own timing section. It feels a little late in that first bit. (00:00:626 - to 00:01:308)

Checked: there are two guitar that start with 1/6 of distance precisely... I strangely obtained 569 checking the first offset. If I'll map that guitar most won't probably find it though.

A significant timing error must be fixed, and this appears to be one.


[Orpheus]
responses

[*]00:36:762 (2,1,2,3) - Unstack these completely. A change in spacing like this will throw off beginner players very very badly.

It's completely playable and more sensed than spraying them all-out the playzone.
Having objects move around the playing field isn't a bad thing. If anything it makes more sense than stacking them in a messy pattern.
It's completely fun to play.
If you can see what's going on. It's not immediately clear what's going on since the stacks make it look 1/2 instead of 1/1.
It's not an hard challenge and make player know that osu! IS a Rhythmn game. not a lame.
It's harder than the easy should be. Also spacing them out wouldn't change the rhythm in any way.

[*]01:04:205 (1) - Shorten this to 01:05:398

Super-dupely short for an easy like you want.
Objects that come soon after spinners can easily throw off beginner players. Shortening the spinner would give the player more time to move on.

[*]01:06:421 (1) - Remove this circle.

why?
This object doesn't start on the downbeat (big white tick). It makes more sense rhythmically and in gameplay to begin that combo where the 2 is.

[*]01:16:308 (1,2,3,4,1) - This part doesn't quite fit the beat. Try to make it fit with the song better.

It do follow the voice.
The slider at 01:17:330 (1) - is the main issue, it lands on odd beats for this section.

[*]01:22:444 (1,2,3,4) - Having these overlap each other makes this part more confusing than it needs to be. Avoid doing that criss-cross formation here.

Ok, why?
Because it makes it more confusing. The hitbursts and previous sliders cover parts of the next sliders, making it harder to see them.

[*]01:27:898 (1,2,3,4,5) - This bit is very confusing. Avoid having those short sliders in there.

confusing? why? It doesn't follow music? Or it follow music too well for an easy?
The slider is so short that it's not immediately clear to a beginner what it is. The slider track is barely visible - it looks like two hitcircles.

[Asura]

[*]00:22:785 (10,11) - Stack these. If it's unstacked it's an antijump, which is hard to read and frustrating to play.

wait, wha? It's normal spacing O.O
0.12x spacing isn't normal spacing.

[Orpheus Telos]

[*]00:25:001 (1) - Move this up and to the right so there isn't a jump.
[*]00:36:080 (1) - Move this closer to the previous 6 so there isn't a jump. This will prevent the misleading spacing.

It's volume-related.
Uh... that doesn't stop it from being misleading

[*]00:39:489 (1) - This spinner is extremely sudden and short. I suggest replacing it with other objects, possibly a long slider.

Aren't spinner supposed to follow holded notes? and end in a higher volume note?
A spinner or slider would work for long notes like that, although this particular word, "way", only lasts for two measures, which is rather short for a spinner.

[*]00:56:876 to 01:01:563 - This section has ridiculously large spacing compared to the rest of the difficulty. It's an unexpected and unfitting difficulty increase. You should remap this section so it fits with the rest of the map.

Mapped in a different manner I like more, still some Insane jumps though
Jumps are fine, but 5.28x jumps are far too large and unnecessary. 00:59:773 (2,3) .

[*]01:02:330 (7,2) - The slowdown on these sliders is quite harsh. I suggest using 0.75x for them (if you really want to slow them down)

they're readable: (7) follow the sudden more acustical-less electrical sounf the guitar make and (2) mirror (7) and follow the No-One hold.
Yet you stuck it right after an insanely fast portion so it goes from super fast to super slow. Jarring and frustrating.

[*]01:04:035 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - I think it would be best not to space these out so much. Compressing the streams would be better

It's the normal Spacing I used in the map.
Yes, and that's the issue. Streams on 1.0x spacing are harder to consistently follow than 1/2 or 1/1 on 1.0x. Lower spacing, like 0.8x, allows the player to focus on the beat more than the movement.

[*]01:19:546 (1) - This slider is extremely difficult to see with all of the hitburts (default skin). You should make this clearer (pointing it upwards instead will fix the issue).

Not that you'll be able to delete the skin hitburst, funnily enough.
This is never an acceptable answer. Map readability is determined by default skin only. If we allowed custom skins to dictate readability, maps would quickly turn into cluttered, cramped messes.

1. 00:36:762 (2,1,2,3) - Won't ever unstack this. It plays too good. It's readable, even for newbie's (yet BATs "I'll try to be a newbie" work really bad).
2. 01:16:308 (1,2,3,4,1) - Won't fix it using slidertick 2. plus the NC arleady say It started following the drums. that part breaked to follow voice (see the NC)
3. 01:04:205 (1) - It makes more sense passing the 1st Tom and finishing in the 2nd. A short spinner and a long pause are disorientating.
4. 01:06:421 (1) - I'll repeat it. Why?. It do make sense rhythmically and will make less as you said. It's another tom.
5. 01:22:444 (1,2,3,4) - I'll repeat it: why? It's an arleady faded out hitburst. That does not cover any circle start.
6. 01:27:898 (1,2,3,4,5) - That kick slider is actually readable. point places where I used a pattern that is similiar to it divided in 2 circle and point the newbie( if I can call him like that) that will think I'm using that, you're welcome.

1. 00:22:785 (10,11) - 0.12x is manual stacking of an unstacked end(in the sense of waypoints, not the unrankable one) and a circle. plus it's (11,12), not (10,11)

1. 00:25:001 (1) and 00:36:080 (1) - It's not misleading. there is a pitch jump too.
2. 00:39:489 (1) - It's not hard to play and it fit good. You're saying it get only to 1000... well I get 300 every time and even 1000. ANd I'm not a pro spinner An I usually get a max of 70% the max bonus of a spinner.
3. 00:56:876 to 01:01:563 - Answer me. It's "derp I can't do long jump" or "it doesn't fit"? because yeah, the first's your fault, the 2nd is I should explain: 00:59:603 (1,2,3,4) - "No" and "more" are distant in pitch (at least they're not that near), 01:00:285 (5,1) - much obvious it's the same reason. there is a pitch jump.
4. 01:02:330 (7,2) - In fact, the slider ticks per slider double, and you played a 1/2 slider a bit before, so that means it's 1/1. Graphical sign.
   Guitar Softness it's another, Symmetry another, hold is another. Yet you need more signs? It's not hard to see and t play, and maybe it's you who aren't used to 0,5x sections (as I saw in Asura)
5. 01:04:035 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - compressed means about 0.4x-0.6x plus 0.8x is a bit less, plus and worser looking, plus I do prefer them as they are now.
6. 01:19:546 (1) - Though you never ever seen I did change that part to some more curvier one. Ah, even with that, it was covered by only one hitburst that had arleady faded off the moment you should have played it.

BPM 176.006 offset 625
BPM 176.006 offset 1311

1. 00:03:694 (1) - Hmm, would be nice if you move the finish from (2) to here - the splash would work better here :3
2. 00:08:296 (3,4,5) - imo it's better to stack (4) on (5) instead of (3) on (4) to avoid overlaps in play mode (yes, in play mode, (4) won't overlap (1) while (3) overlaps (2))
3. 00:20:398 (6) - Really minor, but please move this to x:228 y:104 so (4,5,6)'s triangle will be perfect >_<
4. 00:22:955 (2,3) - (optional) Combine these two as a repeating 1/4 slider? Will be really fancy before the long delay imo xD
5. 00:23:808 (2,3) - I personally disliked this slider fan here, it looks like you're sticking out to the distance snapping too much here... A little jump like this fits the music better imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:25:171 (2,3) - Same as above
7. 00:26:535 (2) - Whistle also on slider's start, as the vocals continue here?
8. 00:31:308 (2) - Whistle should be here instead of (3) as there's actually nothing from the song there - also, you can probably delete (3) and stack (4) above (2) to fit the vocals :3
9. 00:39:489 (x) - As the vocal still continues here, add a circle here (preferably in the center) and start the spinner 1/4 after? Yes - the spinner still gets a 1000~
10. 00:43:239 (3) - I don't see stacking this slider's end to (1)'s start is a good idea... It ruins (1)'s wave imo - I prefer something like this, with (3) encircled to (1)'s start:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 00:50:057 (1,2) - You already have a whistle on your previous (4,5), so why not add whistle here as well? It fits the vocals, really~
12. 01:02:330 (7) - Add the new combo here instead (because of the slowdown)?
13. 01:06:762 (1) - I don't really get the rhythm here... In case you're trying to follow the vocal to the maximum here, the proper rhythm is a 1/8 repeating slider on 01:06:677 (1)
14. 01:08:978 (7,8,9) - Not really sure why you used back-and-forth here... Why don't you continue the flow instead:
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 01:12:217 (4) - Finish on slider's start here, to accompany the cymbal from the song?
16. 01:25:342 (2,3) - The sudden jump here doesn't play well imo. Maybe start (3) 1/2 after, and put (4) here at ~x:256 y:268?

1. 00:00:626 (1) - Move the whistle to (2)'s start? (The guitar gets more noticeable on (2))
2. 00:01:478 (x) - Add circle here, then:
3. 00:01:819 (3,4,5) - Move these three 1/2 later - yes, this follows the guitar sounds much more (:
4. 00:15:285 (2) - Also with this, move 1/2 later (you can just simply place this beside (3)'s start) - it's best to leave (1) on its own because there's nothing from the song on 00:15:285~
5. 00:22:614 (10,11) - (optional) Add a note between these two? A triple here would sound consistent because previously you had a triple on (4,5,6) xD
6. 00:23:808 (1,3) - This jump is really unfitting with the slow part's atmosphere imo, a symmetrical jump like this would play better I think:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:26:194 (1) - Curve this upward (because your next (2) is curved downward)?
8. 00:28:580 (1) - Add whistle on slider's start here as well? The vocal indiffers with the vocal on your previous (2,3) >_<
9. 00:37:444 (5,6,7,1) - Please unstack (6,7) from (5,1), they look really weird on play mode o.o
10. 00:43:921 (x) - Add circle here - there shouldn't be any clap on (3)'s end, clap should belong here :3 (you could just stack this below (3)'s end, though)
11. 00:51:762 (4) - This slider's overlap with (5) doesn't look good in play mode imo, standard curve like this will play better and reduce clustering:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 01:01:989 (2) - Remove the inherit section on slider's end here? Feels weird suddenly switching to soft-hitsample here o.o
13. 01:10:342 (x) - (optional) Add circle here to continue the 1/2 triple?
14. 01:12:217 (2) - Start the new combo here instead on (1) because of the downbeat
15. 01:23:126 (2) - Add finish here, to accompany the song's cymbal?
16. 01:27:217 (5) - As there's a slowdown here, it's best to put a new combo here (although it's not a must - .85x isn't that hard to catch imo)

1. 00:06:080 (1) - Add finish on slider's end as you have a finish already on the song's first circle~
2. 00:18:012 (3,4) - Why these notes overlapped by (2)? imo it's best not to overlap these two, for example by creating antagonistic-looking slider like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:22:273 (4) - (optional) imo it's better to remove the clap on slider's start here, let the song's drums do the magic by itself~ (with clap will be too noisy, I think)
4. 00:22:785 (5,6,7) - At first they looked like a triple for me, just my eyes though >_<
5. 00:24:830 (3,1,2) - Why don't you start the custom claps from here? Really, the song's damp clap sound appears on (1)'s end and (2)' start here :3
6. 00:35:569 (4) - Move 1/4 after? With your previous slider's existence, it feels weird having the downbeat here unmapped xD
7. 00:36:421 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - This might be personal, but I really recommend to dramatically decrease the spacing on (5,1,2) - looks great with your AR8!
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:45:967 (2,3,4) - (optional) Unstack? Kinda looks weird in play mode >_<
9. 00:56:194 (8) - Add the new combo here instead on your next (1) - just take a quick look at the downbeat here :3
10. 00:58:069 (5) - I don't really get the rhythm here, to be honest... Why not using a single circle on 00:58:239 (with no hitsound) instead?
11. 01:17:671 (2) - Add finish here, as there's a finish on your previous 01:06:762 (1)
12. 01:18:353 (3,4,1,2,3) - This pentagon definitely can be arranged tidier - in this case, you only need to move (4,1,2) more to the upper-left xD
13. 01:25:512 (2,3,4) - Stack (3) to (4) instead? I feel the song should be like that, it's not a good idea to stop (2) from moving because it doesn't really fit the vocals >_<
14. 01:27:558 (x) - Add a circle here? 3/4 delay between notes isn't that friendly imo, plus actually there's a hi-hat here :3
15. 01:29:092 (4,5,6,7) - (optional) The ending could be made more attractive rather than just stacks imo (a jump like on Orpheus Telos would do good here), but of course this is purely optional~

1. 00:05:569 (5,2,3) - Hmm, why not stacked perfectly? Moving the previous (1) to x:24 y:44 so (2,3) can be stacked perfectly isn't that hard, though >_<
2. 00:12:217 (2) - Add finish also here - the cymbal from the song needs to be accompanied with a splash from the hitsound :3
3. 00:20:739 (1) - Start the spinner 1/2 or 1/4 after your previous note? Starting 1/1 after doesn't really follow anything imo...
4. 00:20:739 (1) - Also with this spinner, I suggest to add clap to the spinner as Haku did on his diffs (:
5. 00:28:580 (6) - reeeeeally minor stuff here, but rotate this -1° selection centre and move one grid up for better symmetry? xD
6. 00:32:671 (3) - (optional) Remove the whistle on slider's end? There's no vocal there, I think it's better to remove it to emphasize the clap on your next circle~
7. 00:42:557 (4,5,6,7) - Tilt these four? I personally think it would be more fancy rather than just a diamond imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:58:239 (5,6) - Because the vocal goes high on (5), I think it will be much better if the whistle on (6) is moved to (5) :3
9. 01:16:308 (3) - I think the vocal on 01:17:160 is strong enough not to be mapped, perhaps arrange like this so you can put a circle on 00:17:160 stacked under this slider's end?
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:17:671 (1) - Add finish here? (as you already have a finish on 01:06:762 (1)'s start)
11. 01:22:103 (x) - Add circle here, on x:256 y:256? I personally feel (1,2,3)'s rhythm shouldn't be discontinued, and a note here will continue the rhythm :3
12. 01:22:785 (2) - Add finish on slider's repeat? The vocal is strong enough, plus there's a fainting cymbal sound from the song, actually xD
13. 01:25:512 (2) - (optional) Remove the clap here? It can somehow emphasize your clap on (3)~

1. 00:05:739 (3,1) - Considering your previous (6) had a finish to accompany the song's cymbal, it's not a bad idea to add finish on (3)'s end and (1)'s start as well I think :3
2. 00:10:853 (2) - (optional) CTRL+J this slider, so this slider's second half will point at (1)'s end? Flows better this way imo~
3. 00:14:603 (1) - In any way, it's best for me to split this slider into a circle + 2/1 slider rather than a 3/1 slider - 3/1 just feels kinda forced >_<
4. 00:21:592 (1) - Start the spinner on 00:21:847? Therefore, you can add a short 1/2 slider here to fit the drums~
5. 00:28:921 (3) - Again, I feel the rhythm is very forced here - the song restarts on 00:29:262 instead. Try this arrangement?
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:33:012 (4) - Minor stuff, move the first red waypoint more downward so this slider's Z-shape is more emphasized?
7. 00:43:580 (3) - (optional) Rotate this 90° counter-clockwise? I just personally disliked the majority of the vertical arrangement here, I think you can use horizontal arrangement here for variation~
8. 00:55:853 (1,2) - I don't think 3/2 gap between notes is intuitive enough for beginners, considering this is your easiest difficulty... You can add a circle 1/2 before (2) if you want, but of course it's not a must (:
9. 01:03:694 (3) - (optional) Move this to x:340 y:260 to make a blanket here? It plays better before the spinner, really :3
10. 01:12:217 (3) - Add finish on slider's start here to accompany the cymbal's sound? Also, the new combo should be here as the vocal goes strong here xD
11. 01:17:330 (5) - It feels really weird here, because you're not mapping the big note on the downbeat (01:17:671 (1)) - this arrangement should be enough:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 01:29:092 (3) - (optional) Add clap also on slider's start? (would be fancy because the silent on (3)'s end will be emphasized :3)

1. 00:14:603 (1) - It's not exagerately forced (still reasonable), and I'm pretty borderline ... (3,00) ( though I can say it's more forced than almost all of the map)
2. 00:21:592 (1) - I like the spinner a bit longer in this case, and it could be a bit difficultier, as this wasn't an harder part( I did put more emphasis on kiai and prekiai)
3. 00:28:921 (3) - actually, 00:29:262 do have the same sound as here...
4. 00:55:853 (1,2) - the fact (1) end on there + drum snare. and (2) star on "no" + drum snare should make this at least slightly readable (plus borderline)
5. 01:12:217 (3) - Thank for the finish, though the NC are based on phrase in general, not the strongness of voice...
6. 01:17:330 (5) - It'll feel less playable that way because I'll basically drop the "passage point" of lyrics-drums (the combo before did pass from drum to voice (01:15:640 (4,1) - I'm going)) . While the other way will be a bit hard too play and will make me go overlimit)

1. 00:22:273 (4) - I do prefer let hitsounds work for me though u.u
2. 00:22:785 (5,6,7) - The way I mapped shouldn't let you ever think it's overmapped, though...
3. 00:35:569 (4) - uhm, it will be overmapped, it's true I undermapped though... though the idea is (2,3) and (4,5) following a symmetric part and having symmetric hitsounds
4. 00:56:194 (8) - uhm, let not change color at the end of the lily >.<
5. 00:58:069 (5) - I'm following drums with sliders (to simi-follow vocals)
6. 01:18:353 (3,4,1,2,3) - wasn't to be fixed like that ._.
7. 01:25:512 (2,3,4) - Unstacked only(2,3), the (3,4) Stack isn't any better >.<

1. 00:08:296 (3,4,5) - manual stacked so there is no overlap
2. 00:22:955 (2,3) - wait, wha?
3. 00:31:308 (2) - Won't delete the note, though
4. 01:02:330 (7) - Won't NC unfittingly .
5. 01:06:762 (1) - Normalised, though the 1/8 notes is certainly non-present here...
6. 01:12:217 (4) - Finish on slider's start here, to accompany the cymbal from the song?
7. 01:25:342 (2,3) - There is a large difference in pitch here.

Makar wrote:

[General]

1. The difficulty names do not really express difficulty level, and since the star ratings are matching it's even harder to tell :< this can be a problem in multiplayer matches.

[Orpheus]

1. Actually, a novice player doesn't even usually expect he should click following music.
2. 00:00:635 (1) -no need to empathize a guitar note though, the guitar is empathized by the tick, and the end of a slider empathize much more than a hit circle.
3. 00:14:612 (1) - If I was to be completely consistent in all map, this was at east a 4 star difficulty. I'm more consistent during the voiced part.
4. 01:02:851 (1) - And abandon completely the consistency? just no. i made the easy be more consistent on some parts only, and discarded most of it
5. 01:17:339 (1) - There more then only the music calling it: avoiding too many 1/2 consecutive notes( 3 or 4 here ), avoiding the star rating passing 3, using some easy rhythm ( it isn't really to just know I used a slider to follow the overall mix/list]

[Orthrus]

1. 00:06:947 - He's respecting guitar, though he is a symmetry mapper, and that shouldn't be hard to see
2. 00:12:401 - ^
3. 00:23:140 - I will refer this, he arleady refused what I won't refer.
4. 00:28:589 (6) - It's a "corrective" SV change... a 0.05 change is seriously little to call "SV change"
5. 01:21:601 (3) - The fact 01:22:117 (x) - isn't here is hard to read. That's easy to read if you know the symmetry and the fact the last slider and note followed voice.

[Thanatos]

1. I have nothing major to point out, but in general some of your 1/2 sliders seem like they are there just to "be there" if you know what I mean. The locations of them don't really make much musical sense. For example: 01:27:060 (8) - should start on 01:26:890 (7) instead so the sliders start on the accents (clap pattern) instead of being placed randomly.

1. Consider creating a custom sliderpoint10.png and sliderpoint30.png that is fitting of the skin.
2. Maybe it's your hitsounds, maybe it's your offset, but S:C1 clap is awfully off time on some of the objects, as well as the S:C2 clap.

1. Some words are unnecessarily capitalized in your storyboard images, unless there's some sort of reason?
2. 00:37:969 - "it's" should read "its".
3. 01:08:651 - "endless" is one word and should be contained in one image.
4. 01:12:060 - I can't really hear "feel so alive" here, what's your lyric source?
5. 01:23:140 - No fade in sequence.
6. 01:29:958 - No fade out. Perhaps intentional here.

1. 00:32:515 (3) - Can be made better.
2. 00:59:787 (2,3) - 5.28x spacing, less than 200ms. You're looking for symmetry here, but this kind of spacing is kinda meh.
3. 01:02:344 (7) - Although slider tick can tell how fast this slider goes, the sv and spacing for 01:02:344 (7,1,2) - isn't that fitting.
4. 01:04:049 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I'm not sure how this is mapped to the music, since I really only hear 1/2 rhythms.

1. 00:22:287 (8,9,10,11,12,13) - Not really liking the configuration.

1. Default slider tick rate to 1.
2. Default circle size.
3. Background image has the taiko bar a few pixels too high.
4. Can't really say too much about the mapping. There are places in the map where I felt could have used some more notes, but it may or may not throw off the over quality of the map, due to the nature of the song.

1. I'm confused about your usage of 3-object patterns and their spacing. When do you use 00:14:617 (1,2,3) - ? 00:22:799 (5,6,7) - ? 00:35:583 (4,5,1) - ?
2. 00:28:594 (5) - See if you're able to able to make this slider have a whole in the middle to fully distinguish the looping.
3. 00:37:458 (5,1,2,3) - Not really sure if I can agree with this kind of spacing. Much better if you spaced them out.
4. 00:49:049 (2) - Clap the slider head, right?

1. 00:20:498 (1) - Remove new combo spinner, obvious continuation of 00:20:071 (3) - .
2. 00:38:140 (1,2) - Best if sliders were symmetrical since it feels like that's what your intention was, and there isn't much point in making last slider node (1) into an anchor.
3. 01:13:594 (1) - As the above.
4. 01:28:679 (1) - Remove new combo spinner, obvious continuation of 01:28:594 (3) -

1. 00:08:140 (2) - Slider looks rather chunky because the angle formed at the anchors is too large. Make them a little closer to a straight angle for better effect.
2. 00:27:231 (2) - Clap the slider head, right?
3. 00:36:776 (2,1,2,3) - Not so appropriate in the easiest diff of the set. There may be around 700ms of time between each object, but that amount of time flies by really quickly for beginner players.
4. 01:02:856 (1,2) - 1/2 spaced objects generally considered too fast for the easiest diff. I would consolidate these two objects into a single slider.
5. 01:16:322 (1,2,3) - Try making these three objects into a single slider.
6. 01:17:344 (1,2,3) - Not so sure this exact rhythm pattern is accurate or best. There seem to be many alternatives that may be better but only use 1/1 sliders and circles.
7. 01:27:912 (1,2,3,4,5) - Make (1) into a circle. Starting 01:28:594 - , use three 1/2 sliders in time with the music.

those wrote:

[SB]

1. Stylizing reasons. Lie how titles are usually a have some capitalized words
2. 01:08:651 - Is this a rule? It doesn't seem to me. End~less seems better cut in two images
3. 01:12:060 - this, I made some memory errors though(corrected)
4. 01:29:958 - It's intentional like you said.

[Orpheus Telos]

1. 00:59:787 (2,3) - Looking for symmetry ok. The jump is actually justified by the vocal.
2. 01:02:344 (7) - Well, (7) does fit good, you can "lament" (2), but it does hold the note, so the sv changes are justified, NC to (2) (removed to (1) and different jump should fit a bit more.
3. 01:04:049 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - In fact it's overmapped, But it does fit.

[Thanatos]

1. I'm confused about your usage of 3-object patterns and their spacing. When do you use
   00:14:617 (1,2,3) - They all follow the same instrument-line
   00:22:799 (5,6,7) - ^, and the stack is done at the other way to preserve blanketing. though I preferred to spread those.
   00:35:583 (4,5,1) - Should be easy to find that (1) having a NC and being a slider and following vocal means that this is a different line from (4,5). See how (1) start from a vocal.
2. 00:28:594 (5) - You did mean more circular? You can actually really see the looping easily with at least 2 sliderstlyes (peppyslider and mmslider2)
3. 00:37:458 (5,1,2,3) - Much better if I DON'T space them out. No one using antijumps doesn't means no one shall use them. I use antijumps in those cases when the music feel "slowed"
4. 00:49:049 (2) - You mean Finish? the Clap is that Bass-drum like sound.

[Orthrus]

1. 00:38:140 (1,2) - Armin does have a different slider-making style. It's still symmetric if you Ctrl+H. Without the red point it isn't.
2. 01:13:594 (1) - As the above.

[Orpheus]

1. 00:08:140 (2) - I like them better with a larger angle.
2. 00:27:231 (2) - The clap is after that point.(red tick)
3. 00:36:776 (2,1,2,3) - The beginners I asked to play this said "they didn't even feel it, because it felt really natural".
4. 01:02:856 (1,2) - You can actually use 1/2 object in easies. Plus this isn't that hard.
5. 01:16:322 (1,2,3) - It won't play natural.
6. 01:17:344 (1,2,3) - It is a star-lowering pattern that make the player break from those 1/2 before. they follow the principal snares.
7. 01:27:912 (1,2,3,4,5) - the (1,2) do follow vocal and pass to drums.

1. 00:00:890 (2) - uhmm, is this notes are supposed to be on 00:00:976 - , maybe you're mistaking or just place it unintentional before
2. 00:00:976 (2) - also for this circles, i think it was a bit too up, almosttouching the hp bar. Maybe you can fix it by moving the position of 00:00:635 (1,2,3,5,6,7) - a bit
3. 00:12:396 - add note here? I feel better with it on that part :3
4. 00:59:271 (1,2,4) - make this three slider into normal curved slider instead? since i saw that almost the 1/2 beat slider are all with the normal curved shape
5. 01:16:317 (3) - try to make the endslider end on the 01:16:828 - or 01:17:169 - (forming a new pattern)? To make it match with the song rhythm, i feel like the rhythm are kinda off if youre put the endslider on 01:16:998 - while i'm hearing the drum voice are actually getting loud on 01:16:828 - and 01:17:169 -

1. 00:05:067 (3,1,2) - lol, pretty fun with what you did in here, love it^^. But it seems that the endslider on the 00:05:067 (3,1,2) - (the reverse point) are not really symmetrical with the 00:05:067 (3,1,2) -
   try this:
   

   204,288,35237,1,8
   256,184,35578,1,8
   256,240,35748,1,8
   448,280,36089,6,0,B|392:312|288:280,1,140,8|0

2. 00:19:555 - adding note here? seems much better imo
3. 00:33:362 (3) - the upper part of this circle is overlapped by the hp bar, better move this down (along with the next 2 notes) :3

Kuria wrote:

2nd part.
I know, it's strange I'm fixing
Deleted=Fixed
[Orthus]

1. 00:12:396 - It was suggested other times.. though there aren't symmetric ways to map it...
2. 00:59:271 (1,2,4) - for that part, it stay's like this. If you link the first part of the slider it's a triangle
3. 01:16:317 (3) - man, mantaining symmetry's hard, though i fixed

[Ashura]

1. 00:05:067 (3,1,2) - wrong code 35578 is 00:35:578, the real one is with 5067, though rotated by -4°/-5°

1. 00:09:498 (1) - Sento un piatto venir suonato qui. Che ne dici di metterlo in risalto aggiungendo un finish all'inizio di questo slider?
2. 00:12:226 (1) - Lo stesso viene applicato qua
3. 01:03:703 (3) - Che ne diresti di aggiungere un soft finish alla fine dello slider? Secondo me ci sta molto bene...
4. 00:41:203 (1) - CTRL+H qui? Imho,il flow è migliore e più naturale con 00:40:521 (4) -.

1. 00:16:487 (1) - Che ne dici di spostare la New Combo su 00:17:680 (3) - ? E' una cosa piccola,ma penso che attualmente questa impostazione sia più coerente di quella usata ora.

1. 00:50:407 (4) - Che ne diresti di aggiungere un New Combo qui,seguendo così il drum nel bg?
2. 01:10:862 (5) - Non so te,ma io trovo decisamente più naturale il flow tra lo slider 01:10:180 (4) - se questa nota se messa a x:128 y:280. L'impostazione attuale va bene,ma trovo questa qui migliore parlando di flow.
3. 01:18:362 (3,4,5,6,7) - E' piùche altro una cosa grafica,ma questo pentagono potrebbe essere migliorato. Cosa ne pensi di questo pattern?
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   332,212,77680,2,0,B|316:160|268:140,1,99.9999999999999,0|8
   236,236,78362,1,0
   136,228,78703,1,8
   112,132,79044,5,0
   204,88,79385,1,8
   284,148,79726,1,8

   Ho anche ruotato 01:17:680 (2) - per fixare il blanket con la nota successiva

1. 00:15:635 (3,4) - I still don't understand why here you are using a different spacing from all the other patterns. I mean, this the only place in this first zone where you are using a 1.3~1,4 distance!
2. 00:21:260 (4,5,6) - Honestly,I think this triplet fits quite bad here,but if you don't want to change anything here,that's ok.
3. 00:52:794 (1,2,3) - What do you think on changing the pattern into this? I think this flows better than this setting

-kevincela- wrote:

[Orpheus]

1. 01:03:703 (3) - Va un pò contro il modo in cui ho messo gli hitsound...

[Orthrus]

1. 00:16:487 (1) - La più coerente mi pare spostarlo sul (2), la simmetria non ne risente ed è consistente... credo...

[Thanatos]

1. 00:50:407 (4) - Sto seguendo maggiormente le liriche per gli NC
2. 01:10:862 (5) - ho Ctrl+R lo slider così non ho un salto tanto lungo..
3. 01:18:362 (3,4,5,6,7) - Non avevo inizialmente notato il codice e ho fixato con il Create Polygon Circles...
   
   [Asura]
   
   
   1. 00:21:260 (4,5,6) - Ha già rifiutato, diverse volte, e per me non sta poi tanto male... quindi non posso fare niente qui

Orpheus Telos te lo modderò in seguito,ora sono mezzo assonnato,lol