Gens wrote:

We need to reach 100 SP.

Gabi wrote:

if lemon tree #2 got ranked this should aswell, this is stupid <_<

james039 wrote:

Gabi wrote:

if lemon tree [b#2[/b] got ranked this should aswell, this is stupid <_<

Well, that was an April Fool's joke, and it was de-ranked the day after.

Anyway, Lemon Tree was nuts.

This map is hard, but it has its merits, and perhaps should be "Approved", rather than "Ranked". Still, I really want to see a leaderboard for this one.

Gabi wrote:

james039 wrote:

Gabi wrote:

if lemon tree [b#2[/b] got ranked this should aswell, this is stupid <_<

Well, that was an April Fool's joke, and it was de-ranked the day after.

Anyway, Lemon Tree was nuts.

This map is hard, but it has its merits, and perhaps should be "Approved", rather than "Ranked". Still, I really want to see a leaderboard for this one.

no, you didnt understand. i said LEMON TREE #2 -> http://osu.ppy.sh/s/7671

seeing as that got approved, this is even fit for ranking <_<

rust45 wrote:

I think the only thing here that is too unfair is the ninja spinners on Lesjuh's Tag, even if it going for apporval I feel that it should SS'able by auto. That's just me though.

Starrodkirby86 wrote:

Whee, I made 100. Do I get a cookie? :B


(ew paint killed it)

mattyu007 wrote:

That means the map is broken

It's the spinner at the end.

peppy wrote:

Well how about the map is fixed to get all 300s on auto then we can consider action?

rust45 wrote:

I think the only thing here that is too unfair is the ninja spinners on Lesjuh's Tag, even if it going for apporval I feel that it should SS'able by auto. That's just me though.

peppy wrote:

Well how about the map is fixed to get all 300s on auto then we can consider action?

Gabi wrote:

[Lesjuh's TAG4]
03:24:60 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is way to much. while its possible on solo, i doubt it is possible to play this in tag. remap imo or make it more visible (and maybe 1/4 space between each combo).

Doomsday93 wrote:

[Lesjuh's Tag]

01:51:95 (5,1,1,1,1,1,1) - i don't think these follow the music too well. could be just me though. just putting my thoughts out. It's probably you
03:29:07 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - after all that slider spam, this bit seems kinda dissapointing. perhaps replace these with a long-ass stack or stream? (unless someone suggested those sliders, since i haven't read the last few posts) I had to place it like this because else it was impossible to hit them in TAG or the game crashed (Ok, that still happends but the chance is less now :3)

RemmyX25 wrote:

Lesjuh's TAG:
00:47:49 (1,1,1) - These look really ugly. I understand what they're supposed to do, but they're ugly, imo. k placed it like in the previous version

02:13:37 (1,2,3,4) - Stacks like these bother me since they're different rhythms unstack'd

That ending is just...... wow. lulz

Zerostarry wrote:

Storyboard is just argh wtf

I dont think this is what peppy had in mind for storyboarding. Though .osz2 isnt here yet so we can still get rid of this trash

I doubt you will remove it or at least change it up a bit cause I mentioned this a long time ago, but just letting you know that i would never approve of this kind of sbing, its retarded

RemmyX25 wrote:

I feel like, despite the "Approved" status, this could still use an easier difficulty. It's a great song; I'm sure others would like to play it but would not appeal to the extreme diffiiculty of either map.

tieff wrote:

...
You guys just crazy.

[HappyMiX]
00:27:67 (5,6) - Spacing. Or you just can add new combo on 00:28:23 (6). I never noticed this :O not even in gameplay...
I see that the spacing isnt right but does it really make people miss? added new combo ...
00:50:28 (2,3,4) - Spacing. i dont see it wrong here.

As new BATs I'm afraid to give bubble this map, sorry.

Saturos-fangirl wrote:

[baby]
00:43:86 (1) - finish the end ok
00:51:67 (3) - unintuitive bpm change (it directly follows two sliders of the same visual "length" but half the speed! in a supposedly "easy" diff!) please, you dont even have to move your mouse ><, I made it this way so that 00:53:90 (1) - would be less unintuitive.
also thats the weirdest sb warning ive seen like...ever hehe


[happy]
01:41:90 (8) - new combo yes
01:45:67 (3) - stacking yes
01:56:42 (1) - unintuitive bpm change :<
02:16:51 (1) - ^
02:57:81 (1,2) - stack the endpoints etc. ok
03:23:21 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - very messy
03:30:32 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - clusterfuck :<


[TAG]
00:14:42 (1) - unintuitive bpm change (exact same timing length as the previous two notes, but twice the visual length?)
01:13:16 (1) - unintuitive bpm change this is the best part ><


intense

animask wrote:

Fan-made beatmap here~

0_o wrote:

Baby
00:41:62 (2) - I was expecting a whistle here but i didnt place one

Happy
00:30:46 (6) - New combo? no
01:41:76 (1,2) - Move new combo to 2? yup it should be this way
01:46:23 (2,3) - Make either 2 or 3 a new combo, depending on what you did above
same for the next patterns etc I keep this how it is atm

Lesjuh
like I'm modding this why not?

Oh and also, I definitely passed the sliders at the end of HappyMiX. I can provide a video if needed, but it would be easier on everyone if you just took my word for it